從雙路徑模型探討風險訊息的包裝與呈現對環境友善行為意圖的影響_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	從雙路徑模型探討風險訊息的包裝與呈現對環境友善行為意圖的影響
書刊名：	傳播研究與實踐
作者：	施琮仁
作者(外文)：	Shih, Tsung-jen
出版日期：	2017
卷期：	7:1
頁次：	頁5-36
主題關鍵詞：	效能感；氣候變遷；集體行動；環境友善行為；雙路徑模型；Perceived efficacy；Climate change；Collective action；Pro-environmental behaviors；Dual-pathway model
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:37 點閱:14

氣候變遷的負面影響能否減緩，取決於環境友善行為的實踐。本研究以集體行動之雙路徑模型為基礎，聚焦於負面情緒與效能感，藉以討論風險訊息的呈現與包裝如何能有效增進民眾的行為意圖。透過實驗法（N = 211），本研究發現將氣候變遷包裝成在地議題有助於增強相關性認知，而相關性的提升會導致較高的行動意願；民眾認為氣候變遷和自身相關後也會產生負面情緒，進而強化行動意願，此為情緒導向之因應路徑。另一方面，在風險訊息中提供行動建議能增進民眾的行動策略知識，間接提升各種效能感及行為意圖，此為問題導向之因應路徑。結果也指出負面情緒的作用對於具有低回應效能感、低集體效能感的民眾較為顯著，顯示效能感的作用可能會因情境而不同。

以文找文

Whether the negative impact of climate change can be effectively mitigated depends heavily on degree of individual engagement in environmental-friendly behaviors. This study draws on the dual pathway model, which emphasizes the role of negative emotions and different forms of efficacy, to investigate how to facilitate mitigation actions. Through an experiment involving 211 people recruited at a large public university in northern Taiwan, this study found both emotion-focused coping and problem-focused coping to be possible pathways leading to mitigation actions related to climate change. Regarding emotion-focused coping, the findings indicate that framing climate change as a local issue increased its perceived relevance, which, in turn, stimulated negative emotions and behavioral intentions. On the other hand, providing action cues in messages increased knowledge of action strategies, and so triggered different forms of efficacy and behavioral intentions, a case of problem-focused coping. The results also indicate that negative emotions interacted with various forms of efficacy to shape intentions. The effect of negative emotions was stronger for people low in response efficacy and collective efficacy, suggesting the role of efficacy may not be monotonous. Implications of these findings are discussed.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Witte, K.、Allen, M.(2000)。A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns。Health Education & Behavior，27(5)，591-615。
2.	Scheufele, Dietram A.(1999)。Framing as A Theory of Media Effects。Journal of Communication，49(1)，101-122。
3.	徐美苓、楊意菁(20110100)。臺灣全球暖化風險溝通的常民認知。傳播與社會學刊，15，71-104。延伸查詢
4.	Boerschig, S.、De Young, R.(1993)。Evaluation of selected recycling curricula: Educating the green citizen。The Journal of Environmental Education，24(3)，17-22。
5.	Liberman, A.、Chaiken, S.(1992)。Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin，18，669-679。
6.	Van Zomeren, M.、Spears, R.、Fischer, A. H.、Leach, C. W.(2004)。Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，87(5)，649-664。
7.	徐美苓、施琮仁(20151200)。氣候變遷相關政策民意支持的多元面貌。中華傳播學刊，28，239-278。延伸查詢
8.	Bendig, A. W.(1954)。Reliability of short rating scales and the heterogeneity of the rated stimuli。Journal of Applied Psychology，38，167-170。
9.	Bendig, A. W.(1954)。Reliability and the number of rating-scale categories。Journal of Applied Psychology，38(1)，38-40。
10.	Böhm, G.(2003)。Emotional reactions to environmental risks: Consequentialist versus ethical evaluation。Journal of Environmental Psychology，23，199-212。
11.	Feinberg, M.、Willer, R.(2011)。Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs。Psychological Science，22(1)，34-38。
12.	Bord, R. J.、O'Connor, R. E.、Fischer, A.(2000)。In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?。Public Understanding of Science，9，205-218。
13.	Heath, Y.、Gifford, R.(2006)。Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change。Environment and Behavior，38(1)，48-71。
14.	Fischhoff, B.、Slovic, P.、Lichtenstein, S.、Read, S.、Combs, B.(1978)。How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits。Policy Sciences，9(2)，127-152。
15.	Kim, S.、Jeong, S.-H.、Hwang, Y.(2013)。Predictors of pro-environmental behaviors of American and Korean students: The application of the theory of reasoned action and protection motivation theory。Science Communication，35(2)，168-188。
16.	Hsu, S.-J.、Roth, R. E.(1998)。An assessment of environmental literacy and analysis of predictors of responsible environmental behaviour held by secondary teachers in the Hualien area of Taiwan。Environmental Education Research，4(3)，229-249。
17.	Hersch, J.、Viscusi, W. K.(2006)。The generational divide in support for environmental policies: European evidence。Climatic Change，77(1/2)，121-136。
18.	Lam, S. P.(2006)。Predicting intention to save water: Theory of planned behavior, response efficacy, vulnerability, and perceived efficiency of alternative solutions。Journal of Applied Social Psychology，36，2803-2824。
19.	Kuhn, K. M.(2000)。Message format and audience values: Interactive effects of uncertainty information and environmental attitudes on perceived risk。Journal of Environmental Psychology，20，41-51。
20.	Klandermans, B.(1984)。Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansisons of resource mobilization theory。American Sociological Review，49，583-600。
21.	Kittipongvises, S.、Mino, T.(2013)。The influence of psychological factors on global climate change perceptions held by the rural citizens of Thailand。Ecopsychology，5，126-135。
22.	Lee, F. L. F.(2010)。The perceptual bases of collective efficacy and protest participation: The case of pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong。International Journal of Public Opinion Research，22，392-411。
23.	Lubell, M.、Vedlitz, A.、Zahran, S.、Alston, L. T.(2006)。Collective action, environmental activism, and air quality policy。Political Research Quarterly，59(1)，149-160。
24.	Lorenzoni, I.、Whitmarsh, L.(2014)。Climate change and perceptions, behaviors, and communication research after the IPCC 5th assessment report--a WIREs editorial。Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change，5(6)，703-708。
25.	Liberman, N.、Trope, Y.(2008)。The psychology of transcending the here and now。Science，322，1201-1205。
26.	Nisbet, M. C.(2009)。Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement。Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development，51(2)，12-23。
27.	McCarthy, J. D.、Zald, M. N.(1977)。Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory。American Journal of Sociology，82，1212-1241。
28.	Lubell, M.、Zahran, S.、Vedlitz, A.(2007)。Collective action and citizen responses to global warming。Political Behavior，29，391-413。
29.	Ostrom, E.(2010)。Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change。Global Environmental Change，20，550-557。
30.	O'Neill, S.、Nicholson-Cole, S.(2009)。"Fear won't do it": Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations。Science Communication，30(3)，355-379。
31.	Nolan, J. M.(2010)。"An Inconvenient Truth" increases knowledge, concern, and willingness to reduce greenhouse gases。Environment and Behavior，42(5)，643-658。
32.	Retzbach, J.、Otto, L.、Maier, M.(2016)。Measuring the perceived uncertainty of scientific evidence and its relationship to engagement with science。Public Understanding of Science，25，638-655。
33.	Ruiter, R. A.、Abraham, C.、Kok, G.(2001)。Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals。Psychology and Health，16(6)，613-630。
34.	Scannell, L.、Gifford, R.(2013)。Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement。Environment and Behavior，45(1)，60-85。
35.	Shaw, A.、Sheppard, S.、Burch, S.、Flanders, D.、Wiek, A.、Carmichael, J.(2009)。Making local futures tangible--Synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building。Global Environmental Change，19，447-463。
36.	Semenza, J. C.、Hall, D. E.、Wilson, D. J.、Bontempo, B. D.、Sailor, D. J.、George, L. A.(2008)。Public perception of climate change: Voluntary mitigation and barriers to behavior change。American Journal of Preventive Medicine，35，479-487。
37.	Scannell, L.、Gifford, R.(2010)。The relations between natural and civic place attachment and proenvironmental behavior。Journal of Environmental Psychology，30，289-297。
38.	Spence, A.、Poortinga, W.、Pidgeon, N.(2012)。The psychological distance of climate change。Risk Analysis，32(6)，957-972。
39.	Spence, A.、Pidgeon, N.(2010)。Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations。Global Environmental Change，20，656-667。
40.	Slovic, P.、Finucane, M. L.、Peters, E.、MacGregor, D. G.(2004)。Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality。Risk Analysis，24(2)，311-322。
41.	Shih, T.-J.、Lin, C.-Y.(2017)。Developing communication strategies for mitigating actions against global warming: Linking framing and a dual processing model。Environmental Communication，11(6)，840-858。
42.	Tabernero, C.、Hernández, B.(2011)。Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation guiding environmental behavior。Environment and Behavior，43，658-675。
43.	Stürmer, S.、Simon, B.、Loewy, M.、Jörger, H.(2003)。The dual-pathway model of social movement participation: The case of the fat acceptance movement。Social Psychology Quarterly，66，71-82。
44.	Stürmer, S.、Simon, B.(2004)。Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model。European Review of Social Psychology，15(15)，59-99。
45.	Sterman, J. D.、Sweeney, L. B.(2007)。Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults' mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter。Climatic Change，80，213-238。
46.	van Zomeren, M.、Spears, R.、Leach, C. W.(2010)。Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis。Journal of Environmental Psychology，30(4)，339-346。
47.	van Zomeren, M.、Postmes, T.、Spears, R.(2008)。Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives。Psychological Bulletin，134，504-535。
48.	Van Zomeren, Martijn、Leach, Colin Wayne、Spears, Russell(2012)。Protesters as "passionate economists" a dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage。Personality and Social Psychology Review，16(2)，180-199。
49.	van Stekelenburg, J.、Klandermans, B.(2013)。The social psychology of protest。Current Sociology，61(5/6)，886-905。
50.	Witte, K.(1992)。Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model。Communication Monographs，59，329-349。
51.	Witte, K.(1996)。Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale。Journal of Health Communication，1，317-342。
52.	Wiedemann, P. M.、Schütz, H.(2005)。The precautionary principle and risk perception: Experimental studies in the EMF area。Environmental Health Perspectives，113(4)，402-405。
53.	Verplanken, B.、Roy, D.(2013)。"My worries are rational, climate change is not": Habitual ecological worrying is an adaptive response。PLos One，8(9)，(e74708)1-(e74708)6。
54.	Zhao, X.(2009)。Media use and global warming perceptions: A snapshot of the reinforcing spirals。Communication Research，36(5)，698-723。
55.	楊意菁、徐美苓(20121200)。環境風險的認知與溝通：以全球暖化議題的情境公眾為例。中華傳播學刊，22，169-209。延伸查詢
56.	Leiserowitz, Anthony(2006)。Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values。Climatic change，77(1)，45-72。
57.	Slovic, Paul(1987)。Perception of Risk。Science，236(4799)，280-285。
58.	Preacher, Kristopher J.、Hayes, Andrew F.(2004)。SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models。Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers，36(4)，717-731。
59.	周儒、潘淑蘭、吳忠宏(20130900)。大學生面對全球暖化議題採取行動之影響因子研究。環境教育研究，10(1)，1-34。延伸查詢
60.	Entman, Robert M.(1993)。Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm。Journal of Communication，43(4)，51-58。
61.	Kollmuss, Anja、Agyeman, Julian(2002)。Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-environmental Behavior?。Environmental Education Research，8(3)，239-260。
62.	Meinhold, J. L.、Malkus, A. J.(2005)。Adolescent environmental behaviors: Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference?。Environment and Behavior，37(4)，511-532。
63.	Adger, W. Neil(2003)。Social Capital, Collective Action, and Adaptation to Climate Change。Economic Geography，79(4)，387-404。
64.	Loewenstein, George F.、Weber, Elke U.、Hsee, Christopher K.、Welch, Ned(2001)。Risk as feelings。Psychological Bulletin，127(2)，267-286。
65.	Hines, Jody M.、Hungerford, Harold R.、Tomera, Audrey N.(1987)。Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis。The Journal of Environmental Education，18(2)，1-8。
66.	Hayes, Andrew F.(2009)。Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium。Communication Monographs，76(4)，408-420。
67.	Bandura, Albert(1982)。Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency。American Psychologist，37(2)，122-147。
68.	O'Connor, R. E.、Bord, R. J.、Fisher, A.(1999)。Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change。Risk Analysis，19(3)，461-471。
69.	Trope, Y.、Liberman, N.、Wakslak, C.(2007)。Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior。Journal of Consumer Psychology，17(2)，83-95。

會議論文
1.	Hsu, M.-L.、Shih, T.-J.(2014)。Patterns of pro-environmental behavior among Taiwanese adults: A longitudinal comparison。The annual conference of the International Association for International Communication Studies。Providence, RI。

研究報告
1.	徐美苓、施琮仁(2013)。臺灣氣候變遷全國民眾電話調查計畫。臺北：台達電子文教基金會。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Lazarus, Richard S.(1991)。Emotion and adaptation。Oxford University Press。
2.	Hayes, Andrew F.(2013)。Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach。Guilford Press。
3.	Bandura, Albert(1997)。Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control。Worth Publishers。

其他
1.	Leiserowitz, A.，Maibach, E.，Roser-Renouf, C.，Feinberg, G.，Rosenthal, S.，Marlon, J.(2014)。Climate change in the American mind: Americans' global warming beliefs and attitudes in November, 2013，http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/article/Climate-Beliefs-November-2013/，。
2.	行政院環境保護署(20140414)。節能減碳十大無悔宣言，http://www.epa.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=25390&ctNode=32003&mp=epa。延伸查詢
3.	張楊乾(20100506)。臺大教授：莫拉克降雨多，與暖化關係不大，http://lowestc.blogspot.tw/2010/05/blog-post_06.html。延伸查詢
4.	張楊乾(20100726)。「八八風災與暖化意識」語音辨識電話民調發布，http://lowestc.blogspot.tw/2010/07/blog-post_26.html。延伸查詢
5.	柳中明(20100514)。柳中明回應：「莫拉克降雨多，與暖化無關」，http://lowestc.blogspot.tw/2010/05/blog-post_14.html。延伸查詢
6.	Carle, J.(20150704)。Climate change seen as top global threat: Americans, Europeans, middle easterners focus on ISIS as greatest danger，http://www.pewglobal.org/2015/07/14/climate-change-seen-as-top-global-threat/。

圖書論文
1.	Gamson, William A.(1992)。The Social Psychology of Collective Action。Frontiers in Social Movement Theory。New Haven, CT：Yale University Press。
2.	Leiserowitz, A.(2007)。Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities。Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。
3.	Milfont, T. L.(2010)。Global warming, climate change and human psychology。Psychological approaches to sustainability: Current trends in theory, research and practice。New York, NY：Nova Science。
4.	Nisbet, M. C.(2009)。Framing science: A new paradigm in public engagement。Understanding science: New agendas in science communication。New York, NY：Routledge。
5.	Price, V.、Tewksbury, D.(1997)。News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing。Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion。Greenwich, CT：Ablex。
6.	Scheufele, D. A.(2006)。Messages and heuristics: How audiences form attitudes about emerging technologies。Engaging science: Thoughts, deeds, analysis and action。London：Wellcome Trust。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	臺灣民眾對於氣候變遷看法的受眾分層
2.	臺灣氣候變遷調適知識本體(CCAO)之建構與應用
3.	環境議題的媒體關注與框架分析：以臺灣及美國報紙報導空氣污染議題為例
4.	從公眾角度再思科技政策的媒體建構：以《電業法》修法為例
5.	應用故事模式探究大學永續發展教育課程實施的歷程與成效
6.	新冠肺炎的日常防疫行為：媒體、情緒與風險認知的作用
7.	金門山后聚落遊客的懷舊情感對負責任環境行為之影響：兼論地方依賴與地方認同的中介效果
8.	環境教育場域解說志工之氣候變遷因應素養研究
9.	年金改革議題的風險傳播：從公眾情境檢視認知、傳播行為與政策支持傾向
10.	氣候變遷下的網絡觀點：探索環境政治協商的複雜性[評Jennifer Hadden, «Networks in Contention: The Divisive Politics of Climate Change» (論點中的網絡概念：氣候變遷的政治分裂) (Cambridge University Press, 2015)]
11.	線上災難傳播的議題設定效果：高雄氣爆事件中媒體臉書粉絲專頁主文與回應文的互動影響
12.	數位貧窮與天災風險資訊來源：來自臺灣傳播調查的證據
13.	風險感知、價值觀、議題傳播及空污防制行為意向
14.	大學生對PM₂.₅空氣污染的態度與認知之研究
15.	環境未來通識課程對於大學生氣候變遷素養之成效分析

1.	科學桌遊與它們的X
2.	全球暖化科普出版品的視覺再現

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	線上社交購物導向網站對網路衝動性購買行為之影響：虛擬社群感和負面情緒之干擾效果
2.	中國哲學內之寬容思想

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫