臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國際制度合作的有效性：權力、知識與理念分配？--以表決制度與國際貨幣基金之改革為例
書刊名：政治學報
作者：蔡育岱 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tsai, Yu-tai
出版日期：2014
卷期：57
頁次：頁53-76
主題關鍵詞：國際制度；國際關係理論；表決制度；國際貨幣基金；International institutions；International relations theories；Voting system；IMF
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:113
  • 點閱點閱:128
本文重新審視國際合作的看法與國際制度的功能。現實主義認為，制度基本上是反映權力的分配，渠是基於強權間自我利益的計算，呈現較悲觀的國家行為分析模式。而自由制度主義則直接挑戰此一命題，主張制度可以改變國家偏好，進而形塑國家的行為，有能力使更多的國家擺脫衝突。相較之下，建構主義對制度的核心論述，是強調構成性與規則性規範將改變制度和國際體系，進而徹底改變無政府狀態為假設下的自助、自利的思維模式，使國家根據他們自己的身份認同界定利益。緣此，本研究透過國際組織之表決制度，分析合作的限制與制度有效性，其中一為表決權的分配，另為表決方式的操作，藉以解釋國際關係中合作的現象，究竟是何種理論較具有解釋力？最後將以近期國際貨幣基金表決制度與對中國份額之改革策略進行分析，說明其與理論之間的關連性。
This paper re-examines an analysis of the prospects for international cooperation and of the capabilities of international institutions. Realists, liberal institutionalists, and Constructivists particularly disagree about whether institutions markedly affect the prospects for international stability. Realists insist that institutions are fundamentally a function of the distribution of power in the world. Their analysis is based on the self-interested calculations of the great powers, and presents a pessimistic analysis on state behavior. Liberal institutionalists directly challenge the proposition of Realism, arguing instead that institutions can alter state preferences and then change state behavior. Institutions have the capability to move states away from conflict. On the contrary, the central aim of Constructivists is to alter the constitutive and regulative norms of the international system so that states stop thinking and acting according to anarchy. States would not think in terms of self-help or self-interest, but would instead define their interests in terms of the international society. Besides, states may pursue a conditional cooperation in the face of international anarchy. Hence, this paper is to evaluate the limitation of cooperation and the effectiveness of international institutions by analyzing the voting system: voting rights and voting methods. The task involves answering questions: Which is the most causal logic that explains the effectiveness of international institutions? Are these different theories that explain how China works in ＂Quota＂ Reform of IMF and its Voting System? Does the evidence support these theories?
期刊論文
1.乾隆來(2010)。向「IMF學長」看齊成功度過破産危機?。今週刊，698，42-51。  延伸查詢new window
2.許琇媛(2004)。歐盟憲法條約草案之架構與重點。淡江大學歐盟文獻中心通訊，3，1-15。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡永澤(200907)。金融風暴後南韓政經體制的轉變：以國際因素角度分析。商學學報. 空大，17，271-298。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Chorev, Nitsan、Babb, Sarah(2009)。The Crisis of Neoliberalism and the Future of International Institutions: A Comparison of the IMF and the WTO。Theory and Society，38(5)，459-484。  new window
5.陳欣之(200606)。國際制度在國際霸權競逐的權力作用。政治學報，40，115-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Barnett, Michael N.、Finnemore, Martha(1999)。The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations。International Organization，53(4)，699-732。  new window
7.Cooper, S.、Hawkins, D.、Jacoby, W.、Nielson, D.(2008)。Yielding Sovereignty to International Institutions: Bringing System Structure Back。International Studies Review，10(3)，501-524。  new window
8.Crossick, S.(2009)。Whither the European Commission?。Challenge Europe，19，14-18。  new window
9.Duffield, J.(2007)。What Are International In-stitutions。International Studies Review，9(1)，1-22。  new window
10.Eldar, O.(2008)。Vote-trading In International Institutions。European Journal of International Law，19(1)，3-41。  new window
11.Goldstein, J. L.、Martin, L. L.(2000)。Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note。International Organization，54(3)，603-632。  new window
12.Kapur, D.、Nairn, M.(2005)。The IMF and Democratic Governance。Journal of Democracy，16(1)，89-102。  new window
13.Keohane, R. O.、Macedo, S.、Moravcsik, A.(2009)。Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism。International Organization，63(1)，1-31。  new window
14.Lane, J. E.、Maeland, R.(2011)。Global Financial Crisis and International Institutions: Challenges。Public Organization Review，11，29-43。  new window
15.Thimann, C.、Just, C.、Ritter, R.(2009)。Strengthening the Governance of the International Monetary Fund: How a Dual Board Structure Could Raise the Effectiveness and Legitimacy of a Key Global Institution。Global Governance，15(2)，187-193。  new window
16.Wouters, J.、Man, P. D.(2009)。International Organizations as Law-Makers。Working Paper of Leuven Centre for Global，21，1-36。  new window
17.Zacher, M. W.(1987)。Trade Gaps, Analytical Gaps: Regime Analysis and International Commodity Trade Regulation。International Organization，41(2)，173-202。  new window
18.Kahler, Miles(2000)。Conclusion: The Causes and Consequences of Legalization。International Organization，54(3)，661-683。  new window
19.Finnemore, Martha(1993)。International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational Scientific, and Cultural Organization and Science Policy。International Organization，47(4)，565-597。  new window
20.盧業中(20020300)。論國際關係理論之新自由制度主義。問題與研究，41(2)，43-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Wendt, Alexander E.(1987)。The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory。International Organization，41(3)，335-370。  new window
22.Keohane, Robert O.(1988)。International Institutions: Two Approaches。International Studies Quarterly，32(4)，379-396。  new window
23.Young, Oran R.(1986)。International Regimes: Toward a New Theory of Institutions。World Politics，39(1)，104-122。  new window
24.Wendt, Alexander E.(1992)。Anarchy is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics。International Organization，46(2)，391-425。  new window
25.Grieco, Joseph M.(1988)。Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism。International Organization，42(3)，485-507。  new window
26.林文程(20000600)。我國參與國際組織的困境與對策。新世紀智庫論壇，10，26-27。  延伸查詢new window
27.鄭端耀(19971200)。國際關係「新自由制度主義」理論之評析。問題與研究，36(12)，1-22+72。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Krasner, Stephen D.(1982)。Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes As Intervening Variables。International Organization，36(2)，185-205。  new window
29.Mearsheimer, John J.(1994)。The False Promise of International Institutions。International Security，19(3)，5-49。  new window
30.蔡增家(20050700)。九七金融風暴與南韓政經體制的轉變：超越發展國家論。問題與研究，44(4)，75-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.吳萬寶(2009)。變與不變：里斯本條約與歐洲安全暨防衛政策。The Impact of Lisbon Treaty on the European Union研討會，中華民國外交部外交人員講習所 。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kirk, Donald(2000)。Korean Crisis: Unraveling of the Miracle in the IMF Era。London：Macmillan Press Ltd.。  new window
2.梁西(1996)。國際組織法。臺北：志一出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡育岱、熊武(2010)。國際關係之理論與實際。臺中：鼎茂。  延伸查詢new window
4.饒戈平(2003)。國際組織法。北京：北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Amerasinghe, C. F.(1996)。Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Baldwin, D. A.(1993)。Neorealism andNeohberalism: The Contemporary Debate。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
7.Scharf, M. P.(2007)。The Law of International Organizations: Problems and Materials。Durham, NC: Carolina：Academic Press。  new window
8.White, N. D.(1996)。The Law of International Organizations。Manchester：Manchester University Press。  new window
9.Krasenr, Stephen D.(1983)。International Regime。Cornell University Press。  new window
10.Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Johseph S., Jr.(2001)。Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition。New York：Longman。  new window
11.Wendt, Alexander E.(1999)。Social Theory of International Politics。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。  new window
12.Ruggie, John Gerard(1993)。Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
13.Waltz, Kenneth N.(1979)。Theory of International Politics。McGraw Hill。  new window
14.Goldstein, Judith、Keohane, Robert O.(1993)。Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change。Cornell University Press。  new window
15.Hobson, John M.(2000)。The State and International Relations。Cambridge University Press。  new window
16.郭承天(19960000)。國際建制與國際組織。臺北：時英。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Mearsheimer, John J.、Alterman, G.(2001)。The Tragedy of Great Power Politics。W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
18.Keohane, Robert O.(1984)。After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy。Princeton University Press。  new window
其他
1.(2012)。Doubling of Quotas and Major Realignment of Quota Shares，http://www.imf.org/extemal/np/exr/facts/quotas.htm， 2012/07/10。  new window
2.(2010)。Greece Claims Deficit Cut by 40% in First Half of Year，http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10510415， 2012/07/10。  new window
3.(2010)。Greece Set to Receive Next Loan Installment, EU says，http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11025421， 2012/07/10。  new window
4.(2012)。How the IMF Makes Decisions，http://www.imf.org/extemal/np/exr/facts/govem.htm， 2012/07/10。  new window
5.(2012)。Illustration of Proposed Quota and Voting Shares，http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2010/pdfs/pr10418_table.pdf， 2012/07/10。  new window
6.(2012)。IMF Members' Quotas and Voting Power, and IMF Board of Governors，http://www.imf.org/extemal/np/sec/memdir/members.htm， 2012/07/10。  new window
7.(2012)。IMF Quotas，http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/quotas.htm， 2012/07/10。  new window
8.(2012)。IMF Quota and Governance Reform--Elementsof An Agreement，http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2010/103110.pdf， 2012/07/10。  new window
9.(2012)。Note on the Calculation of Members' Voting Rights，http://www.ifad.org/govemance/ifad/vote.htm， 2012/07/10。  new window
10.Bank Information Center(2007)。World Bank Governance Challenges: What Must Be Done，http://www.sarpn.org/documents/dOO02553/WorldBank_governance May2007.pdf， 2012/07/10。  new window
11.Charter of the United Nations。Chapter V: The Security Council，http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/chapter5.shtml， 2012/07/10。  new window
12.Europa(2012)。European Council，http://europa.eu/institutions/inst/council/indexen.htm， 2012/07/10。  new window
13.Europa(2012)。European Parliament，http://europa.eu/mstitutions/inst/parliament/mdexen.htm， 2012/07/10。  new window
14.Fleming, T.(2007)。Improving Global Leadership Selection，http://tonyfleming.org/Improving%20Global%20Leadership%20Selection.pdf， 2012/07/10。  new window
圖書論文
1.盧業中(2010)。國際關係學之自由主義的理論。國際關係綜論。臺北：晶典。  延伸查詢new window
2.Haggard, S.(1991)。Structuralism and Its Critics: Recent Progress in International Relations Theory。Progress in Postwar International Relations。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
3.Martin, L. L.、Simmons, B. A.(2012)。International Organizations and Institutions。Handbook of International Relations。London：Sage。  new window
4.Moravcsik, Andrew(2008)。The New Liberalism。The Oxford Handbook of International Relations。Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Finnemore, M.(1996)。Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention。The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
6.Ruggie, J. G.(1998)。The New Institutionalism in International Relations。Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization。New York：Routledge。  new window
7.Axelrod, Robert、Keohane, Robert O.(1986)。Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions。Cooperation Under Anarchy。Princeton University Press。  new window
8.Grieco, Joseph(1993)。Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism。Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
9.Keohane, Robert O.(1993)。Institutional Tehroy and the Realist Challenge after the Cold War。Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：384（臺灣：384，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67385000
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上