臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：排灣語疑問詞語意範疇及其延伸途徑
書刊名：臺灣語文研究
作者：謝富惠 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hsieh, Fuhui
出版日期：2019
卷期：14:1
頁次：頁1-44
主題關鍵詞：疑問詞；語意範疇；語意間隙；延伸途徑；類型學；Interrogative words；Semantic domains；Semantic gap；Extension paths；Typology
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:75
  • 點閱點閱:6
疑問詞的主要功能是用來詢問特定範疇中的世界現象，例如，排灣語疑問詞ima「誰」用來詢問「事件參與者」，而'aku「為什麼」則是詢問「理由」或是「原因」。本論文主要目的有二。首先，本論文對排灣語疑問詞的詞類、語意功能、語法行為、以及疑問詞所表徵的語意範疇均做詳細描述與探究。接著，將排灣語疑問詞的語意範疇與亞里斯多德的世界範疇以及Heine et al.（1991）的疑問範疇做一比較，希冀呈現排灣語疑問詞所呈現的語意間隙。本論文的第二個目的是討論排灣語疑問詞的主要延伸途徑，並參照其他台灣南島語言疑問詞之語意延伸現象做類型學上的比較。本研究發現，排灣語疑問詞語意範疇及其語意延伸呈現兩點類型學上獨特之處。排灣語疑問動詞kuda「做什麼」是一個語意重量相當重（semantically heavy）的疑問詞，其所承載的語意範疇不僅限於「動作（ACTION）」，更進一步擴及至「方式（MANNER）」、狀態「（STATE）」以及「影響（AFFECTION）」等範疇。另外一個獨特之處就在於排灣語用同一個疑問詞inu來詢問「空間（PLACE）」以及「選擇（SELECTION）」這兩個範疇的訊息：本論文也從認知語言學的角度，對此現象提出解釋
This paper sets out to investigate the word classes, the semantic domains and the semantic extensions of the Paiwan interrogative words. First, this study examines the semantic domains linguistically manifested in each Paiwan interrogative word and makes a comparison between the findings in the study with Aristotle's ten categories and the domains of interrogative words reported in Heine et al. (1991). The second purpose is to discuss the semantic extensions of each Paiwan interrogative word, and intents to make a typological comparison between what we have observed in this study with those reported in other Formosan languages. This study has found that the semantic domains of the Paiwan interrogative words display two unique typological features. The Paiwan interrogative verb kuda 'do.what', a semantically heavy word, is encoded with various meanings ranging from 'action', to 'manner', 'state' and 'affection'. Moreover, Paiwan uses the same interrogative word inu to elicit information in both domains of 'place' and 'selection'. This paper also provides a cognitive linguistic explanation to such an intriguing phenomenon
期刊論文
1.劉創馥(20100500)。亞里士多德範疇論。臺大文史哲學報，72，67-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李壬癸(20080700)。The Great Diversity of Formosan Languages。語言暨語言學，9(3)，523-546。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Boroditsky, Lera(2001)。Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers' conceptions of time。Cognitive psychology，43(1)，1-22。  new window
4.Chang, Henry Y.(2009)。Adverbial verbs and adverbial compounds in Tsou: a syntactic analysis。Oceanic Linguistics，48(2)，439-476。  new window
5.Levinson, Stephen C.、Kita, Sotaro、Haun, Daniel B. M.、Rasch, Björn H.(2002)。Returning the tables: language affects spatial reasoning。Cognition，84(2)，155-188。  new window
6.Li, Paul Jen-kuei(2016)。Verbs or adverbs in Thao?。Concentric: Studies in Linguistics，42(1)，31-44。  new window
7.Hagège, Claude(2008)。Towards a Typology of Interrogative Verbs。Linguistic Typology，12(1)，1-44。  new window
8.葉美利(20180900)。賽夏語疑問詞及其疑問範疇研究。清華學報，48(3)，595-629。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Levinson, Stephen C.(1994)。Vision, shape and linguistic description: Tzeltal body-part terminology and object description。Linguistics，32，791-855。  new window
10.Alloway, Tracy Packiam、Corley, Martin(2004)。Speak before you think: The role of language in verb concepts。Journal of Cognition and Culture，4(2)，319-345。  new window
11.Hsieh, Fu-Hui(2016)。On the development of the lexeme aya in Paiwan。Oceanic Linguistics，55(1)，225-245。  new window
12.Lin, Dong-yi(2012)。Interrogative verbs in Kavalan and Amis。Oceanic Linguistics，51(1)，182-206。  new window
13.Starosta, Stanley(19880600)。A Grammatical Typology of Formosan Languages。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊，59(2)，541-576。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Cysouw, Michael(2004)。Interrogative Words: An Exercise in Lexical Typology。The Workshop 'Bantu Grammar: Description and Theory 3: Session on Question Formation in Bantu'，(會議日期: 2004/02/13)。Berlin。  new window
2.Cysouw, Michael(2005)。The Typology of Content Interrogatives。The 6th Meeting of the Association for Linguistic Typology，(會議日期: 2005/07/24)。Padang。  new window
學位論文
1.Chang, Anna Hsiou-chuan(2006)。A Reference Grammar of Paiwan(博士論文)。Australian National University。  new window
2.Lin, Dong-yi(2013)。Interrogative Constructions in Kavalan and Amis(博士論文)。University of Florida，Florida。  new window
圖書
1.Hengeveld, Kess(1992)。Non-verbal Predication: Theory, Typology, Diachrony。Berlin：Mouton de Gruyter。  new window
2.Lakoff, George、Turner, Mark(1989)。More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor。Chicago, Illinois：University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.Heine, Bemd、Claudi, Ulrike、Hunnemeyer, Friederike(1991)。Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework。University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Ernst, Thomas(2002)。The Syntax of Adjuncts。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.LEVINSON, STEPHEN C.(2003)。Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Fauconnier, Gilles、Turner, Mark(2003)。The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities。Basic Books。  new window
7.吳靜蘭(20180000)。阿美語語法概論。新北市：原住民族委員會。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.李佩容、許韋晟(2018)。太魯閣語法概論。台北：原住民族委員會。  延伸查詢new window
9.張秀絹(20000000)。排灣語參考語法。臺北：遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張秀絹(2018)。排灣語語法概論。台北：原住民族委員會。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃慧娟、施朝凱(20180000)。布農語語法概論。新北：原住民族委員會。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.葉美利(2018)。賽夏語語法概論。原住民族委員會。  延伸查詢new window
13.屈承熹(20100000)。漢語功能篇章語法：從認知、功能到篇章結構。臺北：文鶴。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Lakoff, George、Johnson, Mark(1980)。Metaphors We Live by。University of Chicago Press。  new window
15.Early, Robert、Whitehom, John(2003)。One Hundred Paiwan Texts。Canberra：Australian National University。  new window
其他
1.Aristotle，Edghil, Ella M.(1928)。Categories，http://classics.mit.edu./Aristotle/categories.1.1.html。  new window
2.Aristotle，Marshal, Taylor(2009)。Ten Categories，http://philofbeing.com/2009/07/aristotle%E2%80%99s-ten-categories/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bybee, Joan L.(2003)。Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: the role of frequency。The Handbook of Historical Linguistics。Blackwell。  new window
2.Holmer, Arthur J.(2006)。Seediq-adverbial heads in a Formosan language。Clause Structure and Adjuncts in Austronesian Languages。Mouton de Gruyter。  new window
3.Holmer, Arthur(2010)。Seediq adverbial verbs: a review of the evidence。Austronesian and Theoretical Linguistics。Amsterdam：John Benjamins。  new window
4.Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan、Chang, Melody Yayin(2003)。Two types of wh-adverbials: a typological study of how and why in Tsou。The Linguistic Variations Yearbook。John Benjamins。  new window
5.Chang, Henry Y.(2010)。On the syntax of Formosan adverbial verb constructions。Austronesian and Theoretical Linguistics。John Benjamins。  new window
6.Schachter, Paul(1985)。Parts-of-Speech Systems。Language Typology and Syntactic Description I: Clause Structure。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Barcelona, Antonio(2000)。Introduction: the cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy。Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective。Berlin：Mouton de Gruyter。  new window
8.Traugott, Elizabeth Closs(1995)。Subjectification in grammaticalization。Subjectivity and Subjectivisation。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Chang, Henry Yungli(2006)。The guest playing host: Adverbial modifiers as matrix verbs in Kavalan。Clause structure and adjuncts in Austronesian languages。Berlin：Mouton de Gruyter。  new window
10.Lakoff, George(1993)。The contemporary theory of metaphor。Metaphor and thought。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.黃美金、齊莉莎、葉美莉、張秀絹、吳靜蘭(19990000)。Interrogative Constructions in Some Formosan Languages。中國境內語言暨語言學. 第五輯：語言中的互動。臺北：中研院語言所籌備處。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Boroditsky, Lera(2003)。Linguistic Relativity。Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science。London：MacMillan Press。  new window
13.Brown, Penelope(2008)。Verb specificity and argument realization in Tzeltal child language。Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure。New York：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
14.Lin, Dong-yi(2015)。The syntactic derivations of interrogative verbs in Amis and Kavalan。New Advances in Formosan Linguistics。Canberra：Asia-Pacific Linguistics。  new window
15.Sasse, Hans-Jürgen(1993)。Syntactic phenomena in the world's languages I: Categories and relations。Syntax: An international Handbook of Contemporary Research。Berlin：Walter de Gruyter。  new window
16.Traugott, Elizabeth Closs(2010)。(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: a reassessment。Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization。De Gruyter Mouton。  new window
17.Traugott, Elizabeth Closs(2003)。From subjectification to intersubjectification。Motives for Language Change。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：711（臺灣：698，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67484511
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上