:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:鄰避設施衝突管理之研究
書刊名:國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報
作者:李永展
作者(外文):Lee, Yung-jarn
出版日期:1998
卷期:9
頁次:頁33-44
主題關鍵詞:鄰避鄰避設施空間衝突衝突管理NIMBYNIMBY facilitySpatial conflictConflict management
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(25) 博士論文(3) 專書(2) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:24
  • 共同引用共同引用:90
  • 點閱點閱:240
     「鄰避」(Not-In-My-Back-Yard, NIMBY)往往被視為是個人或社區反對某種設施或土地使用所表現出來的態度,這種又被稱為鄰避症候群(NIMBY Syndrome)的環境衝突,在世界各國已經成為一個不易解決的問題,因此,在整體規劃鄰避設施時便應重視鄰避衝突之管理,以消弭設施周圍民眾的不滿,進而減緩鄰避設施設置、更新、營運的阻力。本文主要目的即透過鄰避設施意涵的分析,探討鄰避設施的空間衝突、管理模式及其和解對策。   民眾反對鄰避設施的原因可歸納為經濟、社會、心理及政治等四個層面,而鄰避衝突產生的原因至少包含空間認知不同,利益分配不均、資源分配不均、資訊傳播不正確等因素。為消弭都市服務設施的鄰避效果,本文建議應透過合作管理的策略,採用鄰避設施的衝突管理模式,以協調並消弭各種不必要的鄰避衝突。而為有效管理鄰避設施的空間衝突,本文提出風險減輕方案、經濟誘因及民眾參與等三種政策工具。
     NIMBY(Not-In-My-Back-Yard) has been described as the attitude against the siting of certain facilities or land uses. Environmental corflicts derived from the NIMBY syndrome has become a critical issue for countries around the world. Therefore, in planning and siting NIMBY facilities, the conflict management must be considered to prevent malcontent reactions from nearby neighborhoods and hence reduce NIMBY effects. The main purpose of this article is to explore the context of NIMBY facilities and to propose NIMBY conflict management strategies.   Four perspectives can be examined in analyzing NIMBY syndrome economic, social, psychological, and political. On the other hand, the causes of NIMBY conflicts can be categorized as follows: different spatial cognition, unbalanced interest distribution, unbalanced resource distribution, and inaccurate information. To mitigate NIMBY conflicts, a cooperative management strategy must be adapted to develop a NIMBY conflict management model. Furthermore, to effectively manage NIMBY spatial conflicts, this article proposes three widely used policy tools-risk-reduction programs, economic incentive programs, and public participation.
期刊論文
1.李永展、陳柏廷(19960600)。從環境認知的觀點探討「鄰避」設施的再利用。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,8,53-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Weisberg, Barbara(1993)。One City's Approach to NIMBY: How New York City Developed a Fair Share Sitting Process。Journal of the American Planning Association,59(1),93-97。  new window
3.李永展(19941100)。鄰避設施與社區關係。人與地,131/132,46-53。  延伸查詢new window
4.Groothuis, P. A.、Miller, G.(1994)。Locating hazardous waste facilities: The influence of NIMBY beliefs。Journal of Economics and Sociology,53,335-346。  new window
5.Lake, Robert W.(1993)。Planners' Alchemy Transforming NIMBY to YIMBY。Journal of the American Planning Association,59,87-93。  new window
6.O'Hare, M.(1977)。Not on My Block You Don't: Facility Siting and the Strategic Importance of Compensation。Public Policy,24(4),407-458。  new window
7.蕭代基(19960700)。汙染性設施之設置與民眾信心之建立。臺灣經濟預測與政策,27(1),39-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Wolsink, Maarten(1994)。Entanglement of Interests and Motives: Assumptions behind the NIMBY-Theory on Facility Siting。Urban Studies,31(6),851-866。  new window
9.Dear, Micheal(1992)。Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome。Journal of the American Planning Association,58(3),288-300。  new window
10.李永展、翁久惠(19950700)。鄰避設施對主觀環境生活品質影響之探討--以居民對垃圾焚化廠之認知與態度為例。經社法制論叢,16,89-117。  延伸查詢new window
11.曾明遜(19940600)。淺論鄰避設施的風險知覺。人與地,126,36-40。  延伸查詢new window
12.Mitchell, R. C.、Carson, R. T.(1986)。Property Rights, protest, and the Siting of Hazardous Waste Facilities。The American Economic Review,76(2),285-290。  new window
13.Morell, D.(1984)。Siting and the Politics of Equity。Hazardous Waste,1(4),555-571。  new window
14.李永展、何紀芳(19960900)。臺北地方生活圈都市服務設施之鄰避效果。都市與計劃,23(1),95-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.何紀芳、李永展(19961200)。都市服務設施接受意願與影響因子之探討。建築學報,19,27-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.李永展(19970300)。鄰避症候群之解析。都市與計劃,24(1),69-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.李永展(19960500)。鄰避設施對社區環境品質之影響--以臺北市三個垃圾焚化廠為例。國立政治大學學報,72(下),263-297。  延伸查詢new window
18.黃建勛、李永展(1995)。土地開發協商模式之探討。國立政治大學學報,71(下),107-144。  延伸查詢new window
19.李永展、何紀芳(1995)。都市服務設施「鄰避」效果與選址規劃原則。環境教育季刊,24,2-10。  延伸查詢new window
20.Carnes, S. A.(1982)。Incentives and Nuclear Waste Siting: Prospects and Constraints。Energy Systems and Policy,7(4),323-351。  new window
21.Inhabler, H.(1992)。Of NIMBYs, LULUs, and NIMTOOs。The Public Interest,107,52-64。  new window
22.Pondy, L. R.(1967)。Organization Conflict: Concept A Model。Administrative Science Quarterly,12。  new window
23.Portney, K. E.(1988)。Allaying the NIMBY Syndrome: Potential for Compensation。Hazardous Waste,1(3),411-421。  new window
會議論文
1.紀駿傑(1996)。環境正義:環境社會學的規範性關懷。第一屆環境價值觀與環境教育學術研討會,成功大學臺灣文化研究中心籌備處 。臺南。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉文正(1996)。社區總體營造中之衝突管理-以三義鄉為例。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.李永展(1997)。台北市鄰避型公共設施更新之研究。台北:台北市政府研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.曾明遜(1992)。不寧適設施對住宅價格影響之研究--以垃圾處理場為個案(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳柏廷(1994)。嫌惡性設施合併再利用之研究--以福德坑垃圾掩埋場及富德公墓合併再利用為例(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.紀素菁(1991)。都市空間摩擦對居住環境生活品質衝擊之研究--以敦化地區為個案(碩士論文)。中興大學  。  延伸查詢new window
4.何紀芳(1995)。都市服務設施鄰避效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.翁久惠(1994)。嫌惡性設施對生活環境品質影響之研究--以台北市內湖、木柵、士林三個垃圾焚化廠為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃燕如(1988)。污染性設施設置政策之研究:以環境經濟學與環境法律學之觀點(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.李自剛(1981)。組織中部門衝突之研究,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.張明馨(1994)。資源回收站與住宅區相容使用之研究-以臺北市大安區、中山區為例,0。  延伸查詢new window
9.彭康鎮(1981)。機關中組織衝突管理之研究,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.錢志偉(1993)。以競標方式來決定污染性設施之區位及對居民補償的研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李永展(1995)。環境態度與環保行爲--理論與實證。臺北市:胡氏圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.賀德芬(1993)。經濟部所屬事業睦鄰工作滿意度調查。臺北:財團法人臺灣大學法學基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Dear, M.(1990)。Gaining Community Acceptance。Princeton, NJ:The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation。  new window
4.劉錦添(1989)。污染性設施設置程序之研究。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會健全經社法規工作小組。  延伸查詢new window
5.Brion, Denis J.(1991)。Essential Industry and the NIMBY Phenomenon。New York:Quorum Books。  new window
6.Edelstein, M. R.(1988)。Contaminated communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure。Denver, CO:Westview。  new window
7.(1993)。Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots。Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots。Boston, MA。  new window
8.Daniel Yankelovich Group(1990)。Public Attitudes Toward People with Chronic Mental Illness Executive Summary。Public Attitudes Toward People with Chronic Mental Illness Executive Summary。Princeton, NJ。  new window
9.Smith, D. A.(1986)。Neighborhood Context of Police Behavior。Communities and Crime。Chicago, IL。  new window
10.Bernard, B. M.、Deep, S. D.(1970)。Perspectives For Managing Organizations。Perspectives For Managing Organizations。Englewood Cliffs, NJ。  new window
11.Dessler, G.(1980)。Organization and Management。Organization and Management。臺北。  new window
12.Fischhoff, B.、Slovic, P.、Lichtenstein, S.(1983)。'The Public' vs. 'The Experts': Perceived v. Actual Disagreements about Risks of Nuclear Power。Analysis of Actual and Perceived Risks。New York, NY。  new window
13.MacDonald, H. I.(1984)。Welcome Address。The Not-In-My-Back-Yard Syndrome。Downsview, Canada。  new window
14.Seley, J.、Wolpert, J.(1983)。Equity and Location。Equity Issues in Radioactive Waste Management。Cambridge, MA。  new window
15.Wulz, F.(1990)。The Concept of Participation。Participatory Design: Theory & Techniques。Raleigh, NC。  new window
其他
1.王樂平(1989)。空間使用衝突管理之探討-以後勁五輕為例,0。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE