本文是以《公羊》、《穀梁》二傳爲依據，分析霸者之定位、條件、職分，並據以檢視前人五霸之說，是否合於二傳所認可之標準，其中合於標準者僅齊桓及晉文；至於《公》、《穀》對霸者的評價，並未如孟、荀貶抑的說法，而是持認可的態度；本文並據《公》、《穀》傳中之辭語，名爲「與霸」。

Based on the readings and the interpretations of "Gong Yang Zhuan" and "Gu Liang Zhuan", this paper will analyze the definitions, the qualifications and the responsibilities of "Hegemony" in the respective texts. The "Five Hegemonies" will be examined to see if they conform to the standards mentioned above. Among the "Five Hegemonies", Duke Huan of Qi and Duke Wen of Jin are qualified as "Hegemony." Unlike the depreciatory view of Mencius and Xuncius, "Gong Yang Zhuan" and "Gu Liang Zhuan" hold an appreciative attitude toward "Hegemony." The specific terminology "Endorsed Hegemony" is quoted from "Gong Yang Zhuan" and "Gu Liang Zhuan."