:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國際關係「新自由制度主義」理論之評析
書刊名:問題與研究
作者:鄭端耀
作者(外文):Cheng, Tuan Y.
出版日期:1997
卷期:36:12
頁次:頁1-22+72
主題關鍵詞:新自由制度主義新自由主義制度主義新自由主義v.新現實主義Neoliberal institutionalismNeoliberalismInstitutionalismNeoliberalism v. neorealism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(32) 博士論文(12) 專書(7) 專書論文(7)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:31
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:75
     新自由制度主義是過去十餘年最具生產力和開創力的國際關係理論,它挑戰現實 主義理論的不當,並展開雙方理論的爭辯,它提出國際制度化的主張,同時在近年來進一步 從事輍證研究。不過該理論未來發展恐存在相當局限:一、國際制度的複雜性遠非該理論可 以解釋;二、該理論僅代表美國的觀點;三、該理論的適用性須待進一步的檢驗。
     Neoliberal institutionalism has been considered as one of the most productive and creative theories in international relations for the last decade. It has successfully challenged the theoretical assumptions of structural realism , and opened the debate between neorealism and neoliberalism. It has also estab- lished its own theoretical assumptions and analytical framework. Moreover, it has proposed a number of research programs, and more efforts in empirical studies have been made for these purposes. Nevertheless, in terms of theoretical utilities and future development, neoliberal institutional theory might confront the problems of empirical effectiveness and the limits of its application. First, the roles and operations of institutions are much more complicated and diversified than the assumptions of the neoliberal approach can provide. Second, neoliberal views chiefly reflect American thoughts on international relations in the post-Cold War period. Some non-Westerners thus may consider that it is for American interest only. Third, institutional effectiveness cannot be proved useful by the neoliberal approach unless it can incorporate other powers, as well as organizational and cultural factors in its emprical examination.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE