臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：從技術面談九年一貫課程能力指標建構：美國學習標準建構的啟示
書刊名：教育研究資訊
作者：盧雪梅 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lu, Sheue-mei
出版日期：2004
卷期：12:2
頁次：頁3-34
主題關鍵詞：九年一貫課程綱要；能力指標；美國標準為本教育；Standards-based education；Grade 1-9 curriuclum guidelines；Competence indicators
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:55
　　　　　能力指標是九年一貫課程綱要提出的新詞彙，根據課程綱要陳述之能力指標功能，能力指標是目標的一個同義詞。理論上，能力指標應是所有指標使用者（如教科書編輯者和審查者、教師、學生、家長、行政人員、測驗發展者等）的共同語言。然而能力指標在體例和敘寫方式並不一致，而且許多指標內涵不夠明確清楚，因此，出現一套指標，各自表述的情形。九年一貫課程能力指標的角色與美國標準為本教育的學習標準很類似，標準為本教育旨在為所有學生設立明確且有挑戰性的學習標準，並幫助他們達到標準，培養其能具備成功因應21世紀挑戰的知識和技能。標準的發展和修訂涉及許多技術課題，因此，本文透過美國研發標準的經驗，從技術面談九年一貫課程能力指標建構的課題。本文首先敘述「美國標準為本教育」的背景、理念和發展概況，闡明標準在教育改革中的角色；其次，就內容標準和表現標準建構的技術性課題作深入探討，並就九年一貫課程綱要能力指標敘寫的問題進行分析。最後，對九年一貫課程能力指標系統的建構提出建議，以供未來修訂課程綱要和研擬相關配套參考。
期刊論文
1.盧雪梅(20030300)。學生成績評定和報告的新趨勢。國教新知，49(3)，28-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳毓瑩(2001)。九年一貫課程之基本能力與學習領域的關係--交會合一或相互對話。課程與教學季刊，4(3)，103-124。  延伸查詢new window
3.盧雪梅(20010500)。「九年一貫課程能力指標」知多少。教育研究，85，66-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.黃政傑、游家政、翁福元、李宜桑(1992)。亞太教育標準專案報告。臺北：國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃政傑、李隆盛、呂建政(1996)。中小學基本學力指標之綜合規劃研究。臺北：國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.National Council on Education Standard and Testing(1992)。Raising standards for American education: A report to congress, the secretary of education, the national education goals panel, and the American people。Washington, DC：U. S. Government Printing Office。  new window
2.Ravitch, D.(1995)。National standards in American education: A citizen's guide。Washington, DC：Brookings Institution。  new window
3.Cizek, G. J.(2001)。Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers。  new window
4.Kendall, J. S.、Marzano, R. J.(2000)。Content knowledge: A compendium of standards and benchmarks for K-12 education。Aurora, Colorado：The Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning。  new window
5.Sanders, N. M.(2001)。Standards in classroom practice: Research synthesis。Aurora, CO：The Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning。  new window
6.Kendall, J. S.(2001)。A technique guide for revising and developing standards and benchmarks。Aurora, Colorado：The Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning。  new window
7.La Marca, P. M.、Redfield, D.、Winter, P. C.、Bailey, A.、Despriet, L.(2000)。State standards and state assessment systems: A guide to alignment。Washington, DC：Council of Chief State School Officers。  new window
8.Marzano, R. J.、Kendall, J. S,(1996)。A comprehensive guide to designing standards-based districts school, and classroom。Alexandria, VA：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
9.Guskey, T. R.、Bailey, J. M.(2001)。Developing grading and reporting systems for student learning。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin Press, Inc.。  new window
10.Popham, W. J.(2002)。Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know。Boston, MA：Allyn and Bacon。  new window
11.Achieve(2001)。Raising the bar closing the gap. Achieve 2001 annual report。Washington, DC：Achieve。  new window
12.Achieve(2001)。Measuring up: A report on education standards and assessments for Massachusetts。Washington, DC：Achieve。  new window
13.Achieve(2002)。Staying on course: Standards-cased reform in America's schools: Progress and prospects。Washington, DC：Achieve。  new window
14.American Federation of Teachers(2001)。Making standards matter 2001: A fifty-state report to implement a standards-based system. Standards, curriculum, assessment, and accountability。Washington, DC：American Federation of Teachers。  new window
15.Carlson, D.(1996)。Adequate yearly progress in title I of the improving America's school act: Issues and strategies。Washington, DC：Council of Chief State School Officers。  new window
16.Council for Basic Education(1998)。Great expectations: Defining and assessing the rigor in state standards for mathematics and English language arts。Washington, DC：Council for Basic Education。  new window
17.Diegmueller, K.(1995)。“Running Out of Steam.” Struggling for standards: An education week special report。Washington, DC：Education Week。  new window
18.Gandal, M.(1995)。Making standards matter, 1995: A fifty-state progress report on efforts to raise academic standards。Washington, DC：American Federation of Teachers。  new window
19.Glidden, H.(1999)。Making standards matter 1999: A fifty-state progress report on efforts to raise academic standards。Washington, DC：American Federation of Teachers。  new window
20.Hansche, L. N.(1998)。Meeting the requirements of title I: Handbook for the development of performance standards。Washington, DC：U. S. Department of Education。  new window
21.Marzano, R. J.、Kendall, J. S.(1998)。Implementing standards-based education。Annapolis Junction, MD：National Educational Association。  new window
22.Marzano, R. J.、Kendall, J. S.、Gaddy, B. B.(1999)。Essential knowledge: The debate over what American students should know。Aurora, CO：Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory。  new window
23.Massachusetts Department of Education(2001)。Massachusetts English language arts curriculum framework。Malden, MA：Massachusetts Department of Education。  new window
24.Massachusetts Department of Education(2003)。Spring 2003 MCAS Tests: Summary of state results。Malden, MA：Massachusetts Department of Education。  new window
25.National Center for History in the School(1994)。National standards for United States history: Exploring the American experience。Los Angeles：National Center for History in the School。  new window
26.National Education Goals Panel, Goals 3 and 4 Technical Planning Group on the Review of Education Standards(1993)。Promises to keep: Creating high standards for American students。Washington, DC：National Education Goals Panel, Goals 3 and 4 Technical Planning Group on the Review of Education Standards。  new window
27.New Standards(1997)。Performance standards: English language arts, mathematics, science, applied learning, volume 1, elementary schools。Washington, DC：National Center on Education and Economy。  new window
28.New Standards(1997)。Performance standards: English language arts, mathematics, science, applied learning, volume 2, middle school。Washington, DC：National Center on Education and Economy。  new window
29.New Standards(1997)。Performance standards: English language arts, mathematics, science, applied learning, volume 3, high school。Washington, DC：National Center on Education and Economy。  new window
30.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
31.教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
32.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
33.Finn, C. E., Jr.、Petrilli, M. J.(2000)。The state of state standards 2000。Washington, DC：Thomas B. Fordham Foundation。  new window
其他
1.教育部(1994)。第七次全國教育會議紀錄，台北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Council for Basic Education。Frequently asked questions about standards，http://www.c-b-e.org/stfaq.htm， 2003/11/20。  new window
3.Hawaii Department of Education(1999)。Hawaii content standards and performance standards II，http://doe.kl2.hi.us/standards/hcps/index.htm， 2001/10/22。  new window
4.Illinois State Board of Education(1997)。English language arts: State goals 1-5，http://www.isbe.net/ils/english/english.pdf， 2003/11/20。  new window
5.Massachusetts Department of Education。MCAS performance level definitions，http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/mcaspld.html， 2003/11/20。  new window
6.Massachusetts Department of Education。Threshold scores on the 2003 MCAS Tests，http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/2003/results/threshscore.html， 2003/11/20。  new window
7.Utah State Office of Education(2001)。Life Skills，http://www.usoe.kl2.ut.us/lifeskills， 2002/07/20。  new window
8.U. S. Department of Education。No child left behind - ED.gov，http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml， 2003/11/20。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃嘉雄(2002)。新的權力分配與社會控制原則：論九年一貫課程改革的社會深層意義。九年一貫課程改革的省思與實踐。台北：心理。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kingston, N. M.、Kahl, S. R.、Sweeney, K. P.、Bay, L.(2001)。Setting performance standards using the Body of Work Method。Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives。Mahwah: NJ：Lawrence Brlbaum Associates。  new window
3.蘇永明(2000)。九年一貫課程的哲學分析--以「實用能力」的概念為核心。九年一貫課程：從理論、政策到執行。高雄：復文。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1052（臺灣：1045，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2133566 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67929089
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上