:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:智力正常與個別內差異二項學習障礙學生鑑定標準的檢討
書刊名:南屏特殊教育
作者:胡永崇
出版日期:2010
卷期:1
頁次:頁25-33
主題關鍵詞:學習障礙差距模式內在差異
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:39
本文主要檢討智力正常及內在差異這二個學習障礙定義及鑑定常用指標。作者建議以「非智能障礙」作為「智力正常」之指標,並建議取消「內在差異」之指標,以保障智力較低或缺乏內在差異,但學業學習有明顯困難的學生接受特教服務的機會。最後作者建議採取非智障、基本學業具有明顯困難、對有效教學介入方式缺乏成效等三項指標,為學障學生鑑定之標準。
期刊論文
1.Fletcher, J. M.、Denton, C.、Francis, D. J.(2005)。Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of learning disabilities: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement。Journal of Learning Disabilities,38,545-552。  new window
2.Freberg, M. E.、Vandiver, B. J.、Watkins, M. W.、Canivez, G. L.(2008)。Significant factor score variability and the validity of the WISC-III full scale IQ in predicting later academic achievement。Applied Neuropsychological,15,131-139。  new window
3.Siegel, L. S.(2001)。Why we do not need intelligence test scores in the definition and analyses of learning disabilities。Journal of Learning Disabilities,22,514-518。  new window
4.Watkins, M. W.、Glutting, J. J.、Lei, Pui-Wa(2007)。Validity of the full-scale IQ when there is significant variability among WISC-III and WISC-IV factor scores。Applied Neuropsychology,14,13-20。  new window
5.Vellutino, F. R.、Scanlon, D. M.、Lyon, G. R.(2000)。Differentiating between Difficult-to-Remediate and Readily Remediated Poor Readers: More Evidence against the IQ-Achievement Discrepancy Definition of Reading Disability。Journal of Learning Disabilities,33(3),223-238。  new window
6.Watkins, M. W.、Kush, J. C.、Schaefer, B. A.(2002)。Diagnostic Utility of the Learning Disability Index。Journal of Learning Disabilities,35(2),98-103。  new window
學位論文
1.陳淑麗(2006)。轉介前介入在學障鑑定的重要性與可行性(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Mercer, C. D.、Pullen, P. C.(2009)。Students with learning disabilities。Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Pearson Education, Inc.。  new window
2.台灣學障學會(2009)。台灣學障學會2009年會手冊。高雄市:台灣學障學會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Fletcher, J. M.、Lyon, G. R.、Fuchs, L. S.、Barnes, M. A.(2007)。Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention。New York:The Guilford Press。  new window
4.McLoughin, J. A .、Lewis, R. B.(2008)。Assessing students with special needs。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill/Prentice Hall。  new window
5.President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education(2002)。A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families。Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Education。  new window
6.教育部(2006)。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.Lerner, J. W.(2003)。Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies。New York:Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
8.周台傑(1999)。學習障礙學生鑑定原則鑑定基準說明。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定原則鑑定基準說明手冊。台北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.台中縣政府教育處(2009)。臺中縣98學年度國民中小學(疑似)身心障礙特殊教育學生鑑定及安置工作手冊,http://163.17.111.5/Bulletin/, 20091114。  延伸查詢new window
2.台北市政府教育局(2005)。台北市國民小學學習障礙學生鑑定模式及流程圖,http://www.edunet.taipei.gov.tw/, 20091114。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪儷瑜(2004)。學習障礙鑑定工作檢討與建議:由各縣市實施學習障礙工作調查表談起,http://www.rm.spc.ntnu.edu.tw/liyuhung/chinese/modules/mydownloads/datashare/ld_identification_ taiwan2005.pdf, 20091115。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE