:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運用文字探勘於教學評鑑分析之研究--以中原大學資管系課程為例
書刊名:商管科技季刊
作者:吳肇銘 引用關係金志聿蔡毓霖
作者(外文):Wu, Chao-mingChin, Chih-yuTsai, Yu-lin
出版日期:2019
卷期:20:4
頁次:頁437-468
主題關鍵詞:教學評鑑文字探勘意見探勘情緒分析校務研究Teaching evaluationText miningOpinion miningSentiment analysisInstitutional research
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:50
  • 點閱點閱:7
為了校務研究與掌握教學品質,台灣的大專院校已全面實施教學評鑑,然而在教學評鑑資料中,學生回饋的意見往往很多,教學管理單位與教師需花費大量時間逐筆查看,方能了解每位學生的意見,且難以統整。為解決此問題,本研究以103-106年中原大學資訊管理學系必修課程之教學評鑑資料進行分析,透過文字探勘技術分析學生回饋的質化意見,藉由詞頻分析、文字雲分析、情緒分析針對不同屬性的課程(管理類、技術類、實作應用類、理論類、商用類)與低評鑑分數課程進行分析,以了解不同屬性的課程中學生的評價、意見及重視的教學元素。主要研究結論如下:(一)本研究提出之文字探勘分析模式可以有效運用在教學評鑑質化資料之分析,提供老師瞭解學生所重視的教學元素;(二)不同屬性的課程,學生所重視的教學元素有所差異,不同屬性課程的老師可以參考這些教學元素,豐富課程的準備與執行;(三)低評價課程的老師必須根據學生重視的教學元素,更有效地面對與改進教學方式。本研究分析結果將可供學校教學管理單位、系上、教師作為瞭解學生的課程學習意見、學校規劃課程以及老師改善教學內容之參考,以針對學生之學習需要,提高課程教學品質、提升學生的學習成效。
The universities in Taiwan have fully implemented the teaching evaluation for institution research and teaching quality. However, there are too many qualitative data in teaching evaluation from students, the administration and teachers must spend a lot of time and effort on reading each comment to understand students' opinions. It is hard to efficiently explore these opinions and get feedback for teaching. In order to solve this problem, this study adopted the text-mining technology to analyze the teaching evaluation data. Based on the teaching evaluation data of the compulsory courses of Information Management Department, Chung Yuan Christian University from the academic year 2014 to 2017, we use term-frequency method, word-cloud presentation, and sentiment-analysis to analyze the data of 5 types courses (including management, technical, practical, theoretical and business courses) and low evaluation-score courses to understand the critical teaching elements in these courses. The main results are as follows: (1) Teachers can understand the teaching elements which students want and care by the text-mining methodology applied to the qualitative analysis in teaching evaluation; (2) Students focus on different teaching elements by different features of course; (3) Teachers with low evaluation score must change their teaching method according students’ opinions. According the findings of this study, the administration and teachers can effectively understand students opinions about the courses and improve teachers’ teaching quality and students' learning performance.
期刊論文
1.Vincent, F. F.、Kennon, M. S.(2008)。Teacher support, student motivation, student need satisfaction, and college teacher course evaluations: Testing a sequential path model。Educational Psychology,28(6),711-724。  new window
2.Zhang, W.、Yoshida, T.、Tang, X. J.(2011)。A comparative study of TF-IDF, LSI and multi-words for text classification。Expert Systems with Applications,38(3),2758-2765。  new window
3.Salton, Gerard、Buckley, Christopher(1988)。Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval。Information Processing & Management,24(5),513-523。  new window
4.張德勝(20051000)。臺灣地區大學校院「學生評鑑教師教學」制度之研究。師大學報. 教育類,50(2),203-225。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.許誌庭(20091200)。影響學生填答教學意見調查問卷的因素及其實施建議。教育研究與發展期刊,5(4),245-267。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Abrami, P. C.、d'Apollonia, S.、Cohen, P. A.(1990)。Validity of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not。Journal of Educational Psychology,82(2),219-231。  new window
7.Spärck-Jones, Karen(1972)。A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval。Journal of Documentation,28(1),11-21。  new window
8.陳世榮(20151200)。社會科學研究中的文字探勘應用:以文意為基礎的文件分類及其問題。人文及社會科學集刊,27(4),683-718。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳琦媛(20070900)。大學教學評鑑的新途徑--同儕評鑑。評鑑雙月刊,9,21-23。  延伸查詢new window
10.Wibbecke, G.、Kahmann, J.、Pignotti, T.、Altenberger, L.、Kadmon, M.(2015)。Improving teaching on the basis of student evaluation: integrative teaching consultation。GMS Zeitschrift Für Medizinische Ausbildung,32(1),(Doc2)1-(Doc2)8。  new window
11.Flodén, J.(2017)。The impact of student feedback on teaching in higher education。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,42(7),1054-1068。  new window
12.謝元晟、程美華、張光昭(2016)。運用R建立文字探勘平台應用於電視收視率預測。Journal of Data Analysis,11(3),109-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Golding, C.、Adam, L.(2014)。Evaluate to improve: Useful approaches to student evaluation。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,41(1),1-14。  new window
14.Marsh, H. W.(1982)。Validity of students' evaluation of college teachings: A multitrait-multimethod analysis。Journal of Educational Psychology,74,264-279。  new window
15.Medhat, W.、Hassan, A.、Korashy, H.(2014)。Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: A survey。Ain Shams Engineering Journal,5(4),1093-1113。  new window
16.Sencan, H.、Karabulut, A. T.(2015)。Monitoring of educational performance indicators in higher education: A comparison of perceptions。Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice,15(2),359-376。  new window
研究報告
1.王保進、周祝瑛、王輝煌(2011)。獎勵大學教學卓越計畫成效評估 (計畫編號:RDEC-RES-099-023)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林彩雯(2015)。以Google App評論為字詞權重調整之情緒分析系統(碩士論文)。靜宜大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝佩庭(2014)。基於使用者情緒關鍵詞彙之臉書粉絲專頁評論分類與評分系統(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃子嫣(2012)。我國大學校院教學評鑑制度之研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.彭英錡(2018)。文字探勘在學生評鑑教師教學之應用研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.游綉雯(2015)。使用情緒分析於社群論壇消費者評論滿意度評估之研究--以TripAdvisor旅遊網站為例(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.蕭惠如(2017)。應用文字探勘於資訊管理領域研究趨勢(碩士論文)。銘傳大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Liu, B.(2011)。Web Data Mining: Exploring Hyperlinks, Contents, and Usage Data。Springer-Verlag。  new window
2.Han, Jiawei、Kamber, Micheline(2006)。Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques。San Francisco:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers。  new window
3.Sullivan, Dan(2001)。Document Warehousing and Text Mining: Techniques for Improving Business Operations, Marketing, and Sales。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
4.Peterson, Kenneth D.(1995)。Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practices。Corwin Press, Inc.。  new window
5.Salton, Gerald、McGill, Michael J.(1983)。Introduction to modern information retrieval。McGraw-Hill。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE