:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「非法」情境下的酷兒生殖--臺灣女同志的人工生殖科技實作
書刊名:女學學誌:婦女與性別研究
作者:何思瑩
作者(外文):Ho, Szu-ying
出版日期:2014
卷期:35
頁次:頁53-122
主題關鍵詞:酷兒生殖女同志人工協助生殖自助滴精臺灣Queering reproductionQueerLesbiansAssisted reproductive technologiesSelf-inseminationROPAReception of oocytes from partnerTaiwan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:149
  • 點閱點閱:108
目前酷兒家庭論述仍多以美國與其他西方國家為研究對象,本研究首度探討西方國家脈絡以外、特別是「非法」情境下的女同志生殖科技實作。透過長達七年的田野觀察,本文訪查14位台灣女同志本身或伴侶實際使用人工生殖的經驗。依照歷史時期與行動類型的區隔,本研究發現台灣女同志的生殖科技實作可分為三種不同階段。第一是零星游擊戰時期,時間約為1990 年代至 2000 年代初期。整體同志社群仍缺乏對人工生殖之想像,亦缺少支持或鼓勵同志親職之論述。因此,當時的女同志多以單打獨鬥的自力救濟方式,透過「偷渡」設法進入既有的醫療體制。第二,自從女同志媽媽聯盟於2006年開始發行《拉媽報》之後,集體的同志親職渴望逐漸浮現,女同志亦透過此網絡分享資訊,嘗試自助滴精的方法。第三,自2012年起,台灣女同志生殖科技實作進入海外人工生殖時期,女同志媽媽聯盟不再是單一的人工生殖資訊傳播來源,許多曾赴海外進行人工生殖的女同志,主動在網路上分享自身親驗,大幅增進了國外人工生殖的親近性與便利性。女同志也開始採用更多樣的人工生殖技術,例如ROPA(reception of oocytes from partner)實作。本文呈現台灣女同志在不同時期運用既有的網絡與社會資源,進行不同形式的生殖科技實作。酷兒生殖,指的正是不同的使用者偷渡並挪用此一科技,鬆動了助孕科技原本欲達成的社會效果,也產生了新形態的同志親屬關係。
While most queer family literature focuses on experiences in Western countries, this paper explores how lesbians in Taiwan have appropriated Assisted Reproduction Technologies (ARTs) in a context in which this technology is denied to them. Through more than seven years’ field work, participation and observation in Taiwan LGBT parenting groups, the author explains how 14 Taiwan lesbians have negotiated and navigated their ways to get access to ARTs in spite of the legal restrictions. In the first period (1990s through early 2000s), due to the lack of lesbian parenting discourses and images in the lesbian community, most lesbians who wanted to be parents tried to misrepresent themselves to the existing medical system to get access to ARTs as individuals. Some lesbians contracted pseudo-marriages with gay men to get legal access to ARTs, and some lesbians disguised themselves as single women (letting physicians assume they were heterosexuals) in order to meet the physicians’ moral concerns. In the second phase (beginning about 2001), lesbian mothers’ associations used multiple channels to disseminate knowledge about selfinsemination. However, the lack of a long history of a feminist health movement as well as appropriate sperm sources in Taiwan were crucial barriers to the practice of self-insemination in Taiwan. In the third phase (beginning about 2012), more and more lesbians pursued access to ARTs abroad and actively shared their experiences on the internet and on websites. Now, besides lesbian mother associations, there are many different information resources to help lesbians find appropriate ARTs. Also, some lesbian have utilized ROPA (reception of oocytes from partner) in this period, since this provides sharing in the reproductive process as well as legal standing for both partners as parents of the child. “Queering” reproduction means lesbian actors not only embody new biomedical modalities by appropriating ARTs -- they also create new kinship and family formations that can provide normative images for the wider society.
期刊論文
1.The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine(2006)。Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons。Fertility and Sterility,86(5),1333-1335。  new window
2.Wikler, D.、Wilder, N. J.(1991)。Turkey-baster babies: The demedicalization of artificial insemination。The Milbank Quarterly,69(1),5-40。  new window
3.Zeiler, K.、Malmquist, A.(2014)。Lesbian shared biological motherhood: The ethics of IVF with reception of oocytes from partner。Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy,17(3),347-355。  new window
4.QC婆婆(1999)。我是美嬌娘,也是女神龍--婆慾望:雌性豪邁。G&L熱愛雜誌,18,140-145。  延伸查詢new window
5.加菲(2001)。我們想要一個小孩。女朋友,34,46。  延伸查詢new window
6.芳仔(1996)。100%的T懷孕了!。女朋友,11,37。  延伸查詢new window
7.林昀嫺(20101200)。我國人工生殖法制之挑戰與契機。中原財經法學,25,63-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.海鷗(1998)。茱蒂生了那妳呢?。女朋友,24,44。  延伸查詢new window
9.雯雯(1997)。另類家人:哄我們的小雞雞。女朋友,17,32。  延伸查詢new window
10.楊惠中(20051100)。誰來同意?誰來代理上帝?談「人工生殖」法律問題。康健雜誌,84,248-249。  延伸查詢new window
11.蘇淑貞(20060300)。談「人工生殖法」。律師雜誌,318,30-35。  延伸查詢new window
12.Clarke, A. E.、Shim, J. K.、Mamo, L.、Fosket, J. R.、Fishman, J. R.(2003)。Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine。American Sociological Review,68(2),161-194。  new window
13.Corea, G.(1986)。The mother machine: Reproductive technologies from artificial insemination to artificial wombs。MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing,11(5),357-363。  new window
14.Dalton, S. E.、Bielby, D. D.(2000)。"THAT'S OUR KIND OF CONSTELLATION" Lesbian mothers negotiate institutionalized understandings of gender within the family。Gender & Society,14(1),36-61。  new window
15.Daniels, C. R.、Golden, J.(2004)。Procreative compounds: Popular eugenics, artificial insemination and the rise of the American sperm banking industry。Journal of Social History,38(1),5-27。  new window
16.Donovan, C.(2000)。Who needs a father? Negotiating biological fatherhood in British lesbian families using self-insemination。Sexualities,3(2),149-164。  new window
17.Fee, E.(1975)。Women and health care: A comparison of theories。International Journal of Health Services,5(3),397-415。  new window
18.Gimenez, M. E.(1991)。The mode of reproduction in transition: A Marxist-feminist analysis of the effects of reproductive technologies。Gender & Society,5(3),334-350。  new window
19.Grzanka, P. R.(2008)。From turkey basters to the fertility clinic: Lesbian reproductive practices in biomedicalization。Symbolic Interaction,31(3),345-348。  new window
20.Haimes, E.、Weiner, K.(2000)。'Everybody's got a dad...' Issues for lesbian families in the management of donor insemination。Sociology of Health & Illness,22(4),477-499。  new window
21.Herrera, F.(2009)。Tradition and transgression: Lesbian motherhood in Chile。Sexuality Research & Social Policy,6(2),35-51。  new window
22.Marina, S.、Marina, D.、Marina, F.、Fosas, N.、Galiana, N.、Jove, I.(2010)。Sharing motherhood: Biological lesbian co-mothers, a new IVF indication。Human Reproduction,25(4),938-941。  new window
23.Pennings, G.(2010)。The rough guide to insemination: Cross-border travelling for donor semen due to different regulations。Gynaecol,1,1-6。  new window
24.Raboy, B.(1993)。Secrecy and openness in donor insemination: A new paradigm。Politics and the Life Sciences: The Journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences,12(2),191-192。  new window
25.Shenfield, F.、de Mouzon, J.、Pennings, G.、Ferraretti, A. P.、Andersen, A. N.、de Wert, G.、The ESHRE Taskforce on Cross Border Reproductive Care(2010)。Cross border reproductive care in six European countries。Human Reproduction,25(6),1361-1368。  new window
26.Stacey, J.(2004)。Gay parenthood and the decline of paternity as we knew it。Sexualities,9(1),27-55。  new window
27.The Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society(1994)。Ethical considerations of assisted reproductive technologies。Fertility and Sterility,61,13S-34S。  new window
28.吳嘉苓(20020300)。臺灣的新生殖科技與性別政治,1950-2000。臺灣社會研究,45,1-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.劉志鴻、李國光(20020500)。合情合理規範「人工生殖法」之我見。立法院院聞,30(5)=349,44-49。  延伸查詢new window
30.趙彥寧(20050300)。老T搬家:全球化狀態下的酷兒文化公民身分初探。臺灣社會研究季刊,57,41-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.吳嘉苓、黃于玲(20020600)。順從、偷渡、發聲與出走:「病患」的行動分析。臺灣社會學,3,73-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Pinch, T. J.、Bijker, W. E.(1984)。The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other。Social Studies of Science,14(3),399-441。  new window
會議論文
1.吳嘉苓(2012)。規範未婚女性:人工協助生殖科技與社會排除。第十屆「性別與健康」國際研討會,國防醫學院通識教育中心、臺灣女人連線(共同主辦) (會議日期: 2012/05/18-05/19)。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.潘美玲(2004)。馴服與抗拒:臺灣高科技產業工程師勞動體制研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李惠珊(2008)。女同志家庭親子關係法制之研究(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.何思瑩(2008)。酷兒再生產:女同志的親職實作、生殖科技使用與情感認同(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃麗珍(2009)。結構與能動的反思:以接受人工生殖治療的婦女為例(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林文源(1998)。To be or not to be?長期洗腎病患的生活、身體經驗(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.簡家欣(1997)。喚出女同志:九0年代台灣女同志的論述形構與運動集結(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Weston, K.(1991)。Family we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
2.臺灣同志家庭權益促進會(2010)。當我們同在一家:給想生小孩的女同志。臺北:女書文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.邱妙津(1999)。鱷魚手記。臺北:時報。  延伸查詢new window
4.認識同志手冊編輯小組(2005)。2005年認識同志手冊。臺北:臺北市政府。  延伸查詢new window
5.Achilles, R.(1988)。What's new about the new reproductive technologies. Discussion paper: Ontario Advisory Council on the Status of Women。Toronto:Government of Ontario。  new window
6.Agigian, A.(2004)。Baby steps: How lesbian alternative insemination is changing the world。Connecticut:Wesleyan。  new window
7.Boston Women's Health Book Collective(1973)。Our bodies, ourselves: A book by and for women。Boston:Boston Women's Health Book。  new window
8.Brill, S.(2006)。The new essential guide to lesbian conception, pregnancy, and birth。New York:Alyson Books。  new window
9.Fabe, M.、Wikler, N.(1979)。Up against the clock: Career women speak on the choice to have children。New York:Random House。  new window
10.Firestone, S.(1970)。The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution。New York, NY:Morrow。  new window
11.Mamo, L.(2007)。Queering reproduction: Achieving pregnancy in the age of technoscience。Durham:Duke University Press Books。  new window
12.Raymond, J. G.(1993)。Women as wombs: Reproductive technologies and the battle over women's freedom。North Melbourne:Spinifex Press。  new window
13.Rose, Nikolas(2006)。The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
14.Sullivan, M.(2004)。The family of woman: Lesbian mothers, their children, and the undoing of gender。California:University of California Press。  new window
15.Farquhar, D.(1996)。The Other Machine: Discourse and Reproductive Technologies。The Other Machine: Discourse and Reproductive Technologies。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
16.Goffman, Erving(1963)。Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
17.張娟芬(2001)。愛的自由式:女同志故事書。臺北:時報。  延伸查詢new window
18.鄭美里(1997)。女兒圈:臺灣女同志的性別、家庭與圈內生活。臺北:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Hirschman, Albert O.(1970)。Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States。Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.Allen(2007)。回應《拉媽報》200701第11期〈拉予受孕DIY--談女同志如何自我注射精子懷孕〉之回覆內容,http://blog.yam.eom/la_ma_news/article/7864914#comments, 2014/06/16。  延伸查詢new window
2.DMV(20140312)。人工受精懷孕(1):透過精子銀行、人工受精,http://jrfamily.pixnet.net/blog/post/93756374, 2014/06/16。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lupy(2006)。英國同志生小孩e撇步,http://blog.yam.com/la_ma_news/article/5971367, 2014/06/16。  new window
4.Lupy(20060716)。〔徵求〕拉媽編輯團隊招募新血,https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/lesbian/M.1153058668.A.2C6.html, 2015/01/08。  new window
5.Penny(20120327)。〔分享〕為什麼選擇在泰國做人工受孕?,https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/lesbian/M.1332833982.A.665.html, 2015/01/08。  延伸查詢new window
6.臺北市女性權益促進會(2007)。拉子健康要妳/你知道--女同志健康行為調查報告發表新聞稿,http://www.tapwr.org.tw/research--artical.asp?arti延伸查詢new window
7.臺灣同志家庭權益促進會(2012)。本會沿革,http://www.lgbtfamily.org.tw/aboutus_01.php, 2014/06/16。  延伸查詢new window
8.臺灣同志家庭權益促進會(2012)。本會對精卵媒合服務的態度,http://www.lgbtfamily.org.tw/events_content.php?id=135&page=1, 2014/06/16。  延伸查詢new window
9.朱若蘭(20060513)。同志家庭一個「媽」一個「乾媽」。  延伸查詢new window
10.艾莉(2010)。感謝拉媽報與擰檬,http://ashley9977.pixnet.net/blog/post/9576892-%E6%84%9F%E8%AC%9D%E6%8B%89%E5%AA%BD%E5%A0%B1%E5%8F%8A%E8%8C%B6%E6%A8%B9, 2015/01/16。  new window
11.李樹人(20010421)。同志夫妻要赴大陸找孕母酬勞數百萬。  延伸查詢new window
12.李樹人(20050910)。死後取精外界批孫連長條款國健局後天善後政院一句話政策大轉彎民眾可照辦?國健局主秘:堅持醫學倫理不輕易放棄規範。  延伸查詢new window
13.李樹人(20061009)。滴管取精受孕女同志生娃兩對同性戀變成4個父母一個娃照顧寶寶大家輪養育費大家攤。  延伸查詢new window
14.李樹人(20100911)。女同志想當媽媽靠男人不如滴管DIY。  延伸查詢new window
15.李樹人(20101002)。補助不孕拚年增2000新生兒研擬兩方案:每年補助5萬或15萬合法夫妻才能夠申請國健局拚生育率!治療補助以試管嬰兒與人工受孕為主。  延伸查詢new window
16.李承穎(20140814)。女同志聲請收養「我們的孩子」他做試管嬰兒生下龍鳳胎成了「單親媽」他共同養育3年卻是「陌生人」律師:為孩子利益法院應認可。  延伸查詢new window
17.吳佩蓉(20010326)。單身、女同志沒有當媽媽的權利?。  延伸查詢new window
18.易禹昕(20130409)。多元家庭:彩虹旗「愛」飄揚同性婚姻,http://info.babyhome.com.tw/info/women/matrimony/article/7638, 2014/06/16。  延伸查詢new window
19.洪淑惠(19980722)。臺灣經驗女作家求子遭拒合法醫生不幫忙受囿於法令依據與倫理不讓孩子叫兩個女人爸媽。  延伸查詢new window
20.洪敬浤(20070105)。徵精卵禁買賣「價錢可談」。  延伸查詢new window
21.陳于媯(20031220)。醫師怕被罰女同志求子夢……難圓「非配偶間人工授精」要求多被拒他們只好黯然離去但也有人不死心想「借種」完心願。  延伸查詢new window
22.陳香蘭(20020609)。他倆與他倆4人共擁1個小孩網路流傳法律上是2對夫婦實際上是2對同志婚姻其中一男一女人工受孕生子4人共同撫養。  延伸查詢new window
23.許家峻(20131206)。人間異語:女同志生子海外受精圓夢。  延伸查詢new window
24.梁玉芳(19980723)。茱蒂生子他們羨慕同性戀者也想當爸媽。  延伸查詢new window
25.詹建富(19980318)。《美國影星茱蒂福斯特‘臺灣版’》無‘性’生殖不婚女子當媽媽。  延伸查詢new window
26.薛桂文(19960709)。27家人工生殖合格施術院所公布規範人工生殖治療混亂現況不合格而擅自施術者將依法嚴懲。  延伸查詢new window
27.Fernando, V.(2012)。The turkey baster as revolutionary: Lesbian self-insemination and processes of (bio)medicalization in the United States,http://writingforstrangers.com/writing/the-turkey-basteras-revolutionary-lesbian-self-insemination-and-processes-ofbiomedicalization-in-the-united-states/, 2014/10/20。  new window
28.Fleming, A. T.(19800720)。New frontiers in conception: Medical breakthroughs and moral dilemmas。  new window
29.Freed, D.(19830301)。S.D. gets artificial insemination service: Doctors oppose unlicensed practice at feminist center, State's 3rd。  new window
30.Jones, H. W.,Cooke, I.,Kempers, R.,Brinsden, P.,Saunders, D.(2010)。International federation of fertility societies surveillance 2010,International Federation of Fertility Societies。,http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.iffs-reproduction.org/resource/resmgr/newsletters/iffssurveillance_2010.pdf, 2014/06/14。  new window
31.Nygren, K.,Hirshikesh, P.,Le Roux, P.,Sullivan, E.(2013)。International federation of fertility societies surveillance 2013,International Federation of Fertility Societies。,http://www.iffs-reproduction.org/resource/resnigr/iffs_surveillance_09-19-13.pdf, 2014/06/14。  new window
圖書論文
1.Arditti, R.、Klein, R. D.、Minden, S.(1989)。Introduction。Test tube women: What future for motherhood?。London:Pandora Press。  new window
2.Homstein, F.(1989)。Children by donor insemination: A new choice for lesbians。Test-tube women: What future for motherhood?。London:Pandora Press。  new window
3.Klein, R. D.(1989)。Doing it ourselves: Self insemination。Test-tube women: What future for motherhood?。London:Pandora Press。  new window
4.Lewin, E.(1995)。On the outside looking in: The politics of lesbian motherhood。Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction。California:University of California Press。  new window
5.Stanworth, M.(1987)。The deconstruction of motherhood。Reproductive technologies: Gender, motherhood and medicine。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE