參考文獻
壹、中文參考資料
書目
1方世榮譯，行銷管理學(原著者Philip Kotler)，台北:東華書局，民
國84年7月2版。
2何之邁，公平交易法專論，台北:三民書局，民國82年10月初版。
3何之邁，公平交易法專論第二冊，台北:三民書局，民國86年3月。
4何之邁，歐洲共同体競爭法論， 台北：三民書局，民國88年初版。
5行政院公平交易委員會編 公平交易法規彙編，民國84年3月
6李明軒、邱如美合譯，競爭優勢（上、下）(原著者Michael E. Porter) 台北:天下文化，民國88年1月。
7周泰華、杜富燕， 零售管理， 台北:華泰書局，民國86年9月初版。
8 林鐘雄，經濟學， 台北：三民書局，民國77年增訂版。
9唐富藏、甘兆欽，總体經濟學精要， 台南:宏寶書局，民國83年3月三版。
10黃茂榮， 公平交易法專題研究， 台北：自版，民國87年。
11經濟部編， 連鎖店經營管理實務，民國85年5月第1版。
12 廖義男，公平交易法之理論與立法， 台北：自版，民國84年初版。
13 廖義男，公平交易法草案總說明及條文， 台北：自版，民國74年。
14賴源河編審， 公平交易法新論， 台北：元照書局，民國89年 。
15簡正儒、蔡惠華，流通系統， 台北:李唐文化，民國85年9月初版一刷。
16蘇永欽，民法經濟法論文集， 台北：三民書局，民國87年初版。
17蘇永欽，經濟法的挑戰， 台北：五南書局，民國83年。
論文、期刊、報章與演講
1 王銘勇，限制轉售價格法制之研究， 政治大學法律學系博士論文，民國90 年1 月。
2 中央產經所張明宗所長講座，反壟斷、國家競爭力與垂直分工，競爭政策通訊第二卷第六期 ，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpb2-6a.htm.
3孔令芬，維持轉售價格之研究， 台灣大學法研所碩士論文，民國74年7 月。
4 台灣區麥粉工業同業公會因聯合行為違反公平交易法處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1.
5朱雲鵬，競爭與合作: 由價格資訊之提供與使用論聯合行為之例外規定 ，公平交易季刊第一卷第三期，民國82年7月。
6吳秀明，公平交易法第七條有關聯合行為之規定究屬概括規定或列舉性規定之研究，第三屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會論文集，第73-98頁，民國87年5月。
7吳秀明，獨占事業濫用市場地位價格行為認定方法之研究，公平交易法學術研討會論文集，第29-32頁，民國86年11月。
8吳秀明，避難到不公平競爭的聯合行為管制 -公平交易法第十四條與第十九條第四款適用關係之釐清，第三屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會論文集，第20-70頁，民國87年5月。
9李仁芳，加盟事業便利商店市場的界定及其行銷通路之探討，第二屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會論文集，第242-276頁，民國86年5月。
10周添城演講，台灣二分化市場結構的競爭政策，競爭政策通訊第一卷第四期，民國86年5月12日，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpb1-4a.htm.
11林忠正立委講座，流通業市場結構與不公平競爭行為，競爭通訊第一卷第三期，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpbl-3a.htm.
12林易典，淺析公平會「例外許可中小企業聯合定價行為審查原則」，公平交易季刊第七卷第四期，第1-48頁，民國88年10月。
13林鐘雄演講，從競爭觀點談論經濟秩序問題，競爭政策通訊第三卷第三期，民國88年4月12日，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpb3-3c.htm.
14經濟日報，流通業超收上架費公平會緊盯，民國89年7月13日第三十七版。
15電子時報周末電子股版第三版，凌陽：協力夥伴同開發市場水平垂直投資並行，民國89年8月19日至21日。
16徐火明演講，聯合行為(卡特爾)與公會之關係 -兼論最高法院84年度台非字第250號判決 ，競爭政策通訊第三卷第六期 ，民國88年9月6日，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpb3-6a.htm.
17徐增明譯，規模與範籌-動態產業資本主義(Alfred D.Chandler原著)， 政治大學企管研究所博士班策略管理理論研討(專書選讀報告)，民國88年7月15日。
18消息報導，台灣銀行總行請釋「公益彩券」每張彩券擬採一固定價格銷售之方式是否違反公平交易法案，競爭政策通訊第四卷第一期，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpb4-1b.htm.
19專題報導，中小企業保護與競爭政策-從憲法增修「中小企業條款」(第十條第三項)談起，競爭政策通訊第一卷第六期，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpb1-4a.htm.
20專題報導，公平會就立法院一讀通過「公平交易法部分條文修正草案」召開座談會，競爭政策通訊第一卷第三期，錄自http:/www.ftc.gov.tw/cpl1-3a.htm.
21專題報導，台灣二分化市場結構的競爭政策，競爭政策通訊第一卷第四期，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpb1-4a.htm.
22張宏碩演講，流通業國際發展新趨勢，競爭政策通訊第二卷第一期，民國86年12月1日，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpb2-1b.htm.
23張明宗演講，反壟斷、國家競爭力與垂直分工 競爭政策通訊第二卷第六期，民國87年9月17 日 錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpb2-6a.htm
24 張芬芳，本會對事業結合、聯合行為之許可案之整理及簡介，公平交易季刊創刊號，第154-55頁，民國82年1月。
25張長樹，公平交易法立法体例及目的之研究，公平交易季刊，第一卷第四期，第108-114頁民國82年10月
26張長樹，樞紐設施原則之研究，政治大學法律學系博士論文，民國89年4 月
27梁國源、陳尚賢， HHI與事業結合申請案，公平交易季刊第八卷第一期，第127-144頁，民國89年1月
28梁基祥，獨家交易安排之經濟分析，公平交易季刊，第五卷第三期，第99頁，民國86年7月
29莊春發演講，反托拉斯管制不同學派的觀點詮釋，競爭政策通訊第三卷第五期，民國88年7月26日 錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpb3-5a.htm
30莊春發，便利商店反托拉斯市場的界定，第二屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會論文集，第38-48頁，民國86年5月
31莊春發，獨家交易反托拉斯管制之研究，公平交易季刊，第七巷第二期第14頁，民國88 年4 月
32莊春發，競爭概念的發展、演變與反托拉斯政策，公平交易季刊第六卷第一期，第29-81頁，民國87年1月
33陳志民， 論美國反托拉斯法對搭售安排「個別產品」要件之認定標準 行政院公平交易委員會第五屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會第四場: 垂直限制與公平交易法，第21-27頁，民國88年5月4日
34陳昭華，歐洲聯內商標權之保護與自由交易原則 -以真品平行輸入為例 經社法制論叢 17.18期，第223-251頁，民國85年7 月
35陳研次，中心、衛星「一家親」 管理雜誌第二三九期，民國83年5月.
36陳偉航，差異化是唯一的生存之道(上)、(中)、(下) 工商時報經營知識版，民國89年6月28.29.30日
37單驥、何之邁、吳秀明主持，從依賴性理論探討相對市場優勢地位–以公平法立場之研析適用，八十八年度行政院公平交易委員會合作研究計劃六，第4-70頁，民國88年3月
38黃亮洲，廠商採行垂直限制策略之理論探討，公平交易季刊第四卷第三期，第39-40頁，民國85年7月
39黃銘傑，中小企業保護與競爭政策 -憲法增修「中小企業保障條款」的問題提起，國立台灣大學法學論叢，第二十七卷第三期，第48-78頁，民國87年4月
40黃營杉、范建得，事業垂直限制行為之公平法適用問題研究 -以非價格垂直交易限制為核心，第五屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會論文集，第392頁，民國88年5月
41黃營杉、黃銘傑，競爭法對流通業經營行為規範之研究-以附加費用收取行為為中心，行政院公平交易委員會第七屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會，第30-31頁，民國89年10月31日
42傳統產業中衛体系轉型電子化當道，工商時報第十九版，民國89年7 月22日
43楊家駿，公平會處理機車事業行銷体系及銷售行為實務報導，公平交易季刊第五卷第二期，第117-18頁，民國86年4月
44楊家駿，國外實務報導，公平交易季刊，第五卷第二期，民國86年4月
45廖義男，公平交易法修正之重點與理由，公平交易季刊，第一卷第四期，第23-41頁，民國82年10月
46廖義男講座，公平交易法六年行政法院裁判之評析，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpb2-6a.htm.
47劉俊儀，連鎖店授權加盟經營法律問題之研究，東吳大學法研所碩士論文，民國81年6月。
48劉俊儀，連鎖店雙重行銷体制公平交易法問題之研究，台灣屏東地方法院檢察署八十三年度研究發展專題報告，民國83年7月20日。
49鄭優、羅昌發、黃營杉、黃銘傑主持，競爭法對流通業經營行為規範之研究-以附加費用收取行為為中心，行政院公平交易委員會八十九年度合作研究報告，第62-63頁，民國89年6月。
50顏廷棟，我國公平交易法垂直限制行為執法實務之檢討-兼論歐盟、德、法、美、日垂直限制規範， 公平交易季刊第八卷第二期，第73-74頁，民國89年4月。
51顏廷棟，論垂直性交易限制在競爭法上之規範，公平交易季刊，第六卷第二期，第143-44頁，民國87年4月。
52魏杏芳，論歐洲共同体對聯合行為的管制 -從群体除外(Block Exemption)制度看超國家体制執行經濟管制的方法與困境，政治大學法律學研究所博士論文，民國87年6月。
53競爭政策通訊第二卷第一期 ，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpb2-1c.htm
54競爭政策通訊第二卷第一期，第 5-6頁，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpb2-1c.htm
政府資料
1三省堂書坊促使出版業者對特定事業斷絕供給之行為處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
2上游代理商不當決定價格妨礙經銷商經營是否違反公平法解釋，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
3大型流通業經營行為導正計劃， 錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/buss1.htm
4女性內衣維持轉售價格導正，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/buss15.htm
5中國石油股份有限公司為妨礙市場公平競爭行為處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
6中華音響發展協會為有妨礙公平競爭之虞之行為處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
7中華電視股份有限公司因電視節目廣告業務作法違法案處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
8中鋼碳素化學公司為限制轉售價格及不當限制相對人與其交易處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
9公平交易法對同業公會之規範，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/ftcpri2.htm
10公平交易法對有線電視相關產業規範說明，行政院公平交易委員會公報八卷八期
11公研釋一○二號代銷契約中專賣限制條款是否違反公平交易法解釋，http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1.
12文心書局促使出版業者對特定事業斷絕供給之行為處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
13台灣山葉機車工業股份有限公司派駐從業人員從事限制下游代銷商不得越區銷售之行為，行政院公平交易委員會(八八)公處字第一四一號處分書，公報第八卷第十二期 。
14台灣電視、中國電視、中華事業股份有限公司因電視節目廣告業務作法違法案處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1.
15正統通訊股份有限公司為不正當限制交易相對人之事業活動處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
16立明光學有限公司為限制轉售價格行為違反公平交易法處分，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
17有關日常用品、贈品促銷、刊登廣告及搭售行為之疑義解釋，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
18米樂公司檢舉美商美樂啤酒公司榨取他人努力成果違反公平法規定，競爭政策通訊第二巷第四期，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/cpb2-4b.htm.
19自由時報從事限制競爭及妨礙公平競爭行為處分書，行政院公平交易委員會(八八)公處字第一三三號處分書，公報第八卷第十一期 。
20自立晚報利誘競爭者之交易相對人與自己交易妨礙公平競爭處分書， 關於本會「處理贈品贈獎促銷案件原則」案解釋，錄自 http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1,
21行政院公平交易委員會公報 書籍訂價、不同給付、定價及預約折扣優待等行為違法否之解釋，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1.
22行政院公平交易委員會關於流通事業收取附加費用案件處理原則，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/ftcpri52.htm
23利誘顧客及供應價售價不一及百貨業專櫃廠商供貨商間關係解釋,錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
24例外許可中小企業聯合定價行為審查原則，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/ftcpri3.htm
25 和成欣業股份有限公司因不正當限制他事業活動處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
26 和成欣業股份有限公司因不正當限制他事業活動違反公平交易訴願決定書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
27金石堂公司因促使他事業對特定事業斷絕供給不服處分訴願案訴願決定書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
28金石堂公司因促使聖誕卡供應商對競爭同業斷絕聖誕卡之供應處分書， 錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
29南一書局不公平競爭行為行政院公平交易委員會(87)公處字第○八七號處分書，公報第七卷第四期。
30美商怡佳公司違反公平法第十八條及第十九條第六款案處分書，錄自
31美商環美家具違法不服本會復函提起訴願訴願決定書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
32限制交易相對人之行銷通路是否違反公平法解釋，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
33限制競爭或妨礙競爭之虞行為之規範，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/qa8.htm
34家樂福股份有限公司因為足以影響交易秩序之顯失公平行為處分書，http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail.
35家樂福從事足以影響交易秩序之顯失公平行為處分書，行政院公平交易委員會公報第七卷第四期。
36 書籍訂價、不同給付、定價及預約折扣優待等行為違法否解釋，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
37特誠公司以保證金等不當方法，影響市場公平競爭處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
38高昇出版社有限公司為不正當限制他事業活動處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
39高雄市建築師公會以損害特定事業為目的，為有妨礙公平競爭處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
40高雄市建築師公會因杯葛行為有妨礙公平競爭之虞，違反公平交易法訴願決定書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
41高雄市餐盒公會因吉之口速食未遵照其訂價而拒絕該公司入會處分書， 錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
42 偉志公司因不當限制他事業活動為條件而與其交易之行為處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1.
43採購設有採購地區限制是否合法之疑義解釋，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
44 眼鏡業價格標示專案導正，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/buss11.htm
45統一超商股份有限公司從事足以影響交易秩序之顯失公平行為處分書， 行政院公平交易委員會公報第九卷第七期 。
46統一超商股份有限公司被檢舉壟斷超商代收民營電信資費涉有違反公平交易法規定案不處分決議書，行政院公平交易委員會公報第九卷第五期。
47華豐鋼鐵鍛造廠使他事業參與聯合之行為有妨礙公平競爭之虞處分書， 錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
48群山公司、達葉公司、和葉公司從事限制下游代銷商不得跨縣市越區銷售行為，行政院公平交易委員會(八八)公處字第一四○號處分書，行政院公平交易委員會公報第八卷第十二期。
49製造廠商限制經銷商之交易對象及予不同待遇之行為有無違法之解釋， 錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1。
50廠商限制經銷商提供售後服務以使用原廠零件為限違法否解釋，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
51標緻錄影股份有限公司因不正當限制他事業活動, 違反公平交易訴願決定書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
52標緻錄影股份有限公司因不正當限制他事業活動行為處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
53 標緻錄影股份有限公司為有妨礙公平競爭之虞行為處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
54學者有限公司所為不正當之搭售限制處分書，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
55樺陽車業股份有限公司限制競爭及妨礙公平競爭行為處分書，行政院公平交易委員會公報第九卷第五期，第756-769頁。
56 機車事業行銷体系及銷售行為導正與警示原則，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/buss16.htm
57燈飾業價格標價導正，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/buss14.htm
58獨家交易安排地域或顧客之限制等行為是否違反公平法解釋，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
59龍響影視公司因推行八二年度版權錄影節目帶連鎖出租店合約處分書， 錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
60聯合行為許可案件統計，錄自http://www.ftc.gov.tw/stat1e.htm
61關於機車業者限定車主應使用特定廠牌機油之適法性事宜案，錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
62寶麗金福茂科藝百代博德曼滾石寶聲唱片公司不公平競爭行為處分書， 錄自http://210.69.106.166/cgi-bin/ftcdetail1
貳、外文參考資料
書目
1 AREEDA, PHILLIP E., ANTITRUST LAW-AN ANALYSIS OF ANTITRUST PRINCIPLES AND THEIR APPLICATION, VOLUME IX, BOSTON : LITTLE, BROWN AND COMPANY (1991).
2 AREEDA, PHILLP E. & HERBERT HOVENKAMP, ANTITRUST LAW- AN ANALYSIS OF ANTITRUST PRINCIPLES AND THEIR APPLICATION, BOSTON: LITTLE, BROWN AND COMPANY (1992 SUPPLEMENT).
3 BLAIR, ROGER D. & DAVID L. KASERMAN, ANTITRUST ECONOMICS, ILLINOIS RICHARD D. IRWIN, INC. (1985).
4 BLAIR, ROGER D. AND JEFFREY L. HARRISON, MONOPSONY-ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS , NEW JERSEY: PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS (1993).
5 BLAIR, ROSS W., FRANCHISING PROBLEMS UNDER ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION LAWS, FROM FRANCHISING 1988 BUSINESS STRATEGIES AND LEGAL COMPLIANCE, COMMERCIAL LAW AND PRACTICE COURSE HANDBOOK SERIES NUMBER 445,U.S.A. (1988).
6 BORK, ROBERT H., THE ANTITRUST PARADOX- A POLICY AT WAR WITH ITSELF, NEW YORK:THE FREE PRESS (1978).
7 GOYDER, D.G., EC COMPETITION LAW, SECOND EDITION, OXFORD: CLARENDON PRESS, (1993).
8 HOVENKAMP, HERBERT, ECONOMICS AND FEDERAL ANTITRUST LAW, MINNESOTA :WEST PUBLISHING CO. (1985).
9 KATZ, MICHAEL & HARVEY S. ROSEN, MICROECONOMICS, IRWIN MCGRAW-HILL (1998).
10KORAH, VALENTINE & WARWICK A. ROTHNIE, AN INTRODUCTORY GUIDE TO EEC COMPETITION LAW AND PRACTICE, FOURTH EDITION, OXFORD: ESC PUBLISHING LIMITED (1990).
11KORAH, VALENTINE & WARWICK A. ROTHNIE, EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTION AND THE EEC COMPETITION RULES REGULATION 1983/83 & 1984/83, SECOND EDTTION, LONDON: SWEET & MAXWELL (1992).
12MENDELSOHN, M., THE GUIDE TO FRANCHISING, SECOND EDITION, NEW YORK: PERGAMON PRESS, (1979).
13OPPENHEM, S. CHESTERFIELD & GLEN E. WESTON, FEDERAL ANTITRUST LAWS CASES AND COMMENTS, THIRD EDITION, MINNESOTA : WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY (1977).
14 OECD,ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT, COMPETITION POLICY AND VERTICAL RESTRAINTS: FRANCHISING AGREEMENTS(1994).
15PINDYCK, ROBERT S. & DANIEL L. RUBINFELD, MICROECONOMICS,PRENTICE HALL (1998).
16RAYBOULD, D. M. & ALISON FIRTH, LAW OF MONOPOLIES- COMPETITION LAW AND PRACTICE IN THE U SA, EEC, GERMANY AND UK, LONDON: GRAHAM & TROTMAN, (1991).
17RITTER, LENNART, FRANCIS RAWLINSON & W.DAVID BRAUN, EEC COMPETITION LAW-A PRACTITIONER’S GUIDE, BOSTON: KLUWER LAW AND TAXATION PUBLISHERS (1991).
18SCHERER, F. M. & DAVID ROSS, INDUSTRIAL MARKET STRUCTURE AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE, THIRD EDITION, BOSTON : HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY (1990).
19SULLIVAN, LAWRENCE ANTHONY, HANDBOOK OF THE LAW OF ANTITRUST, MINNESOTA : WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY (1977).
20VAUGHN, CHARLES L., FRANCHISING-ITS NATURE, SCOPE, ADVANTAGES, AND DEVELOPMENT, SECOND AND REVISED EDITION , LEXINGTON: D.C. HEALTH AND COMPANY, (1979).
21WALDMAN, DON E. & ELIZABETH J. JENSEN, INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION-THEORY AND PRACTICE, NEW YORK: ADDISON WESLEY LONGMAN, INC. (1998).
22WHISH, RICHARD & BRENDA SUFRIN, COMPETITION LAW, THIRD EDITION, LONDON: BUTTERWORTHS (1993).
23WILLIAMSON, OLIVER E., MARKETS AND HIERARCHIES: ANALYSIS AND ANTITRUST IMPLICATIONS-A STUDY IN THE ECONOMICS OF INTERNAL ORGANIZATION, LONDON : COLLIER MACMILLAN PUBLISHERS (1975).
期刊、專論、演講等及判決
（一）英文
a .期刊、專論、演講、準則、公告
1 Adams, Walter & James W. Brock, Revitalizing a Structural Antitrust Policy, THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 239-52(1994).
2 Anticipating the 21st Century: Competition Policy in the New High-Tech, Global Marketplace, 70 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1996).
3 Antitrust Guidelines for Collaborations among Competitors, Issued by the Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice, ( April 2000), available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2000/04/ftcdojguidelines.pdf.
4 Arquit, Kevin J., Resale Price Maintenance: Consumers´ Friend or Foe？,60 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 448-62(1992).
5 B2B Statement: Agnes Foy( CapCLEAR Ltd. ), Re: The Regulation of B2B Internet Exchanges A Eur opean Perspective 2. available at http://www.ftc.gov/bc/b2b/comments/b2bagnesfoy.htm.
6 Baker,Jonathan B.,Predatory Pricing after Brooke Group: An Economic Perspective, 62 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 586-92(1994).
7 Baker,Jonathan B.,Vertical Restraints with Horizontal Consequences: Competitive Effects of "Most-Favored-Customer"Clauses 64 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 519-30(1996).
8 Baker, Simon and Lawrence Wu, Applying the Market Definition Guideline of the European Commission, ECLR 273 (1998).
9 Balto, David A., Standard Setting in a Network Economy, Cutting Edge Antitrust Law Seminars International February 17, 2000 New York, New York, available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/oter/standersetting.htm.
10 Barlas, Ned E., Dealers Coercing Manufacturers: A Proposal for A Unilateral Antitrust Offense, 137 UNIVERSITY PENNSYVANIA LAW REVIEW 2356-57(1989) .
11 Barr, Frances, The New Commission Notice on Agreements of Minor Importance: Is Appreciability a Useful Measure ? 4 ECLR 212 (1997).
12 Beschle, Donald L., Current Topic in Antitrust: "What, Never？Well, Hardly Ever " : Strict Antitrust Scrutiny as an Alternative to Per Se Antitrust Illegality, 38 HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL 484(1987).
13 Biro, Zoltan and Amelia Fletcher, The E.C. Green Paper on Vertical Restraints: An Economic Comment, 3 ECLR 131-32(1998).
14 Bissocoli, Eugenio, Exclusive Purchasing Obligations: The Italian Chapter of the Ice Cream Distribution Saga, ECLR 521(1998).
15 Black, Oliver, Per Se Rules And Rule of Reason: What Are They？3 EUROPEAN COMPETITION LAW REVIEW 152(1997).
16 Blair, Roger D. & Amanda K. Esquibel, Some Remarks on Monopoly Leveraging, 40 THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 374-88(1995 ).
17 Blair, Roger D. & Jeffrey L. Harrison, Antitrust Policy and Monopsony, 76 CORNELL LAW REVIEW 301-03(1991).
18 Blair, Roger D. & Jeffrey L. Harrison, Cooperative Buying, Monopsony Power, and Antitrust Policy 86 NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 336-50(1992).
19 Blair, Roger D. & Jeffrey L. Harrison, Rethinking Antitrust Injury, 42 VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW 1556-57(1989).
20 Blair, Roger D. & Jeffrey L. Harrison, The Measurement of Monopsony Power, 37 THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 148-49(1992).
21 Blair, Roger D. & John E. Lopatka, The Albercht Rule after Khan: Death Becomes Her, 74 NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW 126-27(1998).
22 Borghesani, William H., Jr., & Peter L. de La Cruz, & David B. Berry, Food for Though: The Emergence of Power Buyers and its Challenge to Competition, 4 STANFORD JOURNAL OF LAW 149(1999).
23 Boulter, Louise and Tony Bendell, Competition Risks in Benchmark, 8 ECLR 439(1999).
24 Briley, Michael M.,Price Discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act, 27 UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO LAW REVIEW 403-11(1996).
25 Broberg, Morten P., The De Minimis Notice, EUROPEAN LAW REVIEW 373(1995)
26 Burns, Jean Wegman, The New Role of Coercion in Antitrust, 60 FORDHAM LAW REVIEW 389(1991).
27 Buying Power of Multiproduct Retailers, Daffe/Clp(99)21 Competition Policy Roundtables No. 23 Executive Summary 8 (1999) Available at http:/www.oecd.org/daf/clp/Roundtables/buying00.htm.
28 Cann,Wesley A. JR., Vertical Restraints and The " Efficiency" Influence – Does Any Room Rema in for More Traditional Antitrust Values and More Innovative Antitrust Policies？24 AMERICAN BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL 500-21(1986).
29 Carlin, Fiona M., Vertical Restraints: Time for Change？ 5 EUROPEAN COMPETITION LAW REVIEW 284-86(1996).
30 Carrier, Michael A., The Real Rule of Reason: Bridging the Disconnect, 1999 BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 1268-69(1999).
31 Chard, J.S., The Economics of the Application of Article 85 to Selective Distribution Systems, EUROPEAN LAW REVIEW 97-98(1982).
32 Clark, Donald S., Secretary Federal Trade Commission before the Robinson- Partman Act Committee Section of Antitrust Law Forty-Sixth Annual Spring Meeting, The Robinson-Partman Act: Annual Update, 15 (April 2, 1998), available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/other/spring98.htm.
33 Comanor, William S., Papers Presented at the Airlie House Conference on the Antitrust Alternative: Vertical Arrangements and Antitrust Analysis, 62 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 1163 (1987).
34 Comment, Franchising and Vertical Customer-Territorial Restrictions: GTE Sylvania and the Demise of the Social Goals of the Sherman Act, 9 TEXAS TECH LAW REVIEW 284-86(1977-78).
Commission Finalises New Competition Rules for Distribution, Brussels, 24 May 2000, available at http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guesten.ksh?p -action.gettxt=gt…/520│0│RAPID&lg=E
35 Commission Notice concerning Commission Regulations (EEC) No 1983/83 and (EEC) No 1984/83 of 22 June 1983, available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg04/lawenten/en/not8384.htm.
36 Commission Notice, Guidelines on Vertical Restraints (Text with EEA relevance), available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/antitrust/others/horizontal/reform/consulation/draft -guidelines -en.pdf.
37 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1475/95 of 28 June 1995 on the Application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to Certain Categories of Motor Vehicle Distribution and Servicing Agreements- III Improved Market Access for Spare Part Producers/ Distributors and for Independent Repairers, available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/antitrust/legislation/1475an6 -en.html.
38 Conference Probes Manufactures´ Restraints, Economics Justifications, 46 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1984)..
39 Congress Takes Affirmative Steps to Attack Vertical Restraints Guidelines, 49 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1985 ).
40 Constance, Lisa M., Antitrust Law- Exercising the Rule of Reason: Supreme Court Revises Analysis of Vertical Maximum Price-Fixing, Bringing it Closer to Achieving the Goals of the Sherman Act- State Oil Co. v. Khan, 118 S. Ct. 275 (1997), 72 TEMPLE LAW REVIEW 479-83 (1999).
41 Consulting, Dobson, Buyer Power and its Impact on Competition in the Food Retail Distribution Sector of the European-Prepared for the European Commission-DGIV Study Contract No. IV/98/ETD/078, 3,154,157 (1999), available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg04/publications/studies/bpifrs.
42 Cruz, Jaime J. De La, State Oil Co. v. Khan, 25 OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 417( 1999).
43 Cruz, Peter de la, Vertical Restraints: U.S. and E.U.Policy toward Manufacturer-Retailer Relationships, 5 ECLR 296-98(1997).
44 Curtin, John J., Daniel L. Goldberg & Daniel S. Savrin, The EC´s Rejection of the Kesko/Tuko Merger: Leading the Way to the Application of a "Gatekeeper"Analysis of Retailer Market Power under U.S. Antitrust Law, 40 BOSTON COLLEGE LAW REVIEW 545(1999).
45 Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs Committee on Competition Law and Policy, Buying Power of Multiproduct Retailers, (1999), available at http://www.occd.org/daf/clp/Roundtables/buying00.htm.
46 Discounters, Consumers Call for RPM Enforcement, FTC Sees Need for Balance, 45 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT 370-71(1983).
47 Distribution Agreements: Proposed Commission Regulation, 22 COMPETITION LAW IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1999).
48 Distribution Seminar Speakers Differ on Current Vertical Law, Counseling, 48 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1985).
49 Division to Recall Verticals Guides, Expand Amnesty Policy for Corporations, 65 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1993).
50 Dowd, James Murphy, Oligopsony Power: Antitrust in Injury and Collusive Byuer Practices in Input Markets, 76 BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 1084-90(1996).
51 E.C. Commission,Draft Guidelines on the Applicability of Article 81 to Horizontal Cooperation, available at.http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/antitrust/others/horizontal/reform/consultation/draft -guidelines -en.pdf.
52 E.C. Commission, Draft Guidelines on Vertical Restraints 1999, 5 C.M.L.R. (1999).
53 Easterbrook, Frank H., The Limits of Antitrust, 63 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 19-36(1984).
54 Economic and Social Committee, Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ´Green Paper on Vertical Restraints in EC Competition Policy´, OFFICIAL JOURNAL C 296, (1997).
55 Editorial Comments, The Modernization of the Community Competition Rules on Vertical Agreements, 35 COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW 1227-29(1998).
56 EEC Council: Regulation No 17: First Regulation Implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty, available at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/lif/dat/1962/en -362R0017.html.
57 Eliasberg, Edward D., Jr., Concerted Health Care Buying Activities and Antitrust, 1995 UTAH LAW REVIEW 463(1995).
58 Elzinga, Kenneth G. & David E. Mills, Trumping the Areeda-Turner Test: The Recoupment Standard in Brooke Group, 62 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 574(1994)
59 Europa/Competition/Prohibition on cartels and exemptions(Article 85), available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg04/lawenten/natintro/en/int3b.htm
60 European Commission Starts Review of Policy toward Vertical Restraints, 72 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1997).
61 European Community Competition Policy, Antitrust: Article 81 and 82 A Modernisation of the Legislative and Interpretative Rules, available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg04/public/en/rap98.pdf.
62 Exclusive License, Distributorship for Patented Bit Might Be Sherman Act 1 Violation, 49 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT 320 (1985).
63 Exclusive Territorial Distributorships are Held Per Se Legal under Donnelly Act, 52 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1987).
64 Failure to Allege Agreement on Price Dooms Per Se Case Against Manufacture, 64 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1993).
65 Farm Implement Dealer Established Prima Facie Case of Tying Violation, 48 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1985).
66 Federal Trade Commission, In the Matter of : Workshop on Slotting Allowances, (May 31, 2000), available at http://www.ftc.gov/bc/slotting/slotting531.pdf.
67 Federal Trade Commission, In the Matter of : Workshop on Slotting Allowances, Volume 2, 450 (June 1, 2000), available at http://www.ftc.gov/bc/slotting/slotting61.pdf
68 Federal Trade Commission, In the Matter of : Workshop on Slotting Allowances, Volume 2, Roundtable 5: Policy Recommendations, Panel 5 Moderators, 392-393, 456-457 (June 1, 2000), available at http://www.ftc.gov/bc/slotting/slotting61.pdf.
69 Federal Trade Commission, Public Workshop: Slotting Allowances and Other Grocery Marketing Practices: When Should they Raise Antitrust Concerns？Available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2000/03/slottingfrn.htm.
70 Fisher, Alan A. & Frederick I. Johnson, and Robert H. Lande, Do the DOJ Vertical Restraints Guidelines Provide Guidance？THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 609-37(Fall 1987).
71 Flexner, Donald L. & Mark A. Racanelli, Merger Control and State Aids Panel: State and Federal Antitrust Enforcement in the United States: Collision or Harmony？9 CONNECTICUT JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 517-18(1994).
72 Flynn, John J., The "Is" and " Ought" of Vertical Restraints after Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp., 71 CORNELL LAW REVIEW 1100-22(1986).
73 Fox, Eleanor M. & Lawernce A. Sullivan, Antitrust—Retospective and Prospective: Where are We Coming from? Where are We Going? 62 N. Y. U. LAW REVIEW 969(1987).
74 Fox, Eleanor M., Toward World Antitrust and Market Access 91 AMERICAN JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL LAW 12-22(1997).
75 Fox, Kraig G., Paramount Revisited: The Resurgence of vertical Intergration in the Motion Pictu re Industry, 21 HOFSTRA LAW REVIEW 524(1992).
76 Freed, Charles L., Reconsidering the Per Se Approach to Tying Agreements, 13 TOLEDO LAW REVIEW 577-78(1982).
77 Frenza, Marcello F. De, Vertical Territorial Restrictions as Patent Misuse, 61 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW 221-70(1987).
78 FTC and DOJ Issue Antitrust Guidelines for Collaborations among Competitors, April 7, 2000, available at http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2000/04/collguidelines.htm.
79 FTC Ends Order Imposed on Sharp Banning Use of Vertical Restraints, 57 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1989).
80 FTC Withdraws Statement, Order on Advertising Price Restrictions, 52 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1987).
81 Furse, Mark, The Essential Facilities Doctrine in Community Law, 8 ECLR 472 (1995).
82 Gellhorn, Ernest & Teresa Tatham, Making Sense out of the Rule of Reason, 35 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 158-59(1985).
83 Gidley, J. Mark, Comments Regarding Slotting Allowances and Other Grocery Marketing Practices, 1 (June 23 2000), available at http://www.ftc.gov/bc/slotting/comments/006white&casellp.pdf.
84 Gilbert, Richard J. & Steven C. Sunshine, Incorporating Dynamic Efficiency Concerns in Merger Analysis: The use of Innovation Markets, 63 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 574-75(1995).
85 Glasl, Daniel, Essential Facilities Doctrine in EC Anti-turst Law: A Contribution to the Current Debate, 6 ECLR 308(1994).
86 Goff, Robert F., Emphasizing Conduct over Context and Market Definition over Market Power: Short-Term Strategic Anticompetitive Behavior Absolved in Blue Cross v. Marshfield Clinic, 3 CONNECTICUT INSURANCE LAW JOURNAL 392(1996/1997).
87 Green Paper on Vertical Restraints in EC Competition Policy, available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg04/entente/en/96721en.pdf.
88 Grimes, Warren S., Antitrust Tie-In Analysis after Kodak: Understanding the Role of Market Imperfections, 62 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 271-75(1994).
89 Grimes, Warren S., Brand Marketing, Intrabrand Competition, and the Multibrand Retailer: The Antitrust Law of Vertical Restraints, 64 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAl 102-03(1995).
90 Grimes, Warren S., Making Sense of State Oil Co. v. Khan: Vertical Maximum Price Fixing under a Rule of Reason, 66 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 573-78(1998).
91 Grimm, Victor E., Location Clauses and the Sherman Act: A Practical Guide, 67 TRADEMARK REPORT 25-26(1977).
92 Gulf, Subsidiary Must Stand Trial on Price Fixing, Tying Allegations, 45 ANTITRUST TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1983).
93 Hansen, Hugh C., Robinson-Patman Law: A Review and Analysis, 51 FORDHAM LAW REVIEW 1146-69(1983).
94 Harrison, Jeffrey L., Price Fixing, the Professions, and Ancillary Restraints: Coping with Maricopa County, 1982 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW 926-27 (1982).
95 Havighurst, Clark C., Antitrust Issues in the Joint Purchasing of Health Care, 1995 UTAH LAW REVIEW 411-36 (1995).
96 Hawk, Barry E., System Failure: Vertical Restraints and EC Competition Law, 32 COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW 974-77(1995).
97 Hay, George A., Is the Class Half-Empty or Half-Full？: Reflections on the Kodak Case, 62 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 177-78(1993).
98 Hay, George A., Vertical Restrains after Monsanto, 70 CORNELL LAW REVIEW 424-44(1985).
99 Hellman, Elizabeth, Vertical Territoral and Customer Restrictions in the Franching Industry, 10 COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS 497-515(1974).
100 Hensley William M., Franchise Tying: Gauging the Economic Power of a Trademark, 15 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 412-18(1981).
101 High Court Seeks Government´s Views on Per Se Rule and Vertical Price Fixing, 46 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1984).
102 Hirzel, Canning Co., Comments Regarding Slotting Allowances and Other Grocery Marketing Practices, 2 (June 7 2000), available at http://www.ftc.gov/bc/slotting/comments/hirzelcanningco.pdf.
103 Hoerner, Robert J., The Antitrust Significance of a Patent′s Exclusionary Power, 60 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 875-79(1992).
104 Holgersson, Jörgen, Parallel Import and Competition-Effects of a Court Ruling, Taipei 2000 International Conference on Competition Policies/Laws for the New Millennium V-1-12-14 June19-20 (2000).
105 Hornsby, Stephen B., Public and Private Resale Price Maintenance Systems in the Publishing Sector: The Need for Equal Treatment in European Law, European Law Review 383(1985).
106 Horspool, Margot & Valentine Korah, Competition ,37 THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 340-41(1992).
107 Horton, Emily B., Vertical Restraints and Distributor Termination, A Standard for Proof: Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp., 9 DELAWARE JOURNAL OF CORPORATE LAW 400-03(1985).
108 Hovenkamp, Herbert, Antitrust Policy after Chicago, 84 MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW 226-43(1985).
109 Hovenkamp, Herbert, Vertical Restrictions and Monopoly Power, 64 BOSTON UNIVRSITY LAW REVIEW 529-38(1984).
110 Hovenkamp, Herbert, Antitrust Policy,Restricted Distribution,and the Market for Execusionary Rights,71 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 1302(1987).
111 Jacobson, Jonathan M. & Gary J. Dorman, Joint Purchasing, Monopsony and Antitrust, 36 THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 3-38 ( 1991).
112 Jacobson, Jonathan M. & Gary J. Dorman, Monopsony Revisited: A Comment on Blair & Harrison, 37 THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 154-55(1992).
113 Jordan, William H., Predatory Pricing after Brooke Group: The Problem of States "Sales below Cost" Statutes, 44 EMORY LAW JOURNAL 281(1995).
114 Jorde, Thomas M. & Mark A. Lemley, Summary Judgment in Antitrust Cases: Understanding Monsanto and Matsushita, 36 THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 274-93(1991).
115 Kaplow, Louis, Extension of Monopoly Power through Leverage, 85 COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW 518-19(1985).
116 Kellaway, Rosalind, Vertical Restraints: Which Option? 6 ECLR 387(1997).
117 Klein, Benjamin, Distribution Restrictions Operate by Creating Dealer Profits: Explaining the Use of Maximum Resale Price Maintenance in State Oil v. Khan, 7 SUPREM COURT ECONOMIC REVIEW 57-58(1999).
118 Kleine, Richard A., New Department of Justice Vertical Restraints Guidelines- A Search for Legal Certainty ,40 THE BUSINESS LAWYER 1337-38(1985).
119 Korah, Valentine, The Future of Vertical Agreements under E.C. Competition Law 8 ECLR 507-10(1998).
120 Krattenmaker, Thomas G. & Steven C. Salop, Anticompetitive Exclusion: Raising Rivals´ Cost to Achieve Power over Price, 96 YALE LAW JOURNAL 234-87(1986).
121 Lande, Robert H., Beyond Chicago: Will Activist Antitrust Arise Again？THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 5(1994).
122 Lande, Robert H., Chicago Takes it on the Chin: Imperfect Information Could Play a Crucial Role in the Post-Kodak World, 62 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 194-99(1993).
123 Laurila, Maija, The De Minimis Doctrine in EEC Competition Law: Agreements of Minor Importance, 3 ECLR 97 (1993).
124 Levy, David T. & James D. Reitzes, Product Differentiation and the Ability to Collude: Where Being Different Can Be an Advantage, THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 352-57(1993).
125 Levy, Richard, Jr., Trademark Franchising and Antitrust Law: The Two-Product Rule for Tying Arrangements, 69 TRADEMARK REPORT 53(1978).
126 Lindsey, Michael K., Joint Purchasing Arragements, 61 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 404(1993).
127 Lugard, H. H. Paul, Vertical Restraints under EC Competition Law: A Horrizontal Approach？ 3 EUROPEAN COMPETITION LAW REVIEW 167-68(1996).
128 MacAvoy, Christopher J., Enforcement Policy Regrading Slotting Allowances, 1-2, Federal Trade Commission Workshop On Slotting Allowances May 31–June 1, 2000, available at http://www.ftc.gov/bc/slotting/presentations/slottingallow.pdf.
129 Major, Brewers and Wholesalers Face New York Claims on Territorial Allocation, 51 Antitrust and Trade Regulation Report (1986).
130 Majoros, John M., The Vertical Restraints Guidelines: Improvement or More Confusion？36 CASE WESTERN RESERVE LAW REVIEW 159-61(1986).
131 Manufacturer´s Sales Assistance Program for Track Dealerships Does not Violate？45 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1983).
132 Markovits, Richard S., The Limits to Simplifying Antitrust: A Reply to Professor Easterbrook, 63 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 76-85(1984).
133 Marvel, Howard P., The Resale Price Maintenance Controversy: Beyond the Conventitional Wisdom, 63 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 81-90(1994).
134 MastromanolisFN, Emmanuel P., Predatory Pricing in the European Union: A Case for Legal Reform ,Issue 4 EUROPEAN COMPETITION LAW REVIEW 211-19(1998).
135 MastromanolisFN, Emmanuel P., Insight From U.S. Antitrust Law on Exclusive and Restricted Territorial Distribution: The Creation of a New Legal Standard for European Union Competition Law, 15 UNIVERSITY OF PENSYLVANIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LAW 559-92(1995).
136 McDavid, Janet L., Antitrust Issues in Health Care Reform 43 DEPAUL LAW REVIEW 1071(1994).
137 Meese, Alan J., Economic Theor y, Trade Freedom and Consumer Welfare: State Oil Co.v. Khan and the Continuing Incoherence of Antitrust Doctrin, 84 CORNELL LAW REVIEW 763(1999).
138 Meese, Alan J., Price Theory and Vertical Restraints: A Misunderstood Relation, 45 UCLA LAW REVIEW 170(1997).
139 Meyer, Jayma M., Relaxation of the Per Se Mantra in the Vertical Price Fixing Arena, 68 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW 82-103(1994).
140 Monopolies Subcommittee Receives Views on Division´s Enforcement Track Record, 48 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1985).
141 Monroe, Murray S., Antitrust Symposium: Vertical Restraints, 27 UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO LAW REVIEW 449-56(1996).
142 Most Cooperative Advertising Programs to Be Evaluated under Rule of Reason 66 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1994).
143 Moussis, Nicholas, Small and Medium Enterprises in the Internal Market, EUROPEAN LAW REVIEW 483-85(1992).
144 Murray, Fiona and Jacquelyn MacLennan, The Future for Selective Distirbution Systems: The CFI Judgments on Luxury Perfume and the Commission Green Paper on Vertical Restraints, 4 ECLR 230(1997).
145 NAAG Adopts Alternative Guidelines to Govern Vertical Restraints of Trade, 49 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1985).
146 NAAG Approves Revisions to Vertical Restraint Guides, 68 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1995).
147 NAAG Committee Gives Preliminary Approval to Revised Vertical Restraints Guidelines, 67 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1994).
148 NAAG Resolution, Executive Summary & Summary of Comments on Revisions to Vertical Restraints Guidelines, 68 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1995).
149 NAAG′s Vertical Restraints Guidelines, 49 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1985).
150 Nazerali, Julie and David Cowan, Reforming E.U. Distribution Rules-Has the Commission Found Vertical Reality? 3 ECLR 159-60(1999).
151 Nazerali, Julie and David Cowan, The Commission’s Draft Communication on Distribution Agreements- Market Shares are Predictably Back on the Table! 7 ECLR 409(1998).
152 Newell,Tara, Burns The Removal of Vertical Restraints in EC Competition Policy, 4 COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN LAW 193(1998).
153 New Economics of Vertical Restraints is Focal Point of ABA Panel Discussion, 70 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1996).
154 Note, Oligopsony Power: Antitrust Injury and Collusive Buyer Practices in Input Markets, 76 BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 1100(1996).
155 Note,Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. American Drugs, Inc.: Drawing the Line Between Predatory and Competitive Pricing, 50 ARKANSAS LAW REVIEW 105-118(1997).
156 Note, The Distinction Between the Scope of Section 2(a) and Section 2(d) and 2(e) of the Robinson-Patman Act, 83 Michigan Law Review 1590-94(1985).
157 Note, Tying Arrangement Analysis: A Continued Integration of the Rule of Reason and the Per Se Rule, 63 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW QUARTERLY 346(1985).
158 Notes, An Argument for Exempting Prestige Goods from the Per Se Ban on Resale Price Maintenance, 73 TEXAS LAW REVIEW (1995).
159 Notes., Antitrust law-Vertical Restraints-Per Se Mandate of Schwinn Extended to Location Clause in Franchise Agreement, 26 MERCER LAW REVIEW 635-36(1975).
160 Notice Concerning Agreements, Decisions and Concerted Practices in the Field of Cooperation between Enterprises , available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/antitrust/legislation/ncadcp -en.html.
161 O’Toole Francis, The E.C. Green Paper on Vertical Restraints: Option IV Defended, 1 ECLR 6-7(1999).
162 OECD, Buying Power of Multiproduct Retailers, Draft/CLP(99)21 Competition Policy Roundtables, Les tables rondes sur la politique de concurrence No. 23, (1999), available at: http://www.oecd.org/daf/clp/Roundtables/buying00.htm.
163 Office of Fair Trading (United Kingdom), The Welfare Consequences of the Exercise of Buyer Power, Prepared for the Office of Fair Trading by Paul Dobson, Michael Waterson, and Alex Chu, Office of Fair Trading Research Paper 16 (September 1998), available at http://www.oft.gov.uk/html/rsearch/reports/oft239.htm.
164 Olson James W. & Lawrence J. Spiwak, Can Short-Term Limits on Strategic Vertical Restraints Improve Long-Term Cable Industry Market Performance？13 CARDOZO ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 290-91(1993).
165 Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the Green Paper on Vertical Restraints in EC Competition Policy, 1997 OJ C 244.
166 Parschalk,Martin,Vertical Restraints on Competition: Selective Distribution ,Exclusive Distribution and Exclusive Purchasing System in Austria,7 ECLR 427(1998).
167 Pasahow, Lynn H., Tie-Ins and Exclusive Dealing in the Distribution and Franchising Area: Emerging Issues and Principles after Hyde, sponsored by the Franchising Committee of the Section of Antitrust Law at the Section’s 33d Annual Spring Meeting in Washington, D.C., on March 20, 1985.
168 Patterson, Mark R., The Market Power Requirement in Antitrust Rule of Reason Cases: A Rhetorical History, 37 SAN DIEGO LAW REVIEW 6-7(2000).
169 Peeperkorn, Luc, DGIV-A-1, The Economics of Verticals, Competition Policy Newsletter, 4 (1998-number 2-June), available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg04/speech/eight/en/sp98020.htm.
170 Peritz, Rudolph J. R., Three Visions of Managed Competition, 1920-50, THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 277-81(1994).
171 Pheasant, John and Daniel Weston, Vertical Restraints, Foreclosure and Article 85: Developing an Analytical Framework, 5 ECLR 324-28 (1997).
172 Piraino, Thomas A., Jr., A proposed Antitrust Approach to the Conduct of Retailers, Dealers, and other Resellers, 73 WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW 812-13(1998).
173 Piraino, Thomas A., Jr., Making Sence of the Rule of Reason: A New Standard for Section 1 of the Sherman Act 47 VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW, 1756(1994).
174 Piraino, Thomas A., Jr., Reconciling the Per Se and Rule of Reason Approaches to Antitrust Analysis, 64 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW 686-738(1991).
175 Piraino, Thomas A., Jr., The Case for Presuming the Legality of Quality Motivated Restrictions on Distribution, 63 NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW 2-33(1988).
176 Pitofsky, Calls for Commission Hearings to Bring Law in Line with World Changes, 68 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1995).
177 Pomerantz, Stewart A., A Lawyer′s Ramble down the Information Superhighway: Recent Antitrust Developments and a Selective Antitrust Perspective of the information Superhighway 64 FORDHAM LAW REVIEW 820-22(1995).
178 Posner, Richard A., The Rule of Reason and Economic Approach: Reflections on the Sylvania Decision, 1 THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW 14-16(1977).
179 Prepared Remarks of Robert Pitofskyo Chairman, U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Vertical Restraints and Vertical Aspects of Mergers- A U.S. Perspective, Fordham Corporate Law Institute 24th Annual Conference on International Antitrust Law and Policy October 16-17,1997 . Available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/pitofsky/fordham7.htm.
180 Prepared Remarks of Thomas B. Leary Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission, Distribution Law Developments at Federal Trade Commission., Distribution and Dealer Termination 21st Anniversary Seminar Law Journal Seminars, New York, New York, June 26, 2000 , available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/leary/ddtny000626.htm.
181 Proposal for a Council Regulation-Amending .Regulation No 19/65/EEC on the Application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to Certain Categories of Agreements and Concerted Practices, Proposal for a Council Regulation-Amending .Regulation No 17: First Regulation Implementing Article 85 and 86 of the Treaty , available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg04/entente/en/com1998546.pdf.
182 Ramos, Jeneen Y.," The Wrath of Khan": A Look at the Impact on Minority Franchisees, 42 HOWARD LAW REVIEW 578-82(1999).
183 Rating, Stefan, Commission Proposes New De Minimis Notice, (1/04/97), available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg04/speech/seven/en/sp97017.htm.
184 Ratliff, John, Selective Distribution: Is there a Case for a General Block Exemption or a ‘Guidelines’ Notice? 5 ECLR 301(1996).
185 Reindl, Andreas, Intellectual Poperty and Intra-Community Trade, 20 FORDHAM INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 829-47(1997).
186 Reinert, Peter, Industrial Supply Contracts under EC Competition Law, ECLR 6-7 (1996).
187 Remarks of Commissioner Sheila F. Anthony, 13th Annual Advanced Ali-ABA Course of Study Vertical Issues in Federal Antitrust Law, 2 (March 19, 1998), available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/anthony/aliabaps.htm.
188 Resale Price Maintenance Bill Would Help Terminated Dealer to Get Sherman Act 1 Case to Jury, 58 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1990).
189 Resale Price Maintenance Legislation is Needed to End Confusion in Case Law 58 Antitrust and TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1990) .
190 Ricks, Val D. & R. Chet Loftis, Seeing the Diagonal Clearly: Telling Vertical from Horizontal in Antitrust Law, 28 UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO LAW REVIEW 155-57(1996).
191 Riley, Alan J.,Vertical Restraints: A Revolution? 8 ECLR 483-89(1998).
192 Robinson, Glen O., Explaining Vertical Agreements: The Colgate Puzzle and Antitrust Method, 80 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW 599-618(1994).
193 Rodger, Barry J., The Commission White Paper on Modernisation of the Rules Implementing Articles 81 and 82 of the E.C. Treaty, 24 EUROPEAN LAW REVIEW 655(1999).
194 Rogalski, Martin L., Continental T. V. v. G.T.E. Sylvania: Vertical Restrictions- Location Clauses to be Judged Under the Rule of Reason, DETROIT COLLEGE OF LAW REVIEW 174(1978).
195 Rogers, Wanda Jane, Beyond Economic Theory: A Model for Analyzing the Antitrust Implications of Exclusive Dealing Arrangements 45 DUKE LAW JOURNAL 1026(1996).
196 Ross, Stephen F., The Misunderstood Alliance Between Sports Fans, Players, and the Antitrust Laws, 1997 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW 534(1997).
197 Roszkowski, Mark E., State Oil Company v. Khan and the Rule of Reason: The End of Interbrand Competition？66 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 619(1998).
198 Rule, Criticizes RPM Bill: Promises to Recommend Veto, 53 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1987).
199 Ruskin, Andrew, Unbridled Managed Care: When Consumers Experience Antitrust Welfare Loss from Exclsionary Contracts between HMO Insurers and Health Care Providers, 6 HEALTH MATRIX 403-04(1996).
200 Ruskin, Andrew, Unbridled Managed Care: When Consumers Experience Antitrust Welfare Loss from Exclusionary Contracts between HMO Insurers and Health Care Providers, 6 HEALTH MATRIX JOURNAL OF LAW-MEDICINE 397-413(1996) .
201 Ryan, John P., Jr. and Robert C. Schnitz, The Justice Department′s Guidelines on Vertical Restraints, 74 ILLINOIS BAR JOURNAL 68-70 (1985).
202 Salop, Steven C., Presentation to the FTC Slotting Fee Workshop, 4 (May 31, 2000), available at http://www.ftc.gov/bc/slotting/presentations/slottingfee.pdf.
203 Sanfilippo, Luca, The Retail Sector and Application of Antitrsut Rules, 8 EUROPEAN COMPETITION LAW REVIEW 493-96(1997).
204 SASS, Tim R. & David S. Saurman, Mandated Exclusive Territories and Economic Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis of the Malt-Beverage Industry, 36 JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS 153(1993).
205 Schaub, Alexander, EC Competition System- Proposal for Reform, 22 FORDHAM INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 871-81(1999).
206 Schaub Alexander, EC Competition System-Proposals for Reform, 25th Annual Conference: International Antitrust Law & Policy, Fordham Corporate Law Institute ( Thursday 22 October 1998), available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg04/speech/eight/en/sp98059.pdf.
207 Schaub Alexander, Modernization of EC Competition Law: Reform of Regulation No. 17, 23 FORDHAM INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 754-55(2000).
208 Schneider Steven, A Functional Rule-of-Reason Analysis for the Law of Resale Price Maintenance and its Application to Spray-Rite v. Monsanto, WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW 1211-12(1984).
209 Scholar/Practitioner Offers nine Suggestions to Perform Substance, Procedure of Antitrust Laws, 42 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1982).
210 Schroeder, Dirk, The Green Paper on Vertical Restraints: Beware of Market Share Thresholds, 7 ECLR 431(1997).
211 Second Century of Sherman Act Will Be Marked by More Activity than Last Decade, 58 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT 347 (1990).
212 Shaffer, Greg, Slotting Allowances and Resale Price Maintenance: A Comparison of Facilitating Practices, 22 RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS 121(1991).
213 Shepherd William G., Donald Turner and the Economics of Antitrust ,41 THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 947(1996).
214 Silberman, Alan H., Preliminary Observations Concerning the Potential for "Slotting Allowance" Guidelines, 6 (2000), available at http://www.ftc.gov/bc/slotting/presentations/slottingprelim.pdf.
215 Sims, Joe & Philip A. Proger, Litigation Issues in Dealer Termination Pricing Cases, 60 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 472-73(1992).
216 Singham, Shanker A., Shaping Competition Policy in the Americas: Scope for Transatlantic Cooperation？,24 BROOKLYN J. INTERNATIONAL LAW 363-86(1998).
217 Skitol, Robert A. & Kathleen S. O´Neill, Petition to the Federal Trade Commission on Behallf of the Independent Bakers Association, the Tortilla Industry Association and the National Association of Chewing Gum Manufacturers for the Issuance and Enforcement of Guidelines on Slotting Allowances in the Grocery Industry, 3 (April 14, 2000), available at http://www.ftc.gov/bc/slotting/comments/iba.htm.
218 Slawson, W. David, Excluding Competition Without Monopoly Power: The Use of Tying Arragements to Exploit Market Failure, THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 457-60(1991).
219 Smirti, Stephen J., Jr., Trademarks as Tying Products: The Presumption of Economic Power, 69 TRADEMARK REPORT 11(1978).
220 Snyder, Edward A. & Thomas E. Kauper, Misuse of the Antitrust Law: The Competitor Plaintiff, 90 MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW 576-77(1991).
221 Soames, Trevor & Alan Ryan, Predatory Pricing in Air Transport, 3 EUROPEAN COMPETITION LAW REVIEW 155-56(1994).
222 Solomon, Louis M. & Robert D. Joffe, Exclusive Distribution and Antitrust, 53 FORDHAM LAW REVIEW 491-521(1984).
223 Soma, John T. & Anerew P. McCallin, Summary Jugdement and Discovery Strategies in Antiturst and Rico Action after Matsushita v. Zenith, 36 THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 327-36(1991).
224 Southard, William G., Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.: Proving Upstream and Downstream Concerted Action, 688 DELAWARE JOURNAL OF CORPORATE LAW 673-88(1986).
225 Specialty Food Distributors and Manufacturers Association, Comments Regarding Slotting Allowances and Other Grocery Marketing Practices, 3 (March 24, 2000).
226 Spinks, S.O., Exclusive Dealing, Discrimination, and Discounts under EC Competition Law, 67 Antitrust Law Journal 653(2000).
227 Spivack, Gordon B. & Carolyn T. Ellis, Kodak: Enlightened Antitrust Analysis and Traditional Tying Law, 62 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 205-15(1993).
228 Starek, Urges Restraint in Expansion of Per Se Rule, 72 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1997).
229 Steiner, Robert L., Manufacturers´ Promotional Allowances, Free Riders and Vertical Restraints, 36 THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 386(1991).
230 Stenger,Susan, E. Most-Favored-Nation Clauses and Monopsonistic Power: An Unhealthy Mix, 15 AMERICAN JOURNAL LAW AND MEDICINE 111(1989)
231 Steuer Richard M., The Turning Points in Distribution Law, THE ANTITRUST BULLETIN 469-70(1990).
232 Steuer, Richard M., Vertical Restraints in the Nineties, 62 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 721(1994).
233 Strasser, Kurt A., An Antitrust Policy for Tying Arrangements, 34 EMORY LAW JOURNAL 268-91(1985).
234 Sullivan, Lawerence A., Post-Chicago Economics: Economists, Lawyers, Judges, and Enforcement Officials in A Less Determinante Theoretical World, 63 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 670(1995).
235 Supreme Court of the United States, Syllabus, State Oil Co. v . Khan ET AL. No. 96-871. Argued October 7, 1997- Decided November 4, 1997, Certior to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, available at http://www.apeccp.org.tw/doc/USA/Judicial/96-871.html.
236 Supreme Court Opinions in Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society, 42 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1982).
237 Supreme Court Won´t Review Decision in Mack Trucks Case, 46 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1984).
238 Symposium, Terminated Dealers: Alternatives to Antitrust, 32 NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL LAW REVIEW 767-69(1987).
239 Taney, Frank X., Rewriting the Law of Resale Price Maintenance: The Kodak Decision and Transaction Cost Economics, 143 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW 357(1994).
240 Text of Assistant Attorney General Anne K. Bingaman´s Address to ABA’s Antitrust Section, 65 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1993).
241 The Repudiated Vertical Restraints Guidelines,6, available at http://www.antiturst.org/law/ US/vertguide.html.
242 The Role of a Valid Business Rationale in Mordern Antitrust Jurisprudence-June 13 Remarks of D r. Betty Bock at University College of London ,55 ANTITRUST AND TRADE RAGULATION REPORT (1988).
243 The Supreme Court, 1987 Term: Leading Cases ( Part 3 of 3 ), 102 HARVARD LAW REVIEW (1988).
244 Toys"R"Us, Inc., v. Federal Trade Commission, In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 98-4107 (August 1, 2000), available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/adjpro/d9278/toysrusvftc.htm.
245 Treacy, Pat, Essential Facilities-Is the Tide Turning? 8 ECLR (1998).
246 Turner, Donald F., Anticipating Antitrust´s Centennial: The Durability, Relevance, and Future of American Antitrust Policy ,75 CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW 798(1987).
247 Veltrop, James D., Tying and Exclusive Purchasing Arrangements under EC Competition Law, 31 COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW 551-67(1994).
248 Vertical Conspiracy to Prevent New Dealer Competition Can′t be Attacked, 73 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1997).
249 Vertical Restraints Guide Would Offer Two-Step Analysis: Quick and Indepth Looks, 47 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1984).
250 Vertical Restraints Guidelines Evoke Mixed Reactions within Antitrust Bar, 48 ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION REPORT (1985).
251 Vertical Restraints Guidelines Panel Discussion, 54 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 334 (1985).
252 Vertical Restraints: Commission Communication, 22 COMPETITION LAW IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1999).
253 Vertical Restraints: Commission’s Green Paper, 20 COMPETITION LAW IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1997).
254 Vollebregt, Erik R., Joint Brand Advertising: Is it Allowed ? 4 ECLR 242(1997).
255 Walker, Julian Maitland, Buyer Power, EUROPEAN COMPETITION LAW REVIEW 171-72(2000).
256 Waller, Spencer Weber, Understanding and Appreciating Competition Law, EC62 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL 56-63(1992).
257 Wesseling, Rein, The Commission White Paper on Modernization