臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：運用概念圖作為中級會計學補救教學與評量之輔助工具研究
書刊名：新竹教育大學教育學報
作者：邱垂昌 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chiou, Chei-chang
出版日期：2008
卷期：25:1
頁次：頁127-154
主題關鍵詞：中級會計學；概念圖；概念構圖；補救教學與評量；Intermediate accounting；Concept maps；Concept mapping；Remedial instruction and evaluation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:346
  • 點閱點閱:76
本研究主要目的在探討概念圖是否可以視為中級會計學補救教學與評量之輔助工具。研究檢視兩項問題：(1)概念圖是否可視為中級會計學補救教學之輔助工具；(2)概念圖評量法是否可作為輔助中級會計學傳統評量之可行的評量方法。研究結果發現：(1)概念圖可視為中級會計學補救教學之良好的輔助工具，藉以增進學生學業成就；(2)概念圖評量法可作為輔助中級會計學傳統評量之可行的評量方法。研究結果對會計教育有以下涵意：(1)利用著重在不同概念間之關係聯結的教學方法，來培養學生邏輯思考及推理能力，消除傳統會計僅重視數字之迷思。(2)以概念間聯結之精確性作為補救教學之依據。
The major purpose of this paper is to study whether concept maps can be applied as a remedial instruction and evaluation tool in an intermediate accounting course. Specifically, this paper examines (1) the applicability of using concept maps as an intermediate accounting course remedial instruction tool and (2) the applicability of using concept maps as a feasible evaluation tool for intermediate accounting course. The experimental data reveal two important results. First, concept maps can serve as a useful tool for intermediate accounting course remedial instruction and help students improve their learning performance. Second, concept maps can be used as a feasible evaluation tool for the intermediate accounting course. The results of this study indicate two important implications for accounting education. First, using concept maps, which focuses on associated connection among different concepts, can improve students' logical thought and deductive abilities. It can also reduce the phenomenon that traditional accounting education has been criticized as numeral game. Second, concept maps, due to its emphasis on precise association among different concepts, can become the solid basis for remedial instruction.
期刊論文
1.莊麗娟、邱上真、江新合、謝季宏、羅寶田(20010100)。多媒體動態評量模式之效益分析--以自然科學「浮力概念」為例。測驗年刊，48(1)，43-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.許家驊(20041200)。多階段動態評量在現行國小課程數學文字題單元教學中之應用效益探析。教育與心理研究，27(4)，721-749。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Moreira, M.(1985)。Concept Mapping: An Alternative Strategy for Evaluation。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education，10，159-168。  new window
4.余民寧、陳嘉成(19961000)。概念構圖：另一種評量方法。國立政治大學學報，73(上)，161-200。  延伸查詢new window
5.葉玉珠、李梅齡、葉玉環、林志哲、彭月茵(20060600)。「幼兒創造力測驗」之發展。測驗學刊，53(1)，129-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Rye, J. A.、Rubba, P. A.(2002)。Scoring concept maps: An expert map-based scheme weighted for relationships。School science and mathematics，102(1)，33-44。  new window
7.Pendley, B. D.、Bretz, R. L.、Novak, J. D.(1994)。Concept maps as a tool to assess learning in chemistry。Journal of Chemical Education，71(1)，9-15。  new window
8.葉玉珠、葉碧玲、謝佳蓁(20000100)。「中小學批判思考技巧測驗」之發展。測驗年刊，47(1)，27-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Freeman, L. A.,、Jessup, L. M.(2004)。The power and benefits of concept mapping:Measuring use, usefulness, ease of use, and satisfaction。International Journal of Science Education，26(2)，151-169。  new window
10.葉玉珠、陳月梅、謝佳蓁、葉碧玲(20010700)。「成人批判思考技巧測驗」之發展。測驗年刊，48(2)，35-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Edmondson, K. M.、Novak, J. D.(1993)。The interplay of scientific epistemological views, learning strategies, and attitudes of college students。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，30(6)，547-559。  new window
12.McCagg, E. C.、Dansereau, D. F.(1991)。A convergent strategy for examining knowledge mapping as a learning strategy。Journal of Educational Research，84(6)，317-324。  new window
13.Chularut, Pasana、DeBacker, Teresa K.(2004)。The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language。Contemporary Educational Psychology，29(3)，248-263。  new window
14.岳美群、蔡長添(19930400)。高中生物科環境教材概念分析與學生學習成果評量之研究。科學教育，4，83-132。  延伸查詢new window
15.Cronin, P. J.、Dekkers, J.、Dunn, J. G.(1982)。A Procedure for using and evaluating concept maps。Research in Science Education，12(1)，17-24。  new window
16.Jacobs-Lawson, J. M.、Hershey, D. A.(2002)。Concept maps as an assessment tool in psychology courses。Teaching of Psychology，29(1)，25-30。  new window
17.Markham, K. M.、Mintzes, J. J.、Jones, M. G.(1994)。The concept as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，31，91-101。  new window
18.Novak, J. D.(1980)。Progress in application of learning theory。Theory in Practice，19(1)，58-65。  new window
19.Turns, J.、Atman, C. J.(2000)。Concept maps for engineering education: A cognitively motivated tool supporting varied。IEEE Transactions on Education，43，164-174。  new window
20.Wallace, J. D.、Mintzes, J. J.(1990)。The Concept map as a research tool: Exploring conceptual change in biology。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，27(10)，1033-1052。  new window
21.West, D. C.、Park, J. K.、Pomeroy, J. R.、Sandoval, J.(2002)。Concept mapping assessment in medical education: A comparison of two scoring systems。Medical Education，36，820-827。  new window
22.曾千虹、耿正屏(19930400)。國小、國中及高中學生之細胞概念發展。科學教育，4，157-182。  延伸查詢new window
23.張新仁、邱上真、李素慧(20000600)。國中英語科學習困難學生之補救教學成效研究。教育學刊，16，163-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Moreira, M.(1979)。Concept Maps as Tools for Teaching。Journal of College Science Teaching，8，283-286。  new window
25.宋德忠、陳淑芬、張國恩(19980700)。電腦化概念構圖系統在知識結構測量上的應用。測驗年刊，45(2)，37-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Noavk, J. D.(1991)。Clarify with concept maps。Science Teacher，58(7)，45-49。  new window
27.Schmid, Richard F.、Telaro, Giovanni(1990)。Concept Mapping as an Instructional Strategy for High School Biology。Journal of Educational Research，84(2)，78-85。  new window
28.湯清二(19930600)。我國學生生物細胞概念發展研究迷思概念之唔談與概念圖。彰化師範大學學報，4，141-170。  延伸查詢new window
29.Drucker, Peter F.(1998)。The Discipline of Innovation。Harvard Business Review，76(6)，149-157。  new window
30.林達森(20051200)。不同導入訓練歷程之「概念構圖教學法」對國小階段生物能量概念學習與態度影響之實徵研究。高雄師大學報. 自然科學與科技類，19，105-122。  延伸查詢new window
31.邱垂昌、官月緞(20030600)。結構化知識圖形中概念構圖之運用--以高等會計學為例。教育與心理研究，26(2)，355-384。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Harpaz, I.、Balik, C.、Ehrenfeld, M.(2004)。Concept mapping: An educational strategy for advancing nursing education。Nursing Forum，39(2)，27-30。  new window
33.Novak, Joseph D.、Bob Gowin, D.、Johansen, Gerard T.(1983)。The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students。Science Education，67(5)，625-645。  new window
34.許家驊(20061200)。應用多階段動態評量發展國小數學文字題解題補救教學模式之效益分析研究。教育與心理研究，29(4)，655-686。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.張新仁(20010600)。實施補救教學之課程與教學設計。教育學刊，17，85-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.吳鐵雄(19831200)。電腦輔助教學之補救教學效果初探。教育心理學報，16，61-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.邱垂昌、陳瑞斌(20001200)。應用概念構圖於會計教學與評量之研究。國立政治大學學報，81(2)，37-67。  延伸查詢new window
38.邱垂昌、黃華山、謝佳惠(20040900)。以超媒體輔助之概念圖建構教學教材之實證研究--以會計存貨教材為例。國立臺北師範學院學報. 教育類，17(2)，57-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.Malone, John、Dekkers, John(1984)。The concept map as an aid to instruction in science and mathematics。School science and mathematics，84(3)，220-231。  new window
40.朱錦鳳(2003)。圖形思考智能測驗的發展。測驗學刊，50（1），25-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.高博銓(2007)。教學評量的原則及其革新做法。中等教育，58（1），44-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.Ahlberg, M., Aanismaa, P.,、Dillon, P.(2005)。Education for sustainable living:Integrating theory, practice, design, and development。Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research，49(2)，167-185。  new window
43.Bahar, M.(2003)。Misconceptions in Biology education and conceptual change strategies。Theory & Practice，3(1)，55-64。  new window
44.Roberts L.(1999)。Using concept maps to measure statistical understanding。International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology，30，707-717。  new window
45.Santhanam, E., Leach, C.,、Dawson, C.(1998)。Concept mapping: how should it beintroduced, and is there evidence for long term benefit?。Higher Education，35，317-328。  new window
46.Scanlon, D.(1992)。Interactive semantic mapping: An interactive approach to enhancing LD students' content area comprehension。Learning Disabilities Research and Practice，7(3)，142-146。  new window
47.Shavelson, R.(1974)。Methods for examining representations of subject matter structure instudents' memory。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，11(3)，231-249。  new window
48.Zeilik, M., Schau, C.,、Mattern, N.(1998)。Misconceptions and their change in university level astronomy courses。Physics Teacher，36(2)，104-106。  new window
會議論文
1.Cullen, J. F.(1983)。Don't lose your students: Use a map。Ithaca, New York：Department of Education, Cornell University。  new window
2.康木村、吳吉昌(2000)。國中數學科個別化補救教學實驗研究。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
3.陸正威(2000)。課程本位評量對國小學童數學解決問題補救教學及數學焦慮影響之研究。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.邱上真、謝兆樞、蔡長添、許松樑(1989)。國中生物科概念「構圖技巧」評量研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐光國、洪清一、陳芬蘭、陳芳珊(1993)。國小一年級學習遲緩學生國語科補救教學效果之研究。花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃秀霜(1997)。不同教學方式對學習障礙兒童國字學習效率之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林秀玲(1994)。輕度智能不足兒童注音符號補救教學效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Shao, H. H.(1998)。A study of English individual educational program as a remedia lteaching method of junior high school，Kaohsiung。  new window
圖書
1.(1996)。教育理念與地方教育實務研討會會議記錄。沒有紀錄：行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Aiken, L. R.(2003)。Psychological testing and assessment。Bosten：Allyn and Bacon。  new window
3.Jonassen, D. H.(2000)。Computers as mindtools for school: Engaging critical thinking。Prentice-Hall。  new window
4.Ausubel, David P.、Novak, Joseph D.、Hanesian, Helen(1978)。Educational psychology: A cognitive view。New York：Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
5.余民寧(19970000)。有意義的學習：概念構圖之研究。臺北：商鼎文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Novak, Joseph D.、Gowin, D. Bob(1984)。Learning How to Learn。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J.,、Warfield, T. D.(2001)。Intermediate Accounting (10th ed.)。New York。  new window
8.Novak, J. D.(1983)。Metalearning and metaknowledge instruction as strategies to reduce misconceptions。Proceedings of the International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics。Ithaca, NY。  new window
9.Ruiz-Primo, M.,、Shavelson, R.(2000)。Psychometrics of assessing studentunderstanding。Assessing scienceunderstanding。San Diego, CA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Goldsmith, T. E.、Davenport, D. M.(1990)。Assessing structural similarity of graphs。Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization。Norwood, NJ：Alex。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：694（臺灣：688，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2017497 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67809818
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上