臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：符合建構論理念的教學策略對植物的養分與能量概念學習的成效
書刊名：科學教育學刊
作者：涂志銘／林秀玉／張賴妙理／鄭湧涇
作者(外文)：Tu, Chih-ming／Lin, Show-yu／Changlai, Miao-li／Cheng, Yeong-jing
出版日期：2008
卷期：16:1
頁次：頁75-103
主題關鍵詞：符合建構論理念的教學策略；植物的養分與能量；概念學習；Concept learning；Constructivist teaching strategies；Plant nutrients and energy
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:108
本研究採準實驗研究設計探究「符合建構論理念的教學策略（CTS）」與「一般常見的教學策略（TTS）」對七年級學生理解「植物的養分與能量」科學概念成效的差異，參與研究的對象為四位國中生物教師及583 位七年級學生，實驗組包括兩位生物教師及其任教班級的286 位學生，對照組則由另外兩位生物教師及其任教班級的297 位學生所組成，實驗組接受CTS，而對照組則接受TTS。本研究發展「生物概念診斷測驗—植物的養分與能量（Biology Concept Diagnostic Test– Plant Nutrients and Energy, [BCDT-PNE]）」做為評測學生概念理解的工具，利用共變數分析和卡方分析比較實驗組與對照組在BCDT-PNE 後測得分及答對率的差異，瞭解 CTS 與 TTS 對概念學習成效的差異。研究結果顯示，CTS 對促進七年級學生理解「植物的養分與能量」概念的整體學習成效，顯著優於TTS，特別是對「植物的營養方式」、「植物體內養分來源」、「植物體內澱粉來源」、「光合作用對植物生長的影響」、「植物行呼吸作用的時間」、「植物行呼吸作用的部位」和「光對光反應、暗反應的影響」等概念的學習，CTS 的教學成效顯著優於TTS。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of “constructivist teaching strategies [CTS]” and “traditional teaching strategies [TTS]” on students’ understanding of plant nutrient and energy concepts. Four experienced teachers were involved in this study as the collaborating teachers. Two of them were assigned to the experimental group using CTS to teach biology, while the other two employed TTS to teach biology to the subjects in the control group. The subjects, both in the experimental group (286 students) and the control group (297 students), received instructions on plant nutrients and energy for nine 45-minute class periods. Students'' understanding of plant nutrient and energy concepts were assessed by the Biology Concept Diagnostic Test – Plant Nutrients and Energy (BCDT-PNE), developed in this study. By analyzing the differences in pretest-posttest scores of BCDT-PNE between the experimental group and the control group, the effects of CTS and TTS on learning of plant nutrient and energy concepts were investigated. The results of the study indicated that the CTS produced significantly better result than did TTS on facilitating students'' learning of PNE concepts as assessed by the BCDT-PNE; particularly on the learning of concepts related to “the patterns of plant nutrition,” “the sources of plant nutrient,” “the sources of starch,” “the influences of photo-synthesis on plant growth,” “the occasions of respiration,” “the locations of respiration” and “the influences of light on light and dark reaction.”
期刊論文
1.林達森(20040900)。併用概念圖於國中學生合作學習歷程之研究。南華通識教育研究，2，39-67。  延伸查詢new window
2.林達森(200410)。運用「概念構圖科學教學模式」在高中生物科生物能量教學的實徵研究。南大學報. 教育類，38(2)，45-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.She, H.-C.(2002)。Concepts of a Higher Hierarchical Level Require More Dual Situated Learning Events for Conceptual Change: A Study of Air Pressure and Buoyancy。International Journal of Science Education，24(9)，981-996。  new window
4.邱耀德、耿正屏(19940500)。國二學生之人體循環系統另有架構的探究。科學教育，5，53-73。  延伸查詢new window
5.Canal, P.(1999)。Photosynthesis and "Inverse Respiration" in Plants: An Inevitable Misconception?。International Journal of Science Education，21(4)，363-372。  new window
6.Treagust, David F.(1988)。Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science。International Journal of Science Education，10(2)，159-169。  new window
7.Wood-Robinson, C.(1991)。Young people's ideas about plants。Studies in Science Education，19(1)，119-135。  new window
8.Seymour, Jerry、Longden, Bernard(1991)。Respiration--That's Breathing Isn't It?。Journal of Biological Education，25(3)，177-183。  new window
9.游淑媚(20031000)。中、小學學生對生物腐化原因的想法類型。師大學報. 科學教育類，48(2)，165-196。  延伸查詢new window
10.Duit, R.、Treagust, D. F.(2003)。Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning。International Journal of Science Education，25(6)，671-688。  new window
11.Simpson, M.、Arnold, B.(1982)。Availability of prerequisite concepts for learning biology at certificate level。Journal of Biological Education，16(1)，65-72。  new window
12.Stavy, R.、Eisen, Y.、Yaakobi, D.(1987)。How students aged 13-15 understand photosynthesis。International Journal of Science Education，9(1)，105-115。  new window
13.Hazel, E.、Prosser, M.(1994)。First-year university students' understanding of photosynthesis, their study strategies & learning context。The American Biological Teacher，56(5)，274-279。  new window
14.Haslam, F.、Treagust, D. F.(1987)。Evaluating Secondary Students' Misconceptions of Photosynthesis and Respiration in Plants Using a Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument。Journal of Biological Education，21(3)，203-211。  new window
15.盧秀琴(20030300)。顯微鏡下的世界兩階層診斷式紙筆測驗的發展與效化。國立臺北師範學院學報，16(1)，127-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Lin, S. W.(2004)。Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test for high school students' understanding of flowering plant growth and development。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education，2(2)，175-199。  new window
17.郭金美(19991100)。建構主義教學方法--影響學童光學概念學習教學模式的研究。嘉義師院學報，13，157-202。  延伸查詢new window
18.Odom, Arthur Louis、Barrow, Lloyd H.(1995)。Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，32(1)，45-61。  new window
19.Bahar, M.、Johnstone, A. H.、Hansell, M. H.(1999)。Revisiting learning difficulties in biology。Journal of Biological Education，33(2)，84-86。  new window
20.許瑛玿、謝惠珠(2004)。應用概念改變教學策略在颱風常識的學習。師大學報：科學教育類，49(1)，15-40。  延伸查詢new window
21.Lumpe, A. T.、Staver, J. R.(1995)。Peer collaboration and concept development: Learning about photosynthesis。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，32(1)，71-98。  new window
22.She, H.-C.(2004)。Fostering Radical Conceptual Change through Dual-Situated Learning Model。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，41(2)，142-164。  new window
23.湯清二(19930600)。我國學生生物細胞概念發展研究迷思概念之唔談與概念圖。彰化師範大學學報，4，141-170。  延伸查詢new window
24.Barrass, R.(1984)。Some misconceptions and misunderstandings perpetuated by teachers and textbooks of biology。Journal of Biological Education，18(3)，201-206。  new window
25.林達森(20051200)。不同導入訓練歷程之「概念構圖教學法」對國小階段生物能量概念學習與態度影響之實徵研究。高雄師大學報. 自然科學與科技類，19，105-122。  延伸查詢new window
26.Posner, G. J.、Strike, K. A.、Hewson, P. W.、Gertzog, W. A.(1982)。Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change。Science Education，66(2)，211-227。  new window
27.吳穎沺、蔡今中(20051200)。建構主義式的科學學習活動對國小高年級學生認知結構之影響--以「電與磁」單元為例。科學教育學刊，13(4)，387-411。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.黃台珠(1993)。中學生遺傳學習的現況及問題。高雄師大學報，4，269-300。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Hewson, P. W.、Hewson, M. G.(1984)。The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction。Instructional Science，13，1-13。  new window
30.Brown, D. E.、Clement, J.(1989)。Overcoming Misconceptions Via Analogical Reasoning: Abstract Transfer Versus Explanatory Model Construction。Instructional Science，18，237-261。  new window
31.梁志平、佘曉清(2006)。建構主義式的網路科學學習對國中生力的概念學習之研究。科學教育學刊（中華民國科學教育學會），14(5)，493-516。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.盧秀琴、林玟均(2006)。高中生細胞膜生理現象概念改變教學之發展研究。國立臺北教育大學學報：數理科技教育類，19(1)，67-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Rissing, S. W.、Lawson, A. E.(1990)。An Inquiry Approach to Nonmajors Biology。Journal of College Science Teaching，19(6)，340-346。  new window
34.Wang, J. R.(2004)。Development and Validation of a Two-tier Instrument to Examine Understanding of inteIrnal Transport in Plants and the Human Circulatory System。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education，2(2)，131-157。  new window
35.Lord, T. R.(1994)。Using Constructivism to Enhance Student Learning in College Biology。Journal of College Science Teaching，23(6)，346-348。  new window
36.Kao, H. L.(2007)。A Study of Aboriginal and Urban Junior High School Students' Alternative Conceptions on the Definition of Respiration。International Journal of Science Education，29(4)，517-533。  new window
37.Amir, R.、Tamir, P.(1994)。In-depth Analysis of Misconceptions as a Basis for Developing Research-based Remedial Instruction: The Case of Photosynthesis。The American Biology Teacher，56(2)，94-100。  new window
38.Huang, D. S.(1996)。國小學生的生命、動物、植物概念發展及另有構念研究。行政院國家科學委員會研究彙刊：科學教育，6(1)，39-46。  延伸查詢new window
39.Oxford, R. L.、Burry-Stock, J. A.(1994)。Expert Science Teaching Educational Evaluation model (ESTEEM) for Measuring Excellence in Science Teaching for Professional Development。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education，8(3)，267-297。  new window
40.Kinchin, I. M.(2000)。Confronting Problems Presented by Photosynthesis。School Science Review，81(297)，69-76。  new window
會議論文
1.Wandersee, J. H.(1983)。Students' Misconceptions about Photosynthesis: A Cross-age Study。Ithaca, NY。441-466。  new window
圖書
1.Odum, E. P.(1989)。Ecology and our endangered life-support systems。Charlotte：Baker & Taylor Books。  new window
2.Lawson, A. E.、Abraham, M. R.、Renner, J. W.(1989)。A theory of instruction: Using the learning cycle to teach science concepts and thinking skills。National Association for Research in Science Teaching。  new window
3.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.Ausubel, David Paul(1968)。Educational Psychology: a cognitive view。New York：Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.。  new window
5.Novak, Joseph D.、Gowin, D. Bob(1984)。Learning How to Learn。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Dreyfus, S. E.、Dreyfus, H. L.(1986)。Mind Over Machine。Mind Over Machine。New York, NY。  new window
7.Osborne, R.、Cosgrove, M.(1985)。Lesson Frameworks for Changing Children's Ideas。Learning in Science: The Implications of Children's Science。Auckland, New Zealand/ London, UK/ Portsmouth, UK。  new window
8.Shermis, S. S.、Bigge, M. L.(1999)。Learning Theories for Teachers。Learning Theories for Teachers。New York, NY。  new window
9.National Research Council(1990)。Fulfilling the Promise: Biology Education in the Nation's Schools。Fulfilling the Promise: Biology Education in the Nation's Schools。Washington, DC。  new window
10.Burry-Stock, J. A.(1995)。Expert Science Teaching Evaluation Model (ESTEEM): Theory, Development, and Research。Expert Science Teaching Evaluation Model (ESTEEM): Theory, Development, and Research。Kalamazoo, MI。  new window
其他
1.Duit, R.(2007)。Bibliography STCSE: Students' and Teachers' Conceptions and Science Education，Kiel, Germany。  new window
圖書論文
1.Duit, R.、Treagust, D. F.(1998)。Learning in science--From behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond。International handbook of science education。Dordrecht：Kluwer Academic Press。  new window
2.Chi, M. T. H.、Roscoe, R. D.(2002)。The processes and challenges of conceptual change。Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice。Dordrecht：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
3.Duit, R.、Treagust, D. F.(1995)。Students' conceptions and constructivist teaching approaches。Improving science education。Chicago, IL：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Glynn, S. M.、Duit, R.(1995)。Learning science meaningfully: Constructing conceptual models。Learning Science in the Schools: Research Reforming Practice。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
5.Hewson, P. W.(1996)。Teaching for conceptual change。Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics。New York, NY：Teachers College, Columbia University Press。  new window
6.Wandersee, J. H.、Fisher, K. M.、Moody, D. E.(2000)。The nature of biology knowledge。Mapping biology knowledge。Dordrecht：Kluwer Academic。  new window
7.Driver, R.(1988)。Theory into Practice 2: A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development。Development and Dilemmas in Science Education。London, UK：Falmer Press。  new window
8.Duit, R.、Fraser, B. J.、Treagust, D. F.(1996)。Overview: Research on Students' Preinstructional Conceptions--The Driving Force for Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics。Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics。Teachers College Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：513（臺灣：513，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2196945 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67994187
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上