臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：情態詞與語氣助詞研究：以漢語與汶水泰雅語為例
作者：余信賢
作者(外文)：Yu, Rex Xin Xian
校院名稱：國立清華大學
系所名稱：語言學研究所
指導教授：蔡維天
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2015
主題關鍵詞：情態詞；語氣助詞；製圖理論；汶水泰雅語；modal；mood particle；Cartographic Approach；Mayrinax Atayal
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:49
本篇論文主要探討漢語以及汶水泰雅語中情態詞與語氣助詞的互動關係。我們建議漢語的應該與汶水泰雅語的asi均應重新分類為示證性情態詞，並與認知性情態詞及義務性有所區分。從製圖理論 (Cinque & Rizzi 2008, Tsai 2010, Tsai & Yang 2014) 觀點出發，藉由觀察漢語以及汶水泰雅語中情態詞與語氣助詞在各種句式中的相容性，區辨示證性與認知性情態詞的差異，並嘗試描繪情態詞與語氣助詞兩大類中各成員彼此相互之間的階層性結構關係。在前人(Tang and Tang 1997, Hsin 2000, Palmer 2001, Butler 2003, Tsai 2010)所建立的基礎上，我們確認了情態詞之間的層系關係，更進一步主張漢語以及汶水泰雅語中的情態詞階層結構為：示證性 > 認知性 > 義務性。藉此，將可清楚說明示證性與認知性的差異以及不一致性之所在。同時，也重新定義漢語的應該與汶水泰雅語的asi在本質上的詮釋。
此一結構更因語氣助詞成員的相異分佈使其在理論的基礎上更加穩固。採取與前人(Tang 1998, Law 2002, Li 2006, Sybesma and Li 2007, Hsieh and Sybesma 2008, Paul 2014) 的分析一致的看法，我們認為各個語氣助詞所衍生的位置高度彼此不同，分佈於大句子(CP)之中。根據大句子分裂假說 (Split-CP Hypothesis, Cinque 1999, Rizzi 2004)，位於高位的情態詞阻擋了相對低位的語氣助詞的向上移動，形成了干涉效應並摧毀了問句的衍生過程。因此，包括漢語的應該、聽說以及汶水泰雅語的asi 與tal-an等示證性詞彙均使問句不合語法。而在漢語的是不是問句及汶水泰雅語中以pisa’ 形成的問句則因位處高位而不受相對地低位的示證性詞彙影響。此外，汶水泰雅語的語氣助詞也因其位處於句末或非句末的自由分佈，以及時而略受情態詞影響的特性，進而啟發我們對於語氣助詞的深入討論。
Instead of traditionally treating certain modals with epistemic interpretation, we suggest that yinggai ‘should’ in Mandarin Chinese (MC) and asi ‘seemingly’ in Mayrinax Atayal (MA) be re-categorized as evidential modals. Under Cartography Approach (Cinque & Rizzi 2008, Tsai 2010, Tsai & Yang 2014), we try to build a hierarchical structure involving modals and mood particles, in terms of their interactions in these two languages. To distinguish evidential modals from others, several clausal constructions and elements are manipulated to figure out the compatibility of these modals in these environments. Following previous assumptions (Tang and Tang 1997, Hsin 2000, Palmer 2001, Butler 2003, Tsai 2010), we also confirm the existence of the rigid ordering among modals. We further claim that the various distributions and co-occurrences of modals signify this restricted ordering: Evidential > Epistemic > Deontic. Given that postulation, we could clearly separate evidential modals from epistemic ones. More importantly, we could re-define the essential interpretations of yinggai ‘should’ in MC and asi ‘seemingly’ in MA, and account for the inconsistency between yinggai ‘should’ and keneng ‘may’ in MC.
This hierarchy can be further verified when we consider the interactions between modals and mood particles. Adopting concepts of previous studies (Tang 1998, Law 2002, Li 2006, Sybesma and Li 2007, Hsieh and Sybesma 2008, Paul 2014), we claim that mood particles are located at divergent positions under Split-CP Hypothesis (Cinque 1999, Rizzi 2004), where higher modals are presumed to block the upward movement of the relatively lower mood particle. Once the intervention effect takes place, the derivation in interrogatives is doom to crash. As a result, evidential expressions, including yinggai ‘should’, tingshuo ‘hearsay’ in MC, asi ‘seemingly’ and tal-an ‘it looks like…’ in MA are predicted to fail in yes/no questions, composed with ma in MC and quw in MA. Thanks to their relatively higher locations, only shi-bu-shi in outer A-not-A question of MC, and mood particle pisa’ in questions of MA are able to undergo movement to Force, regardless of the existence of evidential modals. Sentence final and non-final positioning of particles in MA also provides us another way to consider the formation of particles. Their free distributions are also influenced by the existence of higher modals.
Butler, Jonny. 2003. A minimalist treatment of modality. Lingua 113: 967-996.
Chang, Henry Yungli. 2000. On the epistemic modal hui in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics, Singapore.
___________. 2005. The guest playing host: Adverbial modifiers as matrix verbs in Kavalan. In Hans-Martin Gartner et al. (ed.), Clause Structure and Adjuncts in Austronesian Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp: 43-82.
___________. 2010. On the syntax of adverbial verbs in Formosan languages. In Lisa Travis et al. (ed.), Austronesian Contribution to Theoretical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benja.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-shen. 1991. On the typology of Wh-Questions, Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
_________________. 1997. On The Typology of Wh-questions. New York and London.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
_______________. 2004. Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua, 114: 683-710.
Cinque, Guglielmo and Luigi Rizzi. 2008. The cartography of syntactic structure. Ms.
Drubig, Hans Bernhard. 2001. On the syntactic form of epistemic modality. Ms., University of Tuebingen.
Faller, Martina T. 2002. Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford.
_____________. 2006. Evidentiality below and above speech acts. Ms.
Garrett, Edward John. 2001. Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan, Doctoral dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.
Ghio, Gilbert. 2009. Epistemic might in the interrogative. In R. Salkie, P. Busuttil and J. van der Auwera (ed.), Modality in English: Theory and Description. Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, pp: 145-157.
Goodluck, Helen. 1991. Language Acquisition: A Linguistic Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2006. Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116: 1651-1669.
Hsieh, Chia-Ling (謝佳玲). 2001. Guo yu biao qiang diao de shi yu biao yu duan de hui (國語表強調的"是"與表預斷的"會"), 清華學報 31, 3: 249- 300.new window
______________________. 2002. Modal Verbs in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
Hsieh, Feng-fan. 2005. Atoms and particles. Ms., MIT.
Hsieh, Feng-fan and Sybesma, Rint. 2008. Generative syntax and sentence-final particles in Chinese. In Y. Shen and S. Feng (ed.), Contemporary Linguistic Theories and Related Studies in Chinese. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Hsin, Ai-li (忻愛莉). 1999. Modality in Taiwan Southern Min. Doctoral dissertation, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
Hsin, Ai-li. 2000. Huayu qingtaici de yuyi yu jufa chengfen zhi hudong (華語情態詞的語意與句法成分之互動). 第六屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集.
Holmer, Arthur. 2005. Seediq: Antisymmetry and final particles in a Formosan VOS Language. In Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley and Sheila Ann Dooley (ed.), Verb First: On the syntax of verb-initial languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publising Company, pp: 175-201.
Hu, Ming-yang (胡明扬), 1988. Yu qi zhu ci de yu qi yi yi (语气助词的语气意义), 语言学习 6.
Huang, Lillian M. 1995. A Study of Mayrinax Syntax. Taipei: The Crane Publishing.
______________. 1996. Interrogative constructions in Mayrinax Atayal. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Humanities & Social Science 41: 263-296.
______________. 2001. Focus system of Mayrinax Atayal: A syntactic, semantic and pragmatic perspective. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Humanities & Social Science 46, 1-2: 51-69.
Huang, X.-Y. Kevin. 2007. Initialness of sentence-final particles in Mandarin Chinese. Ms., NTHU.
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press.
Law, Ann. 2001. Syntax of Cantonese sentence-final focus particle tim1. Ms., UCL.
Li, Boya. 2006. Chinese Final Particles and the Syntax of the Periphery. Doctoral dissertation, University Leiden.
Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1982. Male and female forms of speech in the Atayalic group. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 53, 2: 265-304.
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1992. Indefinite Wh in Mandarin Chinese, Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 2:125-155.
Liao, Wei-Wen. 2004. The architecture of aspect and duration. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
Lim, Dongsik. 2011. Temporal and inferential interpretation of Korean direct evidential -te-. In Proceedings of the 47th Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago: Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago.
Lin, Jo-wang and Chih-Chen Jane Tang. 1995. Modals as verbs in Chinese: a GB perspective. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 66: 53-105.
Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2006. Predicate-level aspect and event structure in Mandarin Chinese. Talk at Nanzan University, Nagoya.
___________________. 2007. Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Ms.
___________________. 2011. Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese. Syntax 14, 1: 48-73.
Liu, Dorinda Tsai-hsiu Liu. 2011. Complementation in Three Formosan languages — Amis, Mayrinax Atayal and Tsou. University of Hawai’i PhD dissertation.
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matthewson, L., H. Rullmann and H. Davis. 2006. Evidentials are epistemic modals in St’át’imcets. Paper presented at the 41st International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages. UBC Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, 211-263.
McDowell, Joyce. 1987. Assertion and Modality. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
Munaro, N. and C. Poletto. 2004. Ways of clausal typing. In G. Cocchi and C. Donati, Padova (ed.), Proceedings of the XXIX IGG. Unipress, pp: 87-106.
Nuyts, Jan. 1993. Epistemic modal adverbs and adjectives and the layered representation of conceptual and linguistic structure, Linguistics 31: 933- 969.
Palmer, Frank Robert. 2001. Mood and Modality, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
Papafragou, Anna. 2000. Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier
______________. 2006. Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua 116, 1688-1702.
Paul, Waltraud. 2005. Low IP area and left periphery in Mandarin Chinese. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 33 : 111 -134.
____________.2009. Consistent disharmony: Sentence-final particles in Chinese. Ms.
____________. 2014. Why particles are not particular: Sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68, 1: 77-115.
Peng, li-zhen (彭利贞) and Liu yi-bin (刘翼斌). 2007. Co-occurrence restrictions on modality of "yinggai" and aspect markers. (论“应该”的两种情态与体的同现限制). 語言教學與研究 6: 30-37.
Poletto, Cecilia. and Raffaella Zanuttini. 2010. Sentential particles and semnant movement. In P. Benincà and N. Munaro (ed.), Mapping the Left Periphery. Oxford University Press, pp: 201-227.
Qi, Hu-yang (齐沪扬). 2002. Yuqici Yu Yuqixitong (语气词与语气系统). 安徽教育出版社.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
_________. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp: 281-338.
_________. 2001. On the Position “Int(errogative)” in the Left Periphery of the Clause. In G. Cinque and G. Salvi (ed.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland, pp: 287-296.
_________. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyon: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol.3. New York: Oxford University.
Schaffar, Wolfram and Lansun Chen. 2001. Yes-no questions in Mandarin and the theory of focus. Linguistics 39: 837–870.
Shen, Li. 2004. Aspect agreement and light verb in Chinese: a comparison with Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 309-336.
Simpson, Andrew and Zoe Wu. 2002. IP-raising, tone sandhi and the creation of S-final particles: evidence for cyclic Spell-Out. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11, 1: 67-99.
Sybesma, Rint and Boya Li. 2007. The dissection and structural mapping of Cantonese sentence final particles. Lingua 117: 1739–1783.
Tang, Sze-Wing 1998. Parametrization of Features in Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
Tang, Ting-Chi and Tang Chih-Chen Jane. 1997. Huayu qingtaici xulun (華語情態詞序論), 第五屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集：語文分析組, 台北：世界華文出版社, pp: 175-197.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 1994. On Economizing the Theory of A-Bar Dependencies. Doctoral dissertation. MIT: Cambridge.
_________________. 1999. The hows of why and the whys of how. In Francesca Del Gobbo and Hidehito Hoshi (ed.), UCI Working Papers in Linguistics 5, 155-184.
_________________. 2008. Tense Anchoring in Chinese, Lingua 118: 675–686.
__________________. 2010. Tan Hanyu motaici de fanbu yu quanshi zhi duiyingquanxi (談漢語模態詞的分佈與詮釋之對應關係). 中國語文 336: 208-221.
Tsai, Wei-Tien. Dylan and C.-Y. Helen Yang 2014. Mandarin A-not-A questions revisited: A cartographic analysis. Paper presented at IACL-22 & NACCL-26.
Waldie, Ryan, Tyler Peterson and Scott Mackie 2009. Evidentials as epistemic modals or speech act operators: Testing the tests. In Proceedings of the 14th Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas (WSCLA). Vancouver, BC: UBC Working Papers in Linguistics.
Wu, Chunming. 2013. The Syntax of Linking Constructions in Mayrinax Atayal and Sinvaudjan Paiwan, Doctoral dissertation, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
Yang, Chung-Yu Barry. 2012a. Intervention effects and wh-construals. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21:43-87.
__________________. 2012b. Locating wh-intervention effects at CP. Ms.
Yu, Xin-xian. 2006. Evaluative Adverbs in Mandarin Chinese. MA thesis, National Chung-Cheng University.
__________. 2012. Modals and sentence final particles in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the 7th International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics (TEAL-7). Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima.
__________. 2013a. Modal projections in Mandarin Chinese and Mayrinax Atayal. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Conference of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics (IACL-21) at National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
__________. 2013b. Modals and final particles in Mayrinax Atayal. Paper presented at the 14th National Conference on Linguistics (NCL-14) at National Dong Hwa University, Hualien.
Zhang, Yi-sheng. 2000. Xiandai Hanyu Xuci (现代汉语虚词). 华东师范大学出版社.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：274（臺灣：266，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1430120 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67230039
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上