墨家講求法度，思想內容包含複雜的邏輯方法，而三表法可視為墨家立論的根源，亦為墨家思想之核心。另一方面《墨子‧非儒下》因其篇名及內容，遭受後世學者刻意冷落，其所載內容雖部份與史實不合，然此篇實為墨家對於儒家批評之總結，因此本文試由三表法之定義，來分析《墨子‧非儒下》，並探析儒墨相非之歷史意義。

The Mohist attached much importance to legal systems. The ideology of Mohist consisted of complex logical thoughts and the Three Disputes Theory was to see as the foundation as well as the core thinking of Mohism. Due to the title and the content, “Mo-Tzu Fei-Ru-Xia” was de1iberately neglected by later scholars. Although a few parts of “Mo-TzuFei-Ru-Xia” were not parallel to the history, this was in point of fact the conclusion of critiques the Mohist had proposed toward the Confucianist. This article, thus, tried to give a historical definition on Ru-Mo-Xiang-Fei by applying the Three Disputes Theory to analyze “Mo-TzuFei-Ru-Xia.”