臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：美國法上懲罰性賠償金數額分享制度之研究
書刊名：政大法學評論
作者：戴志傑 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tai, Chih-chieh
出版日期：2015
卷期：140
頁次：頁287-371
主題關鍵詞：填補性賠償金；懲罰性賠償金；數額分享法令；消費者保護基金；徵收條款；平等保護條款；過度罰金條款；正當法律程序條款；Compensatory damages；Punitive damages；Spilt-recovery statute；Consumer protection fund；Takings clause；Equal protection clause；Excessive fines clause；Due process clause
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:41
  • 點閱點閱:47
近年來黑心產品致害事件頻傳，故消基會即提出「消費者保護基金」草案，明訂該基金創設上之法源依據及其目的，並規範該基金之經費來源。然儘管該草案立意甚佳，但細究其內容仍有諸多疑慮與商榷之處。是故，因現今美國法上已有若干州施行懲罰性賠償金數額分享法令而實踐如同上開基金之目的，從而本文即研究該國此等數額分享制度，其中包括該制度之公共政策及其實踐疑慮，以及其已涉合憲性爭議的相關判決，尤其是聯邦最高法院於二○○七年Philip Morris USA v. Williams乙案判決後，論者間對該制度存廢與修正上所提出的相關意見。最後，希冀以該國此等制度之實踐經驗為鑑而供我國未來立法上之參考。
Since damaging events caused by defective products have occurred frequently in recent years, the Consumers Foundation proposed the Consumer Protection Fund Draft, which stipulated the legal bases and purposes of creating the fund and also regulates the funds sources of funding. Although the idea of the draft is good, there is still room for doubts and questions concerning its contents. Since certain states in the U.S. already have enacted such split-recovery statutes through carrying out the methods that are similar to the purposes of the funds mentioned above, this thesis, therefore, examines the sharing system of U.S. public policy, its practical concerns, and its relevant decisions challenged by constitutionality. Especially, the study examines the decision for the case of Philip Morris USA v. Williams by the Supreme Court in 2007 and scholarly concerns and studies on the abolition of the system. Finally, it takes the practical experience of these systems as a reference to provide a resource for Taiwans future legislative references.
期刊論文
1.Mann, Kenneth(1992)。Punitive Civil Sanctions: The Middle ground Between Criminal and Civil Law。Yale L. J.，101，1795。  new window
2.Rustad, Michael L.(2005)。Access to Justice: Can Business Co-Exist with the Civil Justice System?: The Closing o f Punitive Damages' Iron Cage。LOY. L. A. L. Rev.，38，1297。  new window
3.Schwartz, Victor E.、Behrens, Mark A.(1993)。Punitive Damages Reform - State Legislatures Can and Should Meet the Challenge Issued by the Supreme Court o f the United States in Halsif。Am. U. L. Rev.，42，1365。  new window
4.Shores, Janie L.(1992)。A Suggestion for Limited Tort Reform: Allocation of Punitive Damage Awards to Eliminate Windfall。Ala. L. Rev.，44，61。  new window
5.陳聰富(20020900)。美國法上之懲罰性賠償金制度。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，31(5)，163-219。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Owen, David G.(1994)。Punitive Damages Awards in Product Liability Litigation: Strong Medicine or Poison Pill? : A Punitive Damages Overview: Functions, Problems and Reform。Villanova Law Review，39，363-413。  new window
7.Jeffries, John Calvin Jr.(1986)。A Comment on the Constitutionality of Punitive Damages。Virginia Law Review，72，139-158。  new window
8.Allen, Michael P.(2007)。Of Remedy, Juries, and State Regulation of Punitive Damages: The Significance of Philip Morris v. Williams。N. Y. U. Ann. Surv. Am. L.，63，343。  new window
9.Behrens, Mark A.、Silverman, Cary(2002)。The Case for Adopting Appointive Judicial Selection Systems for State Court Judges。Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy，11，273–360。  new window
10.Breslo, James A.(1992)。Taking the Punitive Damage Windfall away from the Plaintiff: An Analysis。Nw. U. L. Rev.，86，1130。  new window
11.Colby, Thomas B.(2008)。Clearing the Smoke from Philip Morris v. Williams: The Past, Present, and Future ofPunitive Damages。Y ALE L. J.，118，392。  new window
12.Dodson, Scott(2000)。Assessing the Practicality and Constitutionality of Alaska's Split- Recovery Punitive Damages Statute。Duke L. J.，49，1335。  new window
13.Evans, Benjamin F.(1998)。"Split-Recovery ” Survives: The Missouri Supreme Court Upholds the State's Power to Collect One-Half of Punitive Damage Awards。Mo. L. REV.，63，511。  new window
14.Finch, Michael(2002)。Giving Full Faith and Credit to Punitive Damages Awards: Will Florida Rule the Nation?。MlNN. L. Rev.，86，497。  new window
15.Ghiardi, James D.(1990)。Punitive Damages: State Extraction Practice is Subject to Eighth Amendment Limitations。Tort & Insurance Law Journal，26。  new window
16.Gotanda, John Y.(2003)。Punitive Damages: A Comparative Analysis。Columbia Journal of Transnational Law，42(2)，391-396。  new window
17.Grube, E. Jeffrey(1993)。Punitive Damages: A Misplaced Remedy。Southern California Law Review，66。  new window
18.Hellend, Eric、Tabarrok, Alexander(2002)。The Effect of Electoral Institutions on Tort Awards。Am & L. and Econ. Rev.，4，341。  new window
19.Kirgis, Paul F.(1993)。The Constitutionality of State Allocation of Punitive Damage Awards。Washington and Lee Law Review，50。  new window
20.Klaben, Matthew J.(1994)。Split-Recovery Statutes: The Interplay of the Takings and Excessive Fines Clauses。Cornell law review，80。  new window
21.Lee II, James E.(1994)。Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Conkle: The Georgia Supreme Court Tells the Legislature to Keep on Truckin, When Appropriating Punitive Awards to the State Treasury。MERCER L. Rev.，45，1439。  new window
22.Martin, C. J.(2003)。Casenote: Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield: Judicial Redistribution of Punitive Damage Awards。San Diego L. Rev.，40，1649。  new window
23.McKown, James R.(1995)。Punitive Damages: State Trends and Developments。Review of Litigation，14。  new window
24.Mervine, Leah R.(2007)。Bridging the "Philosophical Void" in Punitive Damages: Empowering Plaintiffs and Society Through Curative Damages。Buffalo law review，54。  new window
25.Miller, Nicholas M.(1998)。Tis Better to Give Than to Receive: Charitable Donations of Medical Malpractice Punitive Damages。J. L. and Health，12，141。  new window
26.Nielsen, Jessica(2003)。A True Hollywood Story: Alternative Distributions and the Ohio Supreme Court’s Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield。U. ClN. L. Rev.，72，815。  new window
27.Pace, Kimberly A.(1997)。Recalibrating the Scales of Justice through National Punitive Damage Reform。Am. U. L. Rev.，46，1573。  new window
28.Priest, George L.(1996)。Punitive Damages Reform: The Case of Alabama。La. L. Rev.，56，825。  new window
29.Rabe, Bethany(2008)。The Constitutionality of Split-Recovery Punitive Damage Statutes: Good Policy but Bad Law。Utah law review，2008，333-356。  new window
30.Rietema, Paul B.(2007)。Recent Developments: Reconceptualizing Split-Recovery Statutes: Philip Morris Usa v. Williams。S. Ct.，127，1057。  new window
31.Rietema, Paul B.(2008)。Recent Developments: Reconceptualizing Split-Recovery Statutes: Philip Morris Usa v. Williams。Harv. J. L. and PUB. POL'Y，31，1159。  new window
32.Schwartz, Victor E.、Behrens, Mark A.、Mastrosimone, Joseph P.(1999)。Reining in Punitive Damages ''Run Wild'' : Proposals for Reform by Courts and Legislatures。Brook. L. Rev.，65，1003。  new window
33.Schwartz, Victor E.、Behrens, Mark A.、Silverman, Cary、Tedesco, Rochelle M.(2003)。Consumer Protection in the Legal Marketplace: A Legal Consumer’s Bill of Rights is Needed。Loy. CONSUMER L. Rev.，15，1。  new window
34.Schwartz, Victor E.、Behrens, Mark A.、Silverman, Cary(2003)。I'II Take That: Legal and Public Policy Problems Raised by Statutes That Require Punitive Damages Awards to be Shared with the State。Mo. L. Rev.，68，525。  new window
35.Sharkey, Catherine M.(2003)。Punitive Damages as Societal Damages。Yale Law Journal，113。  new window
36.Sharkey, Catherine M.(2010)。Federal Incursions and State Defiance: Punitive Damages in the Wake of Philip Morris v. Williams。Willamette Law Review，46。  new window
37.Denemark, Howard A.(2002)。Seeking Greater Fairness When Awarding Multiple Plaintiffs Punitive Damages for a Single Act by a Defendant。Ohio State Law Journal，63，931-978。  new window
38.Colby, Thomas B.(2003)。Beyond the Multiple Punishment Problem: Punitive Damages as Punishment for Individual, Private Wrongs。Minnesota Law Review，87(3)，583-678。  new window
39.謝哲勝(20010100)。懲罰性賠償。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，30(1)，113-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.林德瑞(19980700)。論懲罰性賠償。國立中正大學法學集刊，1，25-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.Polinsky, A. Mitchell、Shavell, Steven(1998)。Punitive Damages: An Economic Analysis。Harvard Law Review，111(4)，869-962。  new window
學位論文
1.戴志傑(2007)。美國懲罰性賠償金制度之基礎問題研究(博士論文)。國立中正大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Am. Law Inst.(1991)。REPORTERS9 STUDY, ENTERPRISE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PERSONAL INJURY, APPROACHES TO LEGAL INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE。PA：American Law Institute。  new window
2.Kircher, John J.、Wiseman, CMstine M.(2000)。PUNITIVE DAMAGES: LAW AND PRACTICE。St. Paul, Minn.：West Group。  new window
3.Olson, Walter K.(1991)。THE LITIGATION EXPLOSION: WHAT HAPPENED WHEN AMERICA UNLEASHED THE LAWSUIT。New York：Traman Talley Books-Dutton。  new window
4.Rotunda, Ronald D.、Nowak, John E.(1992)。Treatise on Constitutional Law: Substance and Procedure。St. Paul, Minn.：West Pub. Co.。  new window
5.Schluete, Linda L.(2005)。PUNITIVE DAMAGES。MA：Mathew Bender and Co.。  new window
6.Keeton, W. Page、Dobbs, D. B.、Keeton, R. E.、Owen, D. G.(1984)。Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts。West Publishing Co.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：893（臺灣：876，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1780212 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67582263
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上