參考文獻
中文部分
王月春（2004）。科學史融入理化教學促進學生科學探究能力之研究。國立高雄師範大學化學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
林淑靜（2006）。國中自然與生活科技領域實施開放式探究教學之研究－以「磁與電流」單元為例。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
洪文東（2000）。從問題解決的過程培養學生的科學創造力。屏師科學教育，11，52-62。
吳坤璋、吳裕益和黃台珠（2005）。科學探究能力測驗的編製與信、效度考驗。測驗學刊，52(2)，119-148。
侯香伶（2002）。科學探究活動中的科學本質面貌對國一生科學本質觀之影響。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
高玉齡（2006）。以「乾冰」為主題教學模組融入自然與生活科技領域教學之研究。國立高雄師範大學化學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
張俊彥和翁玉華（2000）。我國高一學生的問題解決能力與其科學過程技能之相關性研究。科學教育學刊，8(1)，35-55。
張莞珍（1997）。鷹架理論在成人教學實務之應用。成人教育，40，43-51。
陳品華（1997）。從認知觀點談情境學習與教學。教育資料與研究，15，53-59。陳姿妙（2005）。利用探究式教學提昇七年級學生科學學習成效之行動研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
陳榮祥和江新合（2006）。V圖式科學探究指導模式之開發與測試。臺中教育大學學報：數理科技類，20(2)，69-98。
陳慧娟（1998）。情境學習理論的理想與現實。教育資料與研究，25，47-55。許素（2002）。培育國小高年級學童科學探究能力：製作科學展覽的經驗與反省。教育資料與研究，48，24-30。郭靜芳（1997）。國小資優生後設認知與推理思考能力相關之研究。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所，碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北市：教育部。黃瑞琴（1991）。質的教育研究法。台北市：心理出版社。
黃鴻博（2000）。兒童科學探究活動遭遇問題的探討。國立臺中師院學報，14，389-409。楊秀停（2003）。以合作式行動研究協助國小自然科教師實施探究式教學。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
熊召弟（1996）。台北公立高中(高一)學生科學過程技能和邏輯思考能力之探討研究。台北師院學報，9，545-578。
劉宏文（2001）。高中學生進行開放式科學探究活動之個案研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，彰化市。魯俊賢和吳毓瑩（2007）。過程技能之二階段實作評量：規劃、實踐與效益探究。科學教育學刊，15(2)，215-239。
蔡明致、張文華和白榮銓（2001）。設計模組化科學探究歷程之行動研究。論文發表於中華民國第十七屆科學教育學術研討會。高雄市：高雄師大。
蔡明致（2002）。發展輔導模組協助國中生進行小組科學探究之行動研究。發表於台中市九十一學年度教師行動研究論文徵選論文集（pp. 320-329）。台中市：台中市國教輔導團。
蔡明致、張文華（2003）。發展中小學合作進行開放科學探究模組之行動研究。教育部九十二年科學教育專案計畫成果彙編（pp. 13-20）。台北市：教育部。
蔡明致（2008）。以AA Vee 圖策略引導七年級學生進行科學探究之研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
鄭麗華（2002）。以探究式實驗活動提升國二學生參與實驗活動及過程技能之行動研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
賴慶三和高汶旭（2004）。國小專題本位科學展覽活動教學之研究。臺北市立師範學院學報，35(2)，259-284。
蘇麗涼（2002）。國中理化實施探究導向教學對學生學習成效影響之研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
英文部分
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, D.C.: AAAS Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Washington, D.C.: AAAS Press.
Åhlberg, M., & Ahoranta, V. (2002). Two improved educational theory based tools to monitor and promote quality of geographical education and learning. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11(2), 119-137.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.
Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2007). Predators of knowledge construction: Interpreting students' metacognition in an amusement park physics program. Science Education, 91(2), 298-320.
Bianchini, J. A. (1997). Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1039-1065.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bason.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1996). Situated cognition and culture of learning. In McLellan, H. (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives (pp. 19-44). NJ: Educational Technology Publication, Inc.
Brown, R. A. J., & Renshaw, P. D. (2000). Collective argumentation: A sociocultural approach to reframing classroom teaching and learning. In H. Cowie & G. Van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction (pp. 52-66). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Carin, A. A., Bass, J. E., & Contant, T. L. (2003). Teaching science as inquiry. NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Carlsen, W. S. (1993). Teacher knowledge and discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers' classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 471-481.
Carillo, L., Lee, C., & Rickey, D. (2005). Enhancing science teaching by doing more: A framework to guide chemistry students' thinking in the laboratory. Science Teacher, 72(7), 60-65.
Case, J., & Gunstone, R. (2006). Metacognitive development: A view beyond cognition. Journal Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 51-67.
Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Conner, L., & Gunstone, R. (2004). Conscious knowledge of learning: Accessing learning strategies in a final year high school biology class. International Journal of Science Education, 26(12), 1427-1443.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937.
Cross, D.R., & Paris, S.G. (1988). Development and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 131-142.
de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.
Fund, Z. (2007). The effects of scaffolded computerized science problem-solving on achievement outcomes: A comparative study of support programs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(5), 410-424.
Funk, H. J., Fiel, R. L., Okey, J. R., Jaus, H. H., & Sprague, C. S. (1985). Learning science process skills(pp. 35-60). IA: Kendall/ Hunt.
Georghiades, P. (2004). From the general to the situated: Three decades of metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 365-383.
Georghiades, P. (2004). Making pupils’ conception of electricity more durable by means of situated metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 85-99.
Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51-94). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Gott, R., & Duggon, S. (1995). Investigative work in the science curriculum. Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 3-12.
Greeno, J. G., & Collins, A. M. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: Macmillan.
Gunstone, R. F., & Mitchell, I. J. (1998). Metacognition and conceptual change. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee and J. D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 134–163). San Diego: Elsevir Academic Press.
Hacker, D. J. (1998). Metacognition: Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1-24). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Harlan, W., & Jelly, S. (1990). Developing science in the primary classroom (pp.46-48). NH: Heinemann.
Helms-Lorenz, M., & Jacobse, A. E. (2008). Metacognitive skills of the gifted from a cross-cultural perspective. In M. F. Shaughnessy, M.V. E. Veenman & C. K. Kennedy (Eds.), Meta-Cognition: A recent review of research, theory and perspectives (pp. 3-43). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of science enquiry. School Review, 79(2), 171-212.
Hodson, D. (1993). Re-thinking old ways: Towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22(1), 85-142.
Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding scientific competencies within classroom communities of inquiry. In K. Hogan & M. Pressly (Eds.), Scaffolding students learning: Instructional approaches & issues (pp. 74-107). Cambridge: Brooklins Books.
Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82(3), 407-416.
Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3-4), 255-278.
Jegede, O. J., & Olajide, J. O. (1995). Wait-time, classroom discourse, and the influence of sociocultural factors in science teaching. Science Education, 79(3), 233-249.
Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 898-921.
Keys, C. W. (2000). Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 676-690.
King, J. A., & Lonnquist, M. P. (1994). A review of writing on action research (1944-present). Unpublished manuscript.
Kirby, N. F., & Downs, C. T. (2007). Self-assessment and the disadvantages students: Potential for encouraging self-regulated learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 475-494.
Lazarowitz, R., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1998). Cooperative learning in the science curriculum. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 449-467). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Leou, M., Abder, P., Riordan, M. & Zoller, U. (2006). Using HOCS learning as a pathway to promote science teachers’ metacognitive development. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 69-84.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., & Tal, R. T. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1063-1080.
Millar, R. (1989). Bending the evidence: The relationship between theory and experiment in science education. In R. Millar (Ed.), Doing science: Images of science in science education(pp. 62-82). Philadelphia: Falmer.
Millar, R., Lubben, F., Got, R., & Duggan, S. (1994). Investigating in the school science laboratory: Conceptual and procedural knowledge and their influence on performance. Research Papers in Education, 9(2), 207-248.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. F. (Eds.) (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College London.
Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1999). Assessing science understanding: The epistemological vee diagram. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 42-71). San Diego: Elsevir Academic Press.
Moje, E. B. (1995). Talking about science: An interpretation of the effects of teacher talk in a high school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 349-371.
Naylor, P., & Cowie, H. (2000). Learning the communication skills and social processes of peer support: A case study of good practice. In H. Cowie & G. Van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning (pp. 93-103). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Ngeow, K., & Kong, Y. S. (2001). Learning to learn: Preparing teachers and students for problem-based learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 457524)
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools for science and mathematics education. Instructional Science, 19, 29-52.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, S., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (Eds.). ( 2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Oregon Department of Education. (2008). 2002 - 2008 Official Scientific Inquiry Scoring Guide. Retrieved July 9, 2009, from http://silverfalls.k12.or.us/staff/read_shari/asmtsciscorguide0208engbc.pdf
Padilla, M. J. (1991). Science activities, process skills, and thinking. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 205-217). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom application of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.
Polman, J. L., & Pea, R. D. (1997, March). Transformative communication in project science learning discourse. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Polman, J. L., & Pea, R. D. (2001). Transformative communication as a cultural tool for guiding inquiry science. Science Education, 85(2), 223-238.
Quintana, C., Meilan Z., & Krajcik, J. (2005). A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 235-244.
Roth, W. M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Tabak, I., Smith, B. K., Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (1996). Combining general and domain-specific strategic support for biological inquiry. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: Third International Conference, ITS ’96 (pp. 288-296). Montreal: Springer-Verlag.
Tamir, P. (1989). Training teachers to teach effectively in the laboratory. Science Education, 73(1), 59-69.
Tobin, K., Briscoe, C., & Holman, J. (1990). Overcoming constraints to effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 74(4), 409-420.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbooks of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45-93). New York: Macmillan.
Van der Aalsvoort, G., & Harinck, F. J. H. (2000). Studying social interaction in instruction and learning: Methodological approaches and problems. In H. Cowie & G. Van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning (pp. 93-103). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158.
Wang, X., Bernas, R., & Eberhard, P. (2001). Effects of teachers verbal and non-verbal scaffolding on everyday classroom performance of students with down syndrome. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9(1), 71-80.
Watson, F. R. (2004). Students’ discussions in practical scientific inquiries. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 25-45.
Webb, N.M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-871). New York: Macmillan.
White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (2005). A theoretical framework and approach for fostering metacognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 211-223.
Wilson, J., & Livingston, S. (1996). Process skills enhancement in the STS classroom. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), Science/Technology/Society as reform in science education (pp. 59-69). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Yager, R. E. (2000). A vision for what science education should be like for the first 25 years of a new millennium. School Science and Mathematics, 100(6), 327-341.
Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy- Empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2/3), 291-314.