參考文獻
一、中文部份
王敏祝（2004）：以探究導向教學提昇國中學生學習成效之研究—以「光學」單元為例。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所在職進修專班碩士論文，未出版。
吳文宗（2005）：專題導向探究式實驗教學之研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
吳水煌（2003）：科學寫作促進學生科學概念學習之研究。國立嘉義大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
余俊樑（2004）：二階段專題導向探究模式對國小科研社學生進行探究活動之影響。臺北市立師範學院科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
金葉葦（2002）：高中化學教學實施「開放性探究實驗」之探討。國立高雄師範大學化學系碩士論文，未出版。
侯香伶（2002）：科探究活動中的科學本質面貌對國一生科學本質觀之影響。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
教育部（2002）：全國第一次科學教育會議資料。台北：教育部。
教育部（2003）：國民中小學九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北：教育部。
陳威霖（2005）：實施啟發式科學寫作教學之行動研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
張惠博（2001）：九年一貫課程實施與教師的專業成長。科學教育月刊，239，13-25。
張清濱（2000）：探究教學法。師友，395，45-49。
黃子晏（2004）：以科學寫作探究國中學生有關光的迷思概念。國立嘉義大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
黃鴻博（2000）：兒童科學探究活動遭遇問題的探討。台中師院學報，14，389-409。溫存儒（2002）：探究國依學生科學探究活動之參與內涵及其參與動機之個案研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所在職進修專班碩士論文，未出版。
楊榮祥（2004）：台灣科學教育研究的回顧。論文發表於中華民國第二十屆科學教育學術研討會。高雄市：國立高雄師範大學。
劉宏文（2001）：高中學生進行開放式科學探究活動之個案研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文，未出版。鄭湧涇（2005）：我國科學教育改革的回顧與展望。科學教育月刊，284，2-22。
蕭登峰（2003）：探討啟發式科學寫作融入教學對學童科學概念學習與改變之研究－以氧化概念學習為例。國立嘉義大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
蘇麗涼（2002）：國中理化實施探究導向教學對學生學習成效影響之研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所在職進修專班碩士論文，未出版。
二、英文部分
Adey, P., Hewitt, G., Hewitt, J., & Landau, N. (2004). The professional development of teachers: Practice and theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: A Project 2061 report on scientific literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, DC: Author.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, R. D. (2000). Are assessment, certification and licensure the path to excellent science teaching? Proceeding of the National Science Council, Part D, 10, 40-49.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 1-12.
Barnett, C. (1998). Mathematics teaching cases as a catalyst for informed strategic inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 81-93.
Basaga, H., Geban, O., & Tekkaya, C. (1994). The effect of the inquiry teaching method on biochemistry and science process skills achievements. Biochemical Education, 22, 29-32.
Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487-509.
Bencze, L. & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: Toward more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 521-539.
Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2002). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28-33.
Bouillion, L. M. & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 878-898.
Briscoe, C. (1991). The dynamic interactions among beliefs, role metaphors, and teaching practices: A case study of teacher change. Science Education, 75, 185-199.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., ＆ Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Byers, A. & Fitzgerald, M. A. (2002). Networking for leadership, inquiry and systemic thinking: A new approach to inquiry-based learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 81-91.
Callahan, J. F. & Clark, L. H. (1988). Teaching in the middle and secondary schools (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Carin, A. A., Bass, J. E., & Contant, T. L. (2005). Teaching science as inquiry (10th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Century, J. R., Fields, E. T., Jablonski, E. S., Levy, A. J., & Minner, D. D. (2005). Has inquiry made a difference? A synthesis of research on the impact of inquiry science on student outcomes. Retrieved October 18, 2005, from http://cse.edc. org/ work/research/inquirysynth/default.asp
Chang, C. Y. & Mao, S. L. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan science students’ outcomes with inquiry: Group versus traditional instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 340-346.
Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd) (pp.255-296). New York: Macmillan.
Cook, C. & Rasmussen, C. (1994). Framework for designing effective professional development: Change-based inquiry process. Oak Brook: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
Costenson, K. & Lawson, A. E. (1986). Why isn’t inquiry used in more classrooms? The American Biology Teacher, 48, 150-158.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiring: New role for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 916-937.
Crawford, B. A., Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2005). Confronting prospective teachers’ ideas of evolution and scientific inquiry using technology and inquiry-based tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 613-637.
Dantonio, M. (1987). Develop concepts, question by question. The Science Teacher, 54(4), 46-49. Darling-Hammond, L. & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523-545.
Davis, K. S. (2003). Change is hard: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87, 3-30.
DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Department of Educational Curriculum. (1989). Science in the national curriculum. London: HMSO.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
Duit, R. (1991). Students’ conceptual frameworks: consequences for learning science. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 65-58). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dunkhase, J. A. (2003). Coupled-inquiry cycle: A teacher concerns-based model for effective student inquiry. Science Educator, 12, 10-15.
Eick, C. J. & Reed, C. J. (2002). What makes an inquiry-oriented science teacher? The influence of learning histories on student teacher role identity and practice. Science Education, 86, 401-416.
Fickel, L. H. (2002). Quality professional development: Suggestions about process and content. Educational Forum, 67, 47-54.
Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90, 452-467.
Gadamer, H. (1989). Truth and method (2nd ed.). New York: Crossroad.
Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gerber, B. L., Price, C., Barnes, M., Hinkle, V., Barnes, L., Gordon, P., & Stanley, L. (2003). Excellence in rural science teaching: Examining elements of professional development models. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 475 163.
Germann, P. J. (1991). Developing science process skills through directed inquiry. American Biology Teacher, 53, 243-247.
Germann, P. J., Aram, R., & Burke, G. (1996). Identifying patterns and relationships among the responses of seventh-grade students to the science process skill of designing experiments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 79-99.
Gibson, H. L. & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86, 693-705.
Glazer, E. M. & Hannafin, J. H. (2006). The collaborative apprenticeship model: Situated professional development within school settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 179-193.
Hamilton, L. S. (1994). Validating hands-on science assessments through an investigation of response processes. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED376 202)
Hammer, D. (1995). Student inquiry in a physics class discussion. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 401-430.
Hammer, D. & Schifter, D. (2001). Practices of inquiry in teaching and research. Cognition and instruction, 19, 441-478.
Hand, B. & Keys, C. (1999). Inquiry investigation: A new approach to laboratory reports. The Science Teacher, 66(4), 27-29.
Hand, B., Wallace, C., & Yang, E. M. (2004). Using a science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh-grade science: Quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 131-149.
Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 971-993.
Hanson, D. M. (2005). Designing Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Activities. In D. K. Apple & S. W. Beyerlein (Eds.), Faculty Guidebook: A Comprehensive Tool for Improving Faculty Performance (pp. 305-308). Lisle, IL: Pacific Crest.
Harwood, W. S. (2004a). A new model for inquiry: Is the scientific method dead? Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(7), 29-33.
Harwood, W. S. (2004b). An activity model for scientific inquiry. The Science Teacher, 71(1), 44-46.
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Oliver, A., & Wesarne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12-21.
Hinrichsen, J. & Jarrett, D. (1999). Science inquiry for the classroom: A literature review. Portland: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., & Freeman, C. (2005). Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers’ classroom practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 668-690.
Kanari, Z. & Millar, R. (2004). Reasoning from data: How students collect and interpret data in science investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 748-769
Keys, C. W. (1998). A study of grade six students generating questions and plans for open-ended science investigations. Research in Science Education, 28, 301-316.
Keys, C. W. (2000). Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 676-690.
Keys, C. W. & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 631-645.
Keys, C. W. & Kennedy, V. (1999). Understanding inquiry science teaching in context: a case study of an elementary teacher. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 315-333.
Khishfe, R. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551-578.
Kim, E. C. & Kellough, R. C. (1987). A resource guide for secondary school teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Kyle, W. C., Bonnstetter, R. J., & Gadsden, T. (1988). An implementation study: An analysis of elementary students' and teachers' attitudes toward science in process-approach vs. traditional science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 103-120.
Lavonen, J., Jauhiainen, J. Koponen, T. I., & Kurki-Suonio, K. (2004). Effect of a long-term in-service training program on teachers’ beliefs about the role of experiments in physics education. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 309-328.
Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont: Wadworth.
Lee, O., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C. (2004). Professional development in inquiry-based science for elementary teachers of diverse student groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1021-1043.
Loh, B., Marshall, S. Radinsky, J., Mundt, J., & Alamar, K. (1999). Helping students build inquiry skills by establishing classroom norms: How teachers appropriate software affordances. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Researchers Association, Montreal, Canada.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Loughran, J., Gunstone, R., Berry, A., Milroy, P., & Mulhall, P. (2000). Science cases in action: Developing an understanding of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 442 630.
Luft, J. A. (1998). Inquiry-based demonstration classrooms: An in-service model for science teachers. ERIC document Reproduction Service No. ED 421 336.
Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry: Exploring the many types of inquiry in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34-37.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., & Tal, R. T. (2004). Inquiry-based science in middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1063-1080.
Marx, R. W., Freeman, J. G., Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1998). Professional development of science teachers. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp.667-680). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
McComas, W. F. (2002). The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Meichtry, Y. J. (1999). The nature of science and scientific knowledge: Implications for a preservice elementary methods course. Science and Education, 8, 273-286.
Minstrell, J. & van Zee, E. H. (2000). Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 469-498.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Newman Jr., W. J., Abell, S. K., Hubbard, P. D., McDonald, J., Otaala, J., & Martini, M. (2004). Dilemmas of teaching inquiry in elementary science methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15, 257-279.
Oliver-Hoyo, M., Allen, D., & Anderson, M. (2004). Inquiry-guided instruction: Practical issues of implementation. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(6), 20-24.
Parke, H. M. & Coble, C. R. (1997). Teachers designing curriculum as professional development: A model for transformational science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 773-789.
Pataray-Ching, J & Roberson, M. (2002). Misconceptions about a curriculum as inquiry framework. Language Arts, 79, 498-505.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of the new view of cognition. In B. J. Bidle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), The international handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1223-1296). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Radford, D. L. (1998). Transferring theory into practice: A model for professional development for science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 73-88.
Reiff, R. (2002). If inquiry is so great, why isn’t everyone doing it? ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 465 642.
Reiff, R., Harwood, W. S., & Phillipson, T. (2002). A scientific method based upon research scientists’ conceptions of scientific inquiry. Paper presented at the Association for the Education of teachers of Science, Greenville, NC.
Richmond, G. & Kurth, L. A. (1999). Moving from outside to inside: High school students’ use of apprenticeship as vehicles for entering the culture and practice of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 677-697.
Roehrig, G. H. & Luft, J. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 3-24.
Sandoval, W. A. & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 369-392.
Schwab, J. (1960). What do scientists do? Behavioral Science, 5, 1-27.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., Khishfe, R., Lederman, J. S., Matthews, L., & Liu, S. Y. (2002). Explicit/reflective instructional attention to nature of science and scientific inquiry: Impact on student learning. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 465 622.
Senge, P. M., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Kleiner, A., Dutton, J., & Smith, B. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Doubleday.
Shepardson, D. P. (2003). The effectiveness of the envision professional development model. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
Shepardson, D. P. ＆ Moje, E. B. (1994). The nature of fourth graders’ understandings of electric circuits. Science Education, 78, 489-514.
Shepardson, D. P. & Pizzini, E. L. (1993). A comparison of student perceptions of science activities within three instructional approaches. School Science and Mathematics, 93, 127-131.
Solano-Flores, G. (2000). Teaching and assessing science process skills in physics: The bubbles task. Science Activities, 37(1), 31-37.
Sorenson-Johnson, K. (2001). Connecting components of scientific inquiry and instructional strategies for teaching students in urban classrooms: A literature review. Retrieved November 7, 2005, from http://novationsjournal.org/ content/media/volume1/johnson.pdf
Stofflett, R. T. (1994). The accommodation of science pedagogical knowledge: The application of conceptual change constructs to teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 787-810.
Sweeney, A. E., Bula, O. A., & Cornett, J. W. (2001). The role of personal practice theories in the professional development of a beginning high school chemistry teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 408-441.
Takao, A. Y. & Kelly, G. J. (2003). Assessment of evidence in the university students’ scientific writing. Science and Education, 12, 341-363.
Thakkar, U., Bruce, B. C., Hogan, M. P., & Williamson, J. (2001). Extending literacy through participation in new technologies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45, 212-219.
Thompson, S. L. (2003). Development of a framework to measure science teachers’ inquiry perceptions and practices. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 472 970.
Tobin, K. & McRobbie, C. (1996). Cultural myths as constraints to the enacted science curriculum. Science Education, 80, 223-241.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45-93). New York: Macmillan.
Trautmann, N., MaKinster, J., & Avery, L. (2004). What makes inquiry so hard? (And why is it worth it?). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, BC.
Trowbridge, L. W. & Bybee, R. W. (1990). Becoming a secondary school science teacher (5th ed.). New York: Merrill.
van Akker, D. J. (1998). The science curriculum: Between ideals and outcomes. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 421-447). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
van Driel, J. H., Beijard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137-158.
van Zee, E. H., Hammer, D., Bell, M., Roy, P., & Peter, J. (2005). Learning and teaching science as inquiry: A case study of elementary school teachers’ investigations of light. Science Education, 89, 1007-1042.
van Zee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 159-190.
Vanfossen, P. J. & Shiveley, J. M. (1997). Things that make you “hmmm…”: Creating inquiry “problems” in the elementary social studies classroom. Social Studies, 88(2), 71-77.
von Secker, C. E. & Lissitz, R. W. (1999). Estimating the impact of instructional practices on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1110-1126.
Wallace, C. S. & Kang, N. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 936-960.
Ward, B. (n.d.). The design, development and evaluation of an online inquiry mentor. Retrieved August 26, 2004, from http://filebox.vt.edu/users/bward/portfolio/ inquirymentor.pdf
Willison, J. (1996). How R U integrating hands-on, writing and reading for understanding in your students’ science learning? Australian Science Teachers, 42(4), 8-14.
Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87, 112-143.
Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of inquiry: How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 481-512.
Zachos, P., Hick, T. L., Doane, W. E. J., & Sargent, C. (2000). Setting theoretical and empirical foundations for assessing scientific inquiry and discovery in educational programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 938-962.