臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：「善爸」甘休？「育爸」不能？與照顧若即若離的育嬰假爸爸
書刊名：臺大社會工作學刊
作者：李庭欣／王舒芸
作者(外文)：Li, Ting-hsin／Wang, Shu-yung
出版日期：2013
卷期：28
頁次：頁93-135
主題關鍵詞：育嬰假爸爸；性別角色期待；照顧圖像；請領動機；Parental leave fathers；Gender role expectation；Caring experiences；Application motivation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(16) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:16
  • 共同引用共同引用:351
  • 點閱點閱:250
本研究關注於臺灣社會中仍屬少數的育嬰假爸爸，希望透過瞭解他們的請領動機與育兒行為，作為未來提升男性參與照顧時的參考。 研究發現主要分為兩大主軸。首先「善爸」甘休，發現促使男性請育嬰假的因素大致可分別為「個人」、「家庭」、「社會環境」、「職業結構」及「時機出現與問題浮現」等五大因素，彼此間具有層級關係，因此導致部分父親是「想要請領」，有些則是「需要請領」，更有些是「不得不請領」。 第二部分「育爸」不能，點出育爸即使請了育嬰假，仍未能成為主要照顧者，其生活擁有彈性的時間分配，同時在家務與照顧工作上也有較大的豁免權與協商權，使照顧像一場接力賽，隨時有人可接手，一起完成。 整體來說，傳統社會對性別角色的刻板印象仍緊緊鑲嵌在社會結構中，無形中箝制著個人的行為，本質上仍期待男性成為養家者，女性則為照顧者，也因不同的角色期待，所以同樣的照顧工作，對不同的性別則有不同的標準。即使育爸做出了不同於當代多數男性的選擇，但在改變的同時，某部分的態度與行為實際上仍隱含著傳統思維的運作模式。
Taiwan’s Parental Leave policy was set up in 2002, and most of the applicants are still women. Even though the parental leave allowance has been provided since 2009, the duty of care is still mostly undertaken by women. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to understand the motivations and model of care of fathers who take parental leave. This study uses qualitative research and then interviews nine parental leave fathers to find two main points. First, there is a hierarchical relationship among the main five factors for taking parental leave, including “personal”, “family”, “social environment”, “occupational structure” and “the emergence of the problem”. These factors make some fathers “want to” take, others “need to” take, and others “have to” take parental leave. Second, parental leave fathers differ from mothers who are often responsible for the same care work at home. Because fathers can use their time flexibly, they can also clearly separate care work and house work, whereas mothers need to take them all. For most parental leave fathers, caring for a child is just like a relay race, because they can easily pass the baton to the next person. In other words, parental leave fathers still fail to become the primary caregiver, even when they apply for parental leave. Overall, the traditional social stereotypes of gender roles are still firmly embedded in the social structure and they also shape personal behavior. This therefore has a great influence on expecting men to become the breadwinners and expecting women to become the caregivers.
期刊論文
1.天下雜誌(2011)。從我們到我們－重新定義群我關係。天下雜誌，486，54-58。  延伸查詢new window
2.杜宜展(20061200)。家庭類型、幼兒父親個人因素及父職參與意願之研究。國民教育研究集刊，15，225-250。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳思璇(20080200)。談父親角色與影響其參與的因素。教師之友，49(1)，60-70。  延伸查詢new window
4.Almqvist, A.-L.、Sandberg, A.、Dahlgren, L.(2011)。Parental leave in Sweden: Motives, experiences, and gender equality amongst parents。Fathering，9(2)，189-206。  new window
5.Bjørnholt, M.(2010)。Like father, like son? The transmission of values, family practices, and work-family adaptations to sons of work-sharing men。Fathering，8(3)，276-299。  new window
6.Brandth, B.、Kvande, E.(2009)。Norway: The making of the father’s quota. The politics of parental leave policies: Children, parenting, gender and the labour market (vol12，191-206。  new window
7.Catlett, B. S.、McKenry, P. C.(2004)。Class-based masculinities: Divorce, fatherhood, and the hegemonic ideal。Fathering，2(2)，165-190。  new window
8.Doucet, A.(2004)。It’s almost like I have a job, but I don’t get paid”: Fathers at home reconfiguring work, care, and masculinity。Fathering，2(3)，277-303。  new window
9.Garbarino, J.(2000)。The soul of fatherhood。Marriage and Family Review，29(2/3)，11-21。  new window
10.Hobson, B.、Fahlén, S.(2009)。Competing scenarios for European fathers: Applying Sen’s capabilities and agency framework to work-family balance。The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science，624(1)，214-233。  new window
11.Hobson, B.、Fahlén, S.、Takács, J.(2011)。Agency and capabilities to achieve a work-life balance: A comparison of Sweden and Hungary。Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society，18(2)，168-198。  new window
12.Hook, J. L.(2006)。Care in context : men's unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965-2003。American Sociological Review，71(4)，639-660。  new window
13.Iversen, T.、Rosenbluth, F.(2006)。The political economy of gender: Explaining crossnational variation in the gender division of labor and the gender voting gap。American Journal of Political Science，50(1)，1-19。  new window
14.Jesmin, S. S.、Seward, R. R.(2011)。Parental leave and fathers’ involvement with children in Bangladesh: A comparison with United States。Journal of Comparative Family Studies，42(1)，95-112。  new window
15.Keshet, H. F.、Rosenthal, K. M.(1978)。Fathering after marital separation。Social Work，23(1)，11-18。  new window
16.Lamb, M. E.(2000)。The history of research on father involvement。Marriage and Family Review，29(2)，23-42。  new window
17.Long, S. O.、Harris, P. B.(2000)。Gender and elder care: Social change and the role of the caregiver in Japan。Social Science Japan Journal，3(1)，21-36。  new window
18.Merla, L.(2008)。Determinants, costs, and meanings of belgian stay-at-home fathers: An international comparison。Fathering，6(2)，113-132。  new window
19.Yi, C.、Pan, E.、Chang, Y.、Chan, C.(2006)。parents intergenerational relations of Taiwanese youth。Journal of Family Issues，27(8)，1042-1067。  new window
20.Allen, S. M.、Hawkins, A. J.(1999)。Maternal gatekeeping: Mothers' beliefs and behaviors that inhibit greater father involvement in family work。Journal of Marriage and the Family，61(1)，199-212。  new window
21.Evertsson, M.、Nermo, M.(2004)。Dependence within Families and the Division of Labor: Comparing Sweden and the United States。Journal of Marriage and Family，66(5)，1272-1286。  new window
22.Doherty, W. J.、Kouneski, E. F.、Erickson, M. F.(1998)。Responsible Fathering: An Overview and Conceptual Framework。Journal of Marriage and the Family，60(2)，277-292。  new window
23.毛萬儀、黃迺毓(20100700)。初任父親第一年父職經驗歷程之研究--以六位大專教育程度父親為例。人類發展與家庭學報，12，31-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.涂妙如(20070500)。以生態系統論評析國內近二十年來「父職角色」之研究脈絡。弘光學報，50，199-219。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Daly, K. J.(1993)。Reshaping fatherhood: Finding the models。Journal of Family Issues，14(4)，510-540。  new window
26.林莉菁、鄭麗珍(20011200)。離婚單親父親因應親職與工作角色的探討。社會政策與社會工作學刊，5(2)，113-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.李青芬、唐先梅(20081200)。家務工作研究近30年之回顧。生活科學學報，12，77-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.王叢桂(20000600)。促進參與父職因素的探討。應用心理研究，6，131-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.唐文慧(20111200)。為何職業婦女決定離職？結構限制下的母職認同與實踐。臺灣社會研究，85，201-265。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.王舒芸、余漢儀(19970400)。奶爸難為--雙薪家庭之父職角色初探。婦女與兩性學刊，8，115-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.張晉芬、李奕慧(20070600)。「女人的家事」、「男人的家事」：家事分工性別化的持續與解釋。人文及社會科學集刊，19(2)，203-229。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.South, Scott J.、Spitze, Glenna(1994)。Housework in Marital and Nonmarital Households。American Sociological Review，59(3)，327-347。  new window
33.潘淑滿(20051200)。臺灣母職圖像。女學學誌：婦女與性別研究，20，41-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.呂玉瑕、伊慶春(20051200)。社會變遷中的夫妻資源與家務分工：臺灣七○年代與九○年代社會文化脈絡的比較。臺灣社會學，10，41-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.McBride, Brent A.、Brown, Geoffrey L.、Bost, Kelly K.、Shin, Nana、Vaughn, Brian、Korth, Byran(2005)。Paternal identity, maternal gatekeeping, and father involvement。Family Relations，54(3)，360-372。  new window
研究報告
1.Huerta, M. D. C.、Adema, W.、Baxter, J.、Han, W.(2013)。Fathers’ leave, fathers’ involvement and child development: Are they related? Evidence from four OECD countries。  new window
學位論文
1.方婷玉(2010)。我國育嬰留職停薪津貼政策之探討：以台北縣市女性申請者為例(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.伊慶春、章英華(2008)。父系家庭的持續與變遷。群學爭鳴：臺灣社會學發展史，1945-2005。台北：群學。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱珍琬(2010)。父親形象與其轉變。台北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.Day, R.、Lewis, C.、O’Brien, M.、Lamb, M. E.(2005)。Fatherhood and father involvement: Emerging constructs and theoretical orientations。Sourcebook of family theory and research。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
4.Edley, N.(2001)。Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions。Discourse as data: A guide to analysis。London, England：Sage。  new window
5.Esping(2005)。Putting the horse in front of the cart: Towards a social model for mid-century Europe。Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid lecture 2005。Maarssen, Netherlands：Het Steen Typografie。  new window
6.Hochschild, A.、Machung, A.(1990)。The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home。New York, NY：Viking。  new window
7.Hooyman, N. R.、Gonyea, J.(1995)。The consequences of caring。Feminist perspectives on family care: Policies for gender justice。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
8.Palkovitz, R.(1997)。Reconstructing ‘‘involvement” : Expanding conceptualizations of men’s caring in contemporary families。Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspective。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
9.Pleck, J. H.(2010)。Fatherhood and masculinity。The role of the father in child development。Hoboken, NJ：John Wiley and Sons。  new window
10.Connell, R. W.(2000)。The Men and the Boys。University of California Press。  new window
11.楊國樞(2002)。華人心理的本土化研究。台北：桂冠圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.王舒芸(2003)。新手爸爸難為？。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.Hays, Sharon(1996)。The cultural contradictions of motherhood。Yale University Press。  new window
14.Connell, Raewyn W.(1995)。Masculinities。University of California Press。  new window
其他
1.史倩玲(2012)。性別刻板分工 職業婦女三頭燒，http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-120943。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2013)。「就業保險法」立法紀錄，http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lglaw?@97:1804289383:f:NO%3DB03631*%20AND%20NO%3DA2%24%246$$$PD。  new window
3.行政院主計處(2011)。2010婦女婚育與就業調查，http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=28915andctNode=3303andmp=1。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院勞工委員會(2013)。育嬰留職停薪津貼核付情形，http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/year/year01/d4150.htm。  延伸查詢new window
5.Schulz, W.，Ainley, J.，Fraillon, J.，Kerr, D.，Losito, B.(2010)。ICCS 2009 international report: Civic knowledge, attitudes and engagement among lower secondary school students in thirty-eight countries，http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Electronic_versions/IC CS_2009_International_Report.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.唐文慧(2012)。父職角色與照顧工作。性別向度與臺灣社會。台北：巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Lamb, M. E.、Pleck, J. H.、Charnov, E. L.、Levine, J. A.(1987)。A biosocial perspective on paternal behavior and involvement。Parenting across the life span: Biosocial dimensions。Aldine Transaction。  new window
3.Stoller, P. E.(1992)。Gender differences in the experiences of caregiving spouses。Gender, families, and elder care。Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
4.呂寶靜、陳景寧(19970000)。女性家屬照顧者的處境與福利建構。女性‧國家‧照顧工作。臺北：女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：161（臺灣：161，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1366978 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67163679
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上