:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:幼教輔導人員專業能力滿意度之調查研究--受輔園所之觀點
書刊名:幼兒教保研究期刊
作者:張素貞林葙葙
作者(外文):Chang, Su-chenLin, Shang-shang
出版日期:2011
卷期:7
頁次:頁49-76
主題關鍵詞:幼兒教育輔導人員專業能力滿意度Early childhood educationMentorProfessional competencySatisfaction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:76
本研究主要的目的是從受輔園所的觀點來探究帅教輔導人員專業能力表現之滿意度,並且比較不同背景變項的園所對帅教輔導人員專業能力滿意度之差異情形。本研究以問卷調查法為主,並佐以訪談四位受輔園所長及老師。研究工具為研究者自編之「帅教輔導人員專業能力滿意度之調查」問卷,採五點式量表。研究對象為95-98學年度參加教育部補助辦理公私立帅稚園輔導計畫之受輔園所。資料以次數分配、百分比、帄均數、t檢定、及單因子變異數分析等統計方法,加以分析。 研究結果顯示,受輔園所對輔導人員專業能力之滿意度,介於「滿意」到「非常滿意」之間,整體帄均數為4.442。而不同背景變項之受輔園所,對帅教輔導人員專業能力表現滿意度,整體而言,均未達顯著差異。 針對研究發現與結論,提出對帅稚園輔導相關之輔導人員、政府機構提出建議,及未來後續研究可能方向之建議。
The purposes of this research are to investigate the satisfactions of Mentors’ professional competencies for the early childhood education program from the mentees’ points of view and to compare the differences of the satisfactions of Mentors’ professional competencies from mentees with different background factors. A questionnaire survey Method was adopted in this study. In addition, interviews were held with four directors and teachers who had taken part in the Mentoring Project. A self-developed questionnaire, The Satisfaction of Mentors’ Professional Competencies for Early Childhood Education Program Questionnaire, with 5-point Likert scale was used as a research tool. The subjects of the study were the directors or the teachers who had participated in the Mentoring Project between 2006 and 2009 school years. Frequency distribution, percentage, average, t-test, and one-way ANOVA were used for data analysis. The results of this study showed that the satisfactions of Mentors’ professional competencies from mentees’ points of view were between 「satisfaction」 and 「very satisfaction」, and the overall average satisfaction rate was 4.442. In general, there were no significant differences among different background factors. Finally, based on the research findings, several recommendations were proposed for mentors, officials and researchers respectively.
期刊論文
1.Faul, Franz、Lang, Alert-Georg、Erdfelder, Edgar、Buchner, Axel(2009)。Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses。Behavior Research Methods,41(4),1149-1160。  new window
2.Lynn, M. R.(1986)。Determination and quantification of content validity。Nursing Research,35(6),382-385。  new window
3.江如玲(2007)。『輔導人員』專業規準與條件之初探---幼兒園園長觀點。竹師幼教系友會會訊,39。  延伸查詢new window
4.許玉齡、江如玲(2008)。幼教輔導之專業能力初探-輔導人員之觀點。幼兒教育,288,32-46。  延伸查詢new window
5.Rush, D. D.、Shelden, M. L.(2006)。Coaching practices rating scale for assessing adherence to evidence-based early childhood intervention practices。CASEtools,2(2),1-7。  new window
會議論文
1.許玉齡、吳碧惠、李麗娟(2006)。推動公立幼稚園課程變革的力量--輔導者的角色探討。2006全國幼教輔導學術研討會。台灣:新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.王怡云(2006)。我看一所私立幼稚園的課程改變。新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
3.林秀芬(2007)。增進學前機構接受輔導之績效。新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
4.洪福財(2005)。幼稚園與輔導者的磨合與互動-以台北市私立幼稚園自我評鑑為例。新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
5.段慧瑩、胡美智(2005)。托育機構輔導實例探討-以花蓮地區為例。新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
6.張富萍、王淑清、馬祖琳(2005)。托兒所追蹤輔導之經驗分享-以屏東縣為例。新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃麗鳳(2007)。團隊合作和行政領導對輔導計畫成效的影響-以一國小附幼和一所私立托兒所為例。新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.江如玲(2007)。從輔導人員觀點探討幼教輔導人員專業能力與條件。國立新竹教育大學,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
2.林儒君(2009)。國小教師之課程實踐探究。私立東海大學,台中。  延伸查詢new window
3.游意敏(2009)。在幼稚園輔導計畫下,一位幼教師實施搬家主題之歷程。國立東華大學,台東。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務--解構理論與重建。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
2.國語日報出版中心(200008)。新編國語日報辭典。臺北:國語日報社。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析實務。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Gallacher, K. K.(1997)。Supervision, Mentoring, and coaching。Reforming personnel preparation in early intervention: Issues, Models, and practical strategies。  new window
其他
1.台中縣政府(2007)。台中縣96年度幼稚教育輔導團到園訪視受訪教師滿意度調查質量分析,台中縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.台中縣政府(2008)。台中縣九十七年度幼稚教育輔導團到園訪視受訪教師滿意度調查表,台中縣。  延伸查詢new window
3.台中縣幼兒教育資源中心(2010)。台中縣九十九年度幼稚教育輔導團年度工作計劃,http://kidedu.tcc.edu.tw/guide-plan.asp, 20101013。  延伸查詢new window
4.全國幼教資訊網(2010)。幼稚園輔導方案,http://www.ece.Moe.edu.tw/guidance.html, 20100203。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部(2009)。幼稚園輔導計畫打造優質幼教環境,http://epaper.edu.tw/topical.aspx?topical_sn=388, 20100802。  延伸查詢new window
6.NAEYC.(2010)。Best Practices of Accreditation Facilitation Projects,http://www.naeyc.org/files/acadeMy/file/AFPBestPractices.pdf, 20101031。  new window
7.NPDCI(2010)。Wiki: Coaching,http://community.fpg.unc.edu/discussions/wiki-pd-approaches/wiki_coaching, 20100802。  new window
8.Minnesota Center for Professional Development(2010)。Core Competencies for Effective Mentoring,http://mncpd.org/docs/RBPD%20Web%20Site%20Sep%202009/Core_Competencies_for_Effective_Mentoring.pdf, 20100802。  new window
9.Winton, P.,Rush, D. D.(2008)。Practical Approaches to EC Professional Development Evidence, Strategies and Resources,http://community.fpg.unc.edu/resources/presentations/files/ZTT-Winton-Rush-Practical-Approaches-to-EC-PD-presentation-12-3-2008.pdf, 20101213。  new window
10.Bank Street(2010)。DOE System-wide Early Childhood Professional Development-The Center for Early Childhood Professionals,http://www.bankstreet.edu/ecp/contractor.html, 20101031。  new window
11.Colorado Office of Professional Development(2009)。Coaching Competencies for Colorado Early Childhood Education,http://www.netnewsdesk.coM/resources/375/File/ECC-OPD/CoachComp.pdf, 20101102。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE