臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：醫師專業言論理論之限制與司法審查--以美國司法實務為借鏡
書刊名：華岡法粹
作者：許炳華
作者(外文)：Hsu, Pin-hua
出版日期：2021
卷期：70
頁次：頁183-238
主題關鍵詞：言論自由；專業言論；告知後同意；職業自由；專業證照制度；被迫言論；Freedom of speech；Professional speech；Informed consent；Freedom of vocation；Professional licensing；Compelled speech
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:212
  • 點閱點閱:3
期刊論文
1.楊秀儀(20050800)。告知後同意法則之司法實務發展--最高法院九四年臺上字第二六七六號判決評釋。臺灣本土法學雜誌，73，212-214。  延伸查詢new window
2.Nauman, Robert D.(2002)。The Captive Audience Doctrine And Floating Buffer Zones: An Analysis of Hill v. Colorado。Cap. U. L. Rev.，30，769-821。  new window
3.林東茂(20080600)。醫療上病患承諾的刑法問題。月旦法學，157，45-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李建良(20090315)。專門職業人員之依法考選與記帳士之執業資格／釋字第六五五號解釋。臺灣法學雜誌，124，187-194。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳志正(20081100)。誰來說明？對誰說明？誰來同意？--兼評醫療相關法規。月旦法學，162，63-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張陳弘(20180300)。新興科技下的資訊隱私保護：「告知後同意原則」的侷限性與修正方法之提出。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，47(1)，201-297。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林萍章(20081100)。知情同意法則之「見山不是山」--法院近來裁判評釋。月旦法學，162，17-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Bezanson, Randall P.、Buss, William G.(2001)。The Many Faces of Government Speech。Iowa L. Rev.，86，1377+1402-1511。  new window
9.Dolan, Mary Jean(2008)。Why Monuments are Government Speech: The Hard Case of Pleasant Grove City v. Summun。Cath. U. L. Rev.，58，7-53。  new window
10.Lucas, Amy Riley(2008)。Specialty License Plates: The First Amendment and the Intersection of Government Speech and Public Forum Doctrines。UCLA L. Rev.，55(6)，1971-2023。  new window
11.黃昭元(20040500)。憲法權利限制的司法審查標準：美國類型化多元標準模式的比較分析。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，33(3)，45-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Bhagwat, Ashutosh(2017)。When Speech is Not "Speech"。Ohio St. L. J.，78，839-885。  new window
13.Ahmed, Aziza(2015)。Informed Decision Making and Abortion: Crisis Pregnancy Centers, Informed Consent, and the First Amendment。J. L. MED. & ETHICS，43(1)，51-58。  new window
14.Bannon, Patrick(2015)。Intermediate Scrutiny vs. The "Labeling Game" Approach: King v. Governor of New Jersey and the Benefits of Applying Heightened Scrutiny To Professional Speech。J. L. & POL'Y，23，649-688。  new window
15.Blitzs, Marc Jonathan(2016)。Free Speech, Occupational Speech, and Psychotherapy。HOFSTRA L. REV.，44，689-779。  new window
16.Boyd, Thomas H.(1989)。Cost Containment and the Physician's Fiduciary Duty to the Patient。DEPAUL L. REV.，39，131-159。  new window
17.Corbin, Caroline Mala(2009)。The First Amendment Right Against Compelled Listening。B. U. L. REV.，89，939-1016。  new window
18.Dolgin, Janet L.(2014)。Physician Speech and State Control: Furthering Partisan Interests at the Expense of Good Health。NEW ENG. L. REV.，48，293-342。  new window
19.Ehrett, John S.(2018)。Speak No Evil, Do No Harm: A New Legal Standard for Professional Speech Regulation。U. ILL . L. REV. ONLINE，2018，184-193。  new window
20.Gaylord, Scott W.(2015)。Casey and the First Amendment: Revisiting an Old Case to Resolve a New Compelled Speech Controversy。S. C. L. REV.，66，951-986。  new window
21.Gaylord, Scott(2015)。A Matter of Context: Casey and the Constitutionality of Compelled Physician Speech。J. L. MED. & ETHICS，43，351-347。  new window
22.Halberstam, Daniel(1999)。Commercial Speech, Professional Speech, and the Constitutional Status of Social Institutions。U. PA. L. REV.，147，771-874。  new window
23.Haupt, Claudia E.(2016)。Professional Speech。YALE L. J.，125，1238-1303。  new window
24.Haupt, Claudia E.(2018)。The Limits of Professional Speech。YALE L. J. FORUM，128，185-200。  new window
25.Hill, Jessie(2015)。Casey Meets the Crisis Pregnancy Centers。J. L. MED. & ETHICS，43，59-69。  new window
26.Hill, B. Jessie(2018)。Sex, Lies, and Ultrasound。U. COLO. L. REV.，89，421-452。  new window
27.Holtzman, Beth(2017)。Have Crisis Pregnancy Centers Finally Met Their Match: California's Reproductive FACT Act。NW. J. L. & SOC. POL' Y.，12，78-110。  new window
28.Jones, Gregory D.(1998)。Primum Non Nocere: The Expanding "Honest Services" Mail Fraud Statute and the Physician-Patient Fiduciary Relationship。VAND. L. REV.，51，139-182。  new window
29.Jones, Nicole Brown(2014)。Did Fortune Tellers See This Coming? Spiritual Counseling, Professional Speech, And The First Amendment。MISS. L. J.，83，639-670。  new window
30.Keighley, Jennifer M.(2013)。Physician Speech and Mandatory Ultrasound Laws: The First Amendment's Limit on Compelled Ideological Speech。CARDOZO L. REV.，34，2347-2395。  new window
31.Kramer, Sarah(2018)。Not Your Mouthpiece: Abortion, Ideology, and Compelled Speech in Physician-Patient Relationships。U. PA. J. L. & SOC. CHANGE，21，1-26。  new window
32.Kry, Robert(2000)。The "Watchman for Truth": Professional Licensing and the First Amendment。SEATTLE U. L. REV.，23，885-976。  new window
33.McNamara, Robert、Sherman, Paul(2018)。NIFLA v. Becerra: A Seismic Decision Protecting Occupational Speech。CATO SUP. CT. REV.，2018，197-223。  new window
34.Mehlman, Maxwell J.(2012)。Professional Power and the Standard of Care in Medicine。ARIZ. ST. L. J.，44，1165-1235。  new window
35.Moldenhauer, David T.(2006)。Circular 230 Opinion Standards, Legal Ethics and First Amendment Limitations on the Regulation of Professional Speech by Lawyers。SEATTLE U. L. REV.，29，843-915。  new window
36.Parmet, Wendy E.、Smith, Jason A.(2017)。Free Speech and Public Health: Unraveling the Commercial-Professional Speech Paradox。OHIO ST. L. J.，78，887-915。  new window
37.Orentlicher, David(2015)。Abortion and Compelled Physician Speech。J. L. MED. & ETHICS，43，9-22。  new window
38.Post, Robert(2007)。Informed Consent to Abortion: A First Amendment Analysis of Compelled Physician Speech。U. ILL . L. REV.，2007，939-990。  new window
39.Roy, Anna S.(2017)。Constitutional Law--Ninth Circuit Applies Intermediate Scrutiny to Mandated Abortion Clinic Notices。SUFFOLK U. L. REV.，50，771-781。  new window
40.Sawicki, Nadia N.(2010)。Competence, and the Principles of Medical Discipline。J. HEALTH CARE L. & POL' Y，13，285-323。  new window
41.Schutzman, Erika(2015)。We Need Professional Help: Advocating for a Consistent Standard of Review When Regulations of Professional Speech Implicate the First Amendment。B. C. L. REV.，56，2019-2056。  new window
42.Sherman, Paul(2015)。Occupational Speech and the First Amendment。HARV. L. REV. F.，128，183-201。  new window
43.Smolla, Rodney A.(2016)。Professional Speech and the First Amendment。W. VA. L. REV.，119，67-112。  new window
44.Suter, Sonia M.(2015)。The First Amendment and Physician Speech in Reproductive Decision Making。J. L. MED. & ETHICS，43，22-31。  new window
45.Swartz, Martha(2015)。Are Physician-Patent Communications Protected by the First Amendment?。CARDOZO L. REV. DE NOVO，2015，92-104。  new window
46.Wells, Christina E.(1995)。Abortion Counseling As Vice Activity: The Free Speech Implications of Rust v. Sullivan and Planned Parenthood v. Casey。COLUM. L. REV.，95，1724-1763。  new window
47.Zick, Timothy(2015)。Professional Rights Speech。ARIZ. ST. L. J.，47，1289-1360。  new window
48.楊秀儀(20050600)。美國「告知後同意」法則之考察之分析。月旦法學，121，138-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
49.邵惠玲(20101200)。憲法對視障者社會基本權之保障--論釋字第六四九號解釋產生之憲法疑義與因應途徑。月旦法學，187，238-250。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.李建良(20080400)。經濟管制的平等思維--兼評大法官有關職業暨營業自由之憲法解釋。政大法學評論，102，71-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
51.李惠宗(20050100)。職業自由主觀要件限制之違憲審查--司法院大法官釋字第五八四號解釋評析。憲政時代，30(3)，255-293。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳庚(2003)。憲法的解釋與適用。吳庚。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳志正(2006)。解讀醫病關係I：醫療契約篇。元照出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.CHEMERINSKY, ERWIN(2015)。CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES。Wolters Kluwer。  new window
4.法治斌、董保城(2020)。憲法新論。元照。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Coleman, Carl H.(2018)。Regulating Physician Speech，https://ssrn.com/abstract=3234300。  new window
2.Haupt, Claudia E.(2018)。Licensing Knowledge，https://ssrn.com/abstract=3151985。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：693（臺灣：687，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1498098 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67311274
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上