:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兩岸協商與談判理論之探討
書刊名:人文與社會學報
作者:陳振銘
作者(外文):Chen, Jenn-ming
出版日期:2010
卷期:2:6
頁次:頁161-191
主題關鍵詞:協商與談判智豬論博弈理論囚徒困境理論第三方介入理論Consultation and negotiationPigs' playoffsGame theoryPrisoner's dilemma theoryThird party theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:118
  • 點閱點閱:31
協商與談判是門高深的學問,也是一項藝術。其主要目的是針對紛爭或未取得共識之議題,經由雙方相互溝通與協調,共同尋求雙方或多方都能接受的合理解決方案。海峽兩岸目前正處於緩和階段,彼此都在調整互動策略,急需透過協商與談判機制,共創兩岸雙贏新局。 本研究旨在探討尋求適合兩岸協商與談判之相關理論。由於2008年國民黨執政以來,兩岸兩會已舉行多次會談,雙方除有事務性與商務性協商與談判之外,日後,不排除亦可能會觸及軍事性或政治性議題;因此,協商與談判理論之探討,顯得格外重要。 本文運用博奕理論衍生出來之「智猪論」,解釋與模擬兩岸協商與談判可能面臨之狀況,分析兩岸進行折衝過程中,如何在「利益衡量」、「成本估計」及「心理層面」呈現出因應對策。希望有助於瞭解影響兩岸協商與談判之相關國內及國際因素,進而提升協商與談判的策略和技巧,創造有利於兩岸關係發展之協商模式。
The consultation and the negotiation are not only a scholarship, but also an art. It is main purpose is, by having mutual communicating and understanding, to aim at a certain dispute or subject which the mutual recognition still cannot be decided, and to seek for the solution both can accept. This consultative, negotiating mechanism is now being urgently needed for the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, so as to launch a win-win situation to the cross-straits jointly. This research is focused on conferring and questing towards the best suitable consultation and negotiation theory which can be used on the cross-straits. Due to the increasing détente around the cross-strait affairs after May 20th, 2008, except for the transactional and financial consultations and negotiations, even the political affairs may become an option both of the straits might have to approach. This article is trying to explain the current situation the cross-straits are now facing with by using one of the game theory-”Pigs' Playoffs”: that how would the cross-straits deal with their negotiations in response to subdue their rivals; by measuring the advantages, estimating the costs, and concerning the psychological aspects. Therefore, we hope this article may become useful in your understanding of what are the internal/external factors that are affecting the consultations along with the negotiations around the cross-straits, and how could we raise our strategies and skills in a certain consultation and negotiation; so as to initiate an advantageous pattern which gives the best benefit to the cross-straits.
期刊論文
1.邵宗海(20031000)。從兩岸關係的變遷探討兩岸關係的定位。遠景基金會季刊,4(4),1-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.包宗和(19881200)。臺海兩岸互動模式之演變(1949-1988)。政治學報,16,121-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳秀光、吳宗憲(2005)。政治談判之內涵與技巧。文官培訓所:T &D 飛訓,第37期,頁7-15。  延伸查詢new window
4.Patrick Regan。Conditions of Successful Third-Party Intervention in In trastate Conflictpp.341-342。  new window
圖書
1.吳秀光(2001)。政府談判之博奕理論分析。台北:時英出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Fisher, Ronald J.(1997)。Interactive Conflict Resolution。Syracuse University Press。  new window
3.劉必榮(1989)。談判。台北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.邵宗海(2004)。兩岸協商與談判。台北:新文京。  延伸查詢new window
5.Morgenthau, Hans J.(1978)。Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace。Alfred A. Knopf。  new window
6.包宗和、吳玉山(19990000)。爭辯中的兩岸關係理論。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李佩芝、高鴻翔、L. W. Lewis(1989)。理性賭局:從「約會遊戲」到「囚犯兩難」的決策模型探源」。台北。  延伸查詢new window
8.林文程(2000)。中國談判的理論與實務。台北。  延伸查詢new window
9.許慶復主編(1998)。從台北-華盛頓-北京的戰略關係看台海危機。地球村中的台灣。台北。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉必榮(2003)。談判,無所不在。台北。  延伸查詢new window
11.蔡宗揚(1992)。談判技巧手冊。台北。  延伸查詢new window
12.鄧中堅、高永光、黃奎博合著(1996)。政治溝通與談判技巧。台北。  延伸查詢new window
13.譚瑾瑜(2009)。《國政分析.推動兩岸簽署CECA的時代意義》。  延伸查詢new window
14.Victor A. Kremenyuk.(2002)。International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues, 2nd ed。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE