:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高職特教班智能障礙學生轉銜模式之研究--組織與運作模式之探討
書刊名:特殊教育研究學刊
作者:林幸台
作者(外文):Lin, Hsin-tai
出版日期:2002
卷期:22
頁次:頁189-215
主題關鍵詞:高職特教班轉銜服務轉銜制度Special class in vocational senior high schoolTransition serviceTransition system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(17) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:16
  • 共同引用共同引用:32
  • 點閱點閱:45
     本研究以轉銜制度之建立與其組織、人員配置及運作方式等為主要課題,採調查法,探討高職特教班智能障礙學生轉銜制度現況與運作模式。根據52所學校行政人員、104位導師、99位專任教師,104位家長、及40所機構問卷調查結果,有如下之發現: 1.各類樣本對高職特教班的實施多持正向評價,家長基本上均頗為肯定學校提供其子女繼續接受三年職業教育的措施,但樣本在應然面上的反應大多高於實然面,顯示無論學校、教師或家長均認為目前有關轉銜服務的實施與理想仍有相當距離,高職特教班的現況尚有甚多待改進之處。 2.各類樣本之間對現況的認知或了解亦有相當差距,尤其在學校與家長之間,無論轉街規劃工作的參與、轉銜目標的達成、職業教育課程的落實、或職場實習的實施等方面,學校教師與家長間的反應差距頗大,而校內行政單位與教師之間亦有相當落差。 3.樣本之間在應然面上反應差距較小,顯示彼此對轉銜服務的目標與方向有共通的理念,因此雖然現況有甚多待改進之處,但若能掌握雙方共同秉持的理念,應是突破現況困境的重要契機。 4.學校與機構間反應的差異顯示學校與社區相關單位與機構之間仍缺乏溝通管道,以致許多資料重覆蒐集,形成資源重疊人力浪費的現象,在為協助身心障礙者適應與發展的前題下,建立健全的溝通管道與分工合作的方式,應仍有可預期的成果。 5.學校在推動轉銜服務上所遭遇的困難,有甚多非學校所能為力者,包括法令之不足、制度之不全,乃至社會對身心障礙者的接納態度等。但為提供身心障礙者適切的轉銜服務,這些滯礙難行之處,均有待主管單位的正視與因應。 根據研究發現與結論,研究者針對加強校內外的溝通、資源開發與共享,轉銜制度之建立三方面提出具體建議。
     The purpose of this study was to investigate current situation and expectation of transition services for students with mental disabilities in senior vocational high school. Questionnaires were developed to analyze responses from school administrators, teachers, parents, and institution personnel. A total of 399 completed surveys (82%) were returned. Results suggest: 1. Most of the respondents had positive perceptions of transition system. Parents were generally affirmative that schools offered their children three years of vocational education. However, schools administrators, teachers, and parents all considered that there was gap between the ideal transition system and the one currently implemented. 2. There were differences among different group members on their understanding and perception of transition system. The big difference existed especially between school administrators and parents, they had different responses to the participation, goal achievement, vocational education, and apprenticeship of transition program. Besides, even school administrators and teachers had gap of understandings toward transition services. 3. The differences of must or must not to put transition system into practice was relatively small. This showed that the ideal of the goal and direction of transition service was almost the same among groups. Therefore, to grasp the consensus of all parties would be the key factor to overcome the current predicament. 4. The differentiation of the response between schools and institutions showed lack of communication between schools and communities. Materials were double collected and human resources being wasted. In order to implement effective transition service, to develop well communication and cooperation channels could be very helpful. 5. There were many difficulties that schools could not solve while offering transition services, including lack of regulations, systems, social acceptance to disabilities, and etc. Authorities concerned should take the responsibilities to handle these issues. According to the findings and conclusions, suggestions are proposed with the aspects of interintra school communication, resources sharing and development, and the establishment of transition system.
期刊論文
1.陳麗如、王文科、林宏熾(200102)。高中職特殊教育學校(班)學生離校轉銜服務之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,20,23-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Edgar, E.(1987)。Secondary programs in special education: Are many of them justifiable?。Exceptional Children,26,555-561。  new window
3.Edgar, E.、Polloway, E. A.(1994)。Education for adolescents with disabilities: Curriculum and placement issues。Journal of special Education,27,438-452。  new window
4.Gallivan-Fenlon, A.(1994)。"Their senior year": Family and service provider perspectives on the transition from school to adult life for young adults with disabilities。Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps,19,11-23。  new window
5.Haring, K. A.、Lovett, D. L.(1990)。A follow-up study of special education graduates。The Journal of Special Education,23,463-477。  new window
6.許天威、吳訓生(19990600)。我國身心障礙者教育實施現況與發展方向之研究。特殊教育學報,13,179-219。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Heal, L. W.、Copher, J. I.、DeStefano, L.、Rush, F.(1989)。A comparison of successful and unsuccessful placement of secondary students with mental handicaps into competitive employment。Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,12,167-177。  new window
8.Johnson, D. R.、Guy, B.(1997)。Implications of the lessons learned from a state systems change initiative on transition for youth with disabilities。Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,20,191-199。  new window
9.Johnson, D. R.、Halloran, W. H.(1997)。The federal legislative context and goals of the state systems change initiatives on transition for youth with disabilities。Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,20,109-120。  new window
10.Blackorby, J.、Wagner, M.(1996)。Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the national longitudinal transition study。Exceptional Children,62(5),399-413。  new window
11.吳武典、邱紹春、吳道愉(1997)。臺灣省中學階段身心障礙特殊班畢業學生就業狀況追蹤調查研究。特殊教育研究學刊,15,1-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Aspel, N.、Bettis, G.、Test, D. W.、Wood, W. M.(1998)。An evaluation of a comprehensive system of transition services。Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,21,203-223。  new window
13.Benz, M. R.、Yovanoff, P.、Doren, B.(1997)。School-to-work components that predict post-school success for students with and without disabilities。Exceptional Children,63,151-166。  new window
14.Blackorby, J.、Edgar, E.、Kortering, L. J.(1991)。A third of our youth? A look at the problems of high school dropout among students with mild handicaps。Journal of Special Education,25,102-113。  new window
15.DeStefano, L.、Hasazi, S.、Trach, J.(1997)。Issues in the evaluation of a multi-site federal systems change initiative。Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,20,123-139。  new window
16.Colley, D. A.、Jamison, D.(1998)。Post school results for youth with disabilities: Key indicators and policy implication。Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,21,145-160。  new window
17.Eisenman, L. T.、Hughes, C.(1997)。School-to-work system development needs: Perspectives of local education agencies。Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,20,15-28。  new window
18.Furney, K. S.、Hasazi, S. B.、DeStefano, L.(1997)。Transition policies, practices, and promises: Lessons from three states。Exceptional Children,63,343-355。  new window
19.Guy, B.、Schriner, K.(1997)。Systems in transition: Are we there yet?。Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,20,141-164。  new window
20.Halpern, A. S.、Benz, M. R.(1987)。A statewide examination of secondary special education for students with mild disabilities: Implication for the high school curriculum。Exceptional Children,54,122-129。  new window
21.Johnson, D. R.、Rusch, F. R.(1993)。Secondary special education and transition services: Identification and recommendations for future research and demonstration。Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,16,1-18。  new window
22.Kohler, P. D.(1993)。Best practices in transition: Substantiated or implied?。Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,17,187-202。  new window
23.McNair, J.、Rusch, F. R.(1991)。Parent involvement in transition programs。Mental Retardation,29,93-101。  new window
24.Patton, J. R.、Smith, T. E. C.、Clark, G. M.、Polloway, E. A.、Edgar, E.、Lee, S.(1996)。Individual with Mild Mental Retardation: Postsecondary Outcomes and Implications for Educational Policy。Education & Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities,31,75-85。  new window
25.Roessler, R. T.、Brolin, D. E.、Johnson, J. M.(1990)。Factors affecting employment success and quality of life: A one-year follow-up of students in special education。Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,13,95-107。  new window
26.Rush, F. R.、Kohler, P. D.、Hughes, C.(1992)。An alysis of OSERS-sponsored secondary special education and transition services research。Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,15,121-143。  new window
27.Smith, T. E. C.、Puccini, I. K.(1995)。Secondary curricular and policy issues for students with mental retardation。Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities,30,275-282。  new window
研究報告
1.林千惠、徐享良、張勝成、林宏熾(1996)。臺灣地區身心障礙者就業能力與意願之調查研究。臺灣省政府勞工處。  延伸查詢new window
2.張勝成(1998)。臺灣地區身心障礙青年「學校生活素質」之研究(II)。臺北:行政國家科學委員會/國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳靜江(1997)。轉銜方案在啟智學校高職部之發展與成效研究(I,II)。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳丹桂(1997)。高職特教班教育規劃實施現況與成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳清和(2001)。我國高職特殊教育班實施現況之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉玉婷(2001)。高職特殊學校(班)智能障礙學生轉銜服務之現況調查及其相關因素之探討(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.鳳華、徐享良(1998)。高級職業學校輕度智能障礙特殊教育實驗班設科規劃之研究。高級職業學校輕度智能障礙特殊教育實驗班設科規劃之研究。彰化縣彰化市。  延伸查詢new window
2.林幸台(1998)。身心障礙學生接受第十年技藝教育方案之規劃與檢討。中華民國特殊教育學會三十週年紀念專刊。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡崇建(1990)。殘障者之職業訓練、就業輔導狀況及就業需求調查。我國殘障者職業訓練及就業輔導之研究。臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.DeStefano, L.、Wermuth, T. R.(1992)。IDEA (P. L. 101-476): Defining a second generation of transition services。Transition from school to adult life。Sycamore, IL。  new window
5.Everson, J. M.、Guillory, J. D.(1998)。Building statewide transition services through collaborative interagency team-work。Beyond high school: Transition from school to work。Belmont, CA。  new window
6.Everson, J. M.、McNulty, K.(1992)。Interagency teams: Building local transition programs through parental and professional partnerships。Transition from school to adult life。Sycamore, IL。  new window
7.Szymanski, E. M.、Hanley-Maxwell, C.、Asselin, S. R.(1992)。System interface: Vocational rehabilitation, special education, and vocational education。Transition from school to adult life: Models, linkages, and policy。Sycamore, IL。  new window
其他
1.教育部特殊教育工作小組(1999)。八十八學年度高職特殊教育班資料,0。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE