:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以次序理論探討科技大學學生在微積分的學習--以多項式積分為例
書刊名:高等教育
作者:曾炤炫孫立中柯嘉南李振銘
作者(外文):Tzeng, Chao-hsienSun, Li-chungKo, Chia-nanLee, Cheng-ming
出版日期:2011
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁145-164
主題關鍵詞:次序理論多項式積分知識結構試題反應理論Ordering theoryThe integration of polynomialKnowledge structureItem response theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:34
科技大學的數學教師在教學上皆以專家的知識結構方式授課,而學生常不以直接的方式來表達對此知識學習上的困擾,往往遲至面臨試題後才呈現出學習障礙的情況。因此,本研究根據Bart與Krus(1973)的次序理論,建構一個關於科技大學師生在授課與學習者之間的了解機制。本研究分析南開科技大學工程科系一年級學生,在微積分課程中多項式積分的學習單元,依據教師的專業背景建立學習這一單元所需具備的解題能力,再以紙筆測驗的方式測試,根據學生在試題的反應而建立衡量係數矩陣;依據衡量係數矩陣,就族群題目方式進行分析,藉以回饋任課教師有關於學習者在多項式積分的單元中,除了解經過學習後所得到的解題能力之外,同時進一步提供對學習者在學習前應採取的補救教學內容,以銜接在高職(中)數學課程上學習之不足。
This research acts according to Bart and Krus (1973) “ordering theory”, constructs a organization between teachers and the student in the technology university, the formers instruct their teaching with expert knowledge structure, while the latter present his study confusions not directly, but always from the test response. In this approach we analyzed, the freshmen major in engineering of Nan Kai Technology University, about teaching and learning at the integration of polynomial in the Calculus. Based on the expert of the teachers, we build up the necessary problem solving abilities in this unit, through the Paper-and-Pencil-Based Testing of these freshmen, and according the data of item response from them, the coefficient of impact matrix is hence built. The tribal items based on the coefficient of impact matrix are done. These conclusions are then fed back to the teachers, so as to have the judgments of how many abilities that the learners have gotten from this course, or should adopt the recovery teaching to link up the quality in mathematics before they enter university.
期刊論文
1.Fischer, G. H.(1973)。The Linear Logistic Test Model as Instrument in Educational Research。Acta Psychologica,37,359-374。  new window
2.Takeya, M.(1980)。Construction and Utilization of Item Relational Structure Graphs for Use in Test Analysis。Japan Journal of Educational Technology,5,93-103。  new window
3.Bart, W. M.、Krus, D. J.(1973)。An Ordering-theoretic Method to Determine Hierarchies among Items。Educational and Psychological Measurement,33,291-300。  new window
4.楊國賜(20050400)。我國大學自我評鑑機制與運作之探討。臺灣教育,632,2-12。  延伸查詢new window
5.余民寧、陳嘉成(19980500)。排序理論在概念結構評量上的應用。國立政治大學學報,76,17-48。  延伸查詢new window
6.Tatsuoka, K. K.(1983)。Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory。Journal of Educational Measurement,20(4),345-354。  new window
7.林原宏(20050600)。次序理論。教育研究月刊,134,142-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林原宏、陳進春、許天維(2005)。詮釋結構模式分析法的應用示例。測驗統計簡訊,66,1-9。  延伸查詢new window
9.劉湘川、許天維、林原宏(1998)。知識空間的模糊理論分析。測驗統計年刊,6,113-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林原宏、游森期(2006)。次序理論取向的解題規則階層分析及其結構圖比較之探究。測驗學刊,31(2),239-260。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.楊秀倩、陳進春、許天維(2006)。試題關聯結構分析法在探討資賦優異學生梯形面積測量概念上的應用。國民教育研究學報,16,87-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Bart, W. M.、Airasian, P. W.(1974)。Determination of the ordering among seven Piaget task by an ordering theoretic method。Journal of Educational Psychology,66,277-284。  new window
13.Misailidou, C.、Williams, J.(2003)。Diagnostic assessment of children’s proportional reasoning。Journal of Mathematical Behavior,22,335。  new window
14.Mislevy, R. J.、Verheist, N.(1990)。Modeling item response when different subjects employ different solution strategies。Psychometrika,55,195-215。  new window
15.Airasian, P. W.、Bart, W. M.、Greaney, B. J.(1975)。The analysis of a prepositional logic game by ordering theory。Child Study Journal,5,13-24。  new window
圖書
1.Takeya, M.(1991)。New Test Theory: Structural Analysis。Tokyo, Japan:Waseda University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE