資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.19.244.187)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
從消費者導向評鑑觀點論英國大學教學卓越架構之運作與啟示
書刊名:
教育政策論壇
作者:
劉秀曦
/
楊瑩
作者(外文):
Liu, Hsiu-hsi
/
Chan, Ying
出版日期:
2018
卷期:
21:4=68
頁次:
頁1-32
主題關鍵詞:
消費者導向評鑑
;
高等教育
;
教學卓越架構
;
Consumer-oriented evaluation
;
Higher education
;
Teaching excellence framework
;
TEF
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:
49
點閱:4
本文旨在從消費者導向評鑑觀點出發,探討英國大學教學卓越架構之方案特色,做為規劃臺灣高等教育評鑑未來發展方向之參考。為達研究目的,本文採用文件分析法與半結構式訪談,訪談對象包括英國大學校長協會主管和受評學校資深教授共六位。最後透過英國實踐經驗,提出四項對臺灣的啟示如下:一、在評鑑方案的核心概念方面,學生中心雖為共同趨勢,但仍應致力於朝建立供應者與消費者平等對話之互動模式邁進;二、在評鑑指標的證據來源方面,宜強化現有國家層級資料庫功能並要求資訊公開,俾協助利害關係人提高決策品質;三、在評鑑對象的範疇界定方面,可考慮將教學與研究表現分開評鑑,藉此凸顯學校特色並協助大學分類與定位;四、在評鑑結果的行政運用方面,英國政府要求大學先證明教學品質後才能調漲學費的作法具參考價值。
以文找文
This study mainly aims, via adopting the methods of document analysis and semi-structured interview, to analyze and review the system of the “Teaching Excellence Framework” in the United Kingdom, from the perspectives of consumer-oriented evaluation. In total, six senior academics and staff in the UK were interviewed. Based upon the explored experiences of the UK, the following four suggestions are proposed for the reference of future reform of the related policies in Taiwan: 1. Although it has been accepted that being student-centered is a common core concept for evaluating programs, there is still a need for an effort to establish the interactive model for balanced dialogue between providers and consumers. 2. The use of the existing quality assured national datasets should be strengthened as the evident source of evaluation indicators, and it can be used to enhance the quality of decisions made by stakeholders. 3. The separation of teaching and research assessments in the UK may be taken into account as a reference in encouraging universities to shape their own unique characters and have their own development plans. 4. The policies of linking the TEF results of the universities to the approval of charging higher tuition fees in the U.K. can be a reference of evaluation policies in relation to the application of the evaluation results.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
楊瑩(20041200)。英國高等教育評鑑制度。教育資料集刊,29,437-491。
延伸查詢
2.
Bradley, S.、Kirby, E.、Madriaga, M.(2015)。What students value as inspirational and transformative teaching。Innovations in Education and Teaching International,52(3),231-242。
3.
劉秀曦、楊瑩(20170600)。析論英國高等教育研究經費分配機制之運作及其對我國的啟示。當代教育研究季刊,25(2),77-112。
延伸查詢
4.
Madriaga, M.、Morley, K.(2016)。Awarding teaching excellence: What is it supposed to achieve? Teacher perceptions of student-led awards。Teaching in Higher Education,21(2),166-174。
5.
Skelton, A.(2007)。Understanding teacher excellence in higher education。British Journal of Educational Technology,38(1),171-183。
6.
Wespel, J.、Orr, D.、Jaeger, M.(2013)。The implications of excellence in research and teaching。Journal of International Higher Education,72,13-15。
7.
王文科、王智弘(20100600)。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報,17,29-50。
延伸查詢
研究報告
1.
Forstenzer, J.(2016)。The teaching excellence framework: What's the purpose?。The Crick Center: Center for Engaged Philosophy and the University of Sheffield。
2.
Gibbs, G.、Hillman, N.(2016)。Response to the higher education green paper。
3.
Gunn, V.、Fisk, A.(2013)。Considering teaching excellence in higher education: 2007-2013。
4.
National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education(1997)。Higher education in the learning society。
5.
Trendence UK(2017)。Teaching excellence: The student perspective。
圖書
1.
Rapley, Tim(2007)。Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis。Sage Publications Ltd.。
2.
Shadish, W. R.、Cook, T. D.、Leviton, L. C.(1991)。Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories of Practice。Sage。
3.
Alkin, M. C.(2004)。Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists' Views and Influences。Sage。
4.
Brusoni, M.、Damian, R.、Sauri, J. G.、Jackson, S.、Kömürcügil, H.、Malmedy, M.、Matveeva, O.、Motova, G.、Pisarz, S.、Pol, P.、Rostlund, A.、Soboleva, E.、Tavares, O.、Zobel, L.(2014)。The concept of excellence in higher education。Brussels:European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education。
5.
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills(2016)。Success as a knowledge economy: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice。
6.
Donaldson, S. I.(2013)。The future of evaluation in society: A tribute to Michael Scriven。Charlotte, NC:Information。
7.
Gibbs, G.(2010)。Dimensions of quality。
8.
Land, R.、Gordon, G.(2015)。Teaching excellence initiatives: Modalities and operational factors。
9.
Minichiello, V.、Aroni, R.、Hays, T.(2008)。In-depth interviewing: Principles, techniques, analysis。Frenchs Forest:Pearson Education Australia。
10.
Stufflebeam, D. L.、Shinkfleld, A. J.(2007)。Evaluation theory, models, and applications。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。
11.
Bogdan, R. C.、Biklen, S. K.(2007)。Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods。Pearson。
單篇論文
1.
Greatbatch, D.,Holland, J.(2016)。Teaching quality in higher education: Literature review and qualitative research,http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/21253/1/he-teaching-quality-literature-review-qualitative-research.pdf。
2.
Stark, P. B.,Freishtat, R.(2014)。An evaluation of course evaluations,https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/evaluations14.pdf。
其他
1.
Department for Education(2016)。Teaching excellence framework: Year 2 specification,https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20170517113229/https:/www.gov.uk/government/publications/teaching-excellence-framework-year-2-specification, 。
2.
Department for Education(2017)。Teaching excellence and student outcomes framework specification,https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/658490/Teaching_Excellence_and_Student_Outcomes_Framework_Specification.pdf, 。
3.
Department for Education(2018)。Teaching excellence and student outcomes framework: Subject-level,https://consult.education.gov.uk/higher-education-reform/teaching-excellence-and-student-outcomes-framework/supporting_documents/Teaching%20Excellence%20and%20Student%20Outcomes%20Framework%20subjectlevel.pdf。
4.
Grove, J.(2017)。National student survey 2017: Campus omitted after NUS boycott,https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/national-student-survey-2017-campuses-omitted-after-nus-boycott。
5.
Grove, J.(2017)。Subject-level TEF may mislead students,https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/subject-level-tef-may-mislead-students。
6.
教育部(2015)。104學年度大專校院學雜費審議結果,http://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED2200/News_Content.aspx?n=90774906111B0527&sms=F0EAFEB716DE7FFA&s=81BB8ACD8FB891B1。
延伸查詢
7.
教育部(2016)。105學年度大專校院學雜費審議結果,https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2200/News_Content.aspx?n=90774906111B0527&s=288C1DBD6F32D3DF。
延伸查詢
8.
Bagshaw, A.(2017)。A beginner's guide to the teaching excellence framework,https://wonkhe.com/blogs/a-beginners-guide-to-the-teaching-excellence-framework/。
9.
Bagshaw, A.,Morris, D.(2016)。Fun with flags: How metrics will work in TEF outcomes,https://wonkhe.com/blogs/policy-watch-fun-with-flags-the-role-of-metrics-in-tef-outcomes/。
10.
Barre, E.(2015)。Do student evaluations of teaching really get an "F"?,http://cte.rice.edu/blogarchive/2015/07/09/studentevaluations。
11.
Hammonds, W.(20170622)。Teaching excellence framework: What can we learn from the results?,http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/blog/Pages/Teaching-Excellence-Framework-what-can-we-learn-from-the-results.aspx。
12.
Havergal, C.(2015)。TEF metrics plan attacked by academics,https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/tef-metrics-plan-attacked-academics。
13.
Havergal, C.(2017)。House of Lords rejects plans to link TEF results to tuition fees,https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/house-lords-rejects-plans-link-tef-results-tuition-fees。
14.
Higher Education Funding Council for England(2017)。New assessment highlights excellence of teaching and learning across UK universities and colleges,http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/newsarchive/2017/Name,114556,en.html。
15.
Higher Education Funding Council for England(2017)。About the TEF: Frequently asked questions about the TEF,https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/teaching/。
16.
Higher Education Policy Institute(2015)。2015 HEPI-HEA student academic experience survey,http://www.hepi.ac.uk/2015/06/04/2015-academic-experience-survey/。
17.
Higher Education Statistic Agency(2017)。The higher education classification of subjects (HECoS),https://www.hesa.ac.uk/innovation/hecos。
18.
Marginson, S.(2017)。Performance management is here to stay, but TEF needs a rethink,https://wonkhe.com/blogs/comment-tef-shows-performance-management-is-here-to-stay-but-how-it-works-can-change。
19.
National Union of Students(2015)。Quality doesn't grow on fees: NUS response to the Green Paper,https://www.nusconnect.org.uk/resources/quality-doesn-t-grow-on-fees-nus-response-to-he-green-paper, 。
20.
Office for Students(2018)。2018 TEF awards highlight excellence across all areas of the higher education sector,https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/news-blog-and-events/news-and-blog/2018-tef-awards-highlight-excellence-across-all-areas-of-the-higher-education-sector/。
21.
Parr, C.(2017)。Subject-level TEF gets frosty reception from the HE sector,https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/subject-level-tef-gets-frosty-reception-he-sector。
22.
Powell, N.(2018)。Subject-level TEF's good intentions could have unintended consequences,https://wonkhe.com/blogs/subject-level-tefs-good-intentions-could-have-unintended-consequences/。
23.
Scott, P.(20151102)。Three reasons why the teaching excellence framework won't work,https://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/nov/02/why-teaching-excellence-framework-tef-metrics-university-fees。
24.
SOAS(2017)。TEF: London, we have a problem,https://www.soas.ac.uk/blogs/study/tef-london-problem/。
圖書論文
1.
Fitzgerald, T.(2012)。Documents and documentary analysis: Reading between the lines。Research methods in educational leadership and management。London:Sage。
2.
Stufflebeam, D. L.、Coryn, C. L. S.(2014)。14. Michael Scriven's consumer-oriented approach to evaluation。Evaluation theory, models, and applications。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。
3.
Scriven, M.(1967)。The methodology of evaluation。Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation。Rand McNally。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
室內棒壘球訓練場營運模式之初探
2.
社工運用充權觀點於就業服務之經驗分析--以經濟弱勢單親婦女為例
3.
ADHD中輟復學生於安心學園之自我探索與成長經驗研究
4.
探究與實作應用於技專校院專題製作課程教學模式之研究
5.
智能障礙者家屬使用長照資源對其照顧影響之研究
6.
第二專長教師投入生活科技教育之動機、課程意識建構與教學實踐初探
7.
部落文化健康站的照顧實踐與服務困境之研究:一個實務工作者的反思
8.
芬蘭學前課程綱要修訂機制之探究
9.
聽覺障礙中學生運用平板學習地理閱讀之行動研究
10.
消防專技人員執行建築物消防安全設備竣工查驗主要退件原因之探討--以彰化縣為例
11.
實施素養導向體育教學於小學高年級之行動研究
12.
遲語兒母親教養信念及策略之個案研究
13.
埔里鎮地方特色餐飲業:文化性演替下之產業永續發展脈絡分析
14.
師資職前教師專業素養與課程基準之建構及其運用
15.
以大學校務公開資訊探究高教深耕計畫經費核配影響因素
1.
台灣刑事警察查緝重大毒品犯罪策略與工作模式之建構
2.
公共圖書館推展家庭學習方案之研究:以國立臺灣圖書館為例
3.
從Bateson遊戲理論觀點探討不同族裔組合之幼兒於假裝遊戲之信號及後設溝通內涵
4.
中國大陸小學班主任培育課程之研究
5.
大學生網路霸凌倫理判斷歷程之探究
6.
上海地區家事調解社會工作專業知能建構之行動研究
7.
戰後嬰兒潮世代的族群意識-集體記憶框架的分析及其對成人教育的啟示
8.
國小普通班教師推行融合教育之課程轉化與教學實踐研究
9.
幼兒園教師文化知覺、教師專業承諾與學校效能關係之探究
10.
中國大陸高校校辦產業之研究
11.
我國機構式照顧服務員職能模型建構及對長期照顧培育課程之啟示
12.
雙生涯家庭夫妻家庭角色分工與調適之研究
13.
禪修正念對從事高等教育工作者影響之研究
14.
波隆納歷程下英國高等教育制度之變革
15.
我國大學校院學生評鑑制度後設評鑑檢核表建構之研究
1.
英國高等教育品質保證制度
2.
歐盟高等教育品質保證制度的建購與推動情形
3.
[歐盟高等教育品質保證制度]緒論
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code