:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:歐盟母性保護制度之經驗分析
書刊名:華岡法粹
作者:陳靜慧 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Ching-hui
出版日期:2019
卷期:66
頁次:頁93-142
主題關鍵詞:母性保護性別實質平等懷孕歧視產假育嬰假性別刻板印象多元性別Maternity protectionSubstantive gender equalityPregnancy discriminationMaternity leaveParental leaveGender stereotypesGender pluralism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:2
期刊論文
1.劉梅君(20020400)。「兩性工作平等法」與「母性保護」--立法之意義、釋疑及理論淺談。律師雜誌,271,13-27。  延伸查詢new window
2.焦興鎧(20020500)。歐洲聯盟家庭照護休假制度之研究。月旦法學,84,102-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.劉梅君(20021000)。兩性工作平等法中「育嬰津貼」的定位及立法意義淺析。萬國法律,125,2-9。  延伸查詢new window
4.McGlynn, Clare(2000)。Ideologies of Motherhood in European Community Sex Equality Law。European Law Journal,6(1),29-44。  new window
5.陳宜倩(20150600)。邁向一個積極對男性倡議的女性主義取徑?:以臺灣「性別工作平等法」育嬰假之理論與實務為例。女學學誌,36,1-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.李庭欣、王舒芸(20131200)。「善爸」甘休?「育爸」不能?與照顧若即若離的育嬰假爸爸。臺大社會工作學刊,28,93-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳昭如(20161100)。從義務到權利:新舊母性主義下母性保護制度的轉向與重構。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,45(特刊),1095-1162。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.李玉春(20120300)。我國懷孕歧視司法實務問題之研究。法令月刊,63(3),46-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.蔡培元(20170900)。由國際比較觀點檢視我國的幼兒照顧休假政策。社區發展季刊,159,110-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Baird, M.、O'Brien, M.(2015)。Dynamics of parental leave in Anglophone countries: the paradox of state expansion in liberal welfare regimes。Community, Work & Family,18(2),198-217。  new window
11.Fegan, Elieen(1996)。"Ideology" after "Discourse": A Reconceptualization for Feminist Analyses of Law。JOURNAL OF LAW AN SOCIETY,23(2),173-197。  new window
12.Fredman, Sandra(2014)。Reversing roles: bringing men into the frame。International Journal of Law in Context,10(4),442-459。  new window
13.Hervey, Tamara、Shaw, Jo(1998)。Women, Work and Care: Women's Dual Role and Double Burden in EC Sex Equality Law。Journal of European Social Policy,8(1),43-63。  new window
14.Suk, Julie C.(2010)。Are Gender Stereotypes Bad for Women? Rethinking Antidiscrimination Law and Work-Family Conflict。Columbia Law Review,110(1),1-69。  new window
15.Mulderat, Jule(2018)。Promoting substantive gender equality through the law on pregnancy discrimination, maternity and parental leave。European Equality Law Review,1,39-49。  new window
16.Timmer, Alexandra(2015)。Judging Stereotypes: What the European Court of Human Rights Can Borrow from American and Canadian Equal Protection Law。Am. J. Comp. Law.,63(1),239-284。  new window
17.Timmer, Alexandra(2016)。Gender Stereotyping in the case law of the EU Court of Justice。European Equality Law Review,1,37-46。  new window
18.Rubenstein, Michael(2015)。Recent and Current Employment Discrimination Cases in the Court of Justice of the European Union。The Equal Right Review,15,57-74。  new window
19.徐婉寧(20180400)。論臺灣女性勞工之產假制度。月旦醫事法報告,18,7-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.鄭津津(20180700)。懷孕歧視。月旦法學教室,189,29-32。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Jarass, Hans D.(2016)。Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union, Kommentar。  new window
單篇論文
1.Eurofound(2015)。Maternity Leave Provisions in the EU Member States: Duration and Allowances,Luxembourg:Publications Office of the European Union。  new window
2.Mills, Melinda,Tsang, Flavia,Prag, Patrick,Ruggeri, Kai,Miani, Celine,Hoorens, Stijn(2014)。Gender Equality in the Workforce: Reconciling work, private and family life in Europe,European Union。  new window
其他
1.(20170511)。立委提案產假延長勞部投反對票,https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20170511000364-260114?chdtv。  延伸查詢new window
2.李秉芳(20170920)。「台灣女性就業、生育率「雙低」 33國排名墊底,https://www.peoplenews.tw/news/9b01300a-0bd5-4daa-aa52-9da4b5a74399。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.吳秦雯、洪德欽、陳淳文(2015)。歐盟平等權保護中之積極平權措施。歐盟法之基礎原則與實務發展。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.Burri, Susanne(2015)。Parents who want to reconcile work and care: which equality under EU law?。Equality and Human Rights: Nothing but Trouble? Liber amicorum Titia Loenen。  new window
3.MacKinnon, A. Catharine(1987)。On Exceptionality: Women as Women in Law。Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law。London:Harvard University Press。  new window
4.MacKinnon, A. Catharine(1987)。Difference and Dominance: One Sex Discrimination。Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law。London:Harvard University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE