:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:海外直接投資對臺灣生技廠商營運績效影響之研究
書刊名:臺大管理論叢
作者:李揚鄭舜仁李威龍 引用關係夏松喬
作者(外文):Li, YangCheng, Shuenn-renLee, Wei-longHsiao, Song-chiao
出版日期:2012
卷期:23:1
頁次:頁151-174
主題關鍵詞:生技廠商國際直接投資研發Biotech firmFDIR&D
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:230
  • 點閱點閱:38
人類基因體計畫於 2003 年完成人類基因解碼,開啟「後基因時代」。許多國家紛紛加 速發展生技產業,擬定策略、推動各項計畫搶佔先機,台灣亦積極將生技產業列為「兩 兆雙星」計畫的產業之一。台灣生技廠商除了在國內積極發展之外,亦從事海外直接投 資 (FDI) 以期能夠提昇自身的競爭力與效率。本研究採用非射線差額變量模型探討海外 直接投資對台灣生技廠商之經營績效影響,並進一步將其分解成純技術效率、規模效率、 及混合效率。樣本取自於台灣經濟新報資料庫,包括 63 家廠商,共計 188 筆觀測值, 研究期間為 2003 年至 2005 年。實證結果顯示:FDI 可有效提升台灣生技廠商之混合效 率及規模效率成分,且降低資本無效率;此外,台灣生技廠商較適當的研發策略為較高 之研發投資以增加新產品研發成功之機會,或專注於製造生產之低度研發投資策略。其 他發現包括:(1) 台灣生技廠商的效率偏低,尚有 73.75% 的改善空間 (2) 若忽略混合效率, 大約高估台灣生技廠商效率達 37.91%;(3) 無效率的主要來源為原物料無效率。
After the completion of human genome project (HGP) in 2003, biology went into “postgenome era.” Many countries have marked different approaches in craving out a niche in the biotech arena. Taiwan also proposed the “Two Trillions, Twin Stars plan” to advance biotech industry. Taiwan’s biotech firms not only expanded in the domestic market, but also engage in foreign direct investment (FDI) in order to enhance their competitiveness and efficiency. This study applies the slack-based measure (SBM) to analyze how FDI affects the operating efficiency of Taiwan’s biotech firms. We further decompose the technical efficiency into three components: mixed efficiency, pure technical efficiency, and scale efficiency. The data set, obtained from Taiwan Economic Journal, consists of 63 Taiwan’s biotech firms for 2003-2005. The empirical results indicate that FDI can effectively increase the mix efficiency and scale efficiency. In addition, the appropriate R&D strategies of Taiwan’s biotech firms should either invest massively in R&D in order to enhance the likelihood of development of new products, or focus on production with a little investment in R&D. Other findings include: (1) On average, Taiwan’s biotech firms could increase their efficiencies by 73.75 percent if all firms operated on the efficiency frontier; (2) If we omit the mix efficiency, we may overestimate technical efficiency about 37.91 percent; (3) The primary source of inefficiency results from the raw material inefficiency.
期刊論文
1.黃台心(19990600)。由利潤函數衡量我國銀行廠商之經濟效率--參數計量法的應用。經濟論文,27(2),283-309。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Liang, S. K.、Jiang, J. L.、Lai, C. T.(2008)。Effects of Integrative Strategies on the Production Efficiency of Biotech Firms: a Data Envelopment Analysis。International Journal of Management,25(1),140-148。  new window
3.Hall, L. A.、Bagchi-Sen, S.(2007)。An Analysis of Firm-Level Innovation Strategies in the US Biotechnology Industry。Technovation,27(1/2),4-14。  new window
4.楊永列、黃鏡如(20091200)。臺灣地區本國銀行生產面與成本面Malmquist生產力指數之估計。經濟論文叢刊,37(4),353-378。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Roberts, P. W.(1999)。Product Innovation, Product-Market Competition and Persistent Profitability in the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry。Strategic Management Journal,20(7),655-670。  new window
6.邱永和、胡均立、曹嘉麟(20031200)。臺灣生物科技廠商之成本效率分析。農業與經濟,31,55-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.González, E.、Gascón, Fernando(2004)。Sources of productivity growth in the Spanish pharmaceutical industry (1994-2000)。Research Policy,33(5),735-745。  new window
8.Banker, Rajiv D.、Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William Wager(1984)。Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis。Management Science,30(9),1078-1092。  new window
9.Farrell, Michael James(1957)。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency。Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General),120(3),253-290。  new window
10.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
11.Lu, J. W.、Beamish, P. W.(2006)。SME internationalization and performance: Growth vs. Profitability。Journal of International Entrepreneurship,4(1),27-48。  new window
學位論文
1.張萃中(2004)。食品公司投入生物技術產業對其經營績效影響之探討(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cooper, W. W.、Seiford, L. M.、Tone, K.(2007)。Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software。Springer Verlag。  new window
2.高強、黃旭男、末吉俊幸(2003)。管理績效評估:資料包絡分析法。臺北:華泰文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.劉祥熹、朱珮宏(2002)。台灣地區生技產業經營績效之研究--DEA方法與 Malmquist生產力指數之應用。  延伸查詢new window
2.Camanho, A. S. ; Dyson, R. G.(2006)。Data envelopment analysis and malmquist indices for measuring group performance。  new window
3.Chen, M. F. ; Hu, J. L. ; Ding, C. G.(2005)。Efficiency and productivity of Taiwan’s biotech industry。  new window
4.Graves, S. B. ; Langowitz, N. S.(1993)。Innovative productivity and returns to scale in the pharmaceutical industry。  new window
5.Hill, R. W. L.(2009)。International business: Competing in the global marketplace。  new window
6.Huang, J. ; Hu, R. ; Meijl, H. V. ; Tongeren, F. V.(2004)。Biotechnology boosts to crop productivity in China: Trade and welfare implications。  new window
7.Huang, T. H. ; Kao, T. L.(2006)。Joint estimation of technical efficiency and production risk for multi-output banks under a panel data cost frontier model。  new window
8.Kim, M. K. ; Harris, T. R. ; Vusovic, S.(2009)。Efficiency analysis of the US biotechnology industry: Clustering enhances productivity。  new window
9.Kwan, S. H.(2006)。The X-efficiency of commercial banks in Hong Kong。  new window
10.Lin, C. T. ; Wang, S. M.(2005)。Biosensor commercialization strategy: A theoretical approach。  new window
11.Liu, X. ; Shu, C(2003)。Determinants of export performance evidence from Chinese industries。  new window
12.Mazumdar, M. ; Rajeev, M.(2009)。Comparing the efficiency and productivity of the Indian pharmaceutical firms: A Malmquist-Meta-Frontier approach。  new window
13.Pan, Y. ; Li, S. ; Tse, D. K.(1999)。The impact of order and model of market entry on profitability and market share。  new window
14.Qian, G. ; Li, L.(2003)。Profitability of small and medium sized enterprises in high-tech industry: The case of the biotechnology industry。  new window
15.Ray, S. C.(2007)。Are some Indian banks too large? An examination of size efficiency in Indian banking。  new window
16.Saranga, H.(2007)。Multiple objective data envelopment analysis as applied to the Indian pharmaceutical industry。  new window
17.Saranga, H. ; Phani, B. V.(2009)。Determinants of operational efficiencies in the Indian pharmaceutical industry。  new window
18.Sharma, A. ; Lacey, N.(2004)。Linking product development outcomes to market valuation of the firm: The case of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry。  new window
19.Shaver, J. M. ; Mitchell, W. ; Yeung, B.(1997)。The effect of own-firm and other-firm experience on foreign direct investment survival in the United States。  new window
20.Sturm, J. E. ; Williams, B.(2008)。Characteristics determining the efficiency of foreign banks in Australia。  new window
21.Thangavelu, S. M. ; Owyong, D. T.(2003)。The impact of export growth and scale economies on productivity in Singapore’s manufacturing industries。  new window
22.Valverde, S. C. ; Humphrey, D. B. ; Del Paso, R. L.(2007)。Opening the black box: Finding the source of cost inefficiency。  new window
23.Weill, L.(2004)。Measuring cost efficiency in European banking: A comparison of frontier techniques。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE