孔子贊《易》，作《十翼》，自《史》《漢》以來，學者習承其說。下逮北宋，始有疑其說之不足恃者；嗣後紹述，代不乏人。民初疑古學風盛興，疑者益眾；然篤信舊說者亦未滅跡。近年大陸地下考古發掘山土文物，其盛邁逾前代，尤如馬王堆帛本《易》經、傳之面世，於傳世文獻外增加不少可供參考之資料，引起海內外《易》學研究者熱烈討論。然而對於孔門傳《易》此一近千年以來爭訟不休的論題，事實上並未因出土文獻而晶以論定。近年海峽兩岸學者論及此題，即有據新出土文物以堅舊說者；亦有因之而作其他推論以修正新說者。本文即就此一問題，綜合傳世文獻與新出資料重作檢討，提出個人淺見，雖不足以盡釋群疑，然於若干相關問題，庶或可得相當的釐清。

　　　　　Confucius wrote ten articles entitled Yi Zhuan to interpret the Yi Jing. Since it was recoded in the shi Ji and the Han shu, scholars had trusted and pass on this tradition. In Northern sung dynasty, some scholars began to doubt the reliability of this story. Since then some scholars have also doubted the authorship of the Yi Zhuan. In the early years of the Republic, the doubt about the ancient story prevailed, but there were still those who believed in the old story. During the past 20 to 30 years, archaecological studies have succeeded in unearthing ancient cultural objects and documents in Mainland china. Yi Jing in Silk Manuscripts and Yi Zhuan in Silk Manuscripts were discovered in Ma Wang Dui of Hu Nan Province. The added more references to the documents bequeathed in the past and inspired discussions by global scholars who study Yi Jing. In fact, the scholars have not reached an agreement on the issue of the ten articles of Yi Zhuan by Confucius because of the newly found documents. Some sholars supported the old story based on the newly found cultural objects and documents; on the contrary, others verified the doubts based on the same documents. The author of this thesis carefully reviewed the documents and objects and presented this personal interpretation and comments. These assertions are surely of positive value for reference, although they could not explain all the related questions.