:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:賽夏語疑問詞及其疑問範疇研究
書刊名:清華學報
作者:葉美利 引用關係
作者(外文):Yeh, Marie Meili
出版日期:2018
卷期:48:3
頁次:頁595-629
主題關鍵詞:賽夏語疑問詞構詞概念疑問動詞SaisiyatInterrogative wordsMorphologyConceptInterrogative verbs
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:48
  • 點閱點閱:6
本文透過構詞分析探討賽夏語疑問詞所表達的語意範疇,含基本語意範疇涵蓋哪些以及範疇間的關聯性為何。研究發現賽夏語的基本疑問範疇包含人、物、空間、動作與數量。表空間概念的處所疑問詞除了能與不同表路徑與靜態空間概念的詞彙前綴結合表達更細緻的處所疑問之外,並能透過加綴衍生時間疑問詞與方式疑問詞,選擇疑問詞亦是以空間為本透過語用推論(pragmatic inference)延伸而來。疑問動詞在世界語言少見(Hagège 2008),凸顯動作疑問這個概念鮮以單純詞表示,但賽夏語存有詢問動作的疑問詞powa',且表示原因與目的的疑問詞皆是由此動作疑問詞經由隱喻或轉喻發展而來。動作這個概念在賽夏語的獨立性亦展現在數量的疑問:賽夏語以黏著疑問詞-pilaz詢問與動作相關的數概念。
This paper deals with the concepts questioned by interrogative words in Saisiyat, a Formosan language spoken in the northwestern mountainous area of Taiwan. Through morphological decomposition, it is found that the conceptual domains under question include person, object, space, action, and quantity. Spatial interrogative words are combined with morphemes denoting such concepts as source, goal, or path to express specific questions concerning location. In addition, selection, time, and manner interrogative words are derived from spatial interrogative words via metonymic pragmatic inference and metaphoric extension. Although interrogative verbs are reported to be rare in world languages (Hagège 2008), action and quantity interrogative words in Saisiyat manifest themselves as verbs. From the action domain, question words for purpose and cause are derived. The status of action as an independent category is also evident in question words for quantity, where Saisiyat sets aside a bound morpheme, -pilaz, to form questions concerning actions or events.
期刊論文
1.Diessel, Holger(2003)。The relationship between demonstratives and interrogatives。Studies in Language,27(3),635-655。  new window
2.Hopper, Paul J.、Thompson, Sandra A.(1984)。The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar。Language,60(4),703-752。  new window
3.葉美利、高清菊(20110300)。賽夏族語詞典編輯的語義分析問題。臺灣語文研究,6(1),189-210。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃美金(20011000)。Focus System of Mayrinax Atayal: A Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspective。師大學報. 人文與社會科學類,46(1/2),51-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.葉美利(20140300)。賽夏語指示詞的句法、構詞與語意初探。臺灣語文研究,9(1),55-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡維天(2007)。重溫「為什麼問怎麼樣,怎麼樣問為什麼」--談漢語疑問句和反身句中的內、外狀語。中國語文,31,195-207。  延伸查詢new window
7.Cysouw, Michael(2007)。Content Interrogatives in Pichis Ashéninca: Corpus Study and Typological Comparison。International Journal of American Linguistics,73(2),133-163。  new window
8.Hagège, Claude(2008)。Towards a Typology of Interrogative Verbs。Linguistic Typology,12(1),1-44。  new window
9.San Roque, L.(2016)。'Where' Questions and Their Responses in Duna (Papua New Guinea)。Open Linguistics,2(1),85-104。  new window
10.Tsai, Cheng-yu Edwin(2008)。Wh-interrogatives in Saisiyat and Lexical Merger Parameter。USTWPL,4,117-131。  new window
11.蔡維天(2011)。從「這話從何說起?」說起。語言學論叢,43,194-208。  延伸查詢new window
12.齊莉莎、鄧芳青、費羅禮(20101000)。Reconstruction of '2' in PAN and Related Issues。語言暨語言學,11(4),853-884。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.葉美利、何清輝(2015)。卓社布農語的數詞初探。「第九屆臺灣文化國際學術研討會『跨越與創新:新視域下的臺灣語言、文學與文化研究』,國立臺灣師範大學主辦 。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cysouw, Michael(2004)。Interrogative Words: An Exercise in Lexical Typology。The Workshop 'Bantu Grammar: Description and Theory 3: Session on Question Formation in Bantu',(會議日期: 2004/02/13)。Berlin。  new window
3.Cysouw, Michael(2005)。The Typology of Content Interrogatives。The 6th Meeting of the Association for Linguistic Typology,(會議日期: 2005/07/24)。Padang。  new window
4.Lu, Louis W.、Su, Lily I.(2003)。From Main Verb, Verb Aspect to Current Relevant State: A Case Study on the Grammaticalization of Saisiyat Polysemous ila。The Second Workshop on Formosan Languages: On the Notion of "Verb" in Formosan Languages,(會議日期: 2003/11/01-2003-11/02)。Taipei:Institute of Linguistics, Preparatory Office, Academia Sinica。  new window
學位論文
1.高清菊(2009)。賽夏語詞彙的結構與語義研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.周一銘(2008)。賽夏語疑問詞問句及其左緣結構之研究(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lin, Dong-yi(2013)。Interrogative Constructions in Kavalan and Amis(博士論文)。University of Florida,Florida。  new window
4.葉美利(1991)。賽夏語結構(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.葉美利(2003)。賽夏語動詞的語意與語法研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.日智衡(2009)。賽夏族故事劇本。苗栗:苗栗縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
2.Heine, Bernd、Claudi, Ulrike、Hünnemeyer, Friederike(1991)。Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework。University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.Jackendoff, Ray(1983)。Semantics and cognition。Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press。  new window
4.葉美利(2016)。賽夏語語法概論。原住民族委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Traugott, Elizabeth Closs、Dasher, Richard B.(2001)。Regularity in Semantic Change。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Bhat, D. N. S.(1994)。The Adjectival Category: Criteria for Differentiation and Identification。Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company。  new window
7.張永利、潘家榮(2016)。鄒語語法概論。新北市:原住民族委員會。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.李佩容、許韋晟(2016)。太魯閣語語法概論。原住民族委員會。  延伸查詢new window
9.沈文琦(2016)。撒奇萊雅語語法概論。原住民族委員會。  延伸查詢new window
10.何德華、董瑪女(2016)。達悟語語法概論。原住民族委員會。  延伸查詢new window
11.宋麗梅(2016)。賽德克語語法概論。原住民族委員會。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.張永利(20000000)。噶瑪蘭語參考語法。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Lyons, John(1977)。Semantics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.葉美利(20000000)。賽夏語參考語法。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Ross, Malcolm D.(1995)。Reconstructing Proto-Austronesian verbal morphology: evidence from Taiwan。Austronesian Studies Relating to Taiwan。Taipei:Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica。  new window
2.Tai, James H.-Y.(1985)。Temporal sequence and Chinese word order。Iconicity in Syntax。Amsterdam:John Benjamins。  new window
3.葉美利(19950000)。賽夏語的「時制」與「動貌」初探。台灣南島民族母語研究論文集。臺北:教育部教育研究委員會。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.葉美利(2011)。賽夏族語詞典編輯的構詞問題。原住民族語言發展--理論與實務論叢。臺北:行政院原住民族委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bhat, D. N. S.(2000)。Word Classes and Sentential Functions。Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes。Mouton de Gruyter。  new window
6.Clark, Eve V.、Clark, Herbert H.(1978)。Universals, Relativity, and Language Processing。Universals of Human Languages Vol. 1: Method and Theory。Stanford:Stanford University Press。  new window
7.Cuyckens, Hubert(2002)。Metonymy in Prepositions。Perspectives on Prepositions。Tübinge:Niemeyer。  new window
8.黃美金、齊莉莎、葉美莉、張秀絹、吳靜蘭(19990000)。Interrogative Constructions in Some Formosan Languages。中國境內語言暨語言學. 第五輯:語言中的互動。臺北:中研院語言所籌備處。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Ultan, Russell(1978)。Some General Characteristics of Interrogative Systems。Universals of Human Language。  new window
10.Wierzbicka, Anna(2000)。Lexical Prototypes as a Universal Basis for Cross-linguistic Identification of Parts of Speech。Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes。Berlin:De Gruyter。  new window
11.Yeh, Marie Meili(2011)。Nominalization in Saisiyat。Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives。John Benjamins。  new window
12.Zeitoun, Elizabeth(2015)。Chu Tai-hwa and Lalo a tahesh kaybaybaw。A Study of Saisiyat Morphology。Honolulu:University of Hawai'i Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE