:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:C.Fox理論運用與不同文化間差異點研究--以玄奘大學新聞系學生為例
書刊名:復興崗學報
作者:何智文 引用關係
作者(外文):Ho, Chih-wen
出版日期:2007
卷期:89
頁次:頁133-160
主題關鍵詞:基礎人格無意識結構社會距離高系絡低系絡認知歸類經驗觀察倫理政治Basic personalityUnconscious structureSocial distanceHigh contextLow contextCognitiveClassificatoryExperientialObservationalEthnicalPolitical
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:94
檢視跨文化傳播研究的起始與發展,可以對應出過去不同時代的需要與考量,重要的是令什麼學派的理論適合選擇什麼樣問題做為研究的對象,可以有較明白的對照與比較。而這樣的努力,是為讓缺乏不同文化背景經驗的台灣大學生先瞭解國外的跨文化傳播理論是植基於不同文化背景的差異點,並經長期研究才漸次形成的,而這個不同文化間的差異點的取向就是決定跨文化傳播研究其研究對象的關鍵性考量所在。 CFox的跨文化傳播理論便是在這一個思考因素下的選擇,它的內容主要在建議使用五種濾鏡來檢視〔不良溝通與系統性長期性的誤解(或稱不當的扭曲)〕,而這五種類型的濾鏡將各有不同層次的觀察內容,它們分別為(一)符號/引喻(semiotic/metaphorical),(二)認知/歸類(cognitive/classificatory),(三)經驗/觀察(experiential/observational),(四)倫理/政治(ethnical/political),(五)釋義/詮釋(hermeneutic/interpretation) 。 透過教學與分組對話整理顯示,原本以情節編劇及分鏡製片為主要思考軸線的新聞系大四學生,開始對「末代武士」影片中的所有差異點都能快速的以文化角度察覺,對於各類的磨擦點或稱誤解點,乃至扭曲點,也都各組有各組的背景性與潛藏性因素的分析與解說。C.Fox 的五種不同濾鏡不僅提供他們思慮上的新取向,尤其是對尋找可能導致誤解的前因後果也變得更具敏覺性。
To examine the origin and development of the intercultural communication can find out the different needs and considerations in different ages. The appropriate theory that chooses the right issues good for an object of study, which can make sharp contrast, is most concerned. By doing so, students in Taiwan, will experience and understand the origin of intercultural communication based on the different cultural backgrounds, The approach to the different cultural background depends on choosing an object of study of the intercultural communication Fox’s theory on the intercultural communication utilizes five different layers as a filtering lens to examine miscommunication and systemically distorted communication. The content of the different layers through a filtering lens include five parts: semiotic/metaphorical, cognitive/classificatory experiential/observational, ethnical/political, and hermeneutic/interpretation. Through group dialogue and teaching, senior students of Journalism use different ways of filming the movie “The Last Samurai” to make their case so that students understand the cultural difference by way of cultural view and recognize the miscommunication and distorted communication from different backgrounds through factor analysis and interpretation. Fox’s five different layers as a filtering lens not only provide the new approach to thinking but also create the sensibility to the cause of miscommunication.
期刊論文
1.何智文(19951200)。文化體系間傳播研究。復興崗學報,56,173-193。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Cooks, L.(2001)。From distance and uncertainty to research and pedagogy in the borderlands: Implications for the future of intercultural communication。Communication Theory,11,339-351。  new window
3.Corson, D.(1995)。World view, cultural values and discours norms: The cycle of cultural reproductions。International Journal of Intercultural Relation,19183-19195。  new window
4.蕭新煌(20050600)。多元文化社會的族群傳播:剖析一個新典範。中華傳播學刊,7,3-8。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Fox, C.(1997)。The Authenticity of Intercultural Communication。International Journal of Intercultural Relations,21(1),85-103。  new window
學位論文
1.趙子欽(2003)。廣告表現策略之跨文化研究--台灣與日本得獎廣告之比較(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張淑媚(2003)。對話之誤解與澄清--以中文為使用語言之跨文化傳播研究(碩士論文)。國立交通大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳皓怡(2005)。從跨文化觀點探討華人外派主管家長式領導對多國籍部屬身心健康之影響(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hall, E. T.(1984)。La danse de la vie。Paris:Point Seuil。  new window
2.Leach, E.、黃道琳(1987)。結構主義之父。台北:桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hanssens, Vet、Patsalides, Andre(1994)。Communication Interculturelle。Belgique:Diffusion, Universite Ciaco。  new window
4.Hall, E. T.(1992)。An Anthropology of Everyday Life。NY:Doubleday。  new window
5.Hall, E. T.(1990)。The Hidden Dimension。NY:Doubleday。  new window
6.Hall, E. T.(1989)。The Dance of Life。NY:Doubleday。  new window
7.Hall, E. T.(1971)。Dimension cache。Paris:Seuil。  new window
8.Kardiner, A.(1945)。The psychological frontiers of society。New York。  new window
9.Levis-Strauss, C.(1958)。Anthropologie structural。Paris:Plon。  new window
10.Samovar, L. A.、Porter, R. E.(2003)。Intercultural Communication: A Reader。Wadsworth。  new window
11.黃葳威(1999)。文化傳播。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.Simmel, Georg、Wolff, Kurt H.(1950)。The Sociology of Georg Simmel。Free Press。  new window
13.葉蓉慧(2005)。跨文化傳播:教育的體驗與實踐。台北:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.單波、石義彬(2005)。跨文化傳播新論。四川:武漢大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.Hall, Edward(1989)。Beyond Culture。New York:Doubleday。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bennett, M. J.(1998)。Intercultural communication: A current perspective。Basic concepts of intercultural communication: Selected readings。Intercultural Press。  new window
2.Linton, R.(1945)。The cultural background of personality。The Science of Man in World Crisis。New York。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE