析論英國高等教育研究經費分配機制之運作及其對我國的啟示_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	析論英國高等教育研究經費分配機制之運作及其對我國的啟示
書刊名：	當代教育研究季刊
作者：	劉秀曦／楊瑩
作者(外文)：	Liu, Hsiu-hsi／Chan, Ying
出版日期：	2017
卷期：	25:2
頁次：	頁77-112
主題關鍵詞：	英國；高等教育；績效本位研究經費分配制度；雙軌支援系統；United Kingdom；Higher education；Performance-based research funding system；PRFS；Dual support system；DSS
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:14 點閱:11

研究目的　在新自由主義影響下，各國政府在對大學挹注研究經費的同時也開始重視學校的績效責任，遂讓「績效本位研究經費分配制度」應運而生。至2010 年時，全世界至少有14 個國家或地區採用此種制度來分配研究經費，其中又以英國運作最久且最具代表性，英國政府透過著名的「雙軌支援系統」來分配高等教育研究經費，藉此保障研究活動的穩定與卓越發展。與英國相同，我國高等教育研究經費亦分為教育部與科技部兩大財源管道，且同樣採取擇優獎助原則為之，實施以來雖有助於厚植國內研究產能，但亦引起各界對於高等教育資源配置合理性的論辯。由於英國高等教育研究經費分配機制之運作與改革經常受到其他國家關注與仿效，故本研究期能借鏡英國經驗做為精進我國相關政策之參考。研究設計／方法／取徑　本研究採用文件分析法，就英國政府機關所公布之文件記錄、統計資料與報告書進行梳理與分析。研究發現或結論　根據研究發現提出下列啟示：一、釐清政府職能與角色定位，保障大學研究與創新的自主性；二、鼓勵大學開拓更多元的財源管道，因應卓越發展的財務需求；三、協助大學支應研究活動之間接成本，確保研究活動與人才培育的持續性；四、提高政府經費分配過程的透明度和規範性，強化公民社會監督體系；五、建構政策執行成效評估機制，重新思考經費配置的優先順序；六、研究經費的集中挹注僅為短期手段，長期應有更宏觀的規劃。研究原創性／價值　國內尚無以英國「雙軌支援系統」與「績效本位研究經費分配制度」為題進行分析，並提出對我國高等教育經費分配問題改進建議之研究。故本研究除有助於增進讀者對於英國高等教育研究經費配置方式之理解外，亦可做為精進我國相關政策之參考。

以文找文

Purpose With the influence of neoliberalism, governments worldwide have begun to emphasize the performance and responsibilities of universities in research funding. This has led to the creation of performance-based research funding systems in 14 countries and regions as of 2010. The oldest and most representative example is that in the United Kingdom. The UK government famously employs a dual support system to distribute its higher education research funds and safeguard the stability and development of research activities. Similarly, higher education research funding in Taiwan is provided by the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Science and Technology and is performance-based. Although this research funding system has enhanced the research capacity in Taiwan, it has also attracted controversy regarding its rationality. The operations and reform of the UK higher education research funding system have received attention and been replicated by other countries. Therefore, this study referenced the history of research funding in the United Kingdom to enhance research funding policies in Taiwan. Design/methodology/approach Documentary research was conducted to organize and analyze the documentary records, statistical data, and reports issued by UK governmental units. Findings 1. The functions and roles of the government must be clarified to ensure the autonomy of university research. 2. The government must enable universities to develop more diverse financial resource to fulfill the financial requirements for outstanding research development. 3. The government must assist universities in paying the indirect costs of research activities to safeguard the sustainable development of these research activities and the cultivation of talent. 4. The transparency and normativity of research funding must be improved to strengthen the supervision of civil society. 5. An effectiveness evaluation and feedback system must be established for research funding distribution, and priorities for fund usage must be reconsidered. 6. The concentration of research funds is only a short-term approach; a more macroscopic plan is required for the long-term development of research funding. Originality/value No previous studies have investigated the dual support system and performance-based research funding system in the United Kingdom and proposed suggestions to resolve the problems associated with higher education research funding in Taiwan. This study further clarified the distribution mechanism in the United Kingdom and provides a reference for strengthening related policy making in Taiwan.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Ferlie, E.、Musselin, C.、Andresani, G.(2008)。The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective。Higher Education，56(3)，325-348。
2.	范麗雪(20121200)。檢視競爭性經費對大學發展的影響。教育理論與實踐學刊，26，103-123。延伸查詢
3.	McNay, I.(1998)。The Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) and after: you never know how it will all turn out。Perspectives，2(1)，19-22。
4.	Mace, J.(2000)。The RAE and university efficiency。Higher Education Review，32(2)，17-35。
5.	姜添輝(20151200)。臺灣高等教育政策依循新自由主義的現象與缺失。臺灣教育社會學研究，15(2)，131-165。延伸查詢
6.	陳伯璋(20120400)。追求卓越之後。臺灣教育評論月刊，1(6)，26-27。延伸查詢
7.	楊瑩、劉秀曦(2015)。從2014年研究卓越架構之實施檢視英國高等教育品質保證機制。高教評鑑與發展，9(1)，1-30。延伸查詢
8.	劉秀曦(20130900)。高等教育政策工具之探析：大學評鑑結果與政府經費分配之連結。教育研究與發展期刊，9(3)，31-58。延伸查詢
9.	Aagaard, K.、Bloch, C.、Schneider, J. W.(2015)。Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian publication indicator。Research Evaluation，24(2)，106-117。
10.	Ask, A.、Grönlund, A.(2008)。Implementation challenges: Competing structures when new public management meets egovernment。Electronic Government，5184，25-36。
11.	Bloch, C.、Schneider, J. W.(2016)。Performance-based funding models and researcher behavior: An analysis of the influence of the Norwegian publication indicator at the individual level。Research Evaluation，25(4)，371-382。
12.	Corbyn, Z.(2007)。Tough new hurdle for top researchers。The Times Higher Education Supplement。
13.	Deem, R.(2006)。Changing research perspectives on the management of higher education: Can research permeate the activities of manager-academics。Higher Education Quarterly，60(3)，203-228。
14.	Emanuela, R.、Marco, S.(2013)。Instruments as empirical evidence for the analysis of higher education policies。Higher Education，65(1)，135-151。
15.	Hammarfelt, B.、de Rijcke, S.(2015)。Accountability in context: Effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty。Research Evaluation，24(1)，63-77。
16.	Hicks, D.(2012)。Performance-based university research funding systems。Research Policy，41(2)，251-261。
17.	Jump, P.(2015)。Winners and losers in HEFCE funding allocations: REF-based distribution of £1.6bn research pot results in some big changes。The Times Higher Education Supplement。
18.	Matthews, D.(2016)。Focus on 'elite' universities 'risks responsiveness of UK research'。The Times Higher Education Supplement。
19.	Schneider, J. W.、Aagaard, K.、Bloch, C.(2016)。What happens when national research funding is linked to differentiated publication counts? A comparison of the Australian and Norwegian publication-based funding models。Research Evaluation，25(3)，244-256。
20.	Hood, Christopher(1991)。A Public Management for All Seasons?。Public Administration，69(1)，3-19。
21.	Peters, B. Guy、Pierre, John(1998)。Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory，8(2)，223-243。
22.	許添明(20090600)。躋身國際一流大學之財務策略--以美國大學為例。當代教育研究，17(2)，103-148。延伸查詢

會議論文
1.	Butler, L.(2010)。Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: A review of the concerns and the evidence。Performance-based funding for public research in tertiary education institutions: Workshop。Paris：OECD。127-165。

研究報告
1.	中央研究院(2013)。高等教育與科技政策建議書。台北：中央研究院。延伸查詢
2.	科技部(2015)。中華民國科學技術統計要覽（2015年版）。延伸查詢
3.	Bolton, P.(2016)。Higher education finance statistics。

圖書
1.	Whitley, R.、Gläser, J.(2007)。The changing governance of the sciences: The advent of research evaluation systems。Dordrecht：Springer。
2.	科技部(2015)。中華民國科學技術白皮書：以智慧科技打造永續成長的幸福社會（民國104年至107年）。延伸查詢
3.	Pollitt, Christopher(1993)。Managerialism and the public services: Cuts or cultural change in the 1990s。Oxford：Basil Blackwell。
4.	Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2016)。Education at a glance 2016: OECD indicators。OECD。
5.	中央研究院(2011)。研教與公務分軌體制改革建議書。臺北市：中央研究院。延伸查詢
6.	教育部(2013)。邁向頂尖大學計畫。臺北市：教育部。延伸查詢
7.	Altbach, Philip G.、Salmi, Jamil(2011)。The road to academic excellence: The making of world-class research universities。Washington, DC：The World Bank。
8.	Benneworth, P.、de Boer, H.、Cremonini, L.、Jongbloed, B.、Leisyte, L.、Vossensteyn, H.、de Weert, E.(2011)。Quality-related funding, performance agreements and profiling in higher education: An international comparative study。Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), University of Twente。
9.	de Boer, H.、Jongbloed, B.、Benneworth, P.、Cremonini, L.、Kolster, R.、Kottmann, A.、Vossensteyn, H.(2015)。Performance-based funding and performance agreements in fourteen higher education systems。Enschede：University of Twente。
10.	Jongbloed, B.(2010)。Funding higher education: A view across Europe。Enschede：University of Twente。

其他
1.	Department for Business, Innovation and Skills(2013)。International comparative performance of the UK research base--2013，https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/263729/bis-13-1297-international-comparative-performance-of-the-UK-research-base-2013.pdf。
2.	Department for Business, Innovation and Skills(2014)。The allocation of science and research funding 2015/16，https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/332767/bis-14-750-science-research-funding-allocations-2015-2016-corrected.pdf。
3.	(2016)。Success as a knowledge economy: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice，https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/523396/bis-16-265-success-as-a-knowledge-economy.pdf，。
4.	Department for Business, Innovation and Skills(2016)。Case for the creation of UK research and innovation，https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/527803/bis-16-291-ukri-case-for-creation.pdf。
5.	Digital Science(2015)。The value of structural dversity: Assessing diversity form a sustainable research base，https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291818222_The_value_of_structural_diversity_Assessing_diversity_for_a_sustainable_research_base。
6.	European University Association(2015)。Designing strategies for efficient funding of universities in Europe，http://www.eua.be/Libraries/publications-homepage-list/designing-strategies-forefficient-funding-of-universities-in-europe。
7.	GOV(2016)。Department for Business, Innovation and Skills homepage (about us)，https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-business-innovation-skills/about。
8.	Higher Education Funding Councils for England(2005)。Impact of selective funding of research in England, and the specific outcomes of HEFCE research funding: A report to HEFCE and the Department for Education and Skills by Evidence Ltd，http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5807/1/RW47A.pdf。
9.	Higher Education Funding Councils for England(2010)。Guide to funding: How HEFCE allocates its funds 2010，http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce1/pubs/hefce/2010/1024/10_24.pdf。
10.	Higher Education Funding Councils for England(2014)。Guide to funding and student number controls 2013-14 and 2014-15: How HEFCE allocates its funds and controls student numbers，http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/19812/1/Guide%20to%20funding%20and%20SNCs%202013-14%20and%202014-15.pdf。
11.	Higher Education Funding Councils for England(2014)。Recurrent grants and student number controls for 2014-15，http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2014/201405/。
12.	Higher Education Funding Councils for England(2015)。Guide to funding 2015-16: How HEFCE allocates its funds，http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/22562/2/2015_04_Redacted.pdf。
13.	Higher Education Funding Councils for England(2016)。Guide to funding 2016-17: How HEFCE allocates its funds，http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/25778/1/HEFCE2016_07.pdf。
14.	Higher Education Funding Councils for England(2016)。Recurrent grants for 2015-16: Final allocations，http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2016/201608/。
15.	Higher Education Funding Councils for England(2016)。Recurrent grants for 2016-17: Final allocations，http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2016/201631/。
16.	Higher Education Statistics Agency(2016)。Higher education statistics for the UK (2014/15)，https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/publications/higher-education-2014-15。
17.	Hughes, A.，Kitson, M.，Bullock, A.，Milner, I.(2013)。The dual funding structure for research in the UK: Research council and funding council allocation methods and the pathways to impact of UK academics，https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dual-funding-structure-for-research-in-the-uk-research-council-and-funding-council-allocation-methods-and-impactpathway。
18.	Jongbloed, B.(2004)。Funding higher education: Options, trade-offs and dilemmas，http://doc.utwente.nl/56075/。
19.	Jongbloed, B.(2008)。Performance-oriented budgeting in Europe: Trends, effects and consequences，http://www.zfhe.at/index.php/zfhe/article/viewFile/90/114。
20.	Jonkers, K.，Zacharewicz, T.(2016)。Research performance based funding systems: A comparative assessment，http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC101043/jrc101043_pdf%20final(1).pdf。
21.	Lincoln, D.(2012)。Rankings: An idea whose time has come, and gone，https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/world-view/rankings-idea-whose-time-has-come-and-gone。
22.	Nurse, P.(2014)。Ensuring a successful UK research endeavor: A review of the UK research councils by Paul Nurse，https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/478125/BIS-15-625-ensuring-a-successful-UK-research-endeavour.pdf。
23.	Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2007)。Performance budgeting in OECD countries，http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/performancebudgetinginoecdcountries.htm。
24.	Research Fortnight(2014)。Golden triangle pulls ahead in REF shake-out: UCL and KCL ascend power rankings, Manchester and Leeds fall，http://exquisitelife.researchresearch.com/files/rf4470.pdf。
25.	Research Information Network(2010)。Making sense of research funding in UK higher education，http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Making_sense_of_funding.pdf。
26.	UK Parliament(2015)。The Haldane principle，http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmdius/168/16807.htm。
27.	Universities UK(2013)。The funding challenge for universities，http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/highereducation/Documents/2013/FundingChallengeForUniversities.pdf。

圖書論文
1.	Salmi, J.、Hauptman, A. M.(2005)。Resource allocation mechanisms in tertiary education: A typology and an assessment。Higher education in the world 2006: The financing of universities。Basingstoke：Palgrave MacMillan。
2.	Schmidt, E. K.(2012)。University funding reforms in the Nordic countries。Cycles of university reform: Japan and Finland compared。Tokyo：Center for National University Finance and Management。
3.	Marginson, S.、van der Wende, M.(2009)。The new global landscape of nations and institutions。Higher education to 2030, Volume 2: Globalization。Paris：Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	校園霸凌防制政策成效評估指標之建構：政策工具之觀點
2.	我國私立大專校院財務預警指標之建構與應用
3.	私立高等教育機構退場法律制度之現況與未來--私人興學自由、大學自治與國家監督之三面關係
4.	高教深耕計畫經費分配與執行現況之研究--以中部某國立大學為例
5.	以大學校務公開資訊探究高教深耕計畫經費核配影響因素
6.	英國高等教育及品質保證制度最近之改革
7.	從消費者導向評鑑觀點論英國大學教學卓越架構之運作與啟示
8.	大學績效薪資制度的發展趨勢及其對我國的啟示
9.	從政策工具選擇省思臺灣高等教育治理
10.	臺灣高等技術及職業教育品質保證指標之研究
11.	臺灣高等教育政策依循新自由主義的現象與缺失
12.	英國高等教育招收國際學生政策之探討
13.	英國高等教育市場化之研究：財政觀點
14.	InnoSchool特優獎得獎校長經費資源取得之個案研究
15.	英國女性科技人才培育及其對臺灣之啟示

1.	新自由主義下的高等教育治理－以「我國大學評鑑制度」為例
2.	少子化時代私立學校退場機制與基本權利之保障
3.	邁向世界級大學：行政者對於台灣指標性大學發展動態能力之觀點
4.	歐洲高等教育區之發展─波隆納進程之檢視與評析
5.	我國公立大學預算分配機制與執行成效之研究

1.	歐洲聯盟推動建構共同高等教育政策的發展與挑戰：以英國為例
2.	英國高等教育經營管理
3.	英國高等教育品質保證制度

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫