:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:自媒體科學傳播內容與媒體顯著性之研究--以微信公眾號“果殼網”為例
書刊名:新聞大學
作者:王玲寧陳昕卓
出版日期:2017
卷期:2017(5)
頁次:68-76+149
主題關鍵詞:自媒體科學傳播媒體顯著性We-mediaScientific communicationMedia prominence
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:43
  • 點閱點閱:2
本文以"果殼網"的微信公眾號為研究對象,結合媒體顯著性的相關理論,運用內容分析的方法,探討了自媒體科學傳播內容與媒體顯著性之間的關系,并在此基礎上分析了自媒體科學傳播的特征。研究發現:文章來源、科學主題、科學傳播主線和科學議題發生國分別是影響自媒體科學傳播顯著性突出、注意和向度層面的主要內容因素;自媒體科學傳播的議題偏好和敘事方式的獨特,既顯示了與傳統官方媒體的自覺疏離,又有吸引用戶市場的另辟蹊徑;依托自媒體的傳播特征,科學傳播雖然實現了表層上的雙向溝通,但在深層次推動公眾理解科學、參與科學及決策上,還有更大的發揮空間。
Combining with Media Prominence theory, this paper provided an scientific approach to the possible correlation between media prominence and the scientific content spread by we-media by applying content analysis to the wechat public account "Guokr". Based on that, this paper conducts a analysis of the feature of scientific content spreading on we-media. The result shows that source, scientific theme, the country background of certain scientific agenda and the main clue of scientific spreading exert major influence respectively on the prominence, attention and dimension of wemedia scientific communication.The agenda preference and unique narration of we-media scientific content represents the instinctive deviation from traditional official media and a novel path to attract more customers. Considering the characteristics of we-media, the two-way scientific communication at present is still at basic level, waiting to be broadened in order to achieve further goals of promoting public understanding, participating and decision making of science.
期刊論文
1.陳憶寧(20110600)。當科學家與記者相遇:探討兩種專業對於科學新聞的看法差異。中華傳播學刊,19,147-187。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Hijmans, E.、Pleuter, A.、Wester, F.(2003)。Covering scientific research in Dutch newspapers。Science Communication,25,153-176。  new window
3.Massarani, L.、Buys, B.、Amorim, L. H.、Veneu, F.(2005)。Science journalism in Latin America: A case study of seven newspapers in the region。Journal of Science Communication,4(3),1-8。  new window
4.Golan, G.、Wanta, W.(2001)。Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates。Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,78(2),247-259。  new window
5.Meraz, S.(2011)。Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agenda-setting influence in traditional media and political blog networks。Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,88(1),176-194。  new window
6.Sweetser, K. D.、Golan, G. J.、Wanta, W.(2008)。Intermedia agenda setting in television, advertising, and blogs during the 2004 election。Mass Communication and Society,11(2),197-216。  new window
7.Mazzolini, R. G.、Bucchi, M.(2003)。Big Science, Little News: Science Coverage in the Italian Daily Press, 1946-1997。Public Understanding of Science,12(1),7-24。  new window
8.施琮仁(20150700)。不同媒體平臺對公眾參與科學決策能力之影響:以奈米科技為例。新聞學研究,124,165-213。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.黃俊儒、簡妙如(20101000)。在科學與媒體的接壤中所開展之科學傳播研究:從科技社會公民的角色及需求出發。新聞學研究,105,127-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Balmas, M.、Sheafer, T.(2010)。Candidate image in election campaigns: Attribute agenda setting, affective priming, and voting intentions。International journal of public opinion research,22(2),204-229。  new window
11.Pritchard, D.(1986)。Homicide and bargained justice: The agenda-setting effect of crime news on prosecutors。Public Opinion Quarterly,50(2),143-159。  new window
12.王國華、劉煉、王雅蕾(2014)。自媒體視域下的科學傳播模式研究。情報雜誌,2014(3),88-92。  延伸查詢new window
13.Neuman, W. Russell、Guggenheim, Lauren、Jang, S. Mo、Bae, Soo Young(2014)。The Dynamics of Public Attention: Agenda-Setting Theory Meets Big Data。Journal of Communication,64(2),193-214。  new window
14.Vargo, C. J.、Guo, L.、McCombs, M.、Shaw, D. L.(2014)。Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election。Journal of Communication,64(2),296-316。  new window
學位論文
1.潘慧(2016)。知識社會學視野下的科學新聞,以"澎湃新聞"為例(碩士論文)。華東師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dearing, J. W.、Rogers, E. M.(1996)。Agenda Setting。Sage。  new window
2.Wanta, W.(1997)。The public and the national agenda: How people learn about important issues。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
3.Smith, K. A.(1987)。Newspaper coverage and public concern about community issues: A time-series analysis。  new window
4.馬丁.W.鮑爾、馬西米阿諾.布奇、許加彪(2011)。新聞、科學與社會--新聞和公共關係中的科學傳播。北京:中國時代經濟。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Ghanem, S.(1997)。Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting。Communication and Democracy: Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE