The Relationship between Man and Woman is not Necessarily 'Sexes Relat ionship.' The Conception of 'Sexes Relationship' is not Universally Applicable. It Can be Applied Only in the Modern Western World and in those Parts of the Non-Western Areas Deeply Westernized, Especially Among those Students Who Have Studied in Western Countries and those Domestic Intellectuals Who are Influenced by Western thoughts. There are Three Basic Points in the Conception of 'Sexes Relationship': 1)a Universal Idea of 'Human Right' Which Demands That Nobody Should be Deprived of His Right of being Treated as Human Merely Due to His Gender, Age, Class or Ethnicity; 2)Taking 'Sex' as the Natural Endowment in Relation to Human Corporeality, which Can be Analytically Separated from the Cultural Part of Humanity; 3)Insistence on the Cultural-Normative Character of the Concept of 'Gender' as to not Allow any Unequal Terms be Enacted between Sex Classes. Those People Who Like to Talk about 'Sexes Relationship' are in Fact Equalitarians, using Bifurcational thinking and Transcendentalism as Their Fundamental Mode of thinking, though They are not all Really Conscious of That and in the Same Sense being so. Nevertheless, This Mode of thinking is not Commensurable with What Traditional Chinese Called 'Yin-Yang' and 'Ch'ien-Kuen,' which was Taken as a General Explanation of 'Man-Woman' Relationship and Often Interchangeable one another. In Addition, Even within the Western World, This Mode of thinking is also Different from That which Was Available in the Ancient Period, Focusing on Pederasty, and That which is No More Influential within the Current of the So-Called 'Postmodernism,' Relating 'Sex' and 'Gender' Merely as Signs of Simulacrum. In a Word, 'Sex' and 'Gender' are Merely Fictional Concepts, Available and Applicable Only in the Minds of those Who used to and Will to use Them.