:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從臺灣學者引文角度看歷史學期刊及學者之評鑑
書刊名:圖書資訊學研究
作者:黃慕萱 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Mu-hsuan
出版日期:2010
卷期:4:2
頁次:頁1-39
主題關鍵詞:歷史學歷史學期刊學術評鑑書目計量學引文分析HistoryHistory journalsResearch evaluationBibliometricsCitation analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:31
  • 點閱點閱:41
期刊論文
1.杜正勝、陳國棟、柳立言(19981100)。「國內歷史學學術期刊排序計畫」簡介。漢學研究通訊,17(4)=68,441-459。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.King, J.(1987)。A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation。Journal of Information Science,13,261-276。  new window
3.MacRoberts, M. H.、MacRoberts, B. R.(199606)。Problems of Citation Analysis。Scientometrics,36(3),435-444。  new window
4.Seglen, P. O.(1997)。Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research。British Medical Journal,314(7079),498-502。  new window
5.林玉茹(20021200)。歷史學與區域研究:以東臺灣地區的研究為例。東臺灣研究,7,103-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Jones, Clyve、Chapman, Michael、Woods, Pamela Carr(1972)。The Characteristics of the Literature Used by Historians。Journal of Librarianship,4(3),137-156。  new window
7.Kokko, Hanna、Sutherland, William J.(1999)。What Do Impact Factors Tell Us?。Trends in Ecology & Evolution,14(10),382-384。  new window
8.Lawani, Stephen M.、Bayer, Alan E.(1983)。Validity of Citation Criteria for Assessing the Influence of Scientific Publications: New Evidence with Peer Assessment。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,34(1),59-66。  new window
9.Moed, H. F.、Burger, W. J. M.、Frankfort, J. G.、Van Raan, A. F. J.(1985)。The application of bibliometric indicators。Scientometrics,8(3/4),177-203。  new window
10.Rinia, E. J.、Van Leeuwen, Theo、Van Vuren, H. G.、Van Raan, A. F. J.(1998)。Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria: Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands。Research Policy,27(1),95-107。  new window
11.Rousseau, R.(2002)。Journal evaluation: Technical and practical issues。Library Trends,50(3),418-439。  new window
12.謝劍(19700500)。人類學與歷史學。思與言,8(1),42-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.汪榮祖(1997)。論歷史的本質。歷史月刊,100,90-96。  延伸查詢new window
14.張華葆(1993)。歷史學與社會學的交錯及歷史會學之興起。東海學報,34,463-476。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.黃延齡(2008)。歷史學的當前困境與因應之道。歷史月刊,240,116-124。  延伸查詢new window
16.劉益東(1998)。問題譜系比較評議法―同行評議方法新探。自然辯證法研究,14,31-35。  延伸查詢new window
17.Aksnes, D. W.,、Taxt, R. E.(2004)。Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: A comparative study at a Norwegian university。Research Evaluation,13,33-41。  new window
18.Burnhill, P. M.,、Tubby-Hille, M. E.(1994)。On measuring the relation between social science research activity and research publication。Research Evaluation,4,130-152。  new window
19.Cronin, B., Snyder, H.,、Atkins, H.(1997)。Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: A study of sociology。Journal of Documentation,53,263-273。  new window
20.Garfield E.(1999)。Journal impact factor: A brief review。Canadian Medical Association Journal,161,979-980。  new window
21.Goedeken, E. A.,、Herubel, J. P. V. M.(1995)。Periodical dispersion in American history: Observations on article bibliographies from the Journal of American History。The Serials Librarian,27,59-74。  new window
22.Lowe, M. S.(2003)。Reference analysis of the American Historical Review。Collection Building,22,13-20。  new window
23.Meho, L. I.,、Sonnenwald, D. H.(2000)。Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance: A case study of Kurdish scholarship。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,51,123-138。  new window
24.Nederhof, A. J.,、Zwaan, R. A.(1991)。Quality judgments of journals as indicators of research performance in the humanities and the social and behavioral sciences。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,42,332-340。  new window
25.Nelson, T. M., Buss, A. R.,、Kazko, M.(1983)。Rating of scholarly journals by chairpersons in the social sciences。Research in Higher Education,469-497。  new window
26.Norris, M.,、Oppenheim, C.(2003)。Citation counts and the Research Assessment Exercise V: Archaeology and the 2001 RAE。Journal of Documentation,59,709-730。  new window
27.Plomp, R.(1990)。The signi ficance of the number of highly cited papers as an indicator of scientific prolificacy。Scientometrics,19,185-197。  new window
28.Reedijk, J.(1998)。Sense and nonsense of science citation analyses: Comments on the monopoly position of ISI and citation inaccuracies. Risks of possible misuse and biased citation and impact data。New Journal of Chemistry,22,767-770。  new window
29.Sen, B. K.(1992)。Normalised impact factor。Journal of Documentation,48,318-325。  new window
30.Sen, B. K.,、Shailendra, K.(1992)。Evaluation of recent scientific research output by a bibliometric method。Scientometrics,23,31-46。  new window
31.Thomas, P. R.,、Watkins, D. S.(1998)。Institutional research rankings via bibliometric analysis and direct peer review: A comparative case study with policy implications。Scientometrics,41,335-355。  new window
32.van Raan, A.(1999)。Advanced bibliometric methods for the evaluation of universities。Scientometrics,45,417-423。  new window
33.Virgo, J. A.(1977)。A statistical procedure of evaluating the importance of scientific papers。The Library Quarterly,47,415-430。  new window
34.Wong, B. B. M.,、Kokko, H.(2005)。Is science as global as we think?。Trends in Ecology & Evolution,20,475-476。  new window
會議論文
1.顏崑陽(2004)。再哀大學以及一些期待與建議--當前高教學術評鑑的病癥與解咒的可能。反思臺灣的(人文及社會)高教學術評鑑研討會。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.黃寬重、劉錚雲、陳弱水、林麗月、呂妙芬(2008)。歷史學門國內期刊評比之研究 (計畫編號:97-2410-H-001-004)。  延伸查詢new window
2.杜正勝、陳國棟、林麗月(2003)。第二次「國內歷史學相關期刊排序」計畫。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳展良、甘懷真、王遠義、方震華、秦曼儀、劉慧(2006)。「歷史學熱門及前瞻研究議題調查計畫」調查報告。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kruytbosch, C. E.(1989)。The role and effectiveness of peer review。The evaluation of scientific research。Chichester, NY。  new window
2.Makino, J.(1998)。Productivity of research groups: Relation between citation analysis and reputation within research communities。Scientometrics。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE