:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:資優班學生科學探究活動之分析
書刊名:特殊教育與復健學報
作者:張麗雲
作者(外文):Chang, Li-yun
出版日期:2008
卷期:18
頁次:頁51-71
主題關鍵詞:資優班學生科學探究活動Gifted studentsScience inquiry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:21
  • 點閱點閱:34
本研究旨在探究資優班學生科學探究活動,以詮釋性研究法進行,分析學生進行科學研究時所探討的研究問題、所遭遇的困難、解決問題方式、學生與同儕合作關係的發展以及學生所知覺的缺失與收穫,並探索教師於科學探究活動中的角色。研究結論如下:在科學探究活動中,學生所探討的問題與組員的興趣、專長有關,且與日常生活密切關係;學生所遭遇的困難包括訂定題目、實驗材料與儀器、操作過程、撰寫研究報告以及時間問題等;學生透過不斷與小組成員討論,以及與環境互動來解決問題,此正是科學探究活動解決問題的基礎與原動力。合作關係的發展,學生接觸不同觀點,並澄清觀點,相互促進,其中雖然有衝突,但也學習溝通來化解衝突,學會與別人合作與討論,幫助科學概念的學習及科學態度的養成。學生對科學探究活動所知覺的缺失為實驗誤差,而最大的收穫是學習完整的科學探究活動及解決問題的過程。教師的角色應著重,包括教師的發問技巧(增強學生討論,增進思考,學生親自實驗,尋求答案)、引發研究動機、營造科學環境以及運用建構式教學模式進行教學,而不介入學生的科學探索活動太多,讓學生學習科學探索並發揮創意。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the science inquiry activity for gifted students in junior high school. Over a one-year period, the researcher used interviews. Observations, research diary reports, and qualitative analysis as methodology to describe a wide range of phenomena, which happened to scientific inquiry of gifted students. It was found that the problems students brought up were closely related to their daily life experiences. Problems which emerged in the period included the selection of the topic, the experimental material and the instrument, the operating process, the organization of research paper, the problem of insufficient time, and so on. Through inquiry, students learned to cooperate, discuss and solve the problems. The flaw of inquiry was some experimental errors, and what they learned most was that they could learn the whole process of scientific inquiry.
期刊論文
1.Roth, W. M.、Roychoudhury, A.(1993)。The development of science process skills in authentic contexts。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,30(2),127-152。  new window
2.Crawford, Barbara A.(2000)。Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(9),916-937。  new window
3.Wheatley, G. H.(1991)。Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning。Science Education,75(1),9-21。  new window
4.盧秀琴(20021000)。新制科學展覽的動向。國民教育,43(1),74-79。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃鴻博(19960300)。國民小學學校中的科學展覽活動。科學教育研究與發展季刊,2,3-22。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hodson, D.、Hodson, J.(1998)。From Constructivism to Social Constructivism: A Vygotskian Perspective on Teaching and Learning Science。School Science Review,79(289),33-41。  new window
7.張俊彥、程上修(20000900)。在地球科學課融入創造性問題解決及合作學習策略之初探研究。科學教育學刊,8(3),251-272。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉宏文(2001)。高中學生進行開放式科學探究活動之個案研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.翁玉華(1998)。問題解決能力與科學過程技能之相關探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(1998)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1989)。Project 2061: Science for all Americans。Washington, DC:American Association for the Advancement of Science。  new window
3.Chiappetta, E. L.、Koballa, T. R., Jr.、Collette, A. T.(1998)。Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill PrenticeHall。  new window
4.Roth, W. M.(1995)。Authentic school science, knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
5.Woolnough, B.、Allsop, T.(1985)。Practical work in science。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.林寶山(1990)。教學論--理論與方法。臺北:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.王美芬、熊召弟(1995)。國民小學自然科教材教法。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
8.魏明通(1997)。科學教育。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
9.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
10.Slavin, Robert E.(1995)。Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice。Allyn and Bacon, Inc.。  new window
其他
1.王以德(1992)。我國國中生邏輯思考與科學過程技能的研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.何小曼(2001)。如何輔導兒童進行科學展覽活動。  延伸查詢new window
3.李小林(2004)。建構主義教學模式的分析。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡久華(2006)。科學教學建構模式的理論與實踐研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.徐玲(2005)。組織小組合作學習,促進學生自主學習。  延伸查詢new window
6.張政義(2002)。一位國小教師指導「光和像」科學展覽作品的研究。  延伸查詢new window
7.許翠華(2003)。指導科學展覽活動的老師專業發展之行動研究。  延伸查詢new window
8.劉誠傑(2005)。論促進學生合作學習。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭美紅與蔡慶麟(2005)。初中科學探究活動的設計與推行模式。  延伸查詢new window
10.蘇詠梅(2006)。小學科學探究學習的探討。  延伸查詢new window
11.Fensham, P.(1988)。Familiar but different: some dilemmas and new direction on science education。  new window
12.Friedler, Y., & Tamir, P.(1990)。Life in science laboratory classroom at secondary leve。  new window
13.Hodgkin, R. A.(1985)。Playing and exploring: Education through the discovery of order。  new window
14.Hodson, D.(1990)。A critical look at practical work in school science。  new window
15.Hodson, D.(1993)。Re-thinking old ways: Towa rd a more critical approaches to practical work in school science。  new window
16.Lloyd, B. W.(1992)。The 20th century general chemistry laboratory。  new window
17.Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L.(1996)。Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project。  new window
18.Roth, W. M., & McGinn, M. K.(1998)。Knowing, researching, and reporting science education: Lesson from science and technology。  new window
19.Staver, J. R.(1998)。Constructivism: Sound Theory for Explicating the Practice of Science and Science Teaching。  new window
20.Woolnough, B. E.(1994)。Factors affecting students’ choice of science and engineering。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE