臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：網路論證學習環境促進學童批判思考能力之研究
書刊名：教育與心理研究
作者：洪振方 引用關係／林志能
作者(外文)：Hung, Jeng-fung／Lin, Chih-neng
出版日期：2011
卷期：34:3
頁次：頁123-152
主題關鍵詞：論證學習環境；網路學習環境；批判思考；Argumentation-based learning environment；Networked learning environment；Critical thinking
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:131
本研究旨在設計一個網路論證學習環境來促進學童的批判思考能力。研究方法採用準實驗研究的不等組前後測設計，研究對象為國小六年級學生共103人，進行連續8週的實驗教學活動後，比較網路論證學習環境組、課室論證學習環境組和對照組三組學生批判思考能力的表現，以葉玉珠（2003）的「批判思考測驗—第一級」為測驗工具，進行批判思考能力的前、後測共變數分析。資料分析顯示網路組學生在批判思考測驗的得分優於對照組，且達中度效果量，顯示網路論證學習環境可以增進學童的批判思考能力，具有推廣的價值。
This study aimed to design an argumentation-based learning environment to promote the critical thinking abilities of the 6th grade students. These online activities were implemented based on Kuhn’s (2005) argumentation theory. Students can collect data, organize information, interpret, explain and interact with others to increase their critical thinking abilities. There were 103 subjects who participated in the experiment. Quasi-experimental design research method for eight weeks of teaching activities was adopted. We compared three groups of students in critical thinking performance. Data analysis showed that critical thinking test scores of network group were better significantly than the scores of the control group. It also showed the design of argumentation-based learning environment can be demonstrated to enhance the critical thinking abilities of students.
期刊論文
1.Clark, D. B.、Sampson, V.(2008)。Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，45(3)，293-321。  new window
2.Zohar, A.、Nemet, F.(2002)。Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，39(1)，35-62。  new window
3.林建仲、朱耀明、李祈仁、蔡華齡(20031200)。培養國小學生批判思考能力之網路教學模式研究。高雄師大學報，15(1)，85-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Nussbaum, E. M.、Sinatra, G. M.、Poliquin, A.(2008)。Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning。International Journal of Science Education，30(15)，1977-1999。  new window
5.Ennis, R. H.(1985)。A logical basis for measuring critical thinking。Educational Leadership，43(2)，44-48。  new window
6.林志能、洪振方(20080900)。論證模式分析及其評量要素。科學教育，312，2-18。  延伸查詢new window
7.Driver, R.、Newton, P.、Osborne, J.(2000)。Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms。Science Education，84(3)，287-312。  new window
8.林奇賢、馬榮燦、林志能(2000)。網路學習與網路學校的發展對教師專業路線的衝擊。資訊與教育，79，3-7。  延伸查詢new window
9.林奇賢(1998)。網路學習環境設計與應用。資訊與教育，67，34-49。  延伸查詢new window
10.葉玉珠(1996)。電腦模擬應用於批判思考教學訓練之成效。國立政治大學學報，75，99-118。  延伸查詢new window
11.葉玉珠、葉碧玲、謝佳蔡(2000)。「中小學生批判思考技巧測驗」之發展。測驗年刊，47(1)，27-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.楊芳瑩(2002)。日常科學思考的培養。科學教育月刊，247，10-20。  延伸查詢new window
13.譚克平(2007)。國中教導盒狀圖的建議及介紹如何用EXCEL製作盒狀圖。科學教育月刊，305，20-34。  延伸查詢new window
14.龍德義(1999)。兩個訓練領袖的數學遊戲。數學教育，8，33-43。  延伸查詢new window
15.Kuhn, D.、Udell, W.(2007)。Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument。Thinking and Reasoning，13，90-104。  new window
16.de Vries, E.、Lund, K.、Baker, M.(2002)。Computer-mediated episternic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions。The Journal of the Learning Sciences，11(1)，63-103。  new window
17.Fischer, F.、Bruhn, J.、Grasel, C.、Mandi, H.(2002)。Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools。Learning and Instruction，12，213-232。  new window
18.Govier, T.(1989)。Critical thinking as argument analysis?。Argumentation，3，115-126。  new window
19.Hermann, A.(2002)。Teaching critical thinking online。Journal of Instructional Psychology，29(2)，53-76。  new window
20.Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.(2004)。Enhancing the quality of argumentation in science classrooms。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，41(10)，994-1020。  new window
21.van. Eemeren, F. H.(2003)。A glance behind the scenes: The state of the art in the study of argumentation。Studies in Communication Sciences，3(1)，1-23。  new window
22.Kuhn, D.(1993)。Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning science thinking。Science Education，77(3)，319-337。  new window
會議論文
1.林志能、洪振方(2007)。在網路環境中進行科學論證--以部落格(Blog)為例。高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
2.馬榮燦、林志能、洪振方(2009)。網路論證學習環境之設計。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lin, C. N.、Hung, J. F.(2008)。Using blog to improve students' scientific argumentation。Kaohsiung, Taiwan。  new window
4.Lin, C. N.、Hung, J. F.(2009)。The implementation of argumentation-based learning environment。Taipei, Taiwan。  new window
5.Milka, A.、Leena, L.(1998)。Learning of argumentation in face to face and e-mail environments。Amsterdam, The Netherlands。  new window
研究報告
1.林煥祥、周進洋、李暉、劉聖忠、林素微(2008)。臺灣參加PISA 2006 成果報告 (計畫編號：NSC95-2522-S-026-002)。花蓮：國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蔡俊彥(2009)。以認知學徒制網路論證系統促進論證能力、概念學習與批判思考成效之研究。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kuhn, D.(2005)。Education for Thinking。London：Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Missimer, C. A.(2002)。Good arguments: An introduction to critical thinking。New Jersey, NJ：Prentice-Hall Publishes。  new window
3.Paul, R. W.(1995)。Socratic Question and Roleplaying。Socratic Question and Roleplaying。0：Foundation for Critical Thinking。  new window
4.Zohar, A.(2004)。Higher order thinking in science classrooms:Students’ learning and teachers’ professional development。Dordrecht, Netherlands：Kluwer。  new window
5.Lawson, A. E.(2003)。The Neurological basis of learning, development and discovery: Implications forscience and mathematics instruction。Dordrecht, The Netherlands：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
6.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2004)。Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003。Paris：Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
7.葉玉珠(2003)。批判思考測驗--第一級指導手冊。台北：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Mintzes, J. J.、Wandersee, J. H.、Novak, J. D.、黃臺珠、熊召弟、王美芬、佘曉清、靳知勤、段曉林、熊同鑫(2002)。促進理解之科學教學：人本建構取向觀點。臺北：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
10.Halpern, D. F.(2003)。Thought & Knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
11.Norris, Stephen P.、Ennis, Robert H.(1989)。Evaluating critical thinking。Midwest Publications。  new window
12.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
13.吳明隆(2006)。SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與統計應用。臺北：知城數位科技。  延伸查詢new window
14.Nosich, G. M.(2005)。Learning to thinking things through: A guide to critical thinking across the curriculum。Upper Saddle River, NJ。  new window
15.林煥祥、洪振方、洪瑞兒(2007)。智育理念與實踐。德智體群美五育理念與實踐。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
16.Garcia-Mila, M.、Andersen, C.(2008)。Cognitive foundations of learning argumentation。Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research。New York。  new window
17.Jenmann, P.、Dillenbourg, P.(2003)。Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL script。Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments。The Netherlands。  new window
18.Clark, D. B.、Stegmann, K.、Weinberger, A.、Menekse, M.、Erkens, G.(2008)。Technology-enhanced learning environments to support students' argumentation。Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research。New York。  new window
19.Weinberger, A.、Stegmann, K.、Fischer, F.、Mandl, H.(2007)。Scripting argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported learning environments。Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge-cognitive, computational and educational perspectives。New York。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2001)。中小學資訊教育總藍圖--總綱，http://masterplan.educities.edu.tw/conference/total.shtml。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Collins, A.、Brown, J. S.、Newman, S. E.(1987)。Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics。Learning, knowing, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：878（臺灣：875，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2602775 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68398251
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上