:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:華人在傳統與現代生活情境中的傳統與現代行為:人境互動論的觀點
作者:高旭繁 引用關係
作者(外文):Shu-Fang Kao
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:心理學研究所
指導教授:楊國樞
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2008
主題關鍵詞:心理傳統性心理現代性人境互動論個人適應traditional psychological traitsmodern psychological traitsperson-situation interactive perspectivehuman adaptation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:105
本研究採用人境互動論的觀點,探討傳統與現代的情境、心理特徵、行為、及其對個人適應的影響。研究一以質性研究法解析出華人日常生活中重要的五大類傳統情境,以及重要的五大類現代情境。研究二承續研究一的結果,採用人境互動的取徑,以701位有效樣本的資料進行統計分析,結果發現:(1)華人在面對傳統(或現代)情境時,對表現出傳統(或現代)行為之正面評估的傾向高於現代(或傳統)行為;(2)心理傳統性(或現代性)程度越高的華人,在面對各情境時,越傾向對表現出傳統行為(或現代行為)給予正面評估;(3)華人在各情境下的行為表現,確實會受人境互動之影響。研究三則以423有效樣本,探討人境互動後之行為後果對個人可能帶來的影響。經統計分析後,結果發現:(1)華人在面對傳統(或現代)情境時,表現出傳統(或現代)行為比現代行為有利於個人適應;(2)心理傳統性(或現代性)程度越高的華人,在面對各情境時,表現出傳統(或現代)行為比現代(或傳統)行為有利於個人適應;(3)人境互動後之行為確實可能影響華人之適應。綜合上述結果,我們推論:(1)採人境互動論的觀點,有助於深化華人本土心理學的研究;(2)在進行有關華人傳統與現代之心理與行為的研究時,可將影響因素擴大延伸到情境因素的影響。
The present series of studies adopted the person-situation interactive perspective, to explore traditional/modern situations, traditional/modern psychological traits, and their interactions on affecting human behaviors and adaptation. In Study 1, I used a qualitative method to delineate five each most important traditional and modern situations in the Chinese daily life. In Study 2, I followed onto exploring the effects of person-situation interactions on behaviors. With data from 701 respondents, I found that (1) Chinese gave higher positive evaluations to traditional (or modern) behaviors, as opposed to modern (or traditional) behaviors, in traditional (or modern) situations. (2) Those with higher traditional (or modern) psychological traits gave higher positive evaluations to traditional (or modern) behaviors in all situations. (3) Behaviors were affected by interactions between the person (traits) and the situation. In Study 3, I used data from 423 respondents to explore effects of person-situation interactions on adaptation. Results showed that (1) in traditional (or modern) situations, traditional (or modern) behaviors, as opposed to modern (or traditional) behaviors, were more beneficial to adaptation. (2) For those with higher traditional (or modern) psychological traits, traditional (or modern) behaviors, as opposed to modern (or traditional) behaviors, were more beneficial to adaptation in all situations. (3) Behaviors resulted from person-situation interactions affected adaptation. Overall, I conclude that (1) adopting the person-situation interactive perspective is beneficial for deepening the indigenous Chinese psychological research. (2) To understand Chinese traditional/modern psychological traits and behaviors, situational characteristics must be taken into consideration.
文崇一(1972)。從價值取向談中國國民性。見李亦園、楊國樞(主編):「中國人的性格」。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
文崇一(1982)。傳統規範在現代社會的適應,見中華文化復興運動推行委員會編印:「傳統文化與現代生活研討會論文集」,頁49-64。台北:中華文化復興運動推行委員會。
王 笛(2001)。台灣大眾文化的淵源及其流變。見盧漢超(主編):「台灣的現代化和文化認同」。美國紐約州:八方文化企業公司。
王叢桂(1999)。性別角色信念、家庭承諾、工作承諾與工作價值之關係。「本土心理學研究」,11,59-89。new window
主計處(1999)。「行政院主計處中華民國社會指標統計」。台北:行政院主計處出版中心。
余英時(1992)。「中國文化與現代變遷」。台北:三民書局。new window
李本華(1973)。個人現代化程度的相關人格特質。「中華心理學刊」,15,46-53。new window
李亦園(1972)。從若干儀式行為看中國國民性的一面。見李亦園、楊國樞(主編):「中國人的性格」。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
李美枝(1996)。兩性關係的社會生物學原形在傳統中國與今日台灣的表現型態。「本土心理學研究」,5,114-174。new window
李美枝、楊國樞(1972)。中國大學生的價值觀。見李亦園、楊國樞(主編):「中國人的性格」。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
李雅雯(2005)。「因應他人對自身外表的負面評價—對情緒、身體意象與自尊的影響」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:輔仁大學心理學研究所。
沈清松(1998)。儒家與道家的和諧觀。見中國社會科學院學術交流委員會、中國社會科學院哲學研究所(主編):「中華人文精神的呼喚。海峽兩岸弘揚中華傳統文化學術研討會論文集」。北京:九洲圖書出版社。
周立生(1998)。秦漢哲學與中國文化傳統。見中國社會科學院學術交流委員會、中國社會科學院哲學研究所(主編):「中華人文精神的呼喚。海峽兩岸弘揚中華傳統文化學術研討會論文集」。北京:九洲圖書出版社。
周麗芳(2002)。華人組織中的關係與社會網絡。「本土心理學研究」,18,175-228。new window
林盈慧(1996)。「產婦個人現代性與傳統性心理特質與其接受傳統做月子習俗的態度與行為之相關性之探討」(未發表之碩士論文)。高雄:高雄醫學院護理學研究所。
金耀基(1990)。「新序:從傳統到現代」。台北:時報出版社。
金耀基(1999)。現代化、現代性與中國的發展。見喬健、李沛良(主編):「社會科學的應用與中國現代化」。高雄:麗文文化公司。
洪永泰、莊文忠(2007)。台灣地區社會變遷基本調查樣本人口特徵的變化:1990-2004。見「台灣的社會變遷1985∼2005:台灣社會變遷調查計畫第十一次研討會會議論文集(12/22)」。台北:中央研究院社會科學研究所。
胡 佛(1978)。現代人語—序。見楊國樞(著):「現代社會的心理適應」。台北:巨流圖書。
胡幼慧(1996)。「質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例」。台北:巨流圖書公司。
孫立平(1990)。後發外生型現代化模式剖析。「社會科學研究」,6,86-92。
徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎(2002)。組織認同:理論與本質之初步探索分析。「中山管理評論」,10(1),45-64。new window
徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎(2003)。組織認定與企業倫理效益。「應用心理研究」,20,115-138。new window
徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎、黃敏萍(2002)。華人企業領導人的員工歸類與管理行為。「本土心理學研究」,18,51-94。new window
翁克成(2004)。「研究生之個人傳統性╱現代性與師生關係品質及身心適應之關聯」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:輔仁大學心理學研究所。
翁嘉英、楊國樞、許燕(2004)。社會取向與個人取向的自尊。概念分析與實徵測量。見「華人的自我歷程、自我概念及自我評價」研討會會議手冊暨論文集」。宜蘭縣礁溪:佛光人文社會學院心理學研究所。new window
翁儷禎、張郁雯、姚開屏(1996)。談我國心理計量領域之規劃。「中華心理學刊」,38,41-50。new window
高旭繁、陸洛(2006)。夫妻傳統性╱現代性的契合與婚姻適應之關聯。「本土心理學研究」,25,45-98。。new window
唐先梅(1999)。從家務工作的本質談雙薪家庭夫妻家事分工。「應用心理學研究」,4,131-173。new window
張嘉莉(2005)。「心理傳統性與現代性的融合類型與跨範疇模式」(未發表之碩士論文)。宜蘭:佛光人文社會學院心理學研究所。
郭盈本(1996)。「家庭中夫妻購買決策之研究-以織品服裝產品為例」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:輔仁大學織品服裝學系研究所。new window
陳小紅(1999)。現代化與現代人,見「人文關懷與社會實踐:人的素質」學術研討會論文集,頁74-78。台北:法鼓人文社會科學院。
陳秉璋、陳信木(1988)。「邁向現代化」。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
陳芬憶(2002)。「親子在個人傳統性╱現代性及孝道上的契合與幸福感之相關」(未發表之碩士論文)。高雄:高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所。
陳婉琪(2007)。小城故事多,大城利更多?都市教育優勢初探。見「台灣的社會變遷1985∼2005:台灣社會變遷調查計畫第十一次研討會會議論文集(12/22)」。台北:中央研究院社會科學研究所。
陸 洛(2001)。「自我建構,文化價值及幸福感—中國人和英國人的跨文化比較。見「教育部資助華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫研究計畫,八十九年度計畫執行研究報告,計畫編號89-H-FA01-2-4-2」。台北:台灣大學心理學系。
陸 洛(2002)。人我關係與自我運作。見「教育部資助華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫研究計畫,九十年度計畫執行研究報告,計畫編號90-H-FA01-2-4-3」。台北:台灣大學心理學系。
陸 洛(2003a)。個人取向幸福觀與社會取向幸福觀:理念與測量。見「教育部資助華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫研究計畫,九十一年度計畫執行研究報告,計畫編號91-H-FA01-2-4-3」。台北:台灣大學心理學系。
陸 洛(2003b)。人我關係之界定-「折衷自我」的現身。「本土心理學研究」,20,215-246。
陸 洛(2004)。現代華人之個人與社會文化的差距對其生活適應之衝擊。見「教育部資助華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫研究計畫,九十二年度計畫執行研究報告,計畫編號92-H-FA01-2-4-3」。台北:台灣大學心理學系。
陸 洛、高旭繁、陳芬憶(2006)。傳統性、現代性孝道觀念及其對幸福感的影響:一項親子對偶設計。「本土心理學研究」,25,197-232。new window
陸 洛、楊國樞(2005)。社會取向與個人取向的自我實現觀:概念分析與實徵初探。「本土心理學研究」,23,3-69。new window
章英華、林季平(2001)。「都市化、階層化和資訊化之關聯」第四屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會(台北南港)的口頭報告論文。
章英華、傅仰止(2003)。「台灣地區社會變遷基本調查第四期第三次調查計劃執行報告,計劃編號NSC-91-2420-H-001-004」。台北:行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫報告。
曾大千(1998)。「台北縣國民中學教師的個人現代性、傳統性及其教學倦怠關係之研究」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立政治大學教育學研究所。
游嘉瑩(2006)。「威權領導與員工個人創新行為:員工內在動機與負向情緒感受的中介以及兩階段的調節效果」(未發表之碩士論文)。中壢:中原大學心理學研究所。
費孝通(1948)。「鄉土重建」。上海:觀察社。
黃光國(1988)。「儒家思想與東亞現代化」。台北:巨流圖書公司。new window
黃光國(1995)。儒家價值觀的現代轉化:理論分析與實徵研究。「本土心理學研究」,3,276-338。new window
黃光國(2002)。從「現代性」到「本土化」:論「個人現代性」研究的方法論。見葉啟政(主編):「從現代到本土:慶賀楊國樞教授七秩華誕論文集」。台北:遠流出版社。
黃宗堅、葉光輝(2001)。家庭系統中的脈絡、關係與個人:一個多元複和模式的研究取向。見「教育部資助華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫研究計畫,九十年度計畫執行研究報告,計畫編號89-H-FA01-2-4-1」。台北:台灣大學心理學系。
黃俊傑(2002)。傳統中國的思維方式及其價值觀:歷史回顧與現代啟示。見黃俊傑(主編):「傳統中華文化與現代價值的激盪」。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。new window
黃囇莉(1999)。「人際和諧與衝突:本土化的理論與研究」。台北:桂冠圖書。new window
楊中芳(1991)。回顧港台「自我」研究:反省與展望。見高尚仁、楊中芳(主編):「中國人,中國心-社會與人格篇」。台北:遠流出版社。new window
楊中芳(2002)。現代化、全球化是與本土化對立的嗎?-試論現代化研究的本土化。見楊中芳(著):「如何理解中國人:文化與個人論文集」。台北:遠流出版社。
楊宜音(2002)。社會變遷與人的變遷—楊國樞有關中國人「個人現代性」研究述評。見葉啟政(主編):「從現代到本土:慶賀楊國樞教授七秩華誕論文集」。台北:遠流出版社。
楊國樞(1972)。中國大學生的人生觀。見李亦園、楊國樞(主編):「中國人的性格」。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
楊國樞(1978)。現代化的解析。見楊國樞(著):「現代社會的心理適應」。台北:巨流圖書。
楊國樞(1981)。中國人的性格與行為:形成與蛻變。「中華心理學刊」,23,39-55。new window
楊國樞(1982a)。現代社會中的市民性格。見楊國樞(著):「開放的多元社會」,頁51-70。台北:東大圖書。。
楊國樞(1982b)。培養現代的觀念與行為。見楊國樞(著):「開放的多元社會」,頁37-50。台北:東大圖書。
楊國樞(1982c)。心理學研究的中國化:層次與方向。見楊國樞、文崇一(主編):「社會及行為科學研究的中國化」。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
楊國樞(1985)。台灣民眾之性格與行為的變遷。見中央研究院三民主義研究所(主編):「台灣地區之現代化及其問題研討會(第四次社會科學會議)論文集」。台北:中央研究院三民主義研究所。new window
楊國樞(1992)。「父子軸家庭與夫妻軸家庭:運作特徵、變遷方向及適應問題」中國心理衛生協會主辦之家庭與心理衛生國際研討會(台北)的主題演講稿。
楊國樞(1993a)。我們為什麼要建立中國人的本土心理學?「本土心理學研究」,1,6-88。new window
楊國樞(1993b)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。見楊國樞、余安邦(主編):「中國人、中國心—理論及方法篇(一九九二)」。台北:桂冠圖書公司。new window
楊國樞(1994)。傳統價值觀與現代價值觀能否同時並存?。見楊國樞(主編):「中國人的價值觀—社會科學觀點」。台北:桂冠圖書公司。new window
楊國樞(1995)。中國人對現代化的反應:心理學的觀點。見喬健、潘乃谷(主編):「現代化與中國文化」。天津:天津人民出版社。new window
楊國樞(1997)。心理學研究的本土契合性及其相關問題。「本土心理學研究」,8,75-120。new window
楊國樞(2004)。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究:社會取向與個人取向觀點。「本土心理學研究」,22,11-80。new window
楊國樞(2005a)。華人社會取向的理論分析。見楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編):「華人本土心理學研究(上冊)」。台北:遠流出版社。new window
楊國樞(2005b)。心理傳統性與現代性。見楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編):「華人本土心理學研究(下冊)」。台北:遠流出版社。new window
楊國樞、余安邦、葉明華 (1991)。中國人的個人傳統性與現代性:概念與測量。見楊國樞、黃光國(主編):「中國人的心理與行為(一九八九)」。台北:桂冠圖書公司。new window
楊國樞、張分磊(1989)。價值取向及其變遷—以大學生的研究為例。見楊國樞(著):「中國人的蛻變」。台北:桂冠圖書公司。new window
楊國樞、陸洛(2005a)。三探心理學傳統性與現代性:概念架構的擴展與研究工具的建立(1/3)。見「國科會研究計劃報告,計畫編號:NSC93-2413-H- 431-003」。台北:國家科學委員會。new window
楊國樞、陸洛(2005b)。社會取向自我實現者與個人取向自我實現者:概念分析與實徵衡鑑。「本土心理學研究」,23,71-143。new window
楊國樞、程千芳(2001)。自我概念差距與情緒:Higgins理論的本土化驗證。見「教育部資助華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫研究計畫,九十年度計畫執行報告,計畫編號89-H-FA01-2-4-3」。台北:台灣大學心理學系。new window
楊國樞、瞿海源(1974)。中國「人」的現代化:有關個人現代性的研究。「中央研究院民族學研究所集刊」,37,1-37。new window
姜定宇、鄭伯壎、任金剛、黃政瑋(2003)。組織忠誠:本土建構與測量。「本土心理學研究」,19,273-337。new window
葉光輝(1998)。年老父母居住安排的心理學研究:孝道觀點的探討。「中央民族學研究所集刊」,83,121-168。
葉光輝(2001)。孝道觀念的促進與抑制效果:一個整合架構的實徵研究。見「教育部資助華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫研究計畫,九十年度計畫執行研究報告,計畫編號89-H-FA01-2-4-1」。台北:台灣大學心理學系。
葉至誠(1997)。「蛻變的社會:社會變遷的理論與現況」。台北:洪葉文化。new window
葉啟政(1982)。「傳統」概念的社會學分析。見中華文化復興運動推行委員會(編印):「傳統文化與現代生活研討會論文集」,頁65-92。台北:中華文化復興運動推行委員會。
葉啟政(2001)。「傳統與現代的鬥爭遊戲」。台北:巨流圖書。new window
廖玲燕(1999)。「台灣本土社會讚許量表之編製及其心理歷程分析」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。
趙子文(1997)。「大陸台商組織中員工使用印象管理方法之研究」(未發表之碩士論文)。彰化:大葉工學院事業經營研究所。
劉兆明、黃子玲、陳千玉(1995)。企業文化的解讀與分析:以三個大型民營企業為例。「中華心理學刊」,43,189-206。new window
潘君鳳(2005)。「特質自尊與狀態自尊的關係:社會取向與個人取向的觀點」(未發表之碩士論文)。宜蘭:佛光人文社會學院心理學研究所。
鄭伯壎(2001)。家長式領導的三元模式:中國大陸企業組織的證據。見「教育部資助華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫研究計畫,九十年度計畫執行報告書,計畫編號89-H-FA01-2-4-4」。台北:台灣大學心理學系。new window
鄭伯壎、姜定宇(2000)。華人組織中的主管忠誠:主位與客位概念對員工效能的效果。「本土心理學研究」,14,65-113。new window
鄭伯壎、樊景立(2001)。初探華人社會的社會取向:台灣與大陸之比較研究。「中華心理學刊」,43,207-221。new window
盧漢超(2001)。「台灣的現代化和文化認同」。美國紐約州:八方文化企業公司。
蕭志偉(2001)。觀影行為與台灣的現代化。見盧漢超(主編):「台灣的現代化和文化認同」。美國紐約州:八方文化企業公司。
謝佩鴛(2000)。「校長領導作風、上下關係品質及教師組織公民行為關係之研究」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
瞿海源(1971)。「個人現代化程度與人格之關係」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
瞿海源、楊國樞(1988)。中國大學生現代化程度與心理需要的關係。見李亦園、楊國樞(主編):「中國人的性格」。台北:桂冠圖書。
羅一萍(1995)。「父母的傳統性、現代性、管教方式與兒童的創造力相關之研究」(未發表之碩士論文)。屏東:國立屏東師範學院初等教育學系研究所。


Adler, A. (1927). Practice and theory of individual psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitudes-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.
Angyal, A. (1941). Foundations for a science of personality. New York: Commonwealth Fund.
Apter, D. (1965). The politics of modernization. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Argyle, M., Furnham, A. & Graham, J. A. (1981). Social situation. University of Cambridge: Press Syndicate.
Armer, M., & Youtz, R. (1971). Formal education and individual modernity in an African society. American Journal of Sociology, 71,604-626.
Barker, R. G.. (1963) On the nature of the environment. Journal of Social Issues, 19(4), 17-38.
Baron, R. M. (2007). Situating coordination and cooperation between ecological and social psychology. Ecological Psychology, 19(2), 179-199.
Baumeister, R. F. & Tice, D. M. (1985). Toward a theory of situational structure. Environment and Behavior, 17(2), 147-192.
Belk, R. (1974). An Exploratory assessment of situational effects in buyer behaviour. Journal of Marketing Behaviour, 11, 156-163.
Belk, R. (1975). Situational variables and consumer behaviour. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2, 157-164.
Bem, D. J. (1983). Constructing a theory of the triple typology: Some (second) thoughts on nomothetic and idiographic approaches to personality. Journal of Personality, 51, 566-577.
Bishop, D., & Witt, P. (1970). Sources of behavioural variance during leisure time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 352-360.
Black, C. E. (1966). The dynamics of modernization. New York: Harper and Row.
Bowers, K. S. (1973). Situationism in psychology: An analysis and critique. Psychological Review, 80, 307-336.
Brandstätter, H. (1994). Well-being and motivational person-environment fit: A time-sampling study of emotions. European Journal of Personality, 8(2), 75-94.
Brehm, S. S., Kassin, A. M., & Fein, S. (2002). Social psychology (5th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into cluster. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476-506.
Cervone, D., & Shoda, Y. (1999). Beyond traits in the study of personality coherence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 27-32.
Cheng, C., Chiu, C. Y., Hong, Y.-Y., & Cheung, J. S., (2001). Discriminative facility and its role in the perceived quality of interactional experiences. Journal of Personality, 69, 765-786.
Chiu, C. Y., Dweck, C. S., Tong, J. Y.-Y., & Fu, J. H.-Y. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 923-940.
Chiu, C. Y., Hong, Y.-Y., Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y., (1995). Discriminative facility in social competence: Conditional versus dispositional encoding and monitoring-blunting of information. Social Cognition, 13, 49-70.
Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 47-63.
Cohen, R. J., Montague, P., Nathanson, L. S., & Swerdlik, M. E. (1988). Psychological testing: An introduction to tests and measurement. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Conway, L. G., Schaller, M., Tweed, R. G., & Hallett, D. (2001) The complexity of thinking across cultures: Interactions between culture and situational context. Social Cognition, 19(3), 228-250.
Dawson, J. L. M. (1967). Traditional versus Western attitudes in West Africa: The construction, validation, and application of a measuring device. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 81-96.
Dawson, J. L. M. (1969). Attitudinal consistency and conflict in West Africa. Internal Journal of Psychology, 4, 39-53.
Dawson, J. L. M., Law, H., Leung, A., & Whitney, R. E. (1971). Scaling Chinese traditional-modern attitudes and the GSR measurement of “important” versus “un-important” Chinese concepts. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 2, 1-27.
Doob, L. W. (1967). Scales for assessing psychological modernization in Africa. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31, 414-421.
Dworkin, R., & Kihlstrom, J. (1978). An S-R inventory of dominance for research on the nature of persons-situations interaction. Journal of Personality, 46, 43-56.
Ekehammar, B. (1974). Interactionism in personality from a historical perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1026-1048.
Ekehammar, B., & Magnusson, D. (1973). A method to study stressful situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 176-179.
Ekehammar, B., Magnusson, D., & Ricklander, L. (1974). An interactionist approach to the study of anxiety: An analysis of an S-R inventory applied to an adolescent sample. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 15, 4-14.
Endler, N. S. (1973). The person versus the situation: A pseudo issue? A response to Alker. Journal of Personality, 41, 287-303.
Endler, N. S., & Edwards, J. M. (1986). Interactionism in personality in the twentieth century. Personality and Individual Differences, 7(3), 379-384.
Endler, N. S., & Hunt, J. McV. (1966). Sources of behavioral variance as measured by the S-R Inventory of Anxiousness. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 336-346.
Endler, N. S., & Hunt, J. McV. (1968). S-R inventories of hostility and comparisons of the proportions of variance from persons, responses, and situations for hostility and anxiousness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 309-315.
Endler, N. S., & Hunt, J. McV. (1969). Generalizability of contributions from sources of variance in the S-R inventories of anxiousness. Journal of Personality, 37, 1-24.
Endler, N. S., Hunt, J. McV., & Rosenstein, A. J. (1962). An S-R inventory of anxiousness. Psychological Monographs, 76,1-33.
Endler, N. S., & Magnusson, D. (1976a) Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 956-974.
Endler, N. S., & Magnusson, D. (1976b). Interactional psychology and personality. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corp.
Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The scientific study of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Farh, J. L., Hackett, R.D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 715-729.
Festinger, J. L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press,
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Freud, S. (1924). The loss of reality in neurosis and psychosis. In J. Strachey (Ed), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 19: The ego and the id and other works. (pp. 183-187). London: Hogarth Press.
Furnham, A. (1981). A social S-R inventory of anxiousness. In M. Argyle, A. Furnham, & J. A. Graham (Eds.), Social situation. University of Cambridge: Press Syndicate.
Furnham, A., & Jaspars, J. (1983). The evidence for interactionism in psychology: A critical analysis of the situation-response inventories. Personality and Individual Difference, 4(6), 627-644.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity publisher.
Goldstein, K. (1939). The organism. New York: American Book.
Guthrie, G. M. (1977). A social-psychological analysis of modernization in the Philippines. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 8, 177-206.
Hagan, E. E. (1963). On the theory of social change. Homewood: The Dorsey Press.
Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107-112.
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1991). Relational orientation and methodological relationalism. Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, 26, 81-95.
Hodges, B. H., & Baron, R. M. (2007). On making social psychology more ecological and ecological psychology more social. Ecological Psychology, 19(2), 79-84.
Holmes, J. G. (2002). Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective. Personal Relationships, 9(1), 1-26.
Hong, Y.-Y., Morris, M. M., Chiu, C.-Y., & Bennet-Martínez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55(7), 709-720.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1965). The effect of dominant kinship relationships on kin and non-kin behavior: A hypothesis. American Anthropologist, 67, 638-661.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). A hypothesis on kinship and culture. In F. L. K. Hsu (Ed.), Kinship and culture. Chicago: Aldine.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1981). American and Chinese: Passage to differences (3rd ed.). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1985). The self in cross-cultural perspective. In A. J. Marsella, G. DeVos, & F. L. K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self: Asian and Western perspective. New York: Tavistock Publications.
Hwang, K. K. (2003). Critique of the methodology of empirical research on individual modernity in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 241-262.
Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inkeles, A. (1966). The modernization of man. In M. Weiner (Ed.), Modernization: The dynamics of growth. New York: Basic Books.
Inkeles, A. (1969). Making man modern: On the causes and consequences of individual change in six developing countries. American Journal of Sociology, 75, 208-225.
Inkeles, A. (1977). Understanding and misunderstanding individual modernity. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 8, 135-175.
Inkeles, A. (1983). Exploring individual modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
Inkeles, A. (1997). National character: A psycho-social perspective. London: Transaction Publishers.
Inkeles, A. & Smith, D. H., (1974). Becoming modern: Individual change in six developing countries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kahl, J. A. (1968). The measurement of modernism: A study of values in Brazil and Mexico. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Kantor, J. R. (1924). Principles of Psychology (Vol. 1). Bloomington: Principia Press.
Kantor, J. R. (1926). Principles of Psychology (Vol. 2). Bloomington: Principia Press.
Klineberg, S. L. (1973). Parents, schools, and modernity: An exploratory investigation of sex differences in the attitudinal development of Tunisian adolescents. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 14, 221-244.
Knowles, E. D., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y.(2001). Culture and the process of person perception: Evidence for automaticity among East Asians in correcting for situational influences on behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1344-1356.
Kuznets. S, (1973). Modern economic growth: Findings and reflections. American Economic Review, 63(3), 247-258.
LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitude vs. action. Social Forces, 13, 230-237.
Lee, T. (1976). Psychology and the environment. London: Methuen.
Leahey, T. H. (1992). A history of modern psychology. London: Prentice Hall International.
Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: Free Press.
Levy, M. J., (1955). Contrasting factors in the modernization of Japan and China. In S. Kuznets, W. E. Moore, & J. J. Spengler (Eds.), Economic growth: Brazil, India, and Japan. Durhan, N. C.: Duke University Press.
Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2004a). Culture, self and ways to achieve SWB: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 5, 51-79.
Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2004b). Culture and conceptions of happiness: Individual oriented and social oriented SWB. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 269-291.
Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2005). Individual-oriented and social-oriented cultural conceptions of subjective well being: Conceptual analysis and scale development. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 36-49.
Lu, L., Gilmour, R., Kao, S. F., Eng, T. H., Hu, C. H., Chern, J. G., et al. (2001). Two ways to achieve happiness: When the East meets the West. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1161-1174.
Lu, L., Gilmour, R., Kao, S. F., & Huang, M. T. (2006). A cross- cultural study of work/family demands, work/family conflict and wellbeing: The Taiwanese vs. British. Career Development International, 11, 9-27.
Lu, L., & Kao, S. F. (2002). Traditional and modern characteristics across the generations: Similarities and discrepancies. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 45-59.
Lu, L., & Yang, K. S. (2004). The emergence, composition, and change of traditional- modern bicultural self of people in contemporary Chinese societies. Unpiblished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taiwan.
Lu, L., & Yang, K. S. (2006). The emergence and composition of the traditional- modern bicultural self of people in contemporary Taiwanese societies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 167-175.
Magnusson, D. (1981). Wanted: A psychology of situation. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situation: An interpersonal perspective. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawerence Elbraum Associates.
Magnusson, D., & Ekehammar, B. (1975). Perceptions and reactions to stressful situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 1147-1154.
Magnusson, D., & Endler, N. (1977). Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawerence Elbraum Associates.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implication for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1994). A collective fear of the collective: Implication for selves and the theory of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 569-579.
McClelland, D. C. (1955). Some social consequences of achievement motivation. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. New York: Free Press.
Mcdermott, P. A., Steinberg, C. M., & Angelo, L. E. (2005). Situational specificity makes the difference in assessment of youth behavior disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 42(2), 121-136.
Mellstrom, M. Jr., Cicala, G. A., & Zuckerman, M. (1978). General versus specific trait in the assessment of anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 423-431.
Mendoza-Denton, R., Ayduk, O., Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (2001). Person x situation interactionism in self-encoding (I am... when...): Implications for affect regulation and social information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 533-544.
Mendoza-Denton, R., Shoda, Y., Ayduk, O., & Mischel, W. (1999). Applying cognitive-affective processing system (CAPS) theory to cultural differences in social behavior. In W. J. Lonner, D. L. Dinnel, D. K. Forgays, & S. A. Hayes (Eds.), Merging past, present, and future in cross-cultural psychology: Selected papers from the fourteenth international congress of the international association for cross-cultural psychology (pp. 205-217). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
Meyer, A. G. (1970). Theories of convergence. In C. Johnson (Ed.), Change in communist systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley
Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80(4), 252-253.
Mischel, W. (1979). On the interface of cognition and personality: Beyond the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 34(9), 740-754.
Mischel, W. (1999a). Implications of person-situation interaction: Getting over the field''s borderline personality disorder. European Journal of Personality, 13(5), 455-461.
Mischel, W. (1999b). Personality coherence and dispositions in a cognitive- affective personality (CAPS) approach. In D. Cervone, & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 37-60). New York: Guilford Press.
Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1-22.
Mischel, W., & Ayduk, O. (2002). Self-regulation in a cognitive-affective personality system: Attentional control in the service of the self. Self and Identity, 1(2), 113-120.
Mischel, W. & Morf, C. C. (2003).The self as a psycho-social dynamic processing system: A meta-perspective on a century of the self in psychology. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 15-43). New York: Guilford Press.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1994). Personality psychology has two goals: Must it be two fields? Psychological Inquiry, 5(2), 156-158.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective personality system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1998). Reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 229-258.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1999). Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within a unified theory of personality: The cognitive-affective personality system. In L. A Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.) (pp. 197-218). New York: Guilford Press.
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Mendoza-Denton, R. (2002). Situation-behavior profiles as a locus of consistency in personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(2), 50-54.
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Smith, R. E. (2003). Introduction to personality: Toward an integration. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Moore, W. E. (1963). Social change. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Moos, R. H. (1996). Understanding environments: The key to improving social processes and program outcomes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24(1), 193-201.
Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. P. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 949-971.
Murphy, G. (1947). Personality: A biosocial approach to origins and structure. New York: Harper.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Murtha, T. C., Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1996). Toward an interactionist taxonomy of personality and situations: An integrative situational- dispositional representation of personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 193-207.
O’connell, J. (1976). The concept of modernization. In C. E. Ilack (Ed.), Comparative modernization (pp.13-24). New York: Free Press.
Olweus, D. (1977). A critical analysis of the “modern” interactionist position. In D. Magnusson & N. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawerence Elbraum Associates.
Pargament, K. I. (1986). Refining fit: Conceptual and methodological challenges. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(6), 677-684.
Parsons, T., & Shils, E. A. (1951). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
Pek, J. C. X., & Leong, F. T. L. (2003). Sex-related self-concepts, cognitive styles and cultural values of traditionality-modernity as predictors of general and domain-specific sexism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(1), 31-49.
Pervin, L. A. (1976a). A free response description approach of person-situation interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 465-474.
Pervin, L. A. (1976b). Performance and satisfaction as a function of individual- environment fit. Psychological Review, 80(4), 252-253.
Price, R. H., & Bouffard, D. L. (1974). Behavioral appropriateness and situational constraint as dimensions of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 579-586.
Raush, H. L., Dittman, A., T., & Llewellyn, L. G. (1960). Person, setting and change in social interaction: Ⅱ. A normal control study. Human Relations, 13, 305-333.
Raush, H. L., Dittman, A. T., & Taylor, T. J. (1959a). The interpersonal behavior of children in residential treatment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 9-26.
Raush, H. L., Dittman, A. T., & Taylor, T. J. (1959b). Person, setting and change in social interaction. Human Relations, 12, 361-378.
Raushton, J., & Endler, N. (1977). Person by situation interactions in academic achievement. Journal of personality, 45, 297-397.
Rodriguez, M. L., Ayduk, O., Aber, J. L., Mischel, W., Sethi, A., & Shoda, Y. (2005). A contextual approach to the development of self-regulatory competencies: The role of maternal unresponsivity and toddlers’ negative affect in stressful situations. Social Development, 1, 136-157.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174-221). New York: Academic Press.
Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. London: Cambridge University Press.
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: Prentice- Hall.
Sandell, R. (1968). Effects of attitudinal and situational factors on reported choice behaviour. Journal of Marketing Research, 5, 391-397.
Sarbin, T. R. (1995). Emotional life, rhetoric, and roles. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 5(3), 213-220.
Schoggen, P. (1983). Behavior settings and the quality of life. Journal of Community Psychology, 11(2), 144-157.
Schoggen, P. (1988). A behavioral settings approach. In G. W. Albee, J. M. Joffe, & L. A. Dusenbury (Eds.), Prevention, powerlessness, and politics: Readings on social change (pp. 433-440). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications.
Shoda, Y. (1999). A unified framework for the study of behavioral consistency: Bridging person×situation interaction and the consistency paradox. European Journal of Personality, 13(5), 361-387.
Shoda, Y. (2004). Individual differences in social psychology: Understanding situations to understand people, understanding people to understand situations. In C. Sansone, C. C. Morf, & A. T. Panter (Eds.), The Sage handbook of methods in social psychology (pp. 117-141). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
Shoda, Y., LeeTiernan, S., & Mischel, W. (2002). Personality as a dynamical system: Emergence of stability and distinctiveness from intra- and interpersonal interactions. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 6(4), 316-325.
Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (1998). Personality as a stable cognitive-affective activation network: Characteristic patterns of behavior variation emerge from a stable personality structure. In S. J. Read & L. C. Miller (Eds.), Connectionist models of social reasoning and social behavior (pp. 175-208). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (2000). Reconciling contextualism with the core assumptions of personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 14(5), 407-428.
Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Wright, J. C. (1993). The role of situational demands and cognitive competencies in behavior organization and personality coherence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 1023-1035.
Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Wright, J. C. (1994). Intraindividual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior: Incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 674-687.
Silbereisen, R. K., Best, H., & Haase, C. M. (2007). Editorial: Agency and human development in times of social change. International Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 73-76.
Smelser, N. J. (1994). Sociology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
Smith, D. H., & Inkeles, A. (1966). The O. M. scale: A comparative socio- psychological measure of individual modernity. Sociometry, 29, 323-377.
Smith, R. E. (2006). Understanding sport behavior: A cognitive-affective processing systems approach. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18(1), 1-27.
Spreitzer, G. M., Perttula, K. H., & Xin, K. (2005) Traditionality matters: An examination of the effectiveness of transformational leadership in the United States and Taiwan. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(3), 205-227.
Stokols, D. (1978). Environment Psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 253-295.
Sutton, F. X. (1962). Social theory and comparative Politics. In H. Eckstein & D. E. Apter (Eds.), Comparative politics: A reader. New York: Free Press.
Triandis, H. C., Chen, X. P., & Chan, D. K.-S. (1998). Scenarios for the measurement of collectivism and individualism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 275-289.
Van Mechelen, I., & Kiers, H. A. L. (1998). Individual differences in anxiety responses to stressful situations: A triple typology model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 75(3), 751-765.
Vansteelandt, K., & Van Mechelen, I. (1998). Individual differences in situation- behavior profiles: A triple typology model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 751-765.
Vansteelandt, K., & Van Mechelen, I. (1999). Individual differences in situation- behavior profiles: A three-mode component analysis model. European Journal of Personality. 13, 409-428.
Vansteelandt, K., & Van Mechelen, I. (2006). Individual differences in anger and sadness: In pursuit of active situational features and psychological processes. Journal of Personality, 74(3), 871-909.
Wallace, A. F. C. (1965). Culture and personality. New York: Random House Inc.
Weinberg, I. (1969). The problem of the convergence of industrial societies: A critical look at the state of a theory. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 11, 1-15.
Weiten, W., & Lloyd, M. A. (2003). Psychology applied to modern life: Adjustment in the 21st century. Canada: Thomson Learning, Inc.
Wheeler, L. (1988). My year in Hong Kong: Some observations about social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(2), 410-420.
Wicker, A. W. (1992a). Making sense of environments. In W. W. Bruce (Ed.), Person-environment psychology: Models and perspectives (pp. 157-192). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wicker, A. W. (1992b). Processes which mediate behavior-environment congruence. Behavioral Science, 17(3), 265-277.
Wilson, J. P. (1976). Motivation, modeling, and altruism: A person×situation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(6), 1078-1086.
Yang, K. S. (1976). Psychological correlates of family size, son preference, and birth control. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 18, 67-94.
Yang, K. S. (1981). Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan. Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 159-170.
Yang, K. S. (1986). Chinese personality and its change. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Yang, K. S. (1988). Will modernization eventually eliminate cross-cultural psychological differences? In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenge to social psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Yang, K. S. (1995). Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis. In T. Y. Lin, W. S. Tseng, & Y. K. Yeh (Eds.), Chinese societies and mental health (pp.17-39). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Yang, K. S. (1996). The psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernization. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 479-498). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Yang, K. S. (1997). Indigenizing westernized Chinese psychology. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), Working at the interface of cultures: Eighteen lives in social science. London: Routledge.
Yang, K. S. (1998). Chinese responses to modernization: A psychological analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(1), 75-97.
Yang, K. S. (1999). Towards an indigenous Chinese psychology: A selective review of methodological, theoretical, and empirical accomplishments. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 4, 181-211.
Yang, K. S. (2000). Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3), 241-263.
Yang, K. S. (2003). Methodological and theoretical issues on psychological traditionality and modernity research in an Asian society: In response to Kwang-Kuo Hwang and beyond. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(3),263-285.
Yang, K. S. (2006). Indigenized conceptual and empirical analyses of selected Chinese psychological characteristics. International Journal of Psychology, 41(4), 298-303.
Zayas, V., Shoda, Y., & Ayduk, O. N. (2002). Personality in context: An interpersonal systems perspective. Journal of Personality, 70(6), 851-900.
Zijderveld, A. D. (1979). On clichés. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE