臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：侵害陪伴動物之慰撫金賠償與界限
書刊名：東吳法律學報
作者：陳汝吟 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Ju-yin
出版日期：2019
卷期：30:3
頁次：頁45-96
主題關鍵詞：侵權行為；人格權；情感利益；慰撫金；損害賠償；陪伴動物；寵物；Torts；Personal rights；Sentimental value；Recovery of non-pecuniary loss；Compensation；Companion animal；Pet
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:181
  • 點閱點閱:35
陪伴動物是現代社會許多人情感利益所繫，本文借鏡比較法例上瑞士、日本民法及美國等立法與司法實務裁判之新近發展，分析在臺灣現行法律架構下，侵害動物之慰撫金請求是否可行，並提出以陪伴動物之內涵概念、飼主人格利益須證明受有損害、以及加害人主觀要件上限於故意及重大過失等為界線，可謂民法第195條第1項前段之「情節重大」；同時斟酌飼主責任，體現損害賠償正義，落實與有責任之損害歸責原理。藉此希望法律可反映社會現況，提供此方面後續法學研究參考。
The sentimental value ties that owners feel towards their companion animals in modern society. This article review comparative legislation and judicial practices from Swiss and Japanese Civil Code, as well as substantial changes in the U.S. in recent years. To ensure the justice in compensation, I'll bring up proposals for reasonable interpretation of Article 195 ＂wrongfully damaged in a severe way＂, which is in accordance with tort purposes and allow for damages for their genuine mental anguish; meanwhile, I'll line the requirements with the concept of pets, burden of proof, and offender's Intentional or gross negligence Infliction. This may not only meet the society's expectations but also facilitate legal research and legislative action.
期刊論文
1.楊立新、朱呈義(2004)。動物法律人格之否定--兼論動物之法律「物格」。法學研究，2004(5)，86-102。  延伸查詢new window
2.山口真祐子(2013)。ペットブームに伴う動物の在り方の変化について--ドイツの動物愛護体制と日本の裁判例を比較して。法律学研究，50，379-399。  延伸查詢new window
3.王澤鑑(20160400)。損害賠償法上的與有過失。法令月刊，67(4)，1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王澤鑑(19910600)。時間浪費與非財產上損害之金錢賠償。萬國法律，57，2-12。  延伸查詢new window
5.吉井啓子(2006)。フランス民法典における動物の地位--動物保護法制に関するアントワーヌ報告書。国学院法学，44(1)=170，117-142。  延伸查詢new window
6.佐野智也(2014)。民法起草時における参照外国法令の分析。名古屋大學法政論集，257，89-108。  延伸查詢new window
7.岡孝(2014)。明治民法起草過程における外国法の影響。国際哲学研究，別冊4，16-33。  延伸查詢new window
8.Chapman, Casey(2009)。Not Your Coffee Table: An Evaluation of Companion Animals as Personal Property。Cap. U. L. Rev.，38，187-228。  new window
9.Favre, David(2000)。Equitable Self-Ownership for Animals。DUKE L. J.，50，473-502。  new window
10.Squires-Lee, Debra(1995)。In Defense of Floyd: Appropriately Valuing Companion Animals in Tort。N. Y. U. L. Rev.，70。  new window
11.Sullivan, Diane、Vietzke, Holly(2008)。AN ANIMAL IS NOT AN IPOD。J. Animal L.，4。  new window
12.Wilson, Kelly(2009)。Catching the Unique Rabbit: Why Pets Should be Reclassified as Inimitable Property Under the Law。Clev. St. L. Rev.，57，167-196。  new window
13.Pintar, Janice M.(2002)。Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress and the Fair Market Value Approach in Wisconsin: The Case for Extending Tort Protection to Companion Animals and Their Owners。Wis. L. Rev.，2002(3)，735-769。  new window
14.McKenzie, Jade(2016)。Em "BARK" ing on the Journey to Expand Recovery of Damages for the Loss of a Companion Animal。Chap. L. Rev.，19。  new window
15.Hannah, Harold W.(2001)。Animals as Property-Changing Concepts。S. ILL. U. L. J.，25。  new window
16.Byszewski, Elaine T.(2003)。Valuing Companion Animals in Wrongful Death Cases: A Survey of Current Court and Legislative Action and a Suggestion For Valuing Pecuniary Loss of Companionship。Animal L.，9。  new window
17.Michel, Margot、Kayasseh, Eveline Schneider(2011)。The Legal Situation of Animals in Switzerland: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back--Many Steps to go。Journal of Animal Law, Michigan State University College of Law，7，1-42。  new window
18.Livingston, Margit(2004)。The Calculus of Animal Valuation: Crafting a Viable Remedy。Neb. L. Rev.，82(3)，783-848。  new window
19.Sirois, Lauren M.(2015)。Recovering for the Loss of a Beloved Pet: Rethinking the Legal Classification of Companion Animals and the Requirements for Loss of Companionship Tort Damages。U. Pa. L. Rev.，163(4)，1199-1239。  new window
20.Magnotti, Lauren(2006)。Pawing Open the Courthouse Door: Why Animals' Interests Should Matter When Courts Grant Standing。St. John's L. Rev.，80(1)，455-495。  new window
21.Epstein, Lynn A.(2001)。Resolving Confusion in Pet Owner Tort Cases: Recognizing Pets, Anthropomorphic Qualities Under a Property Classification。S. Ill. U. L. J.，26(1)，31-52。  new window
22.Goldberg, Phil(2013)。Courts and Legislatures Have Kept the Proper Leash on Pet Injury Lawsuits: Why Rejecting Emotion-Based Damages Promotes the Rule of Law, Modern Values, and Animal Welfare。Stan. J. Animal L. & Pol'y，6(1)，30-80。  new window
23.Huss, Rebecca J.(2005)。Recent Developments in Animal Law。Tort Trial & Ins. Prac. L. J.，40(2)，233-249。  new window
24.Huss, Rebecca J.(2004)。Valuation in Veterinary Malpractice。Loy. U. Chi. L. J.，35，479-554。  new window
25.Huss, Rebecca J.(2002)。Valuing Man's and Woman's Best Friend: The Moral and Legal Status of Companion Animals。Marq. L. Rev.，86(1)。  new window
26.Cupp, Richard L.(2017)。Cognitively Impaired Humans, Intelligent Animals, and Legal Personhood。Florida Law Review，69(2)，465-517。  new window
27.Cupp, Richard L. Jr.(2016)。Animals as More Than "Mere Things," but Still Property: A Call for Continuing Evolution of the Animal Welfare Paradigm。U Cin. L. Rev.，84。  new window
28.Simmons, Schyler P.(2013)。What is the Next Step for Companion Pets in the Legal System? The Answer May Lie with the Historical Development of the Legal Rights for Minors。Tex. A&M L. Rev.，1(1)，253-285。  new window
29.Waisman, Sonia S.(2005)。Non-Economic Damages: Where Does it Get Us and How Do We Get There?。J. Animal L.，1。  new window
30.Schwartz, Victor E.、Laird, Emily J.(2006)。Non-Economic Damages in Pet Litigation: The Serious Need To Preserve a Rational Rule。Pepp. L. Rev.，33(2)，227-274。  new window
31.Agorianitis, Vasiliki(2006)。Being Daphne's Mom: An Argument for Valuing Companion Animals as Companions。J. Marshall L. Rev.，39(4)，1453-1474。  new window
32.Hankin, Susan J.(2007)。Not a Living Room Sofa: Changing the Legal Status of Companion Animals。Rutgers J. L. & Pub. Pol'y，4(2)，314-410。  new window
33.Banakas, Stathis(2015)。Non-Pecuniary Loss in Personal Injury: Topography Architecture and Nomenclature in the European Landscape。Journal of Comparative Law，10(2)，291-342。  new window
34.Krepper, Peter(2008)。Affektionswert-Ersatz bei Haustieren。Aktuelle Juristische Praxis，704-718。  new window
35.吳瑾瑜(20051200)。由「物」之法律概念論寵物之損害賠償。中原財經法學，15，175-224。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.陳聰富(20060100)。人身侵害之損害概念。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，35(1)，47-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林婉昀(2011)。慰撫金之理論與實務(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.曾隆興(2011)。詳解損害賠償法。三民。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.青木人志(2002)。動物の比較法文化--動物保護法の日欧比較。有斐閣。  延伸查詢new window
3.Regan, Tom、Cohen, Carl(2001)。The Animal Rights Debate。Lanham：Rowman & Littlefield Publishers。  new window
4.孫森炎(2005)。民法債編總論。孫森炎。  延伸查詢new window
5.孫森焱(2001)。新版民法債編總論。台北：孫森焱。  延伸查詢new window
6.鄭玉波(1990)。民法債編總論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.Horton Rogers, W. V.(2001)。Damages for Non-Pecuniary loss in a Comparative Perspective。New York：Springer。  new window
8.邱聰智、姚志明(2014)。新訂民法債編通則。台北：邱聰智。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃立(2006)。民法債編總論。黃立。  延伸查詢new window
10.王澤鑑(2012)。人格權法--法釋義學、比較法、案例研究。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.曾世雄(2005)。非財產上損害賠償。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.齋藤修(2010)。慰謝料算定の理論。ぎょうせい。  延伸查詢new window
13.Frasch, Pamela、Hessler, Katherine、Kutil, Sarah、Waisman, Sonia(2016)。ANIMAL LAW IN A NUTSHELL。West Publishing。  new window
14.Singer, Peter(2001)。ANIMAL LIBERATION。Ecco Press。  new window
15.Landolt, Hardy(2007)。Zürcher Kommentar。Zürich。  new window
16.Schwenzer, Ingeborg H.(2012)。Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht: Allgemeiner Teil。Bern：Stämpfli。  new window
17.Knellwolf, Peggy A.、Strub, Patrick、von Flüe, Karin(2008)。ZGB für den Alltag: kommentierte Ausgabe aus der Beobachter-Beratungspraxis。Zürich：Beobachter-Buchverlag。  new window
18.Kayasseh, Eveline Schneider(2009)。Haftung bei Verletzung oder Tötung eines Tieres--unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Schweizerischen und U.S.-Amerikanischen Rechts。Zurich。  new window
19.Brehm, Roland(2006)。Berner Kommentar zum schweizerischen Privatrecht。Bern。  new window
20.史尚寬(1954)。債法總論。  延伸查詢new window
21.鄭冠宇(2017)。民法債編總論。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
22.林誠二(2015)。債法各論新解--體系化解說。瑞興。  延伸查詢new window
23.曾世雄(1996)。損害賠償法原理。曾世雄。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.吉井啟子(2014)。動物の法的地位。財の多様化と民法学。商事法務。  延伸查詢new window
2.Probst, Thomas(2010)。Der Ersatz "immateriellen Schadens" im schweizerischen Haftpflicht- und Strassenverkehrsrecht。Strassenverkehrsrechts-Tagung: 10.-11. Juni 2010。Bern：Stämpfli。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：203（臺灣：203，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1408417 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67205841
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上