:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Crafting the Self through Losing the Self: Exploring Xunzi's Ideal Self and the Role of Others
書刊名:東吳哲學學報
作者:王華
作者(外文):Wang, Ellie Hua
出版日期:2017
卷期:36
頁次:頁59-101
主題關鍵詞:荀子化性自主自我XunziRitualsMoral transformationAutonomySelf
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:12
本文探究荀子對理想自我和自我轉化的看法,以及自我與他人在這個看法中扮演的角色。筆者指出儒家自我「社會面向」與「反思行動者面向」兩者之間存在的緊張關係,並檢視鄧小虎 (2012) 對禮與社群在自我轉化中角色的論述,藉對其所牽涉到「自主」問題的探討,進一步發展筆者對《荀子》中理想自我與自我轉化的詮釋,以及自我兩個面向間的關係。《荀子》中理想自我涉及的自主並不在強調「獨立」與「自我控制」,而在於對自我加工,創造出一個美好的、與他人緊密相連的自我。筆者指出:自我轉化是透過個人在三個意義下失去自我而與他人連結而達成。
This paper explores Xunzi's account of the ideal self and self-transformation, as well as the roles the self and others play in this account. I first introduce two aspects of the Confucian self, the social aspect and what I call the "reflective agent" aspect, and an apparent tension between them. I then examine Tang (2012)'s account of the roles rituals and community play in self-transformation, and explore the possible tension between these two aspects of the self in this account by addressing the issue of autonomy. I argue that Xunzian autonomy should be understood as a kind of "substantive self-correction", which is different from "autonomy as the modern ideal" and from the form Tang developed (I call it "substantive self-control"). Moreover, I argue that the characteristics often emphasized in the idea of autonomy such as independence and self-control are not ultimate goals of the Xunzian self-transformation. Indeed, as we will see, even though Xunzi emphasizes the reflective capacity of the heartmind, his concern is not so much with the complete control of the self or one's life; rather, it is to craft the self into a beautiful and substantially (instead of merely normatively) other-related existence. I argue that, in this self-crafting process one unavoidably loses oneself in various senses. We can say that Xunzi's self-transformation is through self-loss and the connectedness to others. The tension between the self and others, between the two aspects of the self, is positive and necessary for self-transformation and the ideal self.
期刊論文
1.Fingarette, Herbert(1979)。The Problem of the Self in the Analects。Philosophy East and West,29(2),129-140。  new window
2.Herr, Ranjoo Seodu(2003)。Is Confucianism Compatible with Care Ethics? A Critique。Philosophy East & West,53(4),471-489。  new window
3.Cua, Antonio S.(1979)。Dimensions of Li (Propriety): Reflections on an Aspect of Hsün Tzu's Ethics。Philosophy East and West,29(4),373-394。  new window
4.Ames, R. T.(2010)。Achieving Personal Identity in Confucian Role Ethics: Tang Junyi on Human Nature as Conduct。Oriens Extremus,49,143-166。  new window
5.Chan, J.(2002)。Moral Autonomy, Civil Liberties, and Confucianism。Philosophy East and West,52(3),281-310。  new window
6.De Greek, M.、Shi, Zhenhao、Wang, Gang、Zuo, Xiangyu、Yang, Xuedong、Wang, Xiaoying、Northoff, Georg、Han, Shihui(2012)。Culture Modulates Brain Activity during Empathy with Anger。Neuroimage,59(3),2871-2882。  new window
7.Han, S.、Northoff, G.(2009)。Understanding the Self: A Cultural Neuroscience Approach。Progress in brain Research,178,203-212。  new window
8.Railton, P.(1984)。Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality。Philosophy and Public Affairs,13(2),134-171。  new window
9.鄧小虎(2012)。Self and Community in the Xunzi。Frontiers of Philosophy in China,7(3),455-470。  new window
10.楊儒賓(2016)。恍惚的倫理儒家觀想功夫論之源。中國文化,1,3-22。  延伸查詢new window
11.馮耀明(20050700)。荀子人性論新詮:附〈榮辱〉篇23字衍之糾謬。國立政治大學哲學學報,14,169-230。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Williams, Bernard(1981)。Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973-1980。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Des Pres, T.(1976)。The Survivor. An Anatomy of Life in the Death Camps。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Hutton, E. L.(2014)。Xunzi: The Complete Text by Xunzi。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
4.Knoblock, J.、Zhang, J.(2003)。大中華文庫漢英對照----- 荀子。湖南:湖南人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lau, D. C.(1992)。The Analects。Hong Kong:The Chinese University Press。  new window
6.Iiu, J.-L.(2006)。An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: from Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism。Oxford:Blackwell Publisher。  new window
7.鄧小虎(2015)。荀子的為己之學:從性惡到養心以誠。北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.杜維明(1985)。Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation。New York:SUNY Press。  new window
9.Wiesel, E.(1969)。Night。New York:Avon Books。  new window
10.Chong, Kim-Chong(2007)。Early Confucian Ethics: Concepts and Arguments。Open Court。  new window
其他
1.Christman, J.(2015)。Autonomy in Moral and Political Philosophy,https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/autonomy-moral/。  new window
圖書論文
1.信廣來(2004)。Conception of the Person in Early Confucian Thought。Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Kupperman, Joel J.(2004)。Tradition and Community in the Formation of Character and Self。Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self Autonomy, and Community。Cambridge University。  new window
3.Chen, C.-Y.(2004)。A Theory of Confucian Selfhood: Self-Cultivation and Free Will in Confucian Philosophy。Confucian Ethics, A. Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy and Community。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Chon, K.-C.(2003)。Autonomy in the Analects。The Moral Circle and the Self: Chinese and Western Approaches。Chicago:Open Court。  new window
5.Fingarette, H.(1991)。Comment and Response。Rules, Rituals and Responsibilities。La Salle, IL:Open Court。  new window
6.Hutton, E. L.(2016)。Xunzi on Moral Psychology。Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Xunzi。Dordrecht:Springer。  new window
7.Rosemont, H.(1994)。Why Take Rights Seriously? A Confucian Critique。Human lights and the World's Religions, Boston University Studies in Philosophy and Religion。Notre Dame, Ind.:Notre Dame University Press。  new window
8.Munro, Donald J.(1996)。A Villain in the Xunzi。Chinese Language, Thought, and Culture: Nivison and His Critics。Open Court。  new window
9.Nivison, D. S.(2000)。Xunzi and Zhuang。Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the "Xunzi"。Indianapolis, IN:Hackett。  new window
10.Railton, P.(2006)。Normative Guidance。Oxford Studies in Metaethics。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
11.Rosemont, H.(2004)。Whose Democracy? Which Rights? A Confucian Critique of Modem Western Liberalism。Confucian Ethics, A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy and Community。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Van Norden, B.(2000)。Mengzi and Xunzi: Two Views of Human Agency。Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the "Xunzi"。Indianapolis, IN:Hackett。  new window
13.Wong, David B.(2000)。Xunzi on Moral Motivation。Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi。Hackett。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE