臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：貨損單位責任限制及其於鹿特丹規則之分析
書刊名：運輸學刊
作者：鍾政棋 引用關係／曾文瑞 引用關係／程法彰 引用關係／黃凱臨
作者(外文)：Chung, Cheng-chi／Tseng, Wen-jui／Cheng, Fa-chang／Huang, Kai-lin
出版日期：2012
卷期：24:2
頁次：頁167-198
主題關鍵詞：海運貨損理賠；鹿特丹規則；單位責任限制；Marine cargo claim；The Rotterdam rules；Package limitation of liability
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:143
  • 點閱點閱:67
於海上貨物運送過程中，若發生貨損或將產生單位責任限制的賠償問題。於航運發展與各國利益權衡下，海運貨損單位責任限制之規範，國際間並未統一。聯合國貿法會（UNCITRAL）決議通過「聯合國全部或部分海上國際貨物運送公約」，於2009年9月23日荷蘭鹿特丹舉行簽署，簡稱2009年鹿特丹規則（The Rotterdam Rules），主要目的係為了因應現代航運發展趨勢，並圖統一國際海運公約之準則。於鹿特丹規則第59條第1項，明文規範單位責任限制。本文主要探討單位責任限制之演進，比較國際海運公約之規範，透過歸納分析紛爭解決之道，及鹿特丹規則之規範，探討單位責任限制最新發展趨勢，並針對國內貨損單位責任限制提出具體修正建議。
During the process of marine cargo transportation, when cargo claims occurred in transit, it may trigger the legal issue of the package limitation of liability. The clear substance of the package limitation of liability has not reached common consensus due to the different balance of interests between the development of shipping industries and national concerns. Thus, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) decided to enact the "Convention on Contracts Jar the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea", and held the ratification ceremony in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on September 23rd in 2009. Therefore, the Convention is also called "The Rotterdam Rules". The purpose of the Convention was to respond to the current trend of development in the shipping industry, and also unify the different rules for the international maritime conventions. The package limitation of liability was regulated under Article 59(1) of this Convention. This paper is primarily to discuss the evolution of the idea for package limitation of liability, and compare the different regulations among international societies. By analyzing the legal cases and theories related to such an issue, this paper summarized and explored the developing trend for regulating the issue of the package limitation of liability. In addition, this paper also discussed the regulations of the package limitation of liability under the Rotterdam Rules. This paper emphasizes such latest regulations with regard to the Rotterdam Rules. Finally, this paper concludes these observations and suggests the possible revision of corresponding regulations in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Schelin, J.(2009)。The UNCITRAL Convention on Carriage of Goods by Sea: Harmonization or De-harmonization?。Texas International Law Journal，44(3)，321-327。  new window
2.Faria, Jose Angelo Estrella(2009)。Uniform Law for International Transport at UNCITRAL: New Times, New Players, and New Rules。Texas International Law Journal，44(3)，277-320。  new window
3.柯澤東(1999)。海商法之回顧與前瞻--邁入新世紀國際同化之理想與困境。萬國法律，105，69-77。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bissell, T.(1971)。The Operational Realities of Containerization and Their Effect on the ‘Package’ Limitation and the ‘On-deck’ Prohibition。Tulane Law Review，45，902-924。  new window
5.Carlson, M. H.(2009)。U.S. Participation in Private International Law Negotiation: Why the UNCITRAL Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea Is Important to the United States。Texas International Law Journal，44(3)，269-276。  new window
6.Marcopoulos, A. J.(2007)。Ferrostaal v. M/V Sea Phoenix: the Third Circuit’s Sinking of the Fair Opportunity Doctrine。Tulane Maritime Law Journal，31，679-688。  new window
7.Crowley, M. E.(2005)。The Limited Scope of the Cargo Liability Regime Covering Carriage of Goods by Sea。Tulane Law Review，79，1461-1504。  new window
8.Helman, A. A.(2000)。Limitation of Liability under COGSA: In the Wake of the Fair Opportunity Doctrine。Tulane Maritime Law Journal，25，299-326。  new window
9.Huybrechts, M.(2002)。Limitation of Liability and of Actions。Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, Part 3，370-381。  new window
10.Parigi, A. S.(2001)。Sabah Shipyard Sdn. v. M/V Harbel Tapper: Once Again, COGSA’s $500 Limitation on Liability Proves to Be the Biggest Bargain in the Shipping Industry。Tulane Law Review，75，811-822。  new window
11.Reynolds, F. M. B.(2005)。The Package or Unit Limitation and the Visby Rules, EL Greco v. Mediterranean Shipping。Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, Part 1，1-6。  new window
12.Scowcroft, J. C.(1992)。Package Limitation: Containers Subject to Different Rules than Other Cargoes。Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce，23(3)，487-495。  new window
13.Staring, G. S.(2008)。The Roots and False Aspersions of Shipowner’s Limitation of Liability。Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce，39(3)，315-332。  new window
14.Sturley, M. F.(2009)。The Impact of the Rotterdam Rules in the United States。Texas International Law Journal，44(3)，427-455。  new window
15.Tetley, W.(1995)。Package and Kilo Limitations and the Hague, Hague/Visby and Hamburg Rules and Gold。Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce，26(1)，133-149。  new window
會議論文
1.曾國雄、于惠蓉、曾文瑞(2005)。論單位責任限制與風險承擔之衡平135-145。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sturley, M. F.(2007)。Sea Carriage Goes Ashore: the Relationship between Multimodal Conventions and Domestic Unimodal Rules1-3。  new window
學位論文
1.吳昭瑩(1974)。海陸空貨物運送人責任之比較研究。政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃凱臨(2010)。海運貨損單位責任限制及其於鹿特丹規則之分析。臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.魏憶龍(1983)。海上貨物運送危險分配之研究。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.蘇正信(1981)。海上貨物運送人單位責任限制之適用。臺灣海洋學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.蘇冠儒(2009)。我國貨櫃集散站經營業貨損賠償責任及其責任保險之研究。長榮大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.司玉琢、韓立新(2009)。《鹿特丹規則》研究。大連海事大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.張新平(2004)。海商法。台北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊仁壽(1985)。海商法論。楊仁壽。  延伸查詢new window
4.施智謀(1986)。海商法專題研究。臺北市：政大法律研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.周和平、司玉琢(2003)。海商法。臺北市：國立臺灣海洋大學海運研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊仁壽(1997)。海商法修正評釋。海商法修正評釋。沒有紀錄：三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.尹章華(1992)。海商法之理論與實務。臺北：文笙書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.曾文瑞(201103)。海上貨物保險基礎理論與實務：ICC,2009逐條釋義。麗文。  延伸查詢new window
9.曾世雄(2002)。損害賠償法原理。學林文化事業有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林一山(2005)。民法系列--運送法。三民。  延伸查詢new window
11.邱錦添(1997)。海商法。臺北市：五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.張東亮(1981)。劃時代之國際法：漢堡規則論。臺北市：中國文化大學出版部。  延伸查詢new window
13.戶田修三、中村真澄(1992)。最新海事判例評析。東京。  延伸查詢new window
14.張天欽(1986)。海上貨物運送法修正專論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.曾國雄、徐當仁(1992)。海商法(上)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.曾國雄、張志清、鍾政棋(2009)。載貨證券理論與實務。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.黃裕凱(2009)。最高法院海商法案例整編暨評析(1980-2009)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.劉承漢(1986)。陸空運輸法概要。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.Selvig, E.(1961)。Unit Limitation of Carrier’s Liability。Oslo。  new window
其他
1.IMF(2011)。IMF Determines New Currency Weights for SDR Valuation Basket，http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2010/pr10434.htm， 20110101。  new window
2.Kuhn, M. G.(2005)。Review of the Method of Valuation of the SDR，http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2010/102610.pdf， 20110101。  new window
3.Office of the Secretary of Transportation(2009)。Inflation Adjustments to Liability Limits Governed by the Montreal Convention Effective December 30, 2009。  new window
4.Standler, R. B.(2008)。The Effect of Inflation on Monetary Values in Statutes and Contracts，http://www.rbs2.com/gold.pdf， 20110101。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：929（臺灣：920，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2446764 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68244220
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上