臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：我國區域農業可行機制之研究：以雲嘉南區域為例
書刊名：調查研究
作者：韓宜 引用關係／楊明憲 引用關係
作者(外文)：Han, I／Yang, Min-hsien
出版日期：2014
卷期：32
頁次：頁87-128
主題關鍵詞：區域農業；推動機制；雲嘉南；Regional agriculture；Feasible mechanism；Yun-Cha-Nan region
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:94
  • 點閱點閱:13
本研究旨在探討區域農業的定位，以及推動區域農業之可行機 制，以利瞭解我國未來推動政策之可行機制。區域農業旨在達到農業 資源流通、農業資源共享、降低對區域外與對區域內的農業交易成 本、對外成為具代表性之主體等多種農業部門的經濟效益，為區域農 業的目的。本研究以我國最重要農業生產的雲嘉南區域為研究對象， 綜合質性田野研究訪談24 家農企業，及量化問卷調查雲嘉南產銷班 農漁民回收250 份樣本，認為我國區域農業的推動，應擇有力的「支 點」啟動區域農業的長期發展循環，串聯上層的政府單位、中層的企 業（農企業、農會，產業）、基層的農民（區域農業以產銷班和合作 農場具組織的農民），分層扮演各自專司的職能角色。本研究建議以 下兩種最佳可行性推動之機制：（1）企業推動的機制：上與地方政府 配合，推動地方農產業價值鏈的整合，以求繁榮區域之經濟發展與促 進就業機會，下以農民產銷班或合作農場為生產供應者。（2）農民推動的機制：首賴農民的配合意願，以及他們對參與區域農業跨縣市合 作所可能為其產品競爭力上帶來的潛在效益的認同與期待。
This research aims to explore the policy positioning of regional agriculture and feasible execution mechanisms for a long-term sustainable approach in the context of agricultural development in the Yun- Cha-Nan region in Taiwan. This research defines regional agriculture as “an integration of natural and human resources by geographic proximity, where clustered agricultural activities are connected to gain competitive advantages against other regions.” Regionalization of agriculture facilitates utilization and sharing of local agricultural resources, minimizes within- and cross-region transaction costs, and establishes regional agricultural reputations as an identity. By using both qualitative fieldwork and quantitative survey approaches, we interviewed 24 (agri-)businesses and collected 250 farmer-survey samples to formulate our arguments. A two-way, top-down and bottom-up approach should be the ideal mechanism for regional agriculture. The top authority level of the central government should focus on information platforms, standardization, and national land planning in the agricultural sector. Regional offices as suggested should play roles in communication and coordination across central-local and local-local governments as well as within the region. Local government should conduct security inspections and search for common regional interests. The middle market level of agribusinesses execute daily security inspections, connect value-added activities, and integrate inter-disciplinary technology and marketing. The bottom level of farmers should maximize scale economies through organizing and branding across local-bounded territories. It is highly recommended that our policy maker choose the most feasible and powerful steps to leverage resources for the benefit of agribusiness and organized farmers.
期刊論文
1.Hsiao, R. L.、Tsai, D. H.、Lee, C. F.(2012)。Collaborative Knowing: The Adaptive Nature of Cross-Boundary Spanning。Journal of Management Studies，49(3)，463-491。  new window
2.Morgan, D. L.(2007)。Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods。Journal of Mixed Methods Research，1(1)，48-76。  new window
3.韓宜(2013)。農業的人文創新。農訓雜誌，281，9-11。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bryman, A.(2006)。Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How Is It Done?。Qualitative Research，6(1)，97-113。  new window
5.Carson, R. T.、Flores, N. E.、Meade, N. F.(2001)。Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence。Environmental and Resource Economics，19(2)，173-210。  new window
6.Diamond, P. A.、Hausman, J. A.(1994)。Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?。Journal of Economic Perspectives，8(4)，45-64。  new window
7.Hinrichs, C. Clare(2000)。Embeddedness and Local Food Systems: Notes on Two Types of Direct Agricultural Market。Journal of Rural Studies，16(3)，295-303。  new window
8.Kaplan, Bonnie、Duchon, Dennis(1988)。Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: A case study。MIS Quarterly，12(4)，571-586。  new window
9.Venkatachalam, L.(2004)。The contingent valuation method: a review。Environmental Impact Assessment Review，24(1)，89-124。  new window
10.Fearon, James D.(1991)。Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science。World Politics，43(2)，169-195。  new window
11.廖坤榮(20041200)。臺灣農會的社會資本形成與政策績效。政治科學論叢，22，181-219。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.侯勝宗(20120200)。見所未見：詮釋性個案研究方法探索。組織與管理，5(1)，111-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.(1989)。Building Theories from Case Study Research。Academy of Management Review，14(4)，532-550。  new window
14.Mahoney, James W.(2000)。Path Dependence in Historical Sociology。Theory and Society，29(4)，507-548。  new window
會議論文
1.韓宜、楊明憲、洪萾湘(2013)。政府主導或是民間發起？論農企業的經營效率。2013臺灣農村經濟學會年會。臺中：中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.楊明憲、陳宗禮、陳吉仲、拾已寰(2010)。良質米產銷專區創新經營與行銷策略之研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.韓宜、楊明憲(2013)。我國推動區域農業之可行機制研究--以離島與東部推動先例及現況，看雲嘉南地區推動之可行機制。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.丁文郁(1998)。台灣農民非營利組織策略規劃之研究--以台灣農會為例(博士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.韓宜(1999)。全球競爭下臺灣稻米產業的在地鑲嵌與合作安排(博士論文)。臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fogel, R.(1964)。Railroads and American Economic Growth: Essays in Econometric History。Baltimore, MD：Johns Hopkins Press。  new window
2.Elster, J.(1978)。Logic & Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds。New York：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
3.Fairweather, G. W.、Davidson, W. S.(1986)。An Introduction to Community Experimentation: Theory, Methods and Practice。New York：McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.李慶芳(2013)。質化研究之經驗敘說--質化研究的六個修煉。臺北：高立圖書有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.胡忠一、陳啟榮(2004)。行政院及所屬各機關出國報告書--研習日本新農政下之地區農業發展策略。臺北：行政院農業委員會。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊朝仲、文柏、洪世澤、陳國彰(2011)。反直覺才會贏：你從沒看過的系統思考、專案管理與孫子兵法。臺北：商訊文化事業。  延伸查詢new window
7.Hawthorn, G.(1991)。Plausible Worlds: Possibility and Understanding in History and the Social Sciences。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Tetlock, Philip E.、Belkin, Aaron(1996)。Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
9.蕭代基、鄭蕙燕、吳珮瑛、錢玉蘭、溫麗琪(2002)。環境保護之成本效益分析：理論、方法與應用。俊傑書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Balassa, Bela A.(1961)。The Theory of Economic Integration。Homewood, IL：Richard D. Irwin。  new window
11.Lewis, David K.(1973)。Counterfactuals。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
12.Hausman, J.(1993)。Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment。New York：Elsevier Science Pub.。  new window
13.Hanley, Nick、Spash, Clive L.(1993)。Cost-benefit Analysis and the Environment。Edward Elgar。  new window
14.Tashakkori, Abbas、Teddlie, Charles(1998)。Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches。Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
15.Mitchell, Robert Cameron、Carson, Richard T.(1989)。Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method。Washington, DC：Resources for the Future Press。  new window
16.Bryman, Alan(2004)。Social Research Methods。Oxford University Press。  new window
17.Creswell, John W.(2003)。Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches。Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brannen, J.(1992)。Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: An Overview。Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research。Aldershot：Avebury。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：431（臺灣：420，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67545595
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上