:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:唐代新樂府之發展關鍵--李白開創之功與杜甫、元結之雙線開展
書刊名:政大中文學報
作者:朱我芯 引用關係
作者(外文):Chu, Wo-hsin
出版日期:2007
卷期:7
頁次:頁25-52
主題關鍵詞:新樂府諷諭李白杜甫元結Xin Yue-fuSatireTang poetryLi BoDu FuYuan Jie
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(3) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:109
新樂府於盛、中唐成就精采,其議論時事,述民疾苦,為中國諷諭詩歌的經典。學界過去論新樂府,多限於杜甫、張籍、王建、白居易、元稹、皮日休等少數詩人的代表作,而未能全面篩檢並考察初唐以至晚唐的所有新樂府,以觀其流變,也因而未能精切標誌出新樂府發展中具有轉關意義的詩家。 本文經通讀《全唐詩》,得出全唐新樂府六百四十一首,梳理其發展軌跡,發現自初唐詩人零星偶作以來,李白的廿一首新樂府為首見較為集中的嘗試,既啟動了唐樂府對漢魏樂府社會精神的復歸,也為樂府開創了以新題諷諭時事的新局。元結與杜甫的新樂府臻於成熟,正以此為基礎。元結三十五首與杜甫極其大量的六十五首新樂府,雖同時出現於盛唐之末,共同揭啟了中唐新樂府的創作風潮,然其二者的諷諭主題、形式特徵與發展路線,卻彼此迥異。中唐新樂府大盛,參與詩人及作品之多,冠於全唐,漢樂府特徵也於此際得到最全面且出色的再現,尤其李紳、元稹與白居易,自杜甫與元結的雙線發展中,提煉了雙方的長處,取捨有道,兼融並用,對新樂府有綰合再造之功。然至晚唐,中興夢碎,一場甘露事變,使政治氣氛轉趨凝肅,新樂府遂隨諷諭詩之驟減而趨沉寂,唯皮日休與于濆上承元結路線,為唐代新樂府譜下尾聲。
Xin Yue-Fu which discussed current political situation and suffering of people was classical satiric poetry in ancient Chinese. It achieved a brilliant achievement from High-Tang to Middle-Tang. The academic circle expounded Xin Yue-Fu merely around representative works belong to Du Fu, Zang Ji,Wang Jian, Bo Ju-Yi, Yuan Zhen, Pi Ri-Xiou and so on. Xin Yue-Fu has never been overall searched and the poets who were pivotal significance in the development of Xin Yue-Fu have not been indicated exactly yet.In this article the author sifted poetry comprehensively from Quan Tang Shi and discovered 641 poems of Xin Yue-Fu in Tang. After combed out the development trajectory the author ascertained that the Li Bo’s 21 poems of Xin Yue-Fu were the first view to focus on this issue since the poets in Early-Tang had done piecemeal. It not only fired the Yue-Fu poetry recovering the social spirit of Han Yue-Fu but also initiated the new state of discussion on the current political situation with evolutional issues for Yue-Fu. Yuan Jie and Du Fu just based on them to mature the Xin Yue-Fu. Yuan Jie’s 35 poems and Du Fu’s 65 poems of Xin Yue-Fu simultaneously emerged out in the end of High–Tang and revealed a climate of composing Xin Yue-Fu, but their works were quite different in the issues of allegory, feature of style and route of development. The Xin Yue-Fu in Middle-Tang was flourished and full of participant poets. Kinds of represented wordsmanship of Xin Yue-fu were also outstanding in this period. Especially Li Shen, Yuan Zhen and Bo Ju-Yi retrieved from Du Fu and Yuan Jie’s pair of spreads and refined their fortes harmoniously. They made a contribution to reconstruct synthetic modality for Xin Yue-fu. After resurgence was failed and the political ambiance turned to dreariness after the Gan Lu coup in End-Tang the satiric poetry were drowsy and Xin Yue-Fu quieted down. Only Pi Ri-Xiou and Yu Fen inherited the Yuan Jie’s path and finalized the context of Xin Yue-fu for the Tan Dynasty.
期刊論文
1.單書安(1989)。《正樂府》仿《系樂府》淺說。江寧學刊,6,165-168。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.朱我芯(2004)。詩歌諷諭傳統與唐代新樂府研究(博士論文)。東海大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.聶文郁(1984)。元結詩解。陝西人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉昫(1975)。舊唐書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.歐陽修(1975)。新唐書。鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.計有功(1965)。唐詩紀事。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.許學夷、杜維沫(1987)。詩源辯體。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.王運熙、王國安(1999)。《樂府詩集》導讀。成都:巴蜀書社。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳沆(1970)。詩比興箋。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.胡震亨(1981)。唐音癸籤。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳伯海(1995)。唐詩彙評。浙江教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.干寶、汪紹楹(1979)。搜神記。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.(宋)楊齊賢、(元)蕭士贇(1989)。分類補註李太白詩。分類補註李太白詩。上海。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)李慈銘。越縵堂讀書記。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)沈德潛(1988)。唐詩別裁集,香港。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)沈德潛(1971)。說詩晬語,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE