臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣生技公司如何運用開放式創新開發新藥？
書刊名：中山管理評論
作者：蘇友珊／吳豐祥 引用關係
作者(外文)：Su, Yu-shan／Wu, Feng-shang
出版日期：2015
卷期：23:1(下)
頁次：頁335-376
主題關鍵詞：開放式創新；新藥開發；技術移轉；臺灣生技公司；Open innovation；New drug development；Technology transfer；Taiwanese biotechnology companies
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:35
  • 點閱點閱:28
以開放式創新觀點，本研究分析臺灣生技公司的新藥開發模式。臺灣生技公司從國外引進技術後，進行臨床前期試驗與臨床試驗，再授權技術，如基亞生技公司、寶齡富錦公司。本研究分析擁有內部資源較豐富的基亞生技公司如何結合外部資源來從事新藥開發，與分析內部資源有限的寶齡富錦公司如何引進大量外部資源以從事新藥開發。一方面，本研究希望分析臺灣生技公司從技術引進至新藥開發的創新模式；另一方面，探索臺灣生技公司技術移轉至國際製藥公司之獲利模式與在全球生技產業價值鏈之定位。研究結果指出，基亞生技與寶齡富錦都是著眼於亞洲市場的利基藥品。基亞生技著重抗肝癌新藥；寶齡富錦則著重腎臟疾病新藥。兩者採用不同的開放式創新模式，基亞生技利用自身醫界人脈，結合台灣在地的醫療資源，成功地在臨床試驗第二期後授權給國際大藥廠，並在臨床試驗第三期進行共同「合作」開發。相對地，寶齡富錦公司經營者利用自身在北美的人脈，有效地利用北美的臨床「委外」模式，進行臨床試驗並成功地在臨床第二期試驗後授權給國際大藥廠。這兩個對比案例提供開放式創新的新觀點，也指出企業未來對外整合資源的新作法。
This paper aims to analyze new drug development projects of the Taiwanese biotechnology companies from the perspective of open innovation. Taiwanese biotechnology companies, such as Medigen Biotechnology Company and Panion & BF Biotechnology Company, transfer the foreign technologies and conduct the preclinical trials and clinical trials, and make a profit after licensing out the technologies. This study investigates how Medigen which has rich internal resources leverages external resources to develop the new drug, and how Panion & BF which has less internal resources leverages huge external resources to develop the new drug. Two important issues are addressed in this study: how Taiwanese biotechnology companies can leverage external resources and eventually make a profit by licensing out technologies to international pharmaceutical companies; and how Taiwanese biotechnology companies re-position themselves in the global value chain of biotechnology industry. Research results indicate that although both companies concentrate on the niche markets in Asia, they focus on different product markets, with Medigen focusing on liver cancer drug market and Panion & BF focusing on kidney disease one. Additionally, both companies adopt open innovation as a main business model, but they leverage external resources and network in different ways. Medigen successfully licenses out to a foreign pharmaceutical company after clinical trials by relying on the network of its CEO as a medical doctor and by forming international joint development team for its clinical trials. In contrast, Panion & BF successfully licenses out to an international pharmaceutical company by relying on outsourcing contract clinical/ research organization (CRO) through its networks in North America.
期刊論文
1.Zeng, S. X.、Xie, X. M.、Tam, C. M.(2010)。Relationship between Cooperation Networks and Innovation Performance of SMEs。Technovation，30(3)，181-194。  new window
2.林財源、程運瑤(20121000)。策略聯盟研究主題近三十年來之變遷。管理評論，31(4)，67-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡馥陞、方世杰、楊舒閔、許文齡、邱志芳(20110200)。新產品開發團隊網絡結構、關係系絡與績效：共享知識之中介效果。組織與管理，4(1)，33-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Laursen, Keld J.、Salter, Ammon J.(2006)。Open for Innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovative performance among UK manufacturing firms。Strategic Management Journal，27(2)，131-150。  new window
5.Lichtenthaler, U.、Lichtenthaler, E.(2009)。A capability-based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity。Journal of Management Studies，46(8)，1315-1338。  new window
6.陳玉麟(20111200)。外部創新多元性、吸收能力，與創新產出：以臺灣2000年到2004年上市公司為例。臺大管理論叢，22(1)，199-237。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李沿儒、張振滄(20120300)。探索專利聯盟廠商技術發展策略：DVD 3C個案研究。科技管理學刊，17(1)，111-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.胡欣怡、吳豐祥、張午寧、傅如彬(20140300)。由企業之創新管理觀點探討研究機構之技術移轉與新產品開發管理。產業與管理論壇，16(1)，22+24-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳純德、顧景昇、范懿文(2014)。挑戰新創事業--華生水資源跨足團購品評市場。產業管理評論，7(1)，39-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.賴蓉禾(20110800)。公司治理、夥伴選擇與策略聯盟績效--臺灣與美國企業之比較。組織與管理，4(2)，1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Biedenbach, T.、Müller, R.(2012)。Absorptive, innovative and adaptive capabilities and their impact on project and project portfolio performance。International Journal of Project Management，30(5)，621-635。  new window
12.Chesbrough, H.(2010)。How Smaller Companies Can Benefit from Open Innovation。Japan Spotlight Bimonthly [Economy, Culture & History]，29(1)，13-15。  new window
13.Chiaroni, D.、Chiesa, V.、Frattini, F.(2011)。The Open Innovation Journey: How Firms Dynamically Implement the Emerging Innovation Management Paradigm。Technovation，31(1)，34-43。  new window
14.Colombo, M. G.、Laursen, K.、Magnusson, M.、Rossi-Lamastra, C.(2012)。Innovation: Organizational and Managerial Challenges。Journal of Small Business Management，50(2)，181-190。  new window
15.Debackere, K.、Veugelers, R.(2005)。The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links。Research Policy，34(3)，321-342。  new window
16.Easterby-Smith, Mark、Lyles, Marjorie A.、Tsang, Eric W. K.(2008)。Inter-organizational Knowledge Transfer: Current Themes and Future Prospects。Journal of Management Studies，45(4)，677-690。  new window
17.Granstrand, O.、Patel, P.、Pavitt, K.(1997)。Multi-technology Corporations: Why do They Have "Distributed" rather than "Distinctive Core" Competencies。California Management Review，39(4)，8-25。  new window
18.Kafouros, M. I.、Forsans, N.(2012)。The Role of Open Innovation in Emerging Economies: Do Companies Profit from the Scientific Knowledge of Others?。Journal of World Business，47(3)，362-370。  new window
19.Kim, H.、Park, Y.(2010)。The Effects of Open Innovation Activity on Performance of SMEs: The Case of Korea。International Journal of Technology Management，52(3/4)，236-256。  new window
20.Konsti-Laakso, S.、Pihkala, T.、Kraus, S.(2012)。Facilitating SME Innovation Capability through Business Networking。Creativity and Innovation Management，21(1)，93-105。  new window
21.Lee, H.、Kelley, D.、Lee, J.、Lee, S.(2012)。SME Survival: The Impact of Internationalization, Technology Resources, and Alliances。Journal of Small Business Management，50(1)，1-19。  new window
22.Lichtenthaler, U.、Ernst, H.(2012)。Integrated Knowledge Exploitation: The Complementarity of Product Development and Technology Licensing。Strategic Management Journal，33(5)，513-534。  new window
23.Lichtenthaler, U.、Muethal, M.(2012)。The Impact of Family Involvement on Dynamic Innovation Capabilities: Evidence from German Manufacturing Firms。Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice，36(6)，1235-1253。  new window
24.Lichtenthaler, U.(2008)。Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management，55(1)，148-157。  new window
25.Parida, V.、Westerberg, M.、Frishammar, J.(2012)。Inbound Open Innovation Activities in High-Tech SMEs: The Impact on Innovation Performance。Journal of Small Business Management，50(2)，283-309。  new window
26.West, J.、Bogers, M.(2013)。Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation。Journal of Product Innovation Management，31(4)，814-831。  new window
27.Zhou, K. Z.、Li, C. B.(2012)。How Knowledge Affects Radical Innovation: Knowledge Base, Market Knowledge Acquisition, and Internal Knowledge Sharing。Strategic Management Journal，33(9)，1090-1102。  new window
28.張美玲、孫瑞霙、王國樑(20020400)。策略聯盟理論基礎再探討--以臺灣電子廠商為例。管理評論，21(2)，1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Dibella, A. J.、Nevis, E. C.、Gould, J. M.(1996)。Understanding organizational learning capability。Journal of Management Studies，33(3)，361-379。  new window
30.Christensen, J. F.、Olesen, M. H.、Kjær, J. S.(2005)。The Industrial Dynamics of Open Innovation-Evidence from the Transformation of Consumer Electronics。Research Policy，34(10)，1533-1549。  new window
31.洪世章、譚丹琪、廖曉青(20070300)。企業成長、策略選擇與策略改變。中山管理評論，15(1)，11-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Ahuja, Gautam(2000)。The Duality of Collaboration: Inducements and Opportunities in the Formation of Interfirm Linkages。Strategic Management Journal，21(3)，317-343。  new window
33.Cassiman, B.、Veugelers, R.(2006)。In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition。Management Science，52(1)，68-82。  new window
34.Kale, P.、Singh, H.(2007)。Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success。Strategic Management Journal，28(10)，981-1000。  new window
35.van de Vrande, Vareska、de Jong, Jeroen P. J.、Vanhaverbeke, Wim、de Rochemont, Maurice(2009)。Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges。Technovation，29(6/7)，423-437。  new window
36.Teece, David J.(1986)。Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy。Research Policy，15(6)，285-305。  new window
37.Gulati, Ranjay(1999)。Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation。Strategic Management Journal，20(5)，397-420。  new window
38.Argote, L.、Miron-Spektor, E.(2011)。Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge。Organization Science，22(5)，1123-1137。  new window
39.Belderbos, R.、Carree, M.、Lokshin, B.(2006)。Complementarity in R&D cooperation strategies。Review of Industrial Organization，28(4)，401-426。  new window
圖書
1.蕭瑞麟(2013)。思考的脈絡--掌握問題全貌，創新更成功。臺北：天下文化出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蕭瑞麟(2007)。不用數字的研究：鍛鍊深度思考的質性研究。臺北：臺灣培生教育出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Leonard-Barton, D.、Dorothy, L.(1995)。Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation。Boston, Massachusetts：Harvard Business School Press。  new window
4.Yin, Robert K.(2003)。Case Study Research: Design and Methods。Sage Publications。  new window
5.Chesbrough, Henry William(2003)。Open Innovation: The New Imperative for creating and Profiting from Technology。Harvard Business School Press。  new window
6.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet M.(1990)。Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：954（臺灣：936，外國：18） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1753550 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67560048
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上