:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:災後遷村計畫之政治可行性分析:以高雄縣藤枝新舊部落為例
書刊名:臺灣政治學刊
作者:柯于璋 引用關係
作者(外文):Ke, Yu-chang
出版日期:2009
卷期:13:1
頁次:頁107-159
主題關鍵詞:遷村政治可行性利害關係人分析新制度主義腳本撰寫Political feasibilityNew InstitutionalismRelocationScenario writingStakeholder analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:99
  • 點閱點閱:75
遷村涉及許多不同層面,造成遷村議題較爲複雜;而且對照以往的經驗,以遷村解決天然災害損失成功的案例並不多見,其主要原因之一往往肇因於遷村政策利害關係人對於計畫內容無法認同,導致計畫的延宕或失敗。有鑑於此,本研究從新制度主義的觀點,採用政策利害關係人分析、深度訪談、政治可行性清單與腳本撰寫等方法,探討以遷村方式降低天然災害的「政治可行性」(political feasibility)分析;亦即探討高雄縣藤枝新舊部落遷村個案中,相關遷村政策參與者的動機、信念、資源與立場等,及其對遷村政策造成的影響。本研究期望透過遷村的政治可行性分析,能夠加強政策規劃能力,並且瞭解該政策參與者的動機、信念與立場,及可能碰到的問題。
Relocation involves a variety of aspects, which makes this issue more complicated. Based on previous experience, lack of stakeholders' endorsement to the policy contents is one of the reasons why it is seldom to see successful cases for relocation for reducing losses from natural hazards. Accordingly, this study explores the political feasibility analysis of relocation for natural hazard mitigation from the viewpoint of New Institutionalism. The methods included are the methods of stakeholder analysis, interview, list of political feasibility, and scenario writing. With all the methods, this study discusses the motives, beliefs, resources, positions, and influences of stakeholders on the relocation policy of Teng-Zhi Tribe, Kaoshiung County. Hopefully, through political feasibility analysis, we can strengthen our abilities for policy formulation, and also understand the motives, beliefs, and positions of participants.
期刊論文
1.劉宜君、陳敦源、蕭乃沂、林昭吟(20050600)。網絡分析在利害關係人概念之應用--以我國全民健保政策改革為例。臺灣社會福利學刊,4(1),95-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳敦源、劉宜君、蕭乃沂、林昭吟(20110600)。政策利害關係人指認的理論與實務:以全民健保改革為例。國家與社會,10,1-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.胡至沛(20011200)。新制度主義的檢視與反思。中國行政評論,11(1),145-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.張峻豪、徐正戎(20070300)。閣揆角色的受限或突破:政黨輪替後我國行政院院長與總統互動之研究。臺灣民主季刊,4(1),51-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳敦源(20010800)。新制度論的範圍與方法--一個理性選擇觀點的方法論檢視。行政暨政策學報,3,129-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Hall, Peter A.、Taylor, Rosemary C. R.(1996)。Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms。Political Studies,44(5),936-957。  new window
7.Ostrom, Elinor L.(1986)。An Agenda for the Study of Institutions。Public Choice,48(1),3-25。  new window
8.Immergut, Ellen M.(1998)。The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism。Politics & Society,26(1),5-34。  new window
9.Meltsner, Arnold J.(1972)。Political Feasibility and Policy Analysis。Public Administration Review,32(6),859-867。  new window
10.Lee, Everett S.(1966)。A theory of migration。Demography,3(1),47-57。  new window
11.陳宥全(2006)。〈土石流災後遷村探究—以花蓮銅門村為例〉。《濤聲學報》,創始刊,263-278。  延伸查詢new window
12.魏珊(2001)。〈建立與完善中國非自願性移民安置監測制度的思考〉。《中國人口科學》,5,33-39。  延伸查詢new window
13.Friedman, M. T., and D. S. Mason,(2004)。“A Stakeholder Approach to Analyzing Economic Develoment Decision Making: Public Subsidies for Professional Sports Facilities.”。Economic Development Quarterly,18 (3),236-254。  new window
14.Kirschenbaum, Alan.(1996)。“Residential Ambiguity and Relocation Decisions: Population and Areas at Risk.”。International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters,14 (1),79-96。  new window
15.May, Peter J.(1986)。“Politics and Policy Analysis.”。Political Science Quarterly,101 (1),109-25。  new window
16.Perry, Ronald W., and Michael K. Lindell.(1997)。“Principles for Managing Community Relocation as a Hazard Mitigation Measure.”。Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management,5(1),49-59。  new window
17.Webber, David J.(1986)。“Analyzing Political Feasibility: Political Scientists’ Unique Contribution to Policy Analysis.”。Policy Studies Journal,14 (4),545-553。  new window
研究報告
1.柯于璋(2007)。非結構式天然災害減輕政策之可行性分析—以土地使用管理與遷村計畫為例。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.張金鶚(1998)。《台北市重大工程拆遷戶安置模式之研究》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳丁祥(2003)。〈屏東縣瑪家鄉三和村的空間拼湊:原住民集體移往與生活調適之能動論述〉,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝明霖(1986)。〈山胞遷村與環境調適之研究—以苗栗縣南庄鄉遷村計畫為個案研究〉,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳敦源、余致力、郭昱瑩(2001)。政策分析的政治可行性評估 : 一個從「空間理論」的初探。公共政策分析的理論與實務。臺北:韋伯。  延伸查詢new window
2.Coplin William D. and Michael K. O’Leary.(1972)。Everyman’s Prince: A Guide to Understanding Your Political Problems。Duxbury, MA:Duxbury Press。  new window
3.Weimer, David L.、Vining, Aidan R.(1992)。Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice。Prentice-Hall。  new window
4.丘昌泰、余致力、羅清俊、張四明、李允傑(2001)。政策分析。國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.Peters, B. Guy(1999)。Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism。Pinter Press。  new window
6.吳定(2003)。公共政策。台北:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.Starling, Grover(1988)。Strategies for Policy Making。Dorsey Press。  new window
8.Freeman, Robert Edward(1984)。Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach。Pitman。  new window
9.陳震寰(2002)。《全民健保財務問題解決方案之政治可行性分析》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
10.Brightman, Harvey.(1980)。Problem Solving: A Logical and Creative Approach。Atlanta, GA。  new window
其他
1.薛承泰(2004)。老人照顧老人 將是臺灣現象,http://ntu.edu.tw/~psc_news9312/120701.htm, 20041207。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bogue, Donald J.(1959)。Internal migration。The study of population: An inventory and appraisal。University of Chicago Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE