中文文獻
Arndt Teichmann（1997）吳秀明譯。<支配市場事業及市場強勢事業之阻礙競爭與差別待遇行為>，《公平交易季刊》第5卷第4期，頁137-150。
F.M. Scherer（2001）劉建勳譯。<競爭政策執行的百年歷程>，《公平交易季刊》第9卷第1期，頁113-121。丁麗仙（1988）。《競爭法規之除外適用》，國立政治大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
王 顥（2006）。《歐盟競爭法對保險業之規範》，國立臺北大學法律學系碩士論文。
王文宇（2001）。<金融機構跨業經營相關法律問題>，《實用稅務》第318 期，頁16-24。
王文宇（2003）。<論金融控股公司投資新創事業法制>，《法令月刊》第54卷第8期，頁46-57。王文宇（2011）。<2010臺灣法律發展回顧-金融法>，《國立臺灣大學法學論叢》，第40卷特刊，頁1945-1993。
王文宇、王志誠等（2002）。<從金融市場之演變論公平交易法之規範>，收錄於《新世紀經濟法制之建構與挑戰－廖義男教授六秩誕辰祝壽論文集》，臺北：元照。
王文宇、余雪明（2000）。《銀行跨業經營法制之研究》，行政院經濟建設委員會委託專案研究報告，國立台灣大學法律學院執行。
王以國（2003）。《論公平交易法中調和競爭政策與產業管制之機制-以第四十六條之修正為中心》，國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
王志誠（2000）。<金融控股公司之經營規範與監理機制>，《政大法學評論》第64期，頁153-185。王志誠（2005）。<金控集團之競爭規範>，《政大法學評論》第84期，頁89-161。王志誠（2009）。<銀行業經營危機之處理與因應機制>，《月旦法學雜誌》第165期，頁5-28。
王志誠（2010）。<銀行業之投資規範－銀行業與產業之分合>，《月旦法學雜誌》第182期，頁223-237。
王志誠、李智仁（2008）。<從健全金融機構管理之角度論公股管理法制化之可能性>，《存款保險資訊季刊》第21卷第1期，頁106-148。石世豪（2003）。<第一條>，《公平交易法之註釋研究系列(一)第一條至第十七條》，行政院公平交易委員會92年度合作研究報告。
朱雲鵬（1995）。《競爭政策與產業政策互動關係之研究》，行政院公平交易委員會委託研究計畫。
行政院公平交易委員會（2004）。《公平交易法行政裁判案例彙編93年下冊》。
行政院公平交易委員會（2003）。《公平交易法修法沿革彙編（一）》。
行政院公平交易委員會（2003）。《公平交易法修法沿革彙編（二）》。
江朝國（2006）。<金融控股公司法下之保險子公司投資相關事宜>，《臺灣本土法學雜誌》第78期，頁131-138。
何一芃（2005）。<金融控股公司對傳統競爭法的挑戰>，《法令月刊》第56卷第4期，頁64-71。何之邁(2003)，<第六條>，《公平交易法之註釋研究系列(一)第一條至第十七條》，行政院公平交易委員會92年度合作研究報告。
吳元曜（2004）。<對行政院金融監督管理委員會組織法之評析>，《臺灣本土法學雜誌》第61期，頁116-135。
吳秀明（2004）。<論關係企業與公平交易法之結合管制>，收錄於氏著《競爭法制之發韌與展開》，臺北：元照。吳秀明（2004）。<從依賴性理論探討相對市場優勢地位>，收錄於氏著《競爭法制之發韌與展開》，臺北：元照。吳秀明（2004）。<支配市場事業及市場強勢事業之阻礙競爭與差別待遇行為>，收錄於氏著《競爭法之發韌與展開》，臺北：元照。吳秀明（2010）。<憲法與我國經濟部門之基本秩序>，收錄於氏著《競爭法研究》，臺北：元照。吳秀明（2010）。<競爭法上之概括條款>，收錄於氏著《競爭法研究》，臺北：元照。吳孟珊（1999）。《金融自由化下美國銀行控股公司(Bank Holding Company)監理相關法規之研究》，國立臺灣大學三民主義研究所碩士論文。
李宗賓（1999）。<美國金融現代化之立法爭議>，《國際金融參考資料》第44輯，頁31-37。杜怡靜（2005）。<金融業者於金融商品販賣時之說明義務>，《月旦法學雜誌》第126期，頁5-18。
李桐豪（2001）。<由美國金融服務業現代化法看我國的金融控股公司法>，《臺灣金融財務季刊》第2卷第2期，頁1-17。李智仁（2004）。<試論金融控股公司之監理問題>，《存款保險資訊季刊》第17卷第3期，頁177-203。李憲佐（1999）。<競爭政策與企業經營關係>，收錄於氏著《商事法暨財經法論文集－王仁宏教授六十歲生日祝賀論文集》，臺北：元照。
汪渡村（2007）。《公平交易法》增訂三版，臺北：五南。
阮品嘉（2003）。<金融跨業經營法制上的選擇及其業務範圍>，《月旦法學雜誌》第92期，頁151-166。
林仁光（2005）。<由企業併購規範制度觀察二次金融改革>，《台灣本土法學雜誌》第77期，頁194-201。
林仁光（2009）。<金融危機與轉機－談金融服務業之整合規範>，《月旦法學雜誌》第168期，頁93-105。
林心怡（2005）。<論全球化時代美國與歐體國際結合管制差異與衝突之緩和>，《公平交易季刊》第13卷第2期，頁101-178。林育廷（2011）。<新金融爭端的有效解決－替代性金融爭端解決機制之過去、現在與未來>，《月旦法學雜誌》第199期，頁26-40。
林鐘雄（1993）。《貨幣銀行學》，臺北：三民。
邵慶平（2009）。<金融危機的形成、處理機制與法制基礎－對美國次級房貸金融危機的觀察>，《月旦法學雜誌》第165期，頁29-45。
施錦村（2011）。<事業多角化結合案件類型結構分析-以組合效果為中心>，《公平交易季刊》第19卷第1期，頁155-187。胡祖舜（2008）。《從美國反托拉斯思維的演進看公平會的執法》，行政院公平交易委員會97年度研究發展報告。
殷乃平等（1995）。《金融防火強的設立與我國外來銀行體系之發展》，行政院經建會委託報告。
涂予尹（2001）。《我國銀行管制的法政策考察－成本效益分析的觀點》，國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
張玉山、李員淳（2000）。<競爭政策與管制政策之取捨及協調：以公用事業為例>，收錄於《第八屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會論文》。
張見地（2011）。<黑池交易與交易所之因應>，《證交資料》第591期，頁60-82。
張英磊（2009）。《多元移植與民主轉型過程中我國環評司法審查之發展一個以回應本土發展脈絡為目的之比較法分析》，國立台灣大學法律學院法律學研究所博士論文。梁哲瑋（1996）。<公平交易法第二十四條對定型化契約之監控與公平交易委員會之行業導正>，《公平交易季刊》第4卷第2期，頁39-62。梁哲瑋（2000）。《足以影響交易秩序之欺罔或顯失公平之規範理論與實務檢討》，國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
莊春發（1998）。<競爭概念的發展、演變與反托拉斯法政策>，《公平交易季刊》第6卷第1期頁29-89。莊春發（2000）。<競爭政策與產業政策之間的替代與互補>，收錄於《第八屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會論文》。
莊春發（2002）。<競爭的內涵與公平交易法規範>，《公平交易季刊》第10卷第3期，頁1-44。許耀明（2005）。<二○○四歐洲聯盟競爭法上關於事業結合規範之修正沿革評析>，《財產法暨經濟法》第3期，頁171-206。陳人傑(2000)。《市場進入障礙於事業結合管制之探討》，私立輔仁大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
陳志民（2011）。，《公平交易季刊》第19 卷第1期，頁1-64。陳志龍（2007）。<探討金融集團之法制特色>，《月旦法學雜誌》第144期，頁54-66。
陳俊廷（2004）。《我國結合規範之研究-以審理程序及實體標準為中心》，國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
陳洸岳（2011）。<金融消費者保護法下業者損害賠償責任初探>，《月旦法學雜誌》第199期，頁5-25。
郭時維（2006）。<淺談財務會計準則第三十四號公報>，《華南金控》第39期，頁6-12。
陳凱娟（2010）。《結合補救制度從美國法的認知－對公平交易法適用上之探討與啟示》，輔仁大學財經法律研究所碩士論文。陳銘祥（1999）。<電信規範體制之檢討>，《經社法制論叢》第23期，頁61-81。
陳櫻琴（2000）。<國家競爭力與產業法制－臺灣高科技產業與競爭>，收錄於氏著《公平交易法與經濟政策》，臺北：翰蘆。
單驥、何之邁、吳秀明（1999）。《從依賴性理論探討相對市場優勢地位－以公平法立場之研析適用》，1999年行政院公平交易委員會合作研究計畫六。彭金隆（2003）。<論我國金融控股公司之投資與被投資事業管理>，《臺灣金融財務季刊》第4輯第1期，頁163-183。彭金隆（2004）。《金融控股公司法制監理與經營策略》，臺北：智勝文化。
曾宛如（2009）。<金融海嘯下金融監理之反思>，《月旦法學雜誌》第168期，頁81-92。
曾國列等（1995）。《金融自由化所衍生之銀行監理問題之探討－美、日經驗對我國之啟示》，1995年財政部研究發展專題報告。
曾國烈（2003）。<我國金融改革及法規制定過程>，《存款保險季刊》第16卷第3期，頁1-13。曾國烈（2005）。<金融改革與銀行業之演化與成長>，《臺灣金融財務季刊》第6輯第3期，頁1-14。黃美瑛、盧彥瑋（2008），<臺灣金融業結合案例之經濟效益評估-金控公司範疇經濟衡量>，《公平交易季刊》第16卷第4期，頁31-66。黃茂榮（1993）。<公平交易法之理論與實務>，《作者自刊》，頁14。
黃銘傑（2002）。<中小企業保護與競爭政策>，收錄於氏著《公平交易法之理論與實際－不同意見書》，臺北：學林。
黃銘傑（2002）。<相對優勢地位濫用與公平交易法之規範>，收錄於氏著《公平交易法之理論與實際－不同意見書》，臺北：學林。黃銘傑（2002）。<經濟法基本性格論>，收錄於氏著《公平交易法之理論與實際－不同意見書》，臺北：學林。黃銘傑（2005）。<第四十六條>，《公平交易法之註釋研究系列(三)》，2005年公平交易委員會合作研究計畫。
黃銘傑（2010）。<公平交易法執行機制之現狀與未來>，《月旦法學雜誌》第186期，頁80-98。
楊雨耕（2009）。《金融服務業業務行為準則規範之研究－以金融商品之推介為中心》，國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
楊敬先（1999）。《商業銀行投資股票之規範》，國立中興大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
葉志良（1999）。《電信與有線電視在媒介整合下相關管制規範之研究》，東吳大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
葉斯偉（2005）。《從法律的觀點論金融機構合併與市場競爭秩序》，中原大學財經法律學系碩士論文。
葉逸如(2005)。<金融控股公司共同行銷之規範－以競爭法為中心>，《公平交易季刊》第14卷第2期，頁71-123。葉寧(1999)。<公平交易法中有關事業結合併購規定>，《實用稅務》第298期，頁8-15。
葉鼎煜（2006）。《金融監理行政中立問題之研究-以開發金經營爭奪戰法令形成為例》，國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
詹鎮榮（2011）。<行政處分附款法制之傳統與革新－從公平交易法上之結合管制出發>，《公平交易季刊》第19卷第4期，頁1-57。廖義男（1994）。<公平交易法之立法目的與保護之法益>，收錄於氏著《公平交易之釋論與實務》，臺北：三民。廖義男（1995）。<公平交易法之立法經過>，收錄於氏著《公平交易法之理論與立法》，臺北：三民。廖義男（1995）。<公平交易法應否制定之檢討及其草案之修正建議>，收錄於氏著《公平交易法之理論與立法》，臺北：三民。廖義男（1995）。<反托拉斯法不容擱置>，收錄於氏著《公平交易法之理論與立法》，臺北：三民。廖義男（1995）。<憲法與競爭秩序之維護>，收錄於氏著《公平交易法之理論與立法》，臺北：三民。廖義男（1997）。《行政法院裁判之評析－公平交易法實務與行政法院裁判之評析》，國科會專題研究計畫。
趙永祥、楊福清（2001）。<金融機構合併問題之探討>，《華醫學報》第15期，頁57-80。
趙楊清（1999）。<競爭政策與解除管制>，《公平交易季刊》第7卷第1期，頁137-148。
劉孔中（1995）。<公平交易法與消費者保護法之比較研究>，《人文及社會科學集刊》第7卷第2期，頁1-19。劉孔中（2003）。《公平交易法》，臺北：元照。
劉其昌（2010）。<金融控股公司法制定案之分析>，《臺灣經濟金融月刊》第37卷第10期，頁9-33。
劉彥玲（2005）。《金融機構跨業經營之問題-試論金融控股公司之功能與侷限》，輔仁大學法律學系碩士論文。
劉紹樑（2001）。<我國金融機構融合態勢與法制之探討>，《風險管理》第8期，頁59-76。
劉紹樑（2001）。<金融法制、企業併購與典範遷移－以合併法與控股法為中心>，《臺灣金融財務季刊》第2輯第2期，頁55-71。劉紹樑（2004）。<建構競爭法制－從大陸經驗談起>，《月旦民商法雜誌》第3期，頁5-19。
劉連煜（2002）。<符合世界潮流趨勢之公平交易法有關結合規範之修正-事前申報異議制之採用>，《月旦法學雜誌》第83期，頁266-271。
劉連煜（2007）。<金融控股公司監理之原則：金融與商業分離>，《律師雜誌》第333期，頁12-19。
劉華美（2001）。<論結合管制>，《月旦法學雜誌》第69期，頁81-100。
劉靜怡（1993）。《有線電視系統分區獨占原則之研究》，國立台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
劉靜怡（1999）。<初探網路產業的市場規範及其未來：以United States V. Microsoft案的發展為主軸>，《國立臺灣大學法學論叢》第28卷第4期，頁1-66。蔡昌憲（2010）。<美國金融消費者保護規範之展望-以消費者金融保護局之創設為中心>，《月旦財經法雜誌》第23期，頁187-219。
蔡朝安、謝文欽（2004）。<我國與外國有關商業行轉投資之規範>，《金管法令》，第3期，頁24-33
戴東雄等（1994）。《公平交易法第四十六條第一項之探討》，1992年公平會委託研究計畫。
戴敬哲（2007）。<我國金控跨業經營規範檢討-以金控公司為重心>，《月旦法學雜誌》第144期，頁94-104。
戴敬哲（2008）。《論金融監督管理委員會之組織法制》，國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
戴銘昇（2004）。<金融控股公司法的光與影(上)>，《法令月刊》第55卷第5期，頁62-74。謝易宏（2000）。<企業整合與跨業併購法律問題之研究-以「銀行業」與「證券業」間之整合為例>，《律師雜誌》第252期，頁23-62。
謝易宏（2008）。<金融產業與公平競爭>，《財經法制新時代－賴源河教授七秩華誕祝壽論文集》，臺北：元照。
謝易宏（2009）。<潰敗金融與管制迷思-簡評美國二○○八年金融改革>，《月旦法學雜誌》第164期，頁186-225。
謝嘉玲（2007）。《銀行銷售投資型保險相關法律問題之研究》，國立中正大學財經法律學研究所碩士論文。
謝德宗（1994）。《貨幣銀行學－理論與實際》，臺北：三民。
顏雅倫（2001）。《我國結合管制之檢討與前瞻-以金融產業之結合為例》，國立台灣大學法律學院碩士論文。顏雅倫，楊志文(2012)，<從德國交易所(Deutshe Börse)與紐約泛歐交易所(NYSE Euronext)合併案看交易所結合風潮的反托拉斯法議題>，《證交資料》第603期，頁45-66。
蘇永欽（1999）。<自由化、解除管制與公平交易法>，收錄於氏著《跨越自治與管制》，臺北：五南。蘇永欽（1999）。<競爭法－台灣法律體系與經濟生活的新生事物>，收錄於氏著《跨越自治與管制》，臺北：五南。蘇永欽（2002）。<公平交易法第四六條修正後的適用問題>，收錄於氏著《走入新世紀的私法自治》，臺北：元照。蘇永欽、范建得(2000)。《公平交易法第四十六條修正後之適用問題研究》，行政院公平交易委員會89年度合作研究計畫。
蘇彥蓉（2008）。《我國資本市場整合之策略與法律問題研究》，國立臺北大學法律學系碩士論文。
英文文獻
American Bar Association, Interview with J. Thomas Rosch, Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission, 23 ANTITRUST 32(2009), available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/rosch/090126abainterview.PDF.
Anderson, Alan M., Insurance and Antitrust Law: The Mcarran-Ferguson Act and Beyond, 25 WM. & MARY L. REV. 81-130 (1983).
A peaceful Europe – the beginnings of cooperation,EUROPEAN UNION, http://europa.eu/about-eu/eu-history/1945-1959/index_en.htm(last visited December 9, 2011).
AREEDA, PHILLIP, ET AL., ANTITRUST LAW : AN ANALYSIS OF ANTITRUST PRINCIPLES AND THEIR APPLICATION Vol. I (3d. ed. 2006).
AREEDA, PHILLIP, ET AL., ANTITRUST LAW: AN ANALYSIS OF ANTITRUST PRINCIPLES AND THEIR APPLICATION Vol. IB (3d ed. 2006).
Armstrong, Mark, Competition in Two-Sided Markets,37 RAND J. OF ECON. 3 668-691 (2006), http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/4324/1/competitionintwosidedmarkets.pdf.
Arnold, Thomas M. & Stevens, Jerry L., Mixed Agendas and Government Regulation of Business: Can We Clean Up the Mess?,45 U. RICH. L. REV. 1059-1089(2011).
BAEL, VAN & BELLIS, COMPETITION LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY (4th ed. 2005).
BAIN, JOE S., BARRIERS TO NEW COMPETITION : THEIR CHARACTER AND CONSEQUENCES IN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES (1962).
Balleisen, Edard & Moss, David, Introduction, inGOVERNMENT AND MARKETS: TOWARD A NEW THEORY OF REGULATION1-9 (Edward J. Balleisen & David A. Moss eds. 2010).
Bank Merger Competitive Review - Introduction and Overview (1995), avaialbe at http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/6472.pdf
Barnett, Thomas O., Assistant Attorney Gen. , Antitrust Div. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Merger Review: A Quest for Efficency, Address at N. Y. State Bar Ass’n, Antitrust Section Annual Meeting (Jan. 25, 2007), available athttp://www.justice.gov/atr/public/speeches/221173.htm
Barr, Michael S, et al., The Case for Behaviorally Informed Regulation, inNEW PERSPECTIVES ON REGULATION25-61(David Moss & John Cisternino eds. 2009).
Bernanke, Ben S., Chairman, Bd. of Governors of Fed. Reserve Sys., Financial Reform to Address Systemic Risk, Speech at the Council on Foreign Relations (Mar. 10, 2009) , http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20090310a.htm(la-stvistited October 26, 2011).
Blake, Harlan M. & Jones, William K., Toward A Three-Dimensional Antitrust Policy, 65 COLUM. L. REV. 422-466 (1965)
Bloom, Margaret., The U.S. and Eu Move Towards Substantial Antitrust Convergence on Consumer Welfare Based Enforcement, 19-SUM ANTITRUST 18-22(2005)
Böhm, Franz et al., The Ordo Manifesto of 1936, inGERMANY’S SOCIAL MARKET ECONOMY: ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION 15-25(Alan Peacock & Hans Willgerodt eds. 1989).
Böhm, Franz, Rule of Law in a Market Economy, in GERMANY’S SOCIAL MARKET ECONOMY: ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION46-67(Alan Peacock & Hans Willgerodt eds. 1989)
BORK, ROBERT H., THE ANTITRUST PARADOX: A POLICY AT WAR WITH ITSELF (1993).
Brief Summary of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, http://banking.senate.gov/public/_files/070110_Dodd_Frank_Wall_Street_Reform_comprehensive_summary_Final.pdf. (last visited Aug. 2, 2012)
BUTTIGIEG, EUGÈNE, COMPETITION LAW : SAFEGUARDING THE CONSUMER INTEREST : A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF US ANTITRUST LAW AND EC COMPETITION LAW (2009).
Buxbaum, Hannah L., German Legal Culture and the Globalization of Competition Law: A Historical Perspective on the Expansion of Private Antitrust Enforcement, 23 BERKELEY J. INT''L L. 474-491 (2005).
Cantillon, Estelle & Yin, Pai-Ling, Competition between Exchanges: A Research Agenda (Nov. 2010), Forthcoming INT’L J. OF INDUS. ORG., http://www.ecares.org/ecare/personal/cantillon/web/Cantillon-Yin-IJIO.pdf.
Carlson, Larry D., The Insurance Exemption from the Antitrust Laws, 57 TEX. L. REV. 1127-1191(1979).
CARNELL, RICHARD SCOTT, ET AL., THE LAW OF BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS (4th ed. 2009).
CARPENTER, DAVID H., CONG. RESEARCH SERV. R40530, INSOLVENCY OF SYSTEMICALLY SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL COMPANIES(SSFCS): BANKRUPTCY VS. CONSERVATORSHIP/RECEIVERSHIP (2009) ,available at http://www.stlouisfed.org/timeline/pdf/crs2009-04-20.pdf.
Chang, Seung Wha, The Role of Law in Economic Development and Adjustment Process: The Case of Korea,34 INT''L LAW. 267-287(2000).
CHOWDHURY, ANIS & ISLAM, IYANATUL, THE NEWLY INDUSTRIALISING ECONOMIES OF EAST ASIA (1993).
Clark, Robert Charles., The Regulation of Financial Holding Companies, 92 HARV. L. REV. 789-863(1979).
Comm’n of The European Communities, Sector Inquiry Under Article 17 of Regulation (Ec) No 1/2003 On Retail Banking (Final Report) ,COM(2007) 33 final(Jan.1, 2007), available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2007:0033:FIN:EN:PDF
Communication from Japan, Introduction of Competition Laws and Policies and the Relationship of these to National Development Policies, WT/WGTCP/W/176(Dec. 13, 2001).
Communication from the Republic of Korea, The Role of Competition Policy in the Process of Economic Development, WT/WGTCP/W/166(June 26, 2001).
Communication from Trinidad and Tobago,Working Group on the Interaction between Trade and Competition Policy, WT/WGTCP/W/143 (Aug. 2, 2000).
Competitive Impact Statement of Plaintiff, United States v.Deutsche Börse AG and NYSE Euronext, No.1:11-cv-02280(D. for the Dist. of Columbia Dec. 22, 2011), available athttp://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f278500/278554.pdf.
Complaint of Plaintiff,United States v.Deutsche Börse AG and NYSE Euronext, No.1:11-cv-02280(D. for the Dist. of Columbia Dec. 22, 2011), availablea athttp://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f278500/278545.pdf.
COOK, JOHN & KERSE, CHRISTOPHER, EC MERGER CONTROL(5th ed. 2009).
Cooter, Robert D., The Theory of Market Mordernization of Law, 16 INT''L REV. L. & ECON. 141-172(1996).
Crane, Daniel A., Antitrust Modesty, 105 MICH. L. REV. 1193-1212(2007).
Crane, Daniel A., Chicago, Post-Chicago, and Neo-Chicago, 76 U. CHI. L. REV. 1911-1933 (2009).
Crane, Daniel A., Did We Avoid Historical Failures of Antitrust Enforcement During the 2008-2009 Financial Crisis?, 77 ANTITRUST L.J. 219-228(2010)
Crane, Daniel A., Rules Versus Standards in Antitrust Adjudication, 64 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 49-110 (2007).
CRANE, DANIEL A., THE INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE OF ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT (2011).
DEMSETZ, HAROLD, ECONOMIC, LEGAL, AND POLITICAL DIMENSIONS OF COMPETITION (1982).
DENTON, GEOFFREY R., ET AL., ECONOMIC PLANNING AND POLICES IN BRITAIN, FRANCE AND GERMANY (1968).
Deutsche Börse and NYSE Euronext－Why the marriage failed, THE ECONOMIST(Feb 1, 2012, 5:55 PM), http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/02/deutsche-b%C3%B6rse-and-nyse-euronext.
Devlin, Alan & Jacobs, Michael., Antitrust Divergence and the Limits of Economics, 104 NW. U. L. REV. 253-291 (2010).
Devlin, Alan., A Neo-Chicago Perspective on the Law of Product Tying, 44 AM. BUS. L.J. 521-570 (2007).
Devlin, Alan., Antitrust in an Era of Market Failure, 33 HARV. J.L. & PUB. POL''Y 557-606 (2010).
Diego Valiante, NYSE Euronext-Deutsche Borse Merger: Let the Dance Go On!, ECMI POLICY BRIEF No.18 (March, 2011), available athttp://aei.pitt.edu/30825/1/No_18_Valiante_on_exchange_merger.pdf.
DODD–FRANK WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, available at http://www.sec.gov/about/laws/wallstreetreform-cpa.pdf.
Dogan, Stacey L. & Lemley, Mark A., Antitrust Law and Regulatory Gaming, 87 TEX. L. REV. 685-729(2009).
Dolan, William F., Acquisitions and Mergers: An Overview 2010-2011, 1861 PLI/CORP 385-447(2011).
Easterbrook, Frank H., The Limits of Antitrust, 63 TEX. L. REV.1-40 (1984).
Easterbrook, Frank H., Workable Antitrust Policy, 84 MICH. L. REV. 1696-1713 (1986).
ELHAUGE, EINER & GERADIN, DAMIEN, GLOBAL ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS (2d ed. 2011).
Endo, Seiji, The Japanese State: Surviving Neoliberal Political Economy, in THE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC TRANSITION IN EAST ASIA : STRONG MARKET, WEAKENING STATE 112-135(Xiaoming Huang ed. 2001).
EU Treaties,EUROPEAN UNION, http://europa.eu/about-eu/basic-information/decision-making/treaties/index_en.htm (last visited Aug. 13, 2012)
Europe without frontiers,EUROPEAN UNION, http://europa.eu/about-eu/eu-history/1990-1999/index_en.htm(last visited Aug. 13, 2012)
European Comm’n,Issues Paper of Competition in EU Securities Trading and Post-trading(May 24, 2006), available athttp://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/financial_services/securities_trading.pdf.
Evans, Christian, The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: A Missed Opportunity to Rein in Too-Big-to-Fail Banks, 13 DUQ. BUS. L.J. 43-57(2011).
Evans, David S. & Padilla, A. Jorge., Designing Antitrust Rules for Assessing Unilateral Practices: A Neo-Chicago Approach, 72 U. CHI. L. REV. 73-98 (2005).
Evans, David S., The Antitrust Economics of Multi-Sided Platform Markets,20 YALE J. ON REG. 325 -381(2003).
Evenett, Simon J., Would Enforcing Competition Law Compromise Industry Policy Objectives? (7 Feb. 7, 2005), www.alexandria.unisg.ch/export/DL/22317.pdf(last visited Aug. 12, 2012).
FEJØ, JENS, MONOPOLY LAW AND MARKET : STUDIES OF EC COMPETITION LAW WITH US AMERICAN ANTITRUST LAW AS A FRAME OF REFERENCE AND SUPPORTED BY BASIC MARKET ECONOMICS (1990).
Fiebig, Andre., Crisis Cartels and the Triumph of Industrial Policy over Competition Law in Europe, 25 Brook. J. INT''L L. 607 -638(1999).
Fiebig, Andre., Modernization of European Competition Law As A Form of Convergence, 19 TEMP. INT''L & COMP. L.J. 63-86 (2005).
Foer, Albert A., An Introduction to the American Antitrust Institute''s 11th Annual National Conference: Are the Boundaries Between Public and Private in Transition?, 89 OR. L. REV. 753-773 (2011).
Foer, Albert A., Preserving Competition After the Meltdown, THE ONLINE MAGZINE FOR GLOBAL COMPETITION POLICY [GCP] (Dec. 2008), http://www.antitrustinstitute.org/files/bank%20meltdown%20article%2012-16-08_121520082145.pdf(last vsited Aug. 12, 4:30 PM, 2012).
Foster, Sharon E., Systemic Financial-Service Institutions and MonopolyPower, 60 CATH. U. L. REV. 357-402 (2011).
Foster, Sharon E., Too Big to Fail-Too Small to Compete: Systemic Risk Should Be Addressed Through Antitrust Law but Such A Solution Will Only Work If It Is Applied on an International Basis, 22 FLA. J. INT''L L. 31-64 (2010).
Fox, Eleanor M., Monopolization and Dominance in the United States and the European Community: Efficiency, OPPORTUNITY, AND FAIRNESS, 61 NOTRE DAME LAW. 981-1020 (1986).
Fox, Eleanor M., Toward World Antitrust and Market Access, 91 AM. J. INT''L L. 1-25 (1997).
FOX, ELEANOR M., Trade, Competition, and Intellectual Property - Trips and Its Antitrust Counterparts, 29 VAND. J. TRANSNAT''L L. 481-505 (1996).
Further Expansion,EUROPEAN UNION, http://europa.eu/about-eu/eu-history/2000-2009/index_en.htm(last visited Aug. 13, 2012)
Gal, Michal S., Antitrust in A Globalized Economy: The Unique Enforcement Challenges Faced by Small and Developing Jurisdictions, 33 FORDHAM INT''L L.J. 1-56(2009).
GAL, MICHAL S., COMPETITION POLICY FOR SMALL MARKET ECONOMIES (2003)
Gal, Michal S., Size Does Matter:The Effects of Market Size on Optimal Competition Policy, 74 S. CAL. L. REV. 1437-1478 (2001).
Generally Intervention by Comm’r Neelie Kroes, EP ECON Coordinators Meeting,Neelie Kroes, Competition Aspects of EU Securities Trading and Post Trading (July 11, 2006), http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/financial_services/speech11072006.pdf.
Geradin, Damien., et al., Treaties on European Union Competition Law and Economics, Chapter I－Introduction (Oct. 7, 2010)(unpublished manuscript)
Gerber, David J., Competition Law and International Trade: The European Union and the Neo-Liberal Factor, 4 PAC. RIM L. & POL''Y J. 37-57 (1995)
Gerber, David J., Constitutionalizing the Economy: German Neo-Liberalism, Competition Law and the "New" Europe, 42 AM. J. COMP. L. 25-84 (1994).
GERBER, DAVID J., GLOBAL COMPETITION : LAW, MARKETS, AND GLOBALIZATION 1 (2010)
GERBER, DAVID J., LAW AND COMPETITION IN TWENTIETH CENTURY EUROPE: PROTECTING PROMETHEUS(1998).
Gifford, Daniel J. & Kudrle, Robert T., Antitrust Approaches to Dynamically Competitive Industries in the United States and the European Union, 7 J. COMPETITION L. & ECON. 695-731(2011)
Giocoli, Nicola., Competition Versus Property Rights: American Antitrust Law, the Freiburg School, and the Early Years of European Competition Policy, 5 J. COMPETITION L. & ECON. 747-786 (2009).
Glaeser, Edward L., Paternalism and Psychology, 73 U. CHI. L. REV. 133-156(2006).
GOODHART, CHARLES, ET AL., FINANCIAL REGULATION-WHY? HOW AND WHERE NOW(1998)
Gottsa, Ilene Knable. et al., Nurture and Reaching the Age of Reason: The U.S./E.U. Treatment of Transatlantic Merger, 61 N.Y.U. ANN. SURV. AM. L. 453-508 (2005).
Green Paper on Vertical Restraints in EC Competition Policy COM (96) 721 final (Jan. 22, 1997), available athttp://aei.pitt.edu/1147/1/verticle_restraints_gp_COM_96_721.pdf.
Green, Stephen P., Macroeconomic Dilemmas & Alternative State Strategies,in THE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC TRANSITION IN EAST ASIA : STRONG MARKET, WEAKENING STATE 176-194(Xiaoming Huang ed. 2001).
Haley, John O., Competition Law for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Community: Designing Shoes for Many Sizes, 1 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 1-13 (2002).
Haley, John O., Competition Policy for East Asia, 3 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 277-284(2004).
HALEY, JOHN OWEN, ANTITRUST IN GERMANY AND JAPAN: THE FIRST FIFTY YEARS 1947-1998 (2001).
Haris, Apostolopoulos, Anti-Competitive Abuse of Ip Rights and Compulsory Licensing Through the International Dimension of the Trips Agreement and the Stockholm Proposal for Its Amendment, 6 RICH. J. GLOBAL L. & BUS.265-282(2007).
Harry First, Antitrust in Japan: The Original Intent, 9 PAC. RIM L. & POL''Y J. 1 (2000).
HARRIS, RICHARD G., TRADE, INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION (1985)
Haucap, Justus, Bounded Rationality and Competition Policy, inCOMPETITION POLICY AND THE ECONOMIC APPROACH: FOUNDATIONS AND LIMITATIONS (Josef Drexl, et al eds., 2011).
HAYAMI, YUJIRO & GODO, YOSHIHISA, DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS : FROM THE POVERTY TO THE WEALTH OF NATIONS (3d ed. 2005).
Hochstadt, Eric S., The Brown Shoe of European Union Competition Law, 24 CARDOZO L. REV. 287-395(2002).
Hovenkamp, Herbert., Antitrust and the Costs of Movement, 78 ANTITRUST L.J. 1-21 (2012).
HOVENKAMP, HERBERT, ECONOMICS AND FEDERAL ANTITRUST LAW (1985).
HOVENKAMP, HERBERT, FEDERAL ANTITRUST POLICY: THE LAW OF COMPETITION AND ITS PRACTICE (4th ed. 2011)
Hovenkamp, Herbert., Post-Chicago Antitrust: A Review and Critique, 2001 COLUM. BUS. L. REV. 257-337 (2001).
HOVENKAMP, HERBERT, THE ANTITRUST ENTERPRISE: PRINCIPLE AND EXECUTION (2005).
Hovenkamp, Herbert., The Marginalist Revolution in Legal Thought, 46 VAND. L. REV. 305-359(1993).
Hovenkamp, Herbert., United States Competition Policy in Crisis: 1890-1955, 94 MINN. L. REV. 311-367 (2009).
Huang, Xiaoming, Between the State and the Market : The Problem of Transition in East Asia, in THE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC TRANSITION IN EAST ASIA : STRONG MARKET, WEAKENING STATE 3-23 (Xiaoming Huang ed. 2001).
Huang, Xiaoming, Contested State and Competitive State: Managing the Economy in a Democratic Taiwan, in THE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC TRANSITION IN EAST ASIA : STRONG MARKET, WEAKENING STATE 139-175(Xiaoming Huang ed. 2001).
Iyori, Hiroshi., A Comparison of U.S.-Japan Antitrust Law: Looking at the International Harmonization of Competition Law, 4 PAC. RIM L. & POL''Y J. 59-91(1995).
Iyori, Hiroshi., Competition Policy and Government Intervention in Developing Countries: An Examination of Japanese Economic Development, 1 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 35-48 (2002).
Jacksona, Howell E. & Burlingameaa, Laurie., Kickbacks or Compensation: The Case of Yield Spread Premiums, 12 STAN. J.L. BUS. & FIN. 289-358 (2007).
JALAN, BIMAL., PROBLEMS AND POLITICS IN SMALL ECONOMIES (1982).
Jebsen, Per. & Stevens, Robert., Assumptions, Goals and Dominant Undertakings: The Regulation of Competition Under Article 86 of the European Union, 64 ANTITRUST L.J. 443-516(1996).
Jiang, Xiaojuan., Promoting Competition and Maintaining Monopoly: Dual Functions of Chinese Industrial Policies During Economic Transition, 1 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 49-65(2002)
Jin, Paul., Turning Competition on Its Head: Economic Analysis of the Ec''s Decision to Bar the Ge-Honeywell Merger, 23 NW. J. INT''L L. & BUS. 187-211(2002)
Jollsa, Christine., et al., A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics, 50 STAN. L. REV. 1471-1550 (1998)
Jung, Youngjin. & Chang, Seung Wha., Korea''s Competition Law and Policies in Perspective,26 NW. J. INT''L L. & BUS. 687-728(2006).
Kareff, Scott M., Tetra Pak International Sa v. Commission (Tetra Pak II): The European Approach to Monopoly Leveraging, 28 LAW & POL''Y INT''L BUS. 549-574 (1997).
Karmel, Roberta S., Is the Public Utility Holding Company Act A Model for Breaking Up the Banks That Are Too-Big-to-Fail?, 62 Hastings L.J. 821-864 (2011).
KASERMAN, DAVID L. & MAYO, JOHN W., GOVERNMENT AND BUSINESS: THE ECONOMICS OF ANTITRUST AND REGULATION (1995).
Kauper, Thomas E., Merger Control in the United States and the European Union: Some Observations, 74 ST. JOHN''S L. REV. 305-359(2000).
Kelman, Mark., Behavioral Economics As Part of A Rhetorical Duet: A Response to Jolls, SUNSTEIN, AND THALER, 50 STAN. L. REV. 1577-1591(1998).
Khan, Mushtaq H. & Blankenburg, Stephanie, The Political Economy of Industrial Policy in Asia and Latin American, inINDUSTRIAL POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT : THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF CAPABILITIES ACCUMULATION 336-377(Mario Cimoli, et al eds. 2009).
KHEMANI, R.S. & SHAPIRO, D. M. , OECD, GLOSSARY OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANISATION ECONOMICS AND COMPETITION LAW (1993), available at http://www.oecd.org/regreform/liberalisationandcompetitioninterventioninregulatedsectors/2376087.pdf.
Khemani,R.S. Merger Policy in Small vs. Large Economies, in CANADIAN COMPETITION LAW AND POLICY AT THE CENTENARY 205-223 (R. S. Khemani, et al., 1991).
Kolasky, William J., Deputy Assistant Attorney Gen., Antitrust Div.U.S. Dep’t of Justice, United States and European Competition Policy: Are There More Differences than We Care To Admit?, Address Before the European Policy Center, Brussels, Belgium (Apr. 10, 2002), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/speeches/10999.pdf
KORAH ,VALENTINE, AN INTRODUCTORY GUIDE TO EC COMPETITION LAW AND PRACTICE (8th ed. 2004).
Korah, Valentine., The Interface Between Intellectual Property and Antitrust: The European Experience, 69 ANTITRUST L.J. 801 -839(2002).
Kovacic, William E., Merger Enforcement in Transition: Antitrust Controls on Acquisitions in Emerging Economies, 66 U. CIN. L. REV. 1075-1112 (1998).
Kovacic, William E. & Shapiro, Carl, Antitrust Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal Thinking, 14 1 J. OF ECON. PERSPECTIVES 43-60(2000), available at http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro/century.pdf.
Kovacic, William E., Statement Submitted for the Record by Commissioner by William E. Kovacic on the Proposal to Create a Consumer Financial Protection Ageny to the Committee on Energy & Commerce and the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives(July 28, 2009), available athttp://www.ftc.gov/speeches/kovacic/090728stmtrecord.pdf.
Kovacic, William E., The Intellectual DNA of Modern U.S. Competition Law for Dominant Firm Conduct: The Chicago/harvard Double Helix, 2007 COLUM. BUS. L. REV. 1 (2007).
Kroes, Neelie, Member of the European Comm’n in charge of Competition Policy, Preliminary Thoughts on Policy Review of Article 82, Speech at the Fordham Corporate Law Institute(Sept. 23, 2005), available athttp://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/05/537&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
Lande, Robert H., Wealth Transfers as the Original and Primary Concern of Antitrust: The Efficiency Interpretation Challenged, 50 HASTINGS L.J. 871-957(1999)
Lao, Marina, Editor''s Note: Symposium on the Effect of Economic Crises on Antitrust Policy, 77 ANTITRUST L.J. 213-218 (2010).
Lee, Hyun-Hoon, Korea’s Competition Policy and Its Application to Other Asia Economics , in COMPETITION POLICY AND GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS IN MAJOR ASIAN ECONOMIES 89-106 (Van Hoa Ed. Tran ed. 2003).
Lehr, Stefan & Hempel, Rolf, Act against Restraints of Competition to be amended, INTERNATIONAL LAW OFFICE(August 11, 2011)(last visited Aug. 14, 2012), http://www.internationallawoffice.com/newsletters/detail.aspx?g=68d7670b-4c1d-4760-a6bb-99801e4830db.
Leslie, Christopher R., Rationality Analysis in Antitrust, 158 U. PA. L. REV. 261-353 (2010).
Liu, Lawrence S., Fostering Competition Law and Policy: A Facade of Taiwan''s Political Economy, 1 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 77-169 (2002).
Lopatka, John E., & Page, William H., Economic Authority and the Limits of Expertise in Antitrust Cases, 90 CORNELL L. REV. 617-703 (2005).
Lowe, Philip, Dir. Gen. Dg Competition, How Different is EU Anti-Trust? A Route Map for Advisors, An Overivew of EU Competition Law and Policy on Commercial Practice (October 16, 2003), available at http://ec.europa.eu/competition/speeches/text/sp2003_038_en.pdf.
Lucas, John P., Pruning the Antitrust Tree: Credit Suisse Securities (Usa) LLC v. Billing and the Immunization of the Securities Industry from Antitrust Liability,59 MERCER L. REV. 803-817(2008).
Macey, Jonathan R. & Holdcroft, Jr. James P., Failure Is an Option: An Ersatz-Antitrust Approach to Financial Regulation, 120 YALE L.J. 1368-1418 (2011).
MALINAUSKAITE, JURGITA, MERGER CONTROL IN POST-COMMUNIST COUNTRIES: EC MERGER REGULATION IN SMALL MARKET ECONOMIES (2011).
Markham, Jr. Jesse W., Lessons for Competition Law from the Economic Crisis: The Prospect for Antitrust Responses to the "Too-Big-to-Fail" Phenomenon, 16 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. 261-322 (2011).
Masuyama, Seiichi, The Evolving Nature of Industrial Policy in East Asia: Liberalization, Upgrading, and Integration, in INDUSTRIAL POLICIES IN EAST ASIA 3-18(Seiichi Masuyama, et al. eds. 1997).
Matsushita, Mitsuo., The Intersection of Industrial Policy and Competition: The Japanese Experience,72 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 477-500 (1996).
Meese, Alan J., Price Theory and Vertical Restraints: A Misunderstood Relation, 45 UCLA L. REV. 143-204 (1997).
Memorandum, European Comm’n, Competition: Final Report of the Sector Inquiry into Business Insurance - Frequently Asked Questions(Sep. 25, 2007), http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?aged=0&format=HTML&guiLanguage=en&language=EN&reference=MEMO/07/382.
Memorandum, European Comm’n, Competition: Final Report on Retail Banking Inquiry－Frequently Asked Questions(January, 31 2007), http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/07/40&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
Mierzewski, Michael. et. al., FTC and DOJ Release Proposed Revisions to Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Implications for Bank Mergers, 127 BANKING L.J. 869-872 (2010)
Moeschel, Wernhard, Competition Policy from an Ordo Point of View, inGERMAN NEO-LIBERALS AND THE SOCIAL MARKET ECONOMY 142-159(Alan T. Peacock, et al. eds 1989).
MOLLE, WILLEM, THE ECONOMICS OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION : THEORY, PRACTICE, POLICY (2006).
Monti, Mario, EU Competition Policy, inANNUAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE FORDHAM CORPORATE LAW INSTITUTE: INTERNATIONAL ANTITRUST LAW & POLICY 87-96(Barry E. Hawk ed. 2003) .
Monti, Mario,European Comm’r for Competition Matters, The Future for Competition Policy in the European Union, atMerchant Taylor''s Hall, London (July 9, 2001), available at http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/01/340&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
Nannes, John M., Statement Before the Comm. on the Judiciary U.S. H.R. concerning Mergers in the Fin. Serv. Indus. (June 3, 1998), available athttp://www.justice.gov/atr/public/testimony/1787.pdf
NORTON, JOSEPH J., FINANCIAL SECTOR LAW REFORM IN EMERGING ECONOMIES (2000).
OECD, Competition and Financial Markets－Key Findings (2009),available athttp://www.oecd.org/daf/43067294.pdf.
OECD, Competition Policy, Industrial Policy and National Champions, DAF/COMP/GF(2009)9(Oct. 19, 2009), available at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/44548025.pdf
OECD, OECD Global Forum on Competition, Competition Policy in Small Economies—Korea, CCNM/GF/COMP/WD(2003)39(Feb. 6, 2003), available at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/10/2486790.pdf.
OECD, OECD Global Forum on Competition, Small Economies and Competition Policy -- Note by the Secretariat, CCNM/GF/COMP(2003)5 (Feb 7, 2003), available at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/13/2486724.pdf.
OECD, OECD Global Forum on Competition, Small Economies and Competition Policy－New Zealand, CCNM/GF/COMP/WD(2003)29(Jan 31, 2003), available at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/prosecutionandlawenforcement/2486698.pdf.
OECD, OECD Global Forum on Competition, Small Economies and Competition Policy: A Background Paper, CCNM/GF/COMP(2003)4(Feb 5, 2003), available at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/prosecutionandlawenforcement/2486546.pdf.
OECD, Antitrust Issues Involving Minority Shareholding and Interlocking Directorates, DAF/COMP(2008)30(Dec. 2, 2008), available atwww.oecd.org/dataoecd/40/38/41774055.pdf.
OECD, Roundtable on Competition and Regulation in Retail Banking-- United States, DAF/COMP/WP2/WD(2006)60 (Oct. 2, 2006 ), available athttp://www.ftc.gov/bc/international/docs/Banking_US.pdf
Owen, Bruce M., et al., China''s Competition Policy Reforms: The Anti-Monopoly Law and Beyond, 75 ANTITRUST L.J. 231-265(2008).
Owen, Bruce M., Imported Antitrust Competition Policy for Small Market Economies, Michal S. Gal. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003. Pp. 336. $45.00., 21 YALE J. ON REG. 441-459 (2004).
Pamela, Hon. & Harbour, Jones, Developments in Competition Law in the European Union and the United States: Harmony and Conflict, 19-SPG INT''L L. PRACTICUM 3-10（2006）.
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, International Competition Rules for Governments and for Private Business: A "Trade Law Approach" for Linking Trade and Competition Rules in the WTO, 72 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 545-582 (1996).
Press Release, European Comm’n, Antitrust: Commission Probes Credit Default Swaps Market (Apr. 29, 2011), http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/11/509&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
Press Release, European Comm’n, Mergers: Commission Blocks Proposed Merger between Deutsche Börse and NYSE Euronext(Feb. 1, 2012), http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/12/94&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
Press Release, European Comm’n, Mergers: Commission Blocks Proposed Merger between Deutsche Börse and NYSE Euronext(Feb. 1, 2012), http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/12/94&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
Peacock, Alan & Willerodt, Hans, Overall View of the German Liberal Movement, inGERMAN NEO-LIBERALS AND THE SOCIAL MARKET ECONOMY 1-15 (Alan T. Peacock, et al. eds 1989).
PERITZ, RUDOLPH J.R., COMPETITION POLICY IN AMERICA : HISTORY, RHETORIC, LAW (Rev. ed. 2001).
PITOFSKY, ROBERT., ET AL., TRADE REGULATION: CASES AND MATERIALS (2010).
Pitofsky, Robert., The Political Content of Antitrust, 127 U. PA. L. REV. 1051-1075 (1979).
POMFRET , RICHARD W. T., TRADE POLICIES AND INDUSTRIALIZATION IN A SMALL COUNTRY: THE CASE OF ISRAEL (1976).
POSNER, RICHARD A., A FAILURE OF CAPITALISM: THE CRISIS OF ''08 AND THE DESCENT INTO DEPRESSION (2009).
POSNER, RICHARD A., ANTITRUST LAW (2d ed. 2001)
Posner, Richard A., Rational Choice, Behavioral Economics, and the Law, 50 STAN. L. REV. 1551-1575(1998).
Posner, Richard A., The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis, 127 U. PA. L. REV. 925-948 (1979).
Posner, Richard A., Treating Financial Consumers as Consenting Adults, THE WALL STREET J. (July 22, 2009, 11:41 PM), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203946904574302213213148166.html(last vistited Aug.13, 2012)
Powrie, Erin K., Too Big to Fail" Is Too Big: Why the Mccarran-Ferguson Exemption to Federal Antitrust Enforcement of Insurance Is Past Its Prime, 63 RUTGERS L. REV. 359-388 (2010).
Priest, George L., The Limits of Antitrust and the Chicago School Tradition, 6 J. COMPETITION L. & ECON. 1-9 (2010).
Press Release, Remarks by Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions, Michael Barr at the Financial Times Global Finance Forum on "Reforming the Global Financial System"(Dec., 2, 2010), U.S. DEP’T OF THE TREASURY, http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/tg986.aspx.
[Proposed] Final Judgment of Plaintiff, United States v.Deutsche Börse AG and NYSE Euronext, No.1:11-cv-02280(D. for the Dist. of Columbia Dec. 22, 2011), available at http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f278500/278552.pdf.
Reeves, Amanda P. & Stucke, Maurice E., Behavioral Antitrust,86 IND. L.J. 1527-1586(2011).
Reverse Mortgages: Get the Facts Before Cashing in on Your Home’s Equity, FAIR TRADE COMMISSION(MAR. 2011), http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/homes/rea13.shtm. (last visited Aug.13 2012)
Richa, Jonathan M. & Scrivena, Thomas G., Bank Consolidation Caused By The Financial Crisis: How Should The Antitrust Division Review “Shotgun Marriages”?, 8-DEC ANTITRUST SOURCE 1-8 (2008).
Richa, Jonathon M. & Scriven, Thomas G., DoJ Fast-Track Options Speed Banking Antitrust Reviews, AMERICAN BANKER(May 1, 2009, 1:00AM ET), http://www.americanbanker.com/magazine/119_5/-378012-1.html.
Robinson, Constance K., Dir. of Operations, Antitrust Div., U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Bank Mergers and Antitrust, Address Before the 31st Annual Banking Law Inst. (May 30, 1996), available athttp://www.justice.gov/atr/public/speeches/1003.pdf
Rodriguez, A.E. & Coate, Malcolm B., Limits to Antitrust Policy for Reforming Economies, 18 HOUS. J. INT''L L. 311(1996).
Rodriguez, A.E. & Williams, Mark D., The Effectiveness of Proposed Antitrust Programs for Developing Countries, 19 N.C. J. INT''L L. & COM. REG. 209 (1994).
Rosch , J. Thomas, Comm’r, Fed. Trade Comm’n , Behavioral Economics: Observations Regarding Issues that Lie Ahead, Remarks Before the Vienna Competition Conference(June 9, 2010), available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/rosch/100609viennaremarks.pdf.
Rosch, J. Thomas, Comm’r, Federal Trade Comm’n, Implications of the Financial Meltdown for the FTC, Remarks at New York Bar Association Annual Dinner(Jan. 29, 2009), available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/rosch/090129financialcrisisnybarspeech.pdf.
Rosch, J. Thomas, Comm’r, Fed. Trade Comm’n, Managing Irrationality: Some Observations on Behavioral Economics and the Creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, Remarks at Conference on the Regulation of Consumer Financial Products (Jan. 6, 2010),available athttp://www.ftc.gov/speeches/rosch/100106financial-products.pdf.
Ryan, Stephen, et al., Financial Services, inTHE EC LAW OF COMPETITION 1305-1360(Jonathan Faull & Ali Nikpay, eds., 2d ed. 2007).
San, Gee & Lo, Changfa, A Decade of Fair Trade Law Legislation and Its Enforcement in the Republic of China, inINTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE COMPETITION LAWS AND POLICIES 81-115(Yang-Ching Chao, et al. eds. 2001).
Sauter, Wolf., The Economic Constitution of the European Union, 4 COLUM. J. EUR. L. 27-68(1998).
Scherer, F. M., Some Principles for Post-Chicago Antitrust Analysis, 52 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 5-23 (2001).
Shapiro, Carl, Deputy Assistant Attorney Gen, for Econ.,Antitrust Div.,U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Competition Policy in Distressed Industries, Remarks as Prepared For Delivery to ABA Antitrust Symposium: Competition as Public Policy( May 13, 2009), available at http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/speeches/245857.pdf
Shefer, Michael, Guidelines for Legislation on Monopolies and Restrictive Practices in Small Economies, 15 ANTITRUST BULL. 781-802 (1970)
Shelanski, Howard A., The Case for Rebalancing Antitrust and Regulation, 109 MICH. L. REV. 683-732 (2011).
Sheth, Manisha M., Formulating Antitrust Policy in Emerging Economics, 86 GEO. L.J. 451-477 (1997).
Silva, Andrea Gomes Da & Sansom, Mark., Antitrust Implications of the Financial Crisis: A UK and EU View, 23-SPG ANTITRST 24-31 (2009).
Smitherman III,Charles W., The Future of Global Competition Governance: Lessons from the Transatlantic, 19 AM. U. INT''L L. REV. 769-881 (2004).
Stevens, Sarah., The Increased Aggression of the Ec Commission in Extraterritorial Enforcement of the Merger Regulation and Its Impact on Transatlantic Cooperation in Antitrust, 29 SYRACUSE J. INT''L L. & COM. 263-302 (2002)
STIGLER, GEORGE J., THE ORGANIZATION OF INDUSTRY (1968)
Stock, Eric J., Explaining the Differing U.S. and EU Positions on the Boeing/mcdonnell-Douglas Merger: Avoiding Another Near-Miss,20 U. PA. J. INT''L ECON. L. 825-909 (1999).
Stucke, Maurice E., Behavioral Economists at the Gate: Antitrust in the Twenty-First Century, 38 LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 513-591 (2007).
Stucke, Maurice E., Lessons from the Financial Crisis, 77 ANTITRUST L.J. 313-341(2010)
Stucke, Maurice E., Money, Is That What I Want?: Competition Policy and the Role of Behavioral Economics, 50 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 893-979 (2010).
SUEHIRO, AKIRA & GILL, TOM, CATCH-UP INDUSTRIALIZATION : THE TRAJECTORY AND PROSPECTS OF EAST ASIAN ECONOMIES(2008).
Sullivan, Lawrence A.,& Fikentscher, Wolfgang., On the Growth of the Antitrust Idea, 16 BERKELEY J. INT''L L. 197-233 (1998).
Sunstein, Cass R.,& Thaler, Richard H., Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron,70 U. CHI. L. REV. 1159-1202(2003).
THALER, RICHARD H. & SUNSTEIN, CASS R., NUDGE: IMPROVING DECISIONS ABOUT HEALTH, WEALTH, AND HAPPINESS (2008).
THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD, CONSUMER HANDBOOK ON ADJUSTABLE-RATE MORTGAGES (2011).
Tumlir, Jan, Franz Böhm and Economic-constitutional Analysis, inGERMAN NEO-LIBERALS AND THE SOCIAL MARKET ECONOMY125-141 (Alan T. Peacock, et al. eds 1989)
Treaty Establishing the European Coal and Steel CommunityECSC Treaty, EUROPEAN UNION , http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/institutional_affairs/treaties/treaties_ecsc_en.htm. (last visited Dec. 13,2011)
‘Too Big to Fail?’: The Role of Antitrust Law in Government-Funded Consolidation in the Banking Industry: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Courts and Competition Policy of the Comm. on the Judiciary H.R., 111th Cong. (2010)( Statement of Albert A. Foer, President, American Antitrust Inst.), available athttp://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/printers/111th/111-33_48102.PDF
‘Too Big to Fail?’: The Role of Antitrust Law in Government-Funded Consolidation in the Banking Industry: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Courts and Competition Policy of the Comm. on the Judiciary H.R., 111th Cong. 2(2010)(Statement of C. R. ‘‘Rusty’’ Cloutier, President and Chief Exec. Officer, Midsouth Bank, N.A., Lafayette, LA.) , available athttp://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/printers/111th/111-33_48102.PDF
‘Too Big to Fail?’: The Role of Antitrust Law in Government-Funded Consolidation in the Banking Industry: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Courts and Competition Policy of the Comm. on the Judiciary H.R., 111th Cong. (2010)(statement of Henry C. ‘‘Hank’’ Johnson, Jr., a Rep. in Cong. from the State of Ga., and Chairman, Subcomm. on Courts and Competition Policy), available athttp://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/printers/111th/111-33_48102.PDF.
‘Too Big to Fail?’: The Role of Antitrust Law in Government-Funded Consolidation in the Banking Industry: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Courts and Competition Policy of the Comm. on the Judiciary H.R., 111th Cong. (2010)( Statement of Deborah A. Garza, former Assistant Attorney Gen., Div. of Antitrust,U.S. Dep’t of Justice), available athttp://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/printers/111th/111-33_48102.PDF
‘Too Big to Fail?’: The Role of Antitrust Law in Government-Funded Consolidation in the Banking Industry: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Courts and Competition Policy of the Comm. on the Judiciary H.R., 111th Cong. (2010)( Statement of William Askew, Senior Policy Advisor, Fin. Services Roundtable), available athttp://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/printers/111th/111-33_48102.PDF
‘Too Big to Fail?’: The Role of Antitrust Law in Government-Funded Consolidation in the Banking Industry: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Courts and Competition Policy of the Comm. on the Judiciary H.R., 111th Cong. (2010)( statement of Mark Cooper, Dir. of Research, Fed. of America), available athttp://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/printers/111th/111-33_48102.PDF
Tor, Avishalom., The Fable of Entry: Bounded Rationality, Market Discipline, and Legal Policy, 101 Mich. L. Rev. 482-568 (2002).
Trebilcock, Michael J., The Evolution of Competition Policy: Lessons from Comparative Experience, inBUSINESS, MARKETS AND GOVERNMENT IN THE ASIA PACIFIC: COMPETITION POLICY, CONVERGENCE AND PLURALISM 86-119(Jung-I Wu & Yün-Peng Chu eds. 1998).
Urata Shujiro, Competition Policy and Economic Development in East Asia, 1 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 15-33(2002).
U.S. FINANCIAL CRISIS INQUIRY COMMISSION, THE FINANCIAL CRISIS INQUIRY REPORT: FINAL REPORT OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON THE CAUSES OF THE FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISIS IN THE UNITED STATES xi-xii (U.S. G.P.O. Official government ed. 2011).
Varney, Christine A., Assistant Attorney Gen. Antitrust Div. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,Vigorous Antitrust Enforcement in this Challenging Era, Remarks as Prepared for the United States Chamber of Commerce (May 12, 2009), available at http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/speeches/245777.pdf.
Venit, James S., Article 82: The Last Frontier - Fighting Fire with Fire?, 28 FORDHAM INT''L L.J. 1157 -1178(2005).
VISCUSI, W. KIP, ET AL., ECONOMICS OF REGULATION AND ANTITRUST (2005).
WADE, ROBERT., GOVERNING THE MARKET: ECONOMIC THEORY AND THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT IN EAST ASIAN INDUSTRIALIZATION (1990).
Wade, Robert, State Intervention in “Outward looking” Development: Neoclassical Theory and Taiwanese Practice, inDEVELOPMENTAL STATES IN EAST ASIA 30-67 (Gordon White ed. 1988).
Waller, Spencer Weber., The Role of Monopolization and Abuse of Dominance in Competition Law, 20 LOY. CONSUMER L. REV. 123-126 (2008).
WEBEL, BAIRD, CONG. RESEARCH SERV.R41350, THE DODD-FRANK WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT: ISSUES AND SUMMARY(2010), available athttp://www.llsdc.org/attachments/files/232/CRS-R41350.pdf
White, Gordon, State and Market in China''s Socialist Industrilisation, inDEVELOPMENTAL STATES IN EAST ASIA 153-192 (Gordon White ed. 1988).
White, Gordon &Wade, Robert, Developmental States and Markets in East Asia: An Introduction , inDEVELOPMENTAL STATES IN EAST ASIA 1-29 (Gordon White ed. 1988)
Wilks, Stephen &Mcgowan, Lee, Competition Policy in the European Union: Creating a Federal Agency,inCOMPARATIVE COMPETITION POLICY: NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN A GLOBAL MARKET225-267(G. Bruce Doern & Stephen Wilks eds. 1996).
WILLIAMS, MARK, COMPETITION POLICY AND LAW IN CHINA, HONG KONG, AND TAIWAN (2005).
WILLIAMSON, OLIVER E., MARKETS AND HIERARCHIES: ANALYSIS AND ANTITRUST IMPLICATIONS (1975).
Wilmarth, Jr. Arthur E., Reforming Financial Regulation to Address the Too-Big-to-Fail Problem, 35 BROOK. J. INT''L L. 707-783 (2010)
Wilmarth, Jr. Arthur E., Subprime Crisis Confirms Wisdom of Separating Banking and Commerce, 27 No. 5 BANKING & FIN. SERVICES POL''Y REP. 1-15 (2008).
Wilmarth, Jr. Arthur E., The Dodd-Frank Act: A Flawed and Inadequate Response to the Too-Big-to-Fail Problem, 89 OR. L. REV. 951 -1057(2011).
WORLD BANK, EAST ASIA : THE ROAD TO RECOVERY (1998)
WORLD BANK, THE EAST ASIAN MIRACLE : ECONOMIC GROWTH AND PUBLIC POLICY (1993)
World Fed’n of Exch., 2010 Cost and Revenue Survey(Nov. 2011),available at http://www.world-exchanges.org/files/statistics/excel/2010%20Cost%20&%20Revenue%20Survey_Final.pdf
Wu, Dr. Pijan & Caroline, Thomas, Taiwan''s Fair Trade Act: Achieving the "Right" Balance?,26 NW. J. INT''L L. & BUS. 643-665(2006)
Yale, Brozen, Concentration and Profits: Does Concentration Matter? inA CENTURY OF THE SHERMAN ACT: AMERICAN ECONOMIC OPINION 1890-1990 117-124(Jack C. High & Wayne E. Gable eds., 1992).
YUSUF, SHAHID.& EVENETT, SIMON J., CAN EAST ASIA COMPETE? : INNOVATION FOR GLOBAL MARKETS(2002).
Zheng, Wentong., Transplanting Antitrust in China: Economic Transition, Market Structure, and State Control, 32 U. PA. J. INT''L L. 643-721 (2010).
Zhang, Xiaoji & Long, Guoqiang, China’s Industrial Policies in the Process of Marketization, inINDUSTRIAL POLICIES IN EAST ASIA 255-290 (Seiichi Masuyama, et al. eds. 1997).