臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：以概念演化樹探討跨年級學生演化概念之發展
書刊名：科學教育學刊
作者：辛怡瑩／邱美虹 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hsin, Yi-ying／Chiu, Mei-hung
出版日期：2010
卷期：18:2
頁次：頁131-153
主題關鍵詞：演化；概念改變；概念演化樹；Evolution；Conceptual change；Conceptual evolution tree
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:73
  • 點閱點閱:49
本研究以問卷調查跨年級學生演化概念之發展，對象有小六、國一、國二、高一、高二及大一，有效問卷共 747份。演化概念分為四個主概念和六個次概念，結果顯示小學六年級學生易使用外在特徵解釋，經國一教學後比例下降。學生在選擇題與開放題的答題表現是中相關，開放題得分較選擇題低，與學生寫作表達能力有關。由概念演化樹可看出科學概念出現順序為主概念三「不同的存活率」、主概念一「個別變異」、主概念二「遺傳決定」，最後主概念四「累積世代的改變」。整體而言，跨年級學生發展逐年增長，但國一到國二有下降情況，主因為國二沒有演化課程，其餘階段皆有與演化相關課程，直到大一階段學生仍尚未建立完整的主概念四「累積世代的改變」。
The purpose of this study was to investigate, across age levels, students' conceptions about evolution. The participants were from different grades, namely, 6th, 7th, 8th, 10th, 11th, and freshmen majoring in Life Science at several universities. Seven hundred forty-seven participants were involved in the study. Four major concepts of evolution were identified and then divided into six sub-con¬ceptions of evolution respectively. The authors adopted the software PAUP* 4.0 of phylogenetic systematics to find the goodness of fit of the conceptual evolutionary tree of students’ conceptions about evolution. The results were as follows: First, most of the 6th graders tended to use external characteristics of the organism to explain the process of evolution. After instruction, the percentages of incorrect conceptions were lower than before. Second, the scores between multiple choice and open-ended questions were highly correlated. The students' scores on open-ended questions were lower than their performance on multiple choice questions. Third, the fittest conceptual evolutionary tree represented the developmental sequence of the students' conceptions of evolution: such as "differential survival rates", "individual variation", "genetic determination", and "accumulation of changes over many generations." In summary, the development of students' conceptions of evolution is a gradual process. "Accumulation of changes over many generations" was not learned by the students until the first year at the university level.
期刊論文
1.Driver, R.、Leach, J.、Scott, P.、Wood-Robinson, C.(1994)。Young people's understanding of science concepts: Implications of cross-age studies for curriculum planning。Studies in Science Education，24(1)，75-100。  new window
2.Bishop, B. A.、Anderson, C. W.(1990)。Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，27(5)，415-427。  new window
3.邱美虹(20000300)。概念改變研究的省思與啟示。科學教育學刊，8(1)，1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Chi, M. T. H.、Slotta, J. D.、De Leeuw, N.(1994)。From Things to Processes: A Theory of Conceptual Change for Learning Science Concepts。Learning and Instruction，4(1)，27-43。  new window
5.Vosniadou, S.(1994)。Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change。Learning and instruction，4(1)，45-69。  new window
6.林靜雯、邱美虹(2007)。以概 念演化觀 點分析我國電學教科書之教- 學序列。國立編譯館館刊，35（2），3-14。  延伸查詢new window
7.Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M.,、Norman, G. J.(2002)。Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，39(10)，952-978。  new window
8.Brumby, M. N.(1984)。Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students。Science Education，68(4)，493-503。  new window
9.Chi, M. T. H.(2005)。Commonsense conceptions of emergent process: Why some misconceptions are robust。The Journal of the Learning Science，14(2)，161-199。  new window
10.Downie, J. R.、Barron, N. J.(2000)。Evolution and religion: Attitudes of scottish first year biology and medical students to the teaching of evolutionary biology。Journal of Biological Education，34(3)，139-146。  new window
11.Evans, E. M.(2000)。The emergence of beliefs about the origins of species in school-age children。Merrill-Palmer Quarterly，46(2)，221-254。  new window
12.Evans, E. M.(2006)。Everyday intuition: How children develop their concepts of evolution。Bimonthly News Journal of the Association of Science-Technology Centers，11-13。  new window
13.Ferrari, M.,、Chi, M. T. H.(1998)。The nature of naïve explanation of natural selection。International Journal of Science Education，20(10)，1231-1256。  new window
14.Geraedts, G. L.,、Boersma K. Th.(2006)。Re-inventing natural selection。International Journal of Science Education，28(8)，843-870。  new window
15.Settlage, J.(1994)。Conceptions of natural selection: A snapshot of the sense-making process。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，31(5)，449-457。  new window
16.Shtulman, A.(2006)。Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution。Cognitive Psychology，52(2)，170-194。  new window
17.Slotta, J. D.,、Chi, M. T. H.(2006)。Helping students understand challenging topics in science through ontology training。Cognition and Instruction，24(2)，261-289。  new window
18.Stern, L.(2004)。Effective assessment: Probing students’ understanding of natural selection。Journal of Biological Education，39，12-17。  new window
會議論文
1.Ohlsson, S.(1991)。Young adults’ understanding of evolutionary explanations: Preliminary observations。PA.。  new window
學位論文
1.吳美芬(2002)。師院學生演化概念認知之研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.湯偉君(2008)。以解釋本質探討中學演化論之教科書內容與教學(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林靜雯(2005)。由概念演化觀點探究不同教科書教－學序列對不同心智模式學生電學學習之影響，台北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳藍萍(2003)。高一學生生物演化概念之研究，台北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉誠宗(2003)。學生對物種起源的解釋架構一貫性之探析，台北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Mayr, E.(1982)。The Growth of Biological Thought。Cambridge. Massachusetts：Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Campbell, Neil A.、Reece, Jane B.(2002)。Biology。Benjamin Cummings。  new window
3.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Gunstone, R. F.,、Mitchell, I. J.(1998)。Meta-cognition and conceptual change。Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view。San Diego, CA。  new window
5.Huxley, J. S.(1942)。Evolution。New York and London。  new window
6.Mader, S. S.(1997)。Inquiry into life (8th Ed.)。Dubuque IA。  new window
7.Mayr, E.,、William B. P.(1998)。The evolutionary synthesis: Perspectives on the unification of biology。  new window
8.Mooreead, A.(1971)。Darwin and the Beagle。Ringwood. Vic。  new window
9.Swofford, D. L.(1985)。Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony。Champaign, Ill。  new window
10.Toulmin, S.(1972)。The uses of argument。Cambridge, England。  new window
11.Wiley, E. O., Siegel-Causey, D., Brooks, D. R.,、Funk, V. A.(1993)。The complete cladist: A primer of phylogenetic procedures。Lawrence。  new window
圖書論文
1.Chi, M. T. H.(1992)。Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science。Cognitive Models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science。Minneapolis, MN：University of Minnesota Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1431（臺灣：1406，外國：25） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2459241 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68265454
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上