Most of researches about Su Xue-Lin are focus on the modern literature arena. But according to Ma Sen’s observation, while Su is alive, she rather regard herself as a scholar than a author. Swinging between the identity of a female author and a female scholar, her academic goal is aimed on classical literature, and her choice is related to the slow or scarcity of the construction of new literature research institute. This thesis will focus on Su’s Qu Fu research approach and regarded it as a kind of empirical hermeneutic research, inherited the spirit of May Fourth—innovating boldly, doubting ancient and combining the advantages of western and eastern culture. On the ontology of knowledge, it also inherited the doubting ancient tide of early republican, empirical textology, based on monism of world culture, assisted by the foreign knowledge system and developed into wonder studies. Her methodology’s motif compares the eastern religion and myth with the western’s, close to the co-text of contemporary literary theory and create the possibility to transform from ‘author-text’ structure to ‘text-text’ research. However, limited by the emperical textology, the three assumptions of Su: (1) there is culture communication between eastern and western culture; (2) Qu Yuan is a genius who had absorbed overseas culture; (3) “Asking The Sky” is the converge of oversea cultural knowledge, can’t be fully explained. Su make west asia a imagined cultural source, and it echoed with the statement ‘Chinese origin from the west’. Meanwhile, while her Qu Fu’s researh carries on, Su reveals the knowledge production of gender and religion’s influences. Eventually, her Qu Fu’s research highlights the lack of professional reader and the phenomenon of slow transformation of the canon in the particular arena.