臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：性擇論與色情：評析研究者如何挪用演化論術語傳達性別刻板印象
書刊名：新聞學研究
作者：林芳玫 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Fang-mei
出版日期：2000
卷期：65
頁次：頁131-156
主題關鍵詞：性擇論；色情；羅曼史；科技整合的研究；Sexual selection theory；Pornography；Romance；Interdisciplinary research
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:50
  • 點閱點閱:36
　　　　　本論文分為三大部分。第一部份介紹心理學者與傳播學者如何使用性擇論來解釋 男女兩性性行為的差異，亦即『男人喜歡短期、不帶承諾的性交，女人喜歡長期、忠 誠的關係』。這種說法進而被用於解釋為何男人喜歡色情A片，女人喜歡羅曼史。本 論文第二部份對上述說法提出批評，指出簡化、通俗化性擇論的謬誤，並提出性擇論 的其他觀點。最後，本文企圖將演化生物學與傳播學二者的研究成果加以結合，以色 情與羅曼史的共同主題-性暴力為例，探討其生物基礎及媒介再現的特性。 本文雖然指出通俗化性擇論的謬誤，但並不否認生物學觀點的貢獻。然而，心理 學者與傳播學者在使用性擇論時，往往將主流意識型態與文化中的性別刻板印象帶入 號稱客觀中立的科學論述中，並且漠視自己本行（傳播學）的基本理論。本論文藉由 色情媒介與羅曼史的分析討論，省思自然科學與社會學二者在結合過程中，如何避免 跨學門、跨領域研究易犯的錯誤。
　　　　　This paper intends to explore three areas of inquiries. First, this paper introduces how psychologists and media scholars use sexual selection theory to explain human sexuality; that is, "men prefer short-term relationship, while women prefer long-term relationship." This statement is further applied to explain why men enjoy pornography and women enjoy romance fiction. The second part of this paper points out the mistakes of over-simplified version of sexual selection theory. Scholars often project gender stereotypes and male-centered ideology into "scientific theory," which is claimed and supposed to be neutral and objective. Finally, this paper focuses on the common theme of pornography and romance-sexual violence, in order to integrate the biological perspective and the media / representation perspective. By referring to sexual selection theory, human sexuality, and media representation, the author of this paper attempts to discuss how to undergo interdisciplinary research.
期刊論文
1.徐嘉宏(1995)。人為什麼好色？從演化心理學看人「性」。張老師月刊，1995(2)，86-94。  延伸查詢new window
2.Buss, D. M.(1989)。Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses testes in 37 cultures。Behavioral and Brain Sciences，12，1-49。  new window
3.Clark, R. D.、Hatfield, E.(1989)。Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers。Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality，2，39-55。  new window
4.Ellis, B. J.、Symons, Donald(1990)。Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychological approach。The Journal of Sex Research，27(4)，527-555。  new window
5.Gowaty, Patricia A.(1992)。Evolutionary biology and feminism。Human Nature，3(3)，217-249。  new window
6.Malamuth, N. M.(1996)。Sexually explicit media, gender differences and evolutionary theory。The Journal of Sex Research，27(4)，527-555。  new window
7.Smuts, B.(1992)。Male aggression against women: an evolutionary perspective。Human Nature，3(1)，1-44。  new window
8.Dusek, Val(1999)。Sociobiology sanitized: evolutionary psychology and gene selectionism。Science as Culture，8(2)，129-169。  new window
9.Buss, David M.、Schmitt, David P.(1993)。Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating。Psychological Review，100(2)，204-232。  new window
10.羅文輝(20000400)。性策略理論、性別、第三人效果與支持限制色情媒介。新聞學研究，63，201-222。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Knodel, J.、Low, B.、Saengtienchai, C.、Lucas, R.(1997)。An evolutionary perspective on Thai sexual attitudes and behavior。The Journal of Sex Research，34(3)，292-303。  new window
12.Falk, P.(1993)。The Representation of Presence: Outlining the Anti-Aeothetics of Pornography。Theory, Cultural and Society，10，1-42。  new window
13.Munoz-Rubio, Julio(1999)。On Darwinian Discourse, Part II: Re-anthropologizing Nature by Naturalizing Competitive Man。Science as Culture，8(2)，171-188。  new window
14.李美枝(19960600)。兩性關係的社會生物學原型在傳統中國與今日臺灣的表現型態。本土心理學研究，5，114-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.劉仲冬(1999)。精子也外遇--對新達爾文主義性別論述的批判。「女性主義與台灣社會的關係：社會學的觀點」學術研討會，女學會、台灣社會學社 (會議日期: 1999/03/19-03/20)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Abramson, P. R.、Pinkerton, S. D.、吳國卿(2000)。美麗性世界。台北：經典傳訊。  延伸查詢new window
2.Baker, Robin、李沛沂、章蓓蕾(1999)。精子戰爭。台北：麥田。  延伸查詢new window
3.Batten, M.、林尹星(1987)。顚覆男性擇偶權：她為什麼選擇他。台北：允晨文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Diamond, Jared Mason、王道還(2000)。第三種猩猩：人類的身世與未來。台北：時報。  延伸查詢new window
5.Fisher, Helen E.、刁曉華(1992)。愛慾：婚姻、外遇與離婚的自然史。台北：時報。  延伸查詢new window
6.Margulis, Lynn、Sagan, D.、潘勛(1993)。性的歷史。台北：時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.Bleier, Ruth(1984)。Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women。New York：Pergamon Press。  new window
8.Wright, Robert、林淑貞(1999)。性、演化、達爾文：人是道德的動物？。臺北：張老師文化。  延伸查詢new window
9.Wrangham, Richard、Peterson, Dale、林秀梅(1999)。雄性暴力：人類社會的亂源。臺北：胡桃木文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.Russell, R. J.、林憲正(1995)。權力，性和愛的進化：狐猴的遺產。台北：正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.Daly, M.、Margo, W.(1978)。Sex, Evolution, and Behavior: Adaptations for Reproduction。North Scituate, Mass：North Duxbury Press。  new window
12.Dawkins, Richard(1976)。Then Selfish Gene。Oxford：New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
13.Daly, M.、Margo, W.(1988)。Homicide。New York：A. De Gruyter。  new window
14.Daly, M.、Margo, W.(1983)。Sex, Evolution, and Behavior。Boston：Willard Grant Press。  new window
15.Ellis, Lee(1989)。Theories of Rape: Inquiries into the Causes of Sexual Aggression。New York, NY：Hemisphere Publishing。  new window
16.Shorter, E.(1975)。The Making of the Modern Family。New York：Basic Books。  new window
17.Small, Meredith(1993)。Female Choices: Sexual Behavior of Female Primates。Ithaca N.Y.：Cornell University Press。  new window
18.Spanier, Bonnie B.(1995)。Im/Partial Science: Gender Ideology in Molecular Biology。Bloomington：Indiana University Press。  new window
19.Watt, Ian(1957)。The Rise of the Novel。University of California Press。  new window
20.Bem, Sandra L.(1993)。The Lenses of Gender: Transforming the Debate on Sexual Inequality。New Haven：Yale University Press。  new window
21.Radway, Janice A.(1984)。Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature。University of North Carolina Press：Verso。  new window
22.Williams, Linda(1989)。Hard Core: Power, Pleasure and the "Frenzy of the Visible"。University of California Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Keller, E. F.(1996)。Language and ideology in evolutionary theory: reading cultural norms into natural law。Feminism and Science。Oxford。  new window
2.Braidotti, R.(1994)。Body Image and the Pornography of Representation。Knowledge and Difference: Feminist Perspective in Epistemology。London：Routledge。  new window
3.Haraway, D.(1996)。Animal Sociology and a Natural Economy of the Body Politic, Part II: The Past is the Contested Zone。Feminism and science。New York：Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Lloyd, E. A.(1996)。Pre-theoretical Assumption in Evolutionary Explanations and Female Sexuality。Feminism and Science。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Smith, Robert L.(1984)。Human Sperm competition。Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating System。Orlando：Academic Press。  new window
6.Trivers, R. L.(1972)。Parental Investment and Sexual Selection。Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971。London：Heinemann Educational。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：700（臺灣：695，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2000451 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67795421
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上