《參 考 文 獻》

壹、中文資料（按作者、譯者與編者之姓氏筆畫排列）

一、書籍

世界著名法典漢譯叢書編委會（編），《十二銅表法》，北京：法律出版社，2000年3月初版1刷。
世界著名法典漢譯叢書編委會（編），《漢穆拉比法典》，北京：法律出版社，2000年2月初版1刷。
世界著名法典漢譯叢書編委會（編），《摩奴法典》，北京：法律出版社，2000年4月初版1刷。
由嶸（主編）、林聰賢（校訂），《外國法制史》，台北：五南圖書，1993年10月初版1刷。
朱伯松，《消費者保護法論》，台北：自版，1998年12月初版。
江平、米健，《羅馬法基礎》，北京：中國政法大學出版社，2004年8月初版1刷。
何美歡（譯），John G. Fleming（著），《民事侵權法概論》，香港：中文大學出版社，1992年。
何勤華（主編），《外國法制史》，台北縣：韋伯文化國際，2004年1月初版。
何勤華（主編），《英國法律發達史》，台北縣：韋伯文化國際，2004年1月初版1刷。
何勤華（主編），《德國法律發展史》，北京：法律出版社，2000年1月初版1刷。
何勤華、李秀清（主編），《外國法制史》，上海：復旦大學出版社，2004年2月初版2刷。
何勤華、李秀清、郭光東（等譯），John H. Wigmore（著），《世界法系概覽（上）》，上海：上海人民出版社，2004年9月初版1刷。
李岱，《法學緒論》，台北：台灣中華書局，1970年9月初版。
李紅海（譯），R.C.Van Caenegem（著），《英國普通法的誕生》，北京：中國政法大學出版社，2003年10月初版1刷。
沈宗靈，《比較法研究》，北京：北京大學出版社，2002年9月初版5刷。
易延友，《陪審團審判與對抗式訴訟》，台北，三民書局，2004年11月初版1刷。
林利芝（譯），William Burnham（著），《英美法導論》，台北：元照出版，2001年8月初版1刷。
林紀東，《法學緒論》，台北：五南圖書，2000年4月初版23刷。
邱漢平，《羅馬法》，北京：中國方正出版社，2004年9月初版1刷。
姚志明，《侵權行為法》，台北：元照出版，2005年2月初版1刷。
姚梅鎮（譯），Munroe Smith（著），《歐陸法律發達史》，台北：台灣商務印書館，1987年11月臺4版。
唐豫民（譯），Richard A. Posner（著），《法律之經濟分析》，台北：台灣商務印書館，1989年7月2版。
荊知仁，《美國憲法與憲政》，台北：三民書局，1984年初版。
馬鴻述（譯），H. L. Ellison（著），《出埃及記注釋》，香港：基督教文藝出版社，1996年7月3版。
疰h瑩，《法學緒論—「現代法學」十二講》，台北：自版，1991年修訂32版。
張文顯，《二十世紀西方法哲學思潮研究》，北京，法律出版社，1996年1版。
張企泰（譯），Justinian（著），《法學總論—法學階梯》，北京：商務印書館，1995年2月初版3刷。
張芝梅、陳緒剛（譯），史蒂文‧J‧伯頓（主編），法律的道路及其影響，北京：北京大學出版社，2005年1月初版1刷。
張茂（譯），Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr. & Michele Taruffo（著），《美國民事訴訟法導論》，北京：中國政法大學出版社，1998年9月初版1刷。
陳文吟，《美國法導論》，台北：三民書局，2007年2月初版1刷。
陳炯彰，《英國史》，台北：大安出版社，2000年11月3版3刷。
陳朝壁（譯註），Arthur K. Kuhn（著），《英美法原理》，北京：法律出版社，2004年1月初版2刷。
陳愛娥、黃建輝（合譯），Franz Wieacker（著），《近代私法史：以德意志的發展為觀察重點》，台北：五南圖書，2004年10月初版1刷。
陳聰富、陳忠五、沈冠伶、酗h宦，《美國懲罰性賠償金判決之承認及執行》，台北：學林文化事業，2004年12月初版。
陸潤康（編著），《美國聯邦憲法論》，台北：凱侖出版社，1993年5月增訂再版。
曾世雄，《損害賠償法原理》，台北：學林文化，2002年10月2版3刷。
程漢大（主編），《英國法制史》，濟南：齊魯書社，2001年6月初版1刷。
馮震宇、姜志俊、謝穎青、姜炳俊，《消費者保護法解讀》，台北：元照出版，2000年9月初版1刷。
黃茂榮，《法學方法與現代民法》，國立台灣大學法學叢書（32），台北，自版，1993年增訂3版。
黃風（譯），Giuseppe Grosso（著），《羅馬法史》，北京：中國政法大學出版社，1998年3月初版3刷。
黃風（譯），Pietro Bonfante（著），《羅馬法教課書》，北京：中國政法大學出版社，2005年9月修訂版1刷。
黃風，《羅馬私法導論》，北京：中國政法大學出版社，2003年11月初版1刷。
黃馮明（譯），美濃部達吉（著），《公法與私法》，北京：中國政法大學出版社，2003年5月初版1刷。
楊仁壽，《法學方法論》，台北：自版，1999年3月初版。
楊日然（等合譯），W. Friedmann（著），《法理學》，台北：司法週刊雜誌社，1991年6月6版。
溫麗琪（譯），Robert Cooter & Thomas Ulen（著），《法律經濟學》，台北：華泰文化事業，2003年6月初版。
廖天美（譯），Corwin & Peltason（著），《美國憲法釋義》，台北：結構群文化事業，1992年3月初版。
管歐，《法學緒論》，台北：自版，1988年10月修訂60版。
趙秀文、楊智傑（譯），Vincent R. Johnson（著），《英美侵權法》，台北，五南圖書，2006年9月初版1刷。
潘漢典（等譯），Konrad Zweigert & Hein Kötz（著），《比較法總論》，北京：法律出版社，2003年1月初版1刷。
蔡彥敏、洪浩，《正當程序法律分析—當代美國民事訴訟制度研究》，北京，中國政法大學出版社，2000年4月初版1刷。
鄧來正（譯），Edgar Bodenheimer（著），《法理學：法哲學與法學方法》，台北：漢興書局，2002年10月初版3刷。
韓忠謨，《法學緒論》，台北：自版，1991年5月增訂版。
簡資修，《經濟推理與法律》，台北：元照出版，2004年4月初版1刷。

二、期刊論文

王兆鵬，〈刑事舉證責任理論—由英美法理論出發—〉，台大法學論叢，第28卷第4期，1999年 7 月，第167至 191 頁。
王澤鑑，〈侵權行為法之危機及其發展趨勢〉，收於氏著，《民法學說與判例研究（二）》，台北：自刊，1996年10月，第147至184頁。
史慶縑A〈正當法律程序與美國刑事偵審程序之研究〉，收於氏著，《美國憲法與政府權力》，台北：三民書局，2001年初版。
何建志，〈懲罰性賠償金之法理與運用：論最適賠償金額之判定〉，國立台灣大學法學論叢，2002年 5月，第31卷3期，第237至289頁。
吳永乾，〈美國誹謗法所稱「真實惡意」法則之研究〉，中正大學法學集刊，第15期，2004年4月，第1至97頁。
沈冠伶，〈美國懲罰性賠償判決在德國之承認及執行〉，收於陳聰富（等著），《美國懲罰性賠償金判決之承認及執行》，台北：學林文化，2004年12月初版，第157至197頁。
林世宗，〈懲罰性賠償與違約懲罰之研析比較〉，收於《比較民商論文集》，台北：方長文教授九十華誕祝壽論文集編輯委員會，2005年6月初版1刷，第121至162頁。
林德瑞，〈論懲罰性賠償〉，國立中正大學法學集刊，第1期，1998年7月，第25至66頁。
林德瑞，〈論懲罰性賠償金可保性之法律爭議〉，國立中正大學法學集刊，第2期，1999年7月，第103至129頁。
林德瑞，〈懲罰性賠償金適用之法律爭議問題〉，月旦法學雜誌，第110期，2004年7月，第40至54頁。
邱聰智，〈消費者保護法上商品責任之探討〉，收於《消費者保護研究第二輯》，台北：行政院消費者保護委員會，1996年元月，第61至86頁。
酗h宦，〈美國懲罰性賠償判決在日本之承認及執行〉，收於陳聰富（等著），《美國懲罰性賠償金判決之承認及執行》，台北：學林文化，2004年12月初版，第199至230頁。
郭介恆，〈正當法律程序—美國法制之比較研究〉，收於城仲模教授六秩華誕祝壽論文集編輯委員會，《憲法體制與法治行政（二）》，台北：三民書局，1998年初版。
陳忠五，〈美國懲罰性賠償金判決在法國之承認及執行〉，收於陳聰富（等著），《美國懲罰性賠償金判決之承認及執行》，台北：學林文化，2004年12月初版，第71至156頁。
陳聰富，〈美國法上之懲罰性賠償金制度〉，國立台灣大學法學論叢，第31卷5期，2002年9月，第163至219頁。
陳聰富，〈美國懲罰性賠償金的發展趨勢—改革運動與實證研究的對待〉，國立台灣大學法學論叢，第27卷1期，1997年10月，第231至264頁。
陳聰富（等人），〈美國懲罰性賠償金的發展趨勢—改革運動與實證研究的對待：民法研究會第九次研討會紀錄〉，法學叢刊，第43卷1期，1998年1月，第97至115頁。
湯德宗，〈論憲法上的正當程序保障〉，收於氏著，《行政程序法論》，台北：元照出版，2001年初版。
黃國昌，〈「證明度」—比較法下之觀點〉，法學叢刊，第47卷4期，2002年10月，第117至146頁。
雷敦龢，〈英國大憲章今註今譯〉，輔仁法學，第24期，2002年12月，第155至193頁。
潘華仿，〈英國侵權行為法的源流與演變〉，收於氏著，《英美法論》，北京：中國政法大學出版社，1998年初版1刷，第139至158頁。
潘華仿、高洪鈞、賀衛方，〈當代西方兩大法系主要法律淵源比較研究〉，收於潘華仿，《英美法論》，北京：中國政法大學出版社，1998年初版1刷），第26至50頁。
戴志傑，〈中國大陸懲罰性賠償金制度之規範與實踐問題〉，法令月刊，第54卷4期，2003年4月，第76至84頁。
戴志傑，〈中華人民共和國懲罰性賠償金制度之現狀與未來發展—從消保法過渡到民法典草案之考察〉，經社法制論叢，第39期，2007年元月，第91至133頁。
戴志傑，〈兩岸《消保法》懲罰性賠償金制度之比較研究〉，台北大學法學論叢，第53期，2003年12月，第91至135頁。
謝哲勝，〈懲罰性賠償〉，國立台灣大學法學論叢，第30卷第1期，2001年1月，第113至161頁。

三、學位論文

李志峰，〈懲罰性賠償金與保險法律關係之研究〉，國立中正大學法律學研究所碩士論文，2000年7月。
黃宏全，〈商品責任之損害賠償〉，私立輔仁大學法律學系博士論文，2003年元月。
楊靖儀，〈懲罰性損害賠償金之研究—以評析消費者保護法第五十一條為中心—〉，國立台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文，1996年6月。
蘇志淵，〈懲罰性賠償之憲法基礎研究—以美國法制為中心〉，私立輔仁大學法律學系碩士論文，2004年6月。

四、報章（按出刊日期排列）

〈民法擬引進 懲罰性賠償精神〉，聯合報，2000/08/22，5版。
〈懲罰性賠償 應否入民法〉，民生報，2001/07/10，A2版。
〈民法增訂 懲罰性賠償 立委催生〉，自由時報，2001/07/10，6版。
〈懲罰性賠償 立法法界意見兩極〉，聯合報2001/07/10，8版。
〈法部建議祭出懲罰性賠償 遏阻砂石車肇禍〉，自由時報，2001/08/06，9版。
〈車禍致死 立委提懲罰性賠償〉，聯合報，2001/08/19，2版。
〈撞死人只判三個月 車禍受害者家屬催生 懲罰性賠償入法〉，台灣時報，2001/08/21，5版。
〈懲罰性賠償 條文不在民法中修正〉，自由時報，2001/09/13，10版。
〈阿里山悲劇 罹難者家屬求償1190萬： 家屬不滿賠償金多為保險給付 要求增加480萬懲罰性賠償〉，自由時報，2002/03/05，4版。
〈華航空難 懲罰性賠償 官司打不打？〉，民生報，2002/06/04，A2版。
〈懲罰性賠償 嚇阻再犯〉，中國時報，2002/06/25，15版。
〈民法擬增列 懲罰性賠償〉，中國時報，2002/09/03，13版。

五、工具書

王錦堂，《大學學術研究與寫作》，台北：東華書局，1999年1月3版5刷。
李雙元（等譯），David M. Walker (著)，《牛津法律大辭典》，北京：法律出版社，2003年7月初版1刷。
香港聖經公會（編），《聖經：新標點和合本（上帝版）》，香港：聖經公會，1996年。
薛波（主編），潘漢典（總審訂），《元照英美法辭典》，北京：法律出版社，2003年5月初版1刷。

貳、英文資料（按作者、編者之姓氏字母排列）

1. Books

Blatt, Richard L. & Hammesfahr, Robert W. & Nugent, Lori S., Punitive Damages: A State-by-State Guide to Law and Practice (St. Paul, Minn.: West, a Thomson business, 2004 ed.).
Burnham, William, Introduction to the Law and Legal System of the United States (St. Paul, Minn: West Group, 2d ed., 1999).
Cardozo, Benjamin N., The Growth of the Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1924).
Cardozo, Benjamin N., The Paradoxes of Legal Science (New York: Columbia University Press, 1928).
Chemerinsky, Erwin, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies (New York: Aspen Law & Business, 1997).
Crier, Catherine, The Case Against Lawyers: How the Lawyers, Politicians, and Bureaucrats Have Turned the Law into an Instrument of Tyranny -- and What We as Citizens Have to Do About It (New York: Broadway Books, 1st ed. 2002).
De Cruz, Peter, A Modern Approach to Comparative Law (Boston: Kluwer Law & Taxation Publishers, 1993).
Dobbs, Dan B., Handbook on the Law of Remedies: Damages, Equity, Restitution (St. Paul, Minn.: West Pub. Co., 1973).
Hall, Walter Phelps & Albion, Robert Greenhalgh & Pope, Jennie Barnes, History of England and the Empire Commonwealth (Hall, Walter Phelps, 1884-1962).
Holdsworth, William, A History of English Law (London: Methuen & Co. Ltd., 1922).
Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr., The Common Law 1 (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1881).
Horwitz, Morton J., The Transformation of American Law 1870-1960 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).
Keeton, W. Page (general editor), Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts (St. Paul, Minn.: West Pub. Co., 5th ed., Student ed., 1984).
Kionka, Edward J., Torts in a Nutshell (St. Paul, Minn.: West Pub. Co., 2d ed., 1992).
Kircher, John J. & Wiseman, Christine M., Punitive Damages: Law and Practice (St. Paul, Minn.: West Group, 2d ed., 2000 & 2003).
Landes, William M & Posner, Richard A, The Economic Structure of Tort Law (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987).
McGregor, Harvey, McGregor on Damages (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 14th ed., 1980).
Minzer, Marilyn K. et al., Damages in Tort Actions (New York: M. Bender, 1994).
Nicholas, Barry, An Introduction to Roman Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 3rd ed., 1962).
Olson, Walter K., The Litigation Explosion: What Happened When America Unleashed the Lawsuit (New York: Truman Talley Books-Dutton, 1991).
Plucknett, Theodore Frank Thomas, A Concise History of the Common Law (Boston: Little, Brown & Company, 5th ed., 1956).
Radin, Max, Handbook of Roman Law (St. Paul, Minn.: West Pub. Co., 1927).
Robinson, O. F & Fergus, T. D & Gordon, William M, An Introduction to European Legal History (Abingdon, Oxon.: Professional Books, 1985).
Rothman, Stanley, European Society and Politics (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970).
Schlueter, Linda L., Punitive Damages (Newark, N.J.: Matthew Bender & Company, 5th ed., 2005).
Smith, Maurice Henry, The Writs of Assistance Case (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978).
Strauss, Gerald, Law, Resistance and the State (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1986).
Street, Harry, Principles of the Law of Damages (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1962).
Sunstein, Cass R. & Hastie Reid & Payne, John W. & Schkade, David A. & Viscusi, W. Kip, Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002).
Twining, William (ed.), Legal Theory and the Common Law (Oxford: B. Blackwell, 1986).
Watson, Alan, Roman Law and Comparative Law (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1991).
Weisser, Michael R., Crime and Punishment in Early Modern Europe (Hassocks: Harvester Press, 1979).
Zweigert, Konrad & Kötz, Hein, Introduction to Comparative Law (Tony Weir trans., New York: Oxford University Press , 3d rev. ed., 1998).

2. Periodical Materials

Abraham, Kenneth S. & Jeffries, John C., Jr., Punitive Damages and the Rule of Law: The Role of the Defendant''s Wealth, 18 J. Legal Stud. 415 (1989).
Ackerman, Philip, Some Don''t Like It Hot: Louisiana Eliminates Punitive Damages for Environmental Torts, 72 Tul. L. Rev. 327 (1997).
Adler, Robert S., From "Model Agency" to Basket Case - Can the Consumer Product Safety Commission be Redeemed?, 41 Admin. L. Rev. 61 (1989).
Albers, John A., State of Confusion: Substantive and Procedural Due Process with Regard to Punitive Damages after Txo Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp., 26 U. Tol. L. Rev. 159 (1994).
Annotation, Excessiveness or Inadequacy of Punitive Damages Awarded in Personal Injury or Death Cases, 35 A.L.R.4th 441 (1985).
Annotation, Sufficiency of Showing of Actual Damages to Support Award of Punitive Damages -- Modern Cases, 40 A.L.R.4th 11 (1985).
Arlen, Jennifer H., Should Defendant''s Wealth Matter?, 21 J. Legal Stud. 413 (1991).
Ausness, Richard C., Retribution and Deterrence: The Role of Punitive Damages in Products Liability Litigation, 74 Ky. L.J. 1 (1985).
Baldus, David et al., Improving Judicial Oversight of Jury Damages Assessments: A Proposal for the Comparative Additur/Remittitur Review of Awards for Nonpecuniary Harms and Punitive Damages, 80 Iowa L. Rev. 1109 (1995).
Behrens, Mark A. & Silverman, Cary, The Case for Adopting Appointive Judicial Selection Systems for State Court Judges, 11 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol''y 273 (2002).
Behrens, Mark A. & Tedesco, Rochelle, Addressing Regulation Through Litigation: Some Solutions to Government Sponsored Lawsuits, 3 Engage 109 (2002).
Bell, Griffin B. & Pearce, Perry E., Punitive Damages and the Tort System, 22 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1 (1987).
Belli, Melvin M., Sr., Punitive Damages: Their History, Their Use and Their Worth in Present-Day Society, 49 U.M.K.C. L. Rev. 2 (1980).
Berry, David C., Untwisting New Jersey''s Cap on Punitive Damages, 27 Seton Hall L. Rev. 167 (1996).
Blakey, G. Robert, Of Characterization and Other Matters: Thoughts on Multiple Punitive Damages, 60 Law & Contemp. Probs. 97 (1997).
Blomquist, Robert F., Rethinking the Citizen as Prosecutor Model of Environmental Enforcement under the Clean Water Act: Some Overlooked Problems of Outcome-Independent Values, 22 Ga. L. Rev. 337 (1988).
Borash, Tracy M., Punitive Damages in Non-Personal Injury Cases: Minnesota''s Approach to Punishment and Deterrence, 24 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 213 (1998).
Borowsky, Philip & Nicolaisen, Lee K., Punitive Damages in California: The Integrity of Jury Verdicts, 17 U.S.F. L. Rev. 147 (1983).
Boyle, John D. & O’Malley, Michael R., Insurance Coverage for Punitive Damages and Intentional Conduct in Massachusetts, 25 New Eng. L. Rev. 827 (1991).
Braslow, Norman T., The Recognition and Enforcement of Common Law Punitive Damages in a Civil Law System: Some Reflections on the Japanese Experience, 16 Ariz. J. Int''l & Comp. Law 285 (1999).
Broman, Lisa M., Comment, Punitive Damages: An Appeal for Deterrence, 61 Neb. L. Rev. 651 (1982).
Burrow, David & Collins, John E., Insurance "Crisis" - Texas Style: The Case for Insurance Reform, 18 St. Mary''s L.J. 759 (1987).
Calnan, Alan, Ending the Punitive Damage Debate, 45 DePaul L. Rev. 101 (1995).
Casarez, Nicole B., Punitive Damages in Defamation Actions: An Area of Libel Law Worth Reforming, 32 Duq. L. Rev. 667 (1994).
Castle, T. R. Ted & Dewar, M.A., Medical Malpractice: A New Treatment for an Old Illness, 16 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 537 (1988).
Chapman, Bruce & Trebilcock, Michael, Punitive Damages: Divergence in Search of a Rationale, 40 Ala. L. Rev. 741 (1989).
Clermont, Kevin M. & Eisenberg, Theodore, Trial by Jury or Judge: Transcending Empiricism, 77 Cornell L. Rev. 1124 (1992).
Comment, Discovery of Net Worth in Bifurcated Punitive Damages Cases: A Suggested Approach after Transportation Insurance Co. v. Moriel, 37 S. Tex. L. Rev. 193 (1996).
Cooter, Robert D., Punitive Damages for Deterrence: When and How Much? 40 Ala. L. Rev. 1143 (1989).
Crump, David, Evidence, Economics, and Ethics: What Information Should Jurors Be Given to Determine the Amount of a Punitive Damage Award?, 57 Md. L. Rev. 174 (1998).
Cupp, Richard L., Jr., State Medical Reimbursement Lawsuits after Tobacco: Is the Domino Effect for Lead Paint Manufacturers and Others Fair Game?, 27 Pepp. L. Rev. 685 (2000).
Daniel Kahneman & Cass R. Sunstein & Schkade, David, Assessing Punitive Damages, 107 Yale L.J. 2071 (1998).
Daniels, Stephen & Martin, Joanne, Myth and Reality in Punitive Damages, 75 Minn. L. Rev. 1 (1990).
DeBow, Michael, The State Tobacco Litigation and the Separation of Powers in State Governments: Repairing the Damage, 31 Seton Hall L. Rev. 563 (2001).
Demarest, Sylvia M. & Jones, David E., Exemplary Damages as an Instrument of Social Policy: Is Tort Reform in the Public Interest?, 18 St. Mary''s L.J. 797 (1987).
Denemark, Howard A., Seeking Greater Fairness When Awarding Multiple Plaintiffs Punitive Damages for a Single Act by a Defendant, 63 Ohio St. L.J. 931 (2002).
Dobbs, Dan, Ending Punishment in "Punitive" Damages: Deterrence-Measured Remedies, 40 Ala. L. Rev. 831 (1989).
Doerr, Barbara H., Comment, Prosecuting Corporate Polluters: The Sparing Use of Criminal Sanctions, 62 U. Det. L. Rev. 659 (1985).
Duffy, James E., Punitive Damages: A Doctrine Which Should Be Abolished, in Defense Research Institute: The Case Against Punitive Damages (Donald J. Hirsch & James G. Pouros eds., 1969).
Dumas, Bethany K., Jury Trials: Lay Jurors, Pattern Jury Instructions, and Comprehension Issues, 67 Tenn. L. Rev. 701 (2000).
Eisenberg, Theodore et al., Juries, Judges, and Punitive Damages: An Empirical Study, 87 Cornell L. Rev. 743 (2002).
Eisenberg, Theodore et al., The Predictability of Punitive Damages, 26 J. Legal Stud. 623 (1997).
Ellis, Dorsey D., Jr. Fairness and Efficiency in the Law of Punitive Damages, 56 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1 (1982).
Ellis, Dorsey D., Jr., Punitive Damages in Iowa Law: A Critical Assessment, 66 Iowa L. Rev. 1003 (1981).
Ellis, Dorsey D., Jr., Punitive Damages, Due Process, and the Jury, 40 Ala. L. Rev. 975 (1989).
Fort, Pamela B. et al., Florida''s Tort Reform: Response to a Persistent Problem, 14 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 505 (1986).
Foster, Charles M., Jr. & Poe, Stephen L. & Braswel, Michael K., Compliance Programs: An Alternative to Punitive Damages for Corporate Defendants, 49 S.C. L. Rev. 247 (1998).
Fowler, Ryan, Why Punitive Damages Should Be a Jury''s Decision in Kansas: A Historical Perspective, 52 Kan. L. Rev. 631 (2004).
Franklin, Gary S., Case Comment: Punitive Damages Insurance: Why Some Courts Take the Smart out of “Smart Money”, 40 U. Miami L. Rev. 979 (1986).
Franze, Anthony J. & Scheuerman, Sheila B., Instructing Juries on Punitive Damages: Due Process Revisited after State Farm, 6 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 423 (2004).
Freeman, George Clemon, Jr., Constitutional Constraints on Punitive Damages and Other Monetary Punishments, 57 Bus. Law. 587 (2002).
Galanter, Marc & Luban, David, Poetic Justice: Punitive Damages and Legal Pluralism, 42 Am. U. L. Rev. 1393 (1993).
Galligan, Thomas C., Jr., Augmented Awards: The Efficient Evolution of Punitive Damages, 51 La. L. Rev. 3 (1990).
Ghiardi, James D., Punitive Damages: State Extraction Practice Is Subject to Eighth Amendment Limitations, 26 Tort & Ins. L.J. 119 (1990).
Ghiardi, James D., Punitive Damages--Legislative Reform, 39 Fed''n. Ins. & Corp. Couns. Q. 189 (1989).
Giesel, Grace M., The Knowledge of Insurers and the Posture of the Parties in the Determination of the Insurability of Punitive Damages, 39 Kan. L. Rev. 355 (1991).
Gotanda, John Y., Punitive Damages: A Comparative Analysis, 42 Colum. J. Transnat''l L. 391 (2004).
Grassia, Stephanie L., The Insurability of Punitive Damages in Washington: Should Insureds Who Engage in Intentional Misconduct Reap the Benefit of Their "Bargains?", 26 Seattle Univ. L. R. 627 (2003).
Grey, Thomas C., Holmes and Legal Pragmatism, 41 Stan. L. Rev. 789 (1989).
Guirola, Louis & Carpenter, Thomas L., Jr., Punitive Damages in Mississippi: What Has Happened, What Is Happening and What Is Coming Next, 73 Miss. L.J. 135 (2003).
Hans, Valerie P. & Albertson, Stephanie, Empirical Research and Civil Jury Reform, 78 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1497 (2003).
Hargleroad, Jewell, Comment, Punitive Damages: The Burden of Proof Required by Procedural Due Process, 22 U.S.F. L. Rev. 99 (1987).
Harkin, Douglas G., BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore: A Trial Judge''s Guide to Jury Instructions and Judicial Review of Punitive Damages Awards, 60 Mont. L. Rev. 367 (1999).
Hellend, Eric & Tabarrok, Alexander, The Effect of Electoral Institutions on Tort Awards, 4 Am. L. & Econ. Rev. 341 (2002).
Hoole, Gregory Nathan, In the Wake of Seemingly Exorbitant Punitive Damage Awards America Demands Caps on Punitive Damages--Are We Barking Up the Wrong Tree?, 22 J. Contemp. L. 459 (1996).
Horwitz, Morton J., The History of the Public/Private Distinction, 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1423 (1982).
Howard, Oliver S., Symposium Transcript: Punitive Damages, 24 Pepp. L. Rev. 937 (1997).
Humphreys, Steven L., Comment, An Enemy of the People: Prosecuting the Corporate Polluter as a Common Law Criminal, 39 Am. U. L. Rev. 311 (1990).
Jacoby, F. Warren, Comment, The Relationship of Punitive Damages and Compensatory Damages in Tort Actions, 75 Dick. L. Rev. 585 (1970).
Jeffries, John Calvin, Jr., A Comment on the Constitutionality of Punitive Damages, 72 Va. L. Rev. 139 (1986).
John, Leslie E., Comment, Formulating Standards for Awards of Punitive Damages in the Borderland of Contract and Tort, 74 Cal. L. Rev. 2033 (1986).
Kagan, Jonathan, Toward a Uniform Application of Punishment: Using the Federal Sentencing Guidelines as a Model for Punitive Damage Reform, 40 UCLA L. Rev. 753 (1993).
Kelley, Patrick J. & Wendt, Laurel A., What Judges Tell Juries About Negligence: A Review of Pattern Jury Instructions, 77 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 587 (2002).
Klayman, Elliot & Klayman, Seth, Punitive Damages: Toward Torah-Based Tort Reform, 23 Cardozo L. Rev. 221 (2001).
Klein, Susan R., The Discriminatory Application of Substantive Due Process: A Tale of Two Vehicles, 1997 U. Ill. L. Rev. 453.
Klugheit, Mark A., "Where the Rubber Meets the Road": Theoretical Justifications vs. Practical Outcomes in Punitive Damages Litigation, 52 Syracuse L. Rev. 803 (2002).
Koenig, Thomas & Rustad, Michael, "Crimtorts" as Corporate Just Deserts, 31 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 289 (1998).
Koenig, Thomas H. & Rustad, Michael L., The Quiet Revolution Revisited: An Empirical Examination of State Tort Reforms of Punitive Damages, 16 Just. Sys. J. 23 (1993).
Koesel, Margaret M., Invading the Province of the jury: Section 2315.21(c) and Judicial Determination of the Amount of Punitive Damages, 15 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 55 (1988).
Koruc, Michele, Comment, Putting Polluters in Jail: The Imposition of Criminal Sanctions on Corporate Defendants Under Environmental Statutes, 20 Land & Water L. Rev. 93 (1985).
Kuhlik, Bruce N.& Kingham, Richard F., The Adverse Effects of Standardless Punitive Damage Awards on Pharmaceutical Development and Availability, 45 Food Drug Cosmetics L.J. 693 (1990).
Lahargoue, Brian L., Comment, The Need for Legislative Reform of Punitive Damages, 20 SW. U. L. Rev. 103 (1991).
Lebel, Paul A., Intent and Recklessness as Bases of Product Liability: One Step Back, Two Steps Forward, 32 Ala. L. Rev. 31 (1980).
Lempert, Nina, Punitive Damages - The Dischargeability Debate Continues, 11 Bank. Dev. J. 707 (1995).
Litan, Robert E. & Swire, Peter & Winston, Clifford, The U.S. Liability System: Blackground and Trends, in Liability: Perspectives and Policy 3-5 (Robert E. Litan & Clifford Winston eds., 1988).
Litwiller, Lisa, Has the Supreme Court Sounded the Death Knell for Jury Assessed Punitive Damages? A Critical Re-Examination of the American Jury, 36 U.S.F. L. Rev. 411 (2002).
MacChiaroli, Jean A., Medical Malpractice Screening Panels: Proposed Model Legislation to Cure Judicial Ills, 58 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 181 (1990).
Mallor, Jane & Roberts, Barry, Punitive Damages: Toward a Principled Approach, 31 Hastings L.J. 639 (1980).
Mallor, Jane & Roberts, Barry, Punitive Damages: Toward a Principled Approach, 50 Hastings L.J. 969 (1999).
Mann, Kenneth, Punitive Civil Sanctions: The Middleground between Criminal and Civil Law, 101 Yale L.J. 1795 (1992).
Marcus, Richard L., English Common Law: Studies in the Sources: The Tudor Treason Trials: Some Observations on the Emergence of Forensic Themes, 1984 U. Ill. L. Rev. 675.
Martin, C.J., Casenote: Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield: Judicial Redistribution of Punitive Damage Awards, 40 San Diego L. Rev. 1649 (2003).
Massey, Calvin R., The Excessive Fines Clause and Punitive Damages: Some Lessons from History, 40 Vand. L. Rev. 1233 (1987).
McKee, Bruce J., The Implications of BMW v. Gore for Future Punitive Damages Litigation: Observations from a Participant, 48 Ala. L. Rev. 175 (1996).
McKown, James R., Punitive Damages: State Trends and Developments, 14 Rev. Litig. 419 (1995).
McManus, Brian C., Analyzing Excessive Punitive Damages under Massachusetts Law, 36 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 559 (2003).
Mead, Susanah, Punitive Damages and the Spill Felt Round the World: A U.S. Perspective, 17 Loy. L.A. Int''l & Comp. L.J. 829 (1995).
Melsheimer, Thomas M. & Stodghill, Steven H., Due Process and Punitive Damages: Providing Meaningful Guidance to the Jury, 47 SMU L. Rev. 329 (1994).
Mesulam, Semra, Collective Rewards and Limited Punishment: Solving the Punitive Damages Dilemma with Class, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 1114 (2004).
Metzger, Michael B., Corporate Criminal Liability for Defective Products: Policies, Problems, and Prospects, 73 Geo. L.J. 1 (1984).
Murphy, Richard W., Super bifurcation: Making Room for State Prosecution in the Punitive Damages Process, 76 N.C.L. Rev. 463 (1998).
Note, An Economic Analysis of the Plaintiff''s Windfall from Punitive Damage Litigation, 105 Harv. L. Rev. 1900 (1992).
Note, Attorney''s Fees Under ERISA: When Is an Award Appropriate?, 71 Cornell L. Rev. 1037 (1986).
Note, Crawling out from under Boulder, 34 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 303 (1984).
Note, Developments in the Law, the Paths of Civil Litigation: Problems and Proposals in Punitive Damages Reform, 113 Harv. L. Rev. 1783 (2000).
Note, Limiting Punitive Damages: A Placebo for America''s Ailing Competitiveness, 24 St. Mary''s L.J. 197 (1992).
Note, Pretrial Discovery of Net Worth in Punitive Damages Cases, 54 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1141 (1981).
Note, Proposed Civil Justice Reform Legislation: Proposed Legislation: Model State Punitive Damages Act, 60 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1077 (1992).
Note, Punitive Damages: A Misplaced Remedy, 66 S. Cal. L. Rev. 839 (1993).
Note, The Constitutionality of Florida''s Cap on Noneconomic Damages in the Tort Reform and Insurance Act of 1986, 39 U. Fla. L. Rev. 157 (1987).
Note, The Constitutionality of State Allocation of Punitive Damage Awards, 50 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 843 (1993).
Nunn, Sandra L., The Due Process Ramifications of Punitive Damages, 63 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1029 (1995).
O''Connell, Lori Woodward, The Case for Continuing to Award Punitive Damages, 36 Tort & Ins. L.J. 873 (2001).
Orr, Leila C., Making a Case for Wealth-Calibrated Punitive Damages, 37 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1739 (2004).
Owen, David G., A Punitive Damages Overview: Functions, Problems and Reform, 39 Vill. L. Rev. 363 (1994).
Owen, David G., Civil Punishment and the Public Good, 56 S. Cal. L. Rev. 103 (1982).
Owen, David G., Problems in Assessing Punitive Damages Against Manufacturers of Defective Products, 49 U. Chi. Rev. 1 (1982).
Owen, David G., Punitive Damages Awards in Product Liability Litigation: Strong Medicine Or Poison Pill?: A Punitive Damages Overview: Functions, Problems and Reform, 39 Vill. L. Rev. 363 (1994).
Owen, David G., Punitive Damages in Product Liability Litigation, 74 Mich. L. Rev. 1257 (1976).
Owen, David G., The Moral Foundations of Punitive Damages, 40 Ala. L. Rev. 705 (1989).
Pace, Kimberly A., Recalibrating The Scales of Justice through National Punitive Damage Reform, 46 Am. U.L. Rev. 1573 (1997).
Partlett, David F., Punitive Damages: Legal Hot Zones, 56 La. L. Rev. 781 (1996).
Peters, Susan M., Punitive Damages in Oregon, 18 Willamette L. Rev. 369 (1982).
Pohlman, Jill McKee, Comment, Punitive Damages in the American Civil Justice System: Jackpot or Justice?, 1996 Utah L. Rev. 613 (1996).
Pohlman, Jill McKee, Punitive Damages in the American Civil Justice System: Jackpot or Justice?, 1996 Utah L. Rev. 613.
Polinsky, A. Mitchell & Shavell, Steven, Punitive Damages: A Economic Analysis, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 869 (1998).
Priest, George L., Punitive Damages and Enterprise Liability, 56 S. Cal. L. Rev. 123, (1982).
Priest, George L., Punitive Damages Reform: The Case of Alabama, 56 La. L. Rev. 825 (1996).
Pritchard, Robert W., The Due Process Implications of Ohio''s Punitive Damages Law - A Change Must Be Made, 19 Dayton L. Rev. 1207 (1994).
Pryor, William H., Jr., Comment, Tort Liability, the Structural Constitution and the States, 31 Seton Hall L. Rev. 604 (2001).
Quayle, Dan, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Tenth Anniversary Commemorative Issue: Civil Justice Reform, 41 Am. U.L. Rev. 559 (1992).
Reh, Jeff, Social Issue Litigation and the Route around Democracy, 37 Harv. J. on Legis. 515 (2000).
Robbennolt, Jennifer K., Determining Punitive Damages: Empirical Insights and Implications for Reform, 50 Buff. L. Rev. 103 (2002).
Rottman, David B. & Schotland, Roy A., What Makes Judicial Elections Unique?, 34 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1369 (2001).
Rowe, Thomas D., Jr., The Legal Theory of Attorney Fee Shifting: A Critical Overview, 1982 Duke L.J. 651 (1982).
Rustad, Michael & Koenig, Thomas, Reconceptualizing Punitive Damages in Medical Malpractice: Targeting Amoral Corporations, Not "Moral Monsters", 47 Rutgers L. Rev. 975 (1995).
Rustad, Michael & Koenig, Thomas, The Historical Continuity of Punitive Damages Awards: Reforming the Tort Reformers, 42 Am. U.L. Rev. 1269 (1993).
Rustad, Michael L., Access to Justice: Can Business Co-Exist with the Civil Justice System?: The Closing of Punitive Damages'' Iron Cage, 38 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1297 (2005).
Rustad, Michael L., Nationalizing Tort Law: The Republican Attack on Women, Blue Collar Workers and Consumers, 48 Rutgers L. Rev. 673 (1996).
Rustad, Michael L., Unraveling Punitive Damages: Current Data and Further Inquiry, 1998 Wis. L. Rev. 15.
Rustad, Michael, In Defense of Punitive Damages in Product Liability: Testing Tort Anecdotes with Empirical Data, 78 Iowa L. Rev. 1 (1992).
Saks, Michael J., Public Opinion about the Civil Jury: Can Reality Be Found in the Illusions?, 48 DePaul L. Rev. 221 (1998).
Salbu, Steven R., Developing Rational Punitive Damages Policies: Beyond the Constitution, 49 Fla. L. Rev. 247 (1997).
Sales, James B. & Cole, Kenneth B., Jr., Punitive Damages: A Relic That Has Outlived Its Origins, 37 Vand. L. Rev. 1117 (1984).
Schwart, Victor E. & Behrens, Mark A. & Mastrosimon, Joseph P., Reining in Punitive Damages "Run Wild": Proposals for Reform by Courts and Legislatures, 65 Brook. L. Rev. 1003 (1999).
Schwartz, Gary T., Comment, Deterrence and Punishment in the Common Law of Punitive Damages, 56 S. Cal. L. Rev. 133 (1982).
Schwartz, Teresa Moran, Punitive Damages and Regulated Products, 42 Am. U. L. Rev. 1335 (1993).
Schwartz, Victor E. & Behrens, Mark A. & Lorber, Leah, Tort Reform Past, Present and Future: Solving Old Problems and Dealing With "New Style" Litigation, 27 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 237 (2000).
Schwartz, Victor E. & Behrens, Mark A. & Silverman, Cary & Tedesco, Rochelle M., Consumer Protection in the Legal Marketplace: A Legal Consumer''s Bill of Rights Is Needed, 15 Loy. Consumer L. Rev. 1 (2003).
Schwartz, Victor E. & Behrens, Mark A. & Silverman, Cary, I''ll Take That: Legal and Public Policy Problems Raised by Statutes That Require Punitive Damages Awards to Be Shared With the State, 68 Mo. L. Rev. 525 (2003).
Schwartz, Victor E. & Behrens, Mark A., Punitive Damages Reform - State Legislatures Can and Should Meet The Challenge Issued by The Supreme Court of The United States in Haslip, 42 Am. U.L. Rev. 1365 (1993).
Schwartz, Victor E. & Lorber, Leah, Twisting the Purpose of Pain and Suffering Awards: Turning Compensation into "Punishment", 54 S.C. L. Rev. 47 (2002).
Schwartz, Victor E. & Magarian, Liberty, Challenging the Constitutionality of Punitive Damages: Putting Rules of Reason on an Unbounded Legal Remedy, 28 Am. Bus. L.J. 485 (1990).
Sebok, Anthony J., What Did Punitive Damages Do? Why Misunderstanding the History of Punitive Damages Matters Today, 78 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 163 (2003).
See, Harold, Punitive Damages: A Supporting Theory, 40 Ala. L. Rev. 1227 (1989).
Seltzer, Richard A., Punitive Damages in Mass Tort Litigation: Addressing the Problems of Fairness, Efficiency and Control, 52 Fordham L. Rev. 37 (1983).
Shander, Barbara J., Punitive Damages - Addressing the Constitutionality of Punitive Damages in the Third Circuit Dunn v. HOVIC (1993), 39 Vill. L. Rev. 1105 (1994).
Sharkey, Catherine M., Punitive Damages as Societal Damages, 113 Yale L.J. 347 (2003).
Shores, Janie L., A Suggestion for Limited Tort Reform: Allocation of Punitive Damage Awards to Eliminate Windfalls, 44 Ala. L. Rev. 61 (1992).
Slawotsky, Joel, The Impropriety of Levying Punitive Damages on Innocent Successor Corporations, 38 Duq. L. Rev. 49 (1999).
Smith, David R., Battling a Receding Tort Frontier: Constitutional Attacks on Medical Malpractice Laws, 38 Okla. L. Rev. 195 (1985).
Smith, Steven D., The Critics and the "Crisis": A Reassessment of Current Conceptions of Tort Law, 72 Cornell L. Rev. 765 (1987).
Stepanian, Leo M., Comment, The Feasibility of Full State Extraction of Punitive Damage Awards, 32 Duq. L. Rev. 301 (1994).
Stevens, Clay R., Comment, Split-Recovery: A Constitutional Answer to the Punitive Damages Dilemma, 21 Pepp. L. Rev. 857 (1994).
Sunstein, Cass R. & Kahneman, Daniel & Schkade David, Assessing Punitive Damages, 107 Yale L.J. 2071 (1998).
Sunstein, Cass R. & Kahneman, Daniel & Schkade, David, Do People Want Optimal Deterrence?, 29 J. Legal Studies 237 (2000).
Sunstein, Cass R. et al., Assessing Punitive Damages, 197 Yale L.J. 2071 (1998).
Symposium, Punitive Damages, 56 S. Cal. L. Rev. 155 (1982).
Tabarrok, Alexander & Hellend, Eric, Court Politics: The Political Economy of Tort Awards, 42 J.L. & Econ. 157 (1999).
Tettenborn, Andrew, Punitive Damages - A View from England, 41 San Diego L. Rev. 1551 (2004).
The Supreme Court, 1988 Term-Leading Cases, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 137 (1989).
Tiersma, Peter, The Rocky Road to Legal Reform: Improving the Language of Jury Instructions, 66 Brook. L. Rev. 1081 (2001).
Toney, Bradley D., The Chaotic and Uncertain Due Process Challenge to Punitive Damages, 30 Willamette L. Rev. 635 (1994).
Toy, Amelia J., Comment, Statutory Punitive Damage Caps and the Profit Motive: An Economic Perspective, 40 Emory L.J. 303, 335 (1991).
Viscusi, W. Kip et al., Deterring Inefficient Pharmaceutical Litigation: An Economic Rationale for the FDA Regulatory Compliance Defense, 24 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1438, 1454 (1994).
Wheeler, Malcolm E., A Proposal for Further Common Law Development of the Use of Punitive Damages in Modern Product Liability Litigation, 40 Ala. L. Rev. 919 (1989).
Wheeler, Malcolm E., The Constitutional Case for Reforming Punitive Damage Procedures, 69 Va. L. Rev. 269 (1983).
Williams, Gregory A., Tuttle v. Raymond: An Excessive Restriction upon Punitive Damages Awards in Motor Vehicle Tort Cases Involving Reckless Conduct., 48 Ohio St. L.J. 551 (1987).
Woodbury, Stephen E., Limiting Discovery of a Defendant''s Wealth When Punitive Damages are Alleged, 23 Duquesne L. Rev. 349 (1985).

3. Institutional Reports and Electronic Articles

American Bar Assoc., Special Comm. on Punitive Damages of the American Bar Assoc. Section on Litigation, Punitive Damages: A Constructive Examination (1986).
American College of Trial Lawyers, Report on Punitive Damages of the Committee on Special Problems in the Administration of Justice (1989).
American Law Inst., Enterprise Responsibility for Personal Injury - Reporters'' Study (1991).
ATLA, Fact Sheet: Punitive Damages Are Rarely Awarded, the Amounts Are Small, and Judges, Not Juries, Are More Apt to Give them, available at http://www.atla.org/ConsumerMediaResources/Tier3/press_room/FACTS/pundam/judges.punitives.bjs.aspx (last visited Feb. 5, 2004).
Dodd, John L. et al., The Federalist Soc''y, White Paper: The Case for Judicial Appointments, available at http://www.fedsoc.org/Publications (last visited Aug. 11, 2003).
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, Model Punitive Damages Act (1996), available at http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/mpda/MPDAFNAL.htm (last visited Mar. 16, 2004)
The English Law Commission, Aggravated, Exemplary and Restitutionary Damages (Consultation Paper No. 247, 1997), available at http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/files/lc247.pdf. (last visited Apr. 25, 2005)

4. Newspapers

Baldas, Tresa, Verdicts Swelling from Big to Bigger, Nat''l L.J., Nov. 25, 2002, at A1.
Goldreich, Samuel, Small Farmers Stand against Big Tobacco''s Settlement: $ 246 Billion Deal Burns Independent Growers, Wash. Times, Apr. 26, 1999, at D11.
Hechler, David, Tenfold Rise in Punitives, Nat''l L.J., Feb. 3, 2003, at C3.
McArdle, Elaine, Trial Lawyers, AGs Creating a New Branch of Government, Law. Wkly. USA, July 12, 1999, at B3.
McCollam, Douglas, Editorial, Damaging Justice, Wall St. J., Oct. 31, 2002, at A18.
Reich, Robert B., Don''t Democrats Believe in Democracy?, Wall St. J., Jan. 12, 2000, at A22.
Reich, Robert B., Regulation is Out, Litigation is In, USA Today, Feb. 11, 1999, at 15A.
Schwartz, Victor E., Ohio Court Overreaches, USA Today, Jan. 9, 2003, at 10A.
Spencer, Gary, Punitive Damages Tax Yields Little So Far, N.Y. L.J., Nov. 5, 1992, at 1.
Thomson, Linda, Utah''s Split-Recovery Law Declared Unconstitutional, Desert Morning News (Salt Lake City), June 12, 2004, at A1.
Tybor, Joseph R., How Ford Won Pinto Trial, Nat''l L.J., Mar. 24, 1980, at 1.

5. Reference Books

Garner, Bryan A. (ed. in chief), Black’s Law Dictionary (St. Paul, Minn.: West Group, 7th ed., 1999).