:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:民居空間理論模型之試建
書刊名:國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報
作者:陳志梧
作者(外文):Chen, Chih-Wu
出版日期:1983
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁21-31
主題關鍵詞:民居空間形式
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:46
本文旨在從人類住屋演進的歷史觀察中建立一個民居研究的基本模型。文章分成三部分: 1.現有理論的回頭-主要在批評以拉普普(A. Rapoport)爲代表這支理論的缺陷。 2.民居起源-從住屋起源的觀察中,提出民居原型的産生是來自一串模仿與修正過程的結果。 3.民居形式的塑造-從住屋形式的觀察中,提出住屋的形式乃是對應於其社會經濟變化的結果,並對影響住屋原型發展之諸因素作一簡單的討論。在這個模型中,親民居爲對應其所處之社會及生態條件之函數。而這些條件經由三度空間幾何呈現出來時,實則帶著一個雙重性格,其一爲形式之必然性,另一爲形式之偶創性。前者是受其所之社會經濟條件所規定,是人類民居演化之共同原則;而後者則意指其形式之發現及是偶然的行為而言,是地域風格之由來。
The paper attempts to establish a comprehensive model for physical formation of vernacular houses. It consists of three identifiable themes as follows (1) A review of alternative theories Mainly to present existing theories on the topic and to undertake a critical analysis of the idealistic approach towards the subject as identified by Rapoport. (2) The origin of houses Based on archeo1ogical and anthropological evidences, a basic concept is suggested that implies that forms of vernacular houses are unintentional results of continuous processes of imitation and adaptation, parallel to that of man`s tool making (3) Forming of domestic houses Following a brief socio economic analysis on the transformation of vernacular houses, a general model is introduced In this model, vernacular houses are regarded as functions of their social and ecological conditions, and are crystalized through certain spatial geometries which are limited by their technological experiences This three dimensional consolidation is also subjected to a duality the necessity of spatial type and the coincidence of the house form The former is a result of the social and economic status, and underlines the common basis of the shaping of a vernaculat house, while the latte suggests that physical forms are discovered by occasional attempts, and forms the origin of the vernacular styles.
期刊論文
1.富田芳郎、許粵華(1955)。台灣鄉鎮之研究。台灣銀行季刊,7(3),85-100。  延伸查詢new window
2.Rapoport, Amos、關華山(19811100)。「人與環境學」之社會文化面。中華民國建築師雜誌,7(11)=83,25-30。  延伸查詢new window
3.Graves, W.(1975)。Iran。National Geographic,147(1)。  new window
4.Azzi, R.(1973)。Oman--Land of Frankiness and Oil。National Geographic,143(2)。  new window
5.朱保良(1980)。上海農村住宅調查。同濟大學學報,1980(4),96-107。  延伸查詢new window
6.Turnbull, C.(1963)。The Lesson of the Pygmies。Scientific American,208。  new window
7.關華山(19800300)。臺灣傳統民宅所表現的空間觀念。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,49,175-215。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊鴻勛(1981)。西周岐邑建築遺址初步考察。文物,1981(3),23-33。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.拉普普、張玫玫(1979)。住屋形式與文化。臺北:境與象出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Morgan, Lewis H.(1965)。Houses and House-life of the American Aborigines。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.Marc, Olivier、Wood, Jessie(1977)。Psychology of the House。London:Thames and Hudson。  new window
4.(1975)。Man's Domain。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
5.Hoebel, E. A.(1958)。Anthropology--The Study of Man。N.Y.:McGraw-Hill。  new window
6.Hawkes, Jacquetta(1981)。The Atlas of Early Man。N.Y.:St. Martine's。  new window
7.Soitoti, T.、Beckwith, C.(1980)。Maasai。N.Y.:Abrams Inc。  new window
圖書論文
1.Austin, M. R.(1976)。A Description of the Maori Marae。The Mutual Interaction of People and Their Built Environment。The Hague:Mouton Publishers。  new window
2.Tuan, Yi-Fu(1979)。Body, Personal Relations and Spatial Values。Space and Place。Minneapolis, Minnesota:Minnesota University Press。  new window
3.Doxiadis, C. A.(1976)。How Can We Learn About Man and His Settlement。The Mutual Interaction of People and Their Built Environment。The Hague:Mouton Publishers。  new window
4.Tuan, Yi-Fu(1979)。Architectural Space and Awareness。Space and Place。Minneapolis, Minnesota:Minnesota University Press。  new window
5.Fischer, E.(1981)。The Origins of Arts。The Necessity of Art。Middlesex:Penguin Books。  new window
6.Fraser, D.、張岱文(1972)。Mbuti Pygmies。原始世界的村落計劃。台北:境與象出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Sjoberg, G.(1973)。The Origin and Evolution of Cities。Cities--Their Origin, Growth and Human Impact, a Scientific American book。S.F.:W.H. Freeman & Co。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE